The Effects of Cue-Do-Review on Teaching Assistant and Student Perceptions of Learning

As a result of increasing emphasis placed on high quality education for all students through such legislative mandates as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), teachers cannot afford to waste valuable instruction time. Evidence-based practi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Education (Chula Vista) 2019-06, Vol.139 (4), p.187-196
Hauptverfasser: Rutledge, Chayla D., Bullard, Filer, Patricia D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 196
container_issue 4
container_start_page 187
container_title Education (Chula Vista)
container_volume 139
creator Rutledge, Chayla D.
Bullard
Filer, Patricia D.
description As a result of increasing emphasis placed on high quality education for all students through such legislative mandates as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), teachers cannot afford to waste valuable instruction time. Evidence-based practices are required to assist all students as they work toward meeting federal and state content requirements. Cue-Do-Review, a teaching sequence that can be used in any lesson, regardless of content level, age of the students, or ability level, is one way to help ensure classroom instruction time is used effectively, as well as efficiently. By purposefully targeting specific teacher behaviors at the beginning, middle, and end of a lesson, students are more likely to connect with, and remember content. In the current study, graduate school teaching assistants were asked to participate in a short one-hour professional development session, during which they learned specific behaviors to include in their lessons at the beginning, middle, and end. Undergraduate candidates were given a survey both prior to the professional development (before midterm), and at the conclusion of the course near the end of the semester. The teaching assistants were also surveyed before and after the professional development activity. An analysis of results indicated that undergraduate candidates whose teaching assistants used the Cue-Do-Review sequence, responded more positively to the learning experience, sharing that the sequence had a positive effect on their perceptions of learning. The researchers suggest possible interpretations for the results as well as areas for future study.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_ingen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A593431236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>prin/ed/2019/00000139/00000004/art00001</ingid><galeid>A593431236</galeid><ericid>EJ1320743</ericid><sourcerecordid>A593431236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e4651-556747a2066dc080a2b38558cf6d7b2decd1e76d6002c1e03586b56a0f83b41c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1rGzEQhvfQQtK0P6Gw0FMpW_Sx0q5Pxd26ToqpS-OmRyFLo43CWhskbT766ytnfTE4wdJBw8wzL8PofZWdIoRpgXFFTrI3IdygdAirT7Or1TXkM2NAxZD3Jm8GKL71xW-4s3Cf9y5fgVTX1rX5NAQbonQxl07nl3HQkOJf4BXcRtu7p_YFSO8S_TZ7bWQX4N3uPcv-fJ-tmvNisZxfNNNFASVnuGCMV2UlCeJcK1QjSda0ZqxWhutqTTQojaHimqdpFQZEWc3XjEtkarousaJn2YdRt5UdCOtMH71UGxuUmLIJLSkmlCeqOEC14MDLrndgbErv8Z8P8Olq2Fh1sOHjXkNiIjzEVg4hiIvLn8ezy6vj2a_zffbT8-x09bc5fop6vnhpfTtW9V0HLYj0oc1yn38_8uCtErfebqR_FLMfmBJUlTTVl2M9GSV5SIqbfvAu2USMuBNbt27NKu4wnbhSEEQwmhAiMEZMaDBy6KKI0ov2nwg4KX55RvFJDnRSwBOxdX1S3gUIlUL6OOb-A6jz9MQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Cue-Do-Review on Teaching Assistant and Student Perceptions of Learning</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Rutledge, Chayla D. ; Bullard ; Filer, Patricia D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Chayla D. ; Bullard ; Filer, Patricia D.</creatorcontrib><description>As a result of increasing emphasis placed on high quality education for all students through such legislative mandates as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), teachers cannot afford to waste valuable instruction time. Evidence-based practices are required to assist all students as they work toward meeting federal and state content requirements. Cue-Do-Review, a teaching sequence that can be used in any lesson, regardless of content level, age of the students, or ability level, is one way to help ensure classroom instruction time is used effectively, as well as efficiently. By purposefully targeting specific teacher behaviors at the beginning, middle, and end of a lesson, students are more likely to connect with, and remember content. In the current study, graduate school teaching assistants were asked to participate in a short one-hour professional development session, during which they learned specific behaviors to include in their lessons at the beginning, middle, and end. Undergraduate candidates were given a survey both prior to the professional development (before midterm), and at the conclusion of the course near the end of the semester. The teaching assistants were also surveyed before and after the professional development activity. An analysis of results indicated that undergraduate candidates whose teaching assistants used the Cue-Do-Review sequence, responded more positively to the learning experience, sharing that the sequence had a positive effect on their perceptions of learning. The researchers suggest possible interpretations for the results as well as areas for future study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Project Innovation</publisher><subject>College students ; Counselor Training ; Cue-Do-Review ; Cues ; Disabled children ; Disabled students ; Education ; Evidence-based medicine ; Graduate Students ; Lesson Planning ; Lesson Plans ; Lesson Sequence ; Methods ; Professional Development ; Student Attitudes ; Student Perceptions Of Learning ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Assistants ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching Sequences</subject><ispartof>Education (Chula Vista), 2019-06, Vol.139 (4), p.187-196</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Project Innovation (Alabama)</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Project Innovation (Alabama)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1320743$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Chayla D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filer, Patricia D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Cue-Do-Review on Teaching Assistant and Student Perceptions of Learning</title><title>Education (Chula Vista)</title><addtitle>Education</addtitle><description>As a result of increasing emphasis placed on high quality education for all students through such legislative mandates as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), teachers cannot afford to waste valuable instruction time. Evidence-based practices are required to assist all students as they work toward meeting federal and state content requirements. Cue-Do-Review, a teaching sequence that can be used in any lesson, regardless of content level, age of the students, or ability level, is one way to help ensure classroom instruction time is used effectively, as well as efficiently. By purposefully targeting specific teacher behaviors at the beginning, middle, and end of a lesson, students are more likely to connect with, and remember content. In the current study, graduate school teaching assistants were asked to participate in a short one-hour professional development session, during which they learned specific behaviors to include in their lessons at the beginning, middle, and end. Undergraduate candidates were given a survey both prior to the professional development (before midterm), and at the conclusion of the course near the end of the semester. The teaching assistants were also surveyed before and after the professional development activity. An analysis of results indicated that undergraduate candidates whose teaching assistants used the Cue-Do-Review sequence, responded more positively to the learning experience, sharing that the sequence had a positive effect on their perceptions of learning. The researchers suggest possible interpretations for the results as well as areas for future study.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Counselor Training</subject><subject>Cue-Do-Review</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Disabled children</subject><subject>Disabled students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Lesson Planning</subject><subject>Lesson Plans</subject><subject>Lesson Sequence</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Perceptions Of Learning</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Assistants</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching Sequences</subject><issn>0013-1172</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk1rGzEQhvfQQtK0P6Gw0FMpW_Sx0q5Pxd26ToqpS-OmRyFLo43CWhskbT766ytnfTE4wdJBw8wzL8PofZWdIoRpgXFFTrI3IdygdAirT7Or1TXkM2NAxZD3Jm8GKL71xW-4s3Cf9y5fgVTX1rX5NAQbonQxl07nl3HQkOJf4BXcRtu7p_YFSO8S_TZ7bWQX4N3uPcv-fJ-tmvNisZxfNNNFASVnuGCMV2UlCeJcK1QjSda0ZqxWhutqTTQojaHimqdpFQZEWc3XjEtkarousaJn2YdRt5UdCOtMH71UGxuUmLIJLSkmlCeqOEC14MDLrndgbErv8Z8P8Olq2Fh1sOHjXkNiIjzEVg4hiIvLn8ezy6vj2a_zffbT8-x09bc5fop6vnhpfTtW9V0HLYj0oc1yn38_8uCtErfebqR_FLMfmBJUlTTVl2M9GSV5SIqbfvAu2USMuBNbt27NKu4wnbhSEEQwmhAiMEZMaDBy6KKI0ov2nwg4KX55RvFJDnRSwBOxdX1S3gUIlUL6OOb-A6jz9MQ</recordid><startdate>20190622</startdate><enddate>20190622</enddate><creator>Rutledge, Chayla D.</creator><creator>Bullard</creator><creator>Filer, Patricia D.</creator><general>Project Innovation</general><general>Project Innovation, Inc</general><general>Project Innovation (Alabama)</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190622</creationdate><title>The Effects of Cue-Do-Review on Teaching Assistant and Student Perceptions of Learning</title><author>Rutledge, Chayla D. ; Bullard ; Filer, Patricia D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e4651-556747a2066dc080a2b38558cf6d7b2decd1e76d6002c1e03586b56a0f83b41c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Counselor Training</topic><topic>Cue-Do-Review</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Disabled children</topic><topic>Disabled students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Lesson Planning</topic><topic>Lesson Plans</topic><topic>Lesson Sequence</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Perceptions Of Learning</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Assistants</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching Sequences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Chayla D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filer, Patricia D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><jtitle>Education (Chula Vista)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutledge, Chayla D.</au><au>Bullard</au><au>Filer, Patricia D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1320743</ericid><atitle>The Effects of Cue-Do-Review on Teaching Assistant and Student Perceptions of Learning</atitle><jtitle>Education (Chula Vista)</jtitle><addtitle>Education</addtitle><date>2019-06-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>187-196</pages><issn>0013-1172</issn><abstract>As a result of increasing emphasis placed on high quality education for all students through such legislative mandates as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), teachers cannot afford to waste valuable instruction time. Evidence-based practices are required to assist all students as they work toward meeting federal and state content requirements. Cue-Do-Review, a teaching sequence that can be used in any lesson, regardless of content level, age of the students, or ability level, is one way to help ensure classroom instruction time is used effectively, as well as efficiently. By purposefully targeting specific teacher behaviors at the beginning, middle, and end of a lesson, students are more likely to connect with, and remember content. In the current study, graduate school teaching assistants were asked to participate in a short one-hour professional development session, during which they learned specific behaviors to include in their lessons at the beginning, middle, and end. Undergraduate candidates were given a survey both prior to the professional development (before midterm), and at the conclusion of the course near the end of the semester. The teaching assistants were also surveyed before and after the professional development activity. An analysis of results indicated that undergraduate candidates whose teaching assistants used the Cue-Do-Review sequence, responded more positively to the learning experience, sharing that the sequence had a positive effect on their perceptions of learning. The researchers suggest possible interpretations for the results as well as areas for future study.</abstract><pub>Project Innovation</pub><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-1172
ispartof Education (Chula Vista), 2019-06, Vol.139 (4), p.187-196
issn 0013-1172
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A593431236
source EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects College students
Counselor Training
Cue-Do-Review
Cues
Disabled children
Disabled students
Education
Evidence-based medicine
Graduate Students
Lesson Planning
Lesson Plans
Lesson Sequence
Methods
Professional Development
Student Attitudes
Student Perceptions Of Learning
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Assistants
Teaching Methods
Teaching Sequences
title The Effects of Cue-Do-Review on Teaching Assistant and Student Perceptions of Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A56%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_ingen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Cue-Do-Review%20on%20Teaching%20Assistant%20and%20Student%20Perceptions%20of%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Education%20(Chula%20Vista)&rft.au=Rutledge,%20Chayla%20D.&rft.date=2019-06-22&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=187-196&rft.issn=0013-1172&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_ingen%3EA593431236%3C/gale_ingen%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A593431236&rft_ingid=prin/ed/2019/00000139/00000004/art00001&rft_ericid=EJ1320743&rfr_iscdi=true