The Australian child support reforms: A critical evaluation
The Australian Child Support Scheme aims to ensure that children continue to be supported financially should their parents separate or never live together. Sweeping changes to the Australian Child Support Scheme were introduced between 2006 and 2008, featuring a dramatically different system for the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of social issues 2015-03, Vol.50 (3), p.217-232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 232 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 217 |
container_title | The Australian journal of social issues |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Smyth, Bruce Rodgers, Bryan Son, Vu Vnuk, Maria |
description | The Australian Child Support Scheme aims to ensure that children continue to be supported financially should their parents separate or never live together. Sweeping changes to the Australian Child Support Scheme were introduced between 2006 and 2008, featuring a dramatically different system for the calculation of child support and a more rigorous enforcement regime. The reforms were intended to respond to ongoing concerns about equity, and to changes in social expectations and practices in gender, work, and parenting. In this article we summarise key findings from a large cross-sequential study of the child support reforms. Although the new formula initially led to lower child support payments, and an increase in the proportion of separated mothers experiencing income disadvantage, payments two years later had increased slightly. More broadly, the new scheme appears to have resulted in little change in separated parents' policy knowledge, parenting arrangements, perceptions of fairness, and child support compliance. Taken together, these findings suggest that Australia may not have made as much progress as it would have liked in this thorny area of social policy - especially in relation to compliance and perceptions of fairness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00347.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_8GL_A431531622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A431531622</galeid><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.494430022752068</informt_id><sourcerecordid>A431531622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c8657-8ebeec6bd9b1fc44658de224af4c7b94400f7395cab4d6e6ed4658a588e046423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkl1v0zAUhiMEEmXwHyK4gYsGO3YSZ1xFFWwdFUPa4NZynJPWlRt3tgPdv8dpy6BQ0KZcOPJ5zns-_EbRS4wSjFD6dplgRsoxzbMsSRHOEl8jRGiRbB5Fo7vQ42gUYsU4Jyl-Gj1zbokQYrgko-jd9QLiqnfeCq1EF8uF0k3s-vXaWB9baI1dudO4iqVVXkmhY_gmdC-8Mt3z6EkrtIMX-_Mk-vLh_fXkfDy7PJtOqtlYsjxUZVADyLxuyhq3koaGWANpSkVLZVGXlCLUFqTMpKhpk0MOzYCIjDFANKcpOYle73TX1tz04DxfKSdBa9GB6R3HRV6QtCwICeirP9Cl6W0XugsUZqxkLKO_qLnQwFXXmjC-HER5RQnOCM7Toez4CDWHDsKuTAetCtcHfHKED18DKyWPJrw5SAiMh42fi945_vHz9N7s9OrTvVl2NvvfkHtWGq1hDjy84-TykD_d8dIa54I_-NqqlbC3HCM-WJIv-eA7PviOD5bke0vyTUiudsnfwyZuH5DJq4sruv0PGl93GnalPN_2KQczuqXwjjsQVi62y9_GjZ3zxiguajeUIWEIrkCLteA0OI-EsmmRpShnQfjiN-FAtP6fcndSPwN_i50_XOx4Xz8ASloxjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718898854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Australian child support reforms: A critical evaluation</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Smyth, Bruce ; Rodgers, Bryan ; Son, Vu ; Vnuk, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Smyth, Bruce ; Rodgers, Bryan ; Son, Vu ; Vnuk, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>The Australian Child Support Scheme aims to ensure that children continue to be supported financially should their parents separate or never live together. Sweeping changes to the Australian Child Support Scheme were introduced between 2006 and 2008, featuring a dramatically different system for the calculation of child support and a more rigorous enforcement regime. The reforms were intended to respond to ongoing concerns about equity, and to changes in social expectations and practices in gender, work, and parenting. In this article we summarise key findings from a large cross-sequential study of the child support reforms. Although the new formula initially led to lower child support payments, and an increase in the proportion of separated mothers experiencing income disadvantage, payments two years later had increased slightly. More broadly, the new scheme appears to have resulted in little change in separated parents' policy knowledge, parenting arrangements, perceptions of fairness, and child support compliance. Taken together, these findings suggest that Australia may not have made as much progress as it would have liked in this thorny area of social policy - especially in relation to compliance and perceptions of fairness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-6321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-4655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00347.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSIBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Australia ; child maintenance ; Child poverty ; Child Support ; Child Support Scheme (Australia) ; Childrearing Practices ; children ; Children & youth ; Compliance ; Costs ; divorce ; Economic aspects ; Equity ; Families & family life ; Government regulation ; Law and legislation ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legislation ; Mothers ; Nonresidents ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; Payments ; policy evaluation ; Reform ; Reforms ; Social Policy ; Social reform</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of social issues, 2015-03, Vol.50 (3), p.217-232</ispartof><rights>Australian Social Policy Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Australian Social Policy Association 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c8657-8ebeec6bd9b1fc44658de224af4c7b94400f7395cab4d6e6ed4658a588e046423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c8657-8ebeec6bd9b1fc44658de224af4c7b94400f7395cab4d6e6ed4658a588e046423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.1839-4655.2015.tb00347.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.1839-4655.2015.tb00347.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27344,27924,27925,33774,33775,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smyth, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vnuk, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>The Australian child support reforms: A critical evaluation</title><title>The Australian journal of social issues</title><addtitle>Australian Journal of Social Issues</addtitle><description>The Australian Child Support Scheme aims to ensure that children continue to be supported financially should their parents separate or never live together. Sweeping changes to the Australian Child Support Scheme were introduced between 2006 and 2008, featuring a dramatically different system for the calculation of child support and a more rigorous enforcement regime. The reforms were intended to respond to ongoing concerns about equity, and to changes in social expectations and practices in gender, work, and parenting. In this article we summarise key findings from a large cross-sequential study of the child support reforms. Although the new formula initially led to lower child support payments, and an increase in the proportion of separated mothers experiencing income disadvantage, payments two years later had increased slightly. More broadly, the new scheme appears to have resulted in little change in separated parents' policy knowledge, parenting arrangements, perceptions of fairness, and child support compliance. Taken together, these findings suggest that Australia may not have made as much progress as it would have liked in this thorny area of social policy - especially in relation to compliance and perceptions of fairness.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>child maintenance</subject><subject>Child poverty</subject><subject>Child Support</subject><subject>Child Support Scheme (Australia)</subject><subject>Childrearing Practices</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>divorce</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Law and legislation</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Nonresidents</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>policy evaluation</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Social reform</subject><issn>0157-6321</issn><issn>1839-4655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkl1v0zAUhiMEEmXwHyK4gYsGO3YSZ1xFFWwdFUPa4NZynJPWlRt3tgPdv8dpy6BQ0KZcOPJ5zns-_EbRS4wSjFD6dplgRsoxzbMsSRHOEl8jRGiRbB5Fo7vQ42gUYsU4Jyl-Gj1zbokQYrgko-jd9QLiqnfeCq1EF8uF0k3s-vXaWB9baI1dudO4iqVVXkmhY_gmdC-8Mt3z6EkrtIMX-_Mk-vLh_fXkfDy7PJtOqtlYsjxUZVADyLxuyhq3koaGWANpSkVLZVGXlCLUFqTMpKhpk0MOzYCIjDFANKcpOYle73TX1tz04DxfKSdBa9GB6R3HRV6QtCwICeirP9Cl6W0XugsUZqxkLKO_qLnQwFXXmjC-HER5RQnOCM7Toez4CDWHDsKuTAetCtcHfHKED18DKyWPJrw5SAiMh42fi945_vHz9N7s9OrTvVl2NvvfkHtWGq1hDjy84-TykD_d8dIa54I_-NqqlbC3HCM-WJIv-eA7PviOD5bke0vyTUiudsnfwyZuH5DJq4sruv0PGl93GnalPN_2KQczuqXwjjsQVi62y9_GjZ3zxiguajeUIWEIrkCLteA0OI-EsmmRpShnQfjiN-FAtP6fcndSPwN_i50_XOx4Xz8ASloxjA</recordid><startdate>20150322</startdate><enddate>20150322</enddate><creator>Smyth, Bruce</creator><creator>Rodgers, Bryan</creator><creator>Son, Vu</creator><creator>Vnuk, Maria</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150322</creationdate><title>The Australian child support reforms: A critical evaluation</title><author>Smyth, Bruce ; Rodgers, Bryan ; Son, Vu ; Vnuk, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c8657-8ebeec6bd9b1fc44658de224af4c7b94400f7395cab4d6e6ed4658a588e046423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>child maintenance</topic><topic>Child poverty</topic><topic>Child Support</topic><topic>Child Support Scheme (Australia)</topic><topic>Childrearing Practices</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>divorce</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Law and legislation</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Nonresidents</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>policy evaluation</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Social reform</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smyth, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vnuk, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smyth, Bruce</au><au>Rodgers, Bryan</au><au>Son, Vu</au><au>Vnuk, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Australian child support reforms: A critical evaluation</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle><addtitle>Australian Journal of Social Issues</addtitle><date>2015-03-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>217-232</pages><issn>0157-6321</issn><eissn>1839-4655</eissn><coden>AJSIBA</coden><abstract>The Australian Child Support Scheme aims to ensure that children continue to be supported financially should their parents separate or never live together. Sweeping changes to the Australian Child Support Scheme were introduced between 2006 and 2008, featuring a dramatically different system for the calculation of child support and a more rigorous enforcement regime. The reforms were intended to respond to ongoing concerns about equity, and to changes in social expectations and practices in gender, work, and parenting. In this article we summarise key findings from a large cross-sequential study of the child support reforms. Although the new formula initially led to lower child support payments, and an increase in the proportion of separated mothers experiencing income disadvantage, payments two years later had increased slightly. More broadly, the new scheme appears to have resulted in little change in separated parents' policy knowledge, parenting arrangements, perceptions of fairness, and child support compliance. Taken together, these findings suggest that Australia may not have made as much progress as it would have liked in this thorny area of social policy - especially in relation to compliance and perceptions of fairness.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00347.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0157-6321 |
ispartof | The Australian journal of social issues, 2015-03, Vol.50 (3), p.217-232 |
issn | 0157-6321 1839-4655 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss_8GL_A431531622 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Analysis Australia child maintenance Child poverty Child Support Child Support Scheme (Australia) Childrearing Practices children Children & youth Compliance Costs divorce Economic aspects Equity Families & family life Government regulation Law and legislation Laws, regulations and rules Legislation Mothers Nonresidents Parents Parents & parenting Payments policy evaluation Reform Reforms Social Policy Social reform |
title | The Australian child support reforms: A critical evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T21%3A00%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Australian%20child%20support%20reforms:%20A%20critical%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20social%20issues&rft.au=Smyth,%20Bruce&rft.date=2015-03-22&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=217-232&rft.issn=0157-6321&rft.eissn=1839-4655&rft.coden=AJSIBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00347.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA431531622%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718898854&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A431531622&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.494430022752068&rfr_iscdi=true |