Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy

Background Early antiviral treatment is effective for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) but currently available agents are expensive. Favipiravir is routinely used in many countries, but efficacy is unproven. Antiviral combinations have not been systematically studied. We aimed to evaluate the eff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS medicine 2022-10, Vol.19 (10)
Hauptverfasser: Chowdhury, Kashfia, Shah, Divya, Lennon, Alexander, Checkley, Anna, Standing, Joseph F, Davey, Stephanie, Yee, Philip, Ndoutoumou, Amalia, Ikeji, Felicia, Breuer, Judith, Agyeman, Akosua A, Lowe, David M, Rai, Abhulya, Brown, Li-An K, Freemantle, Nick, Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay, Longley, Nicola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title PLoS medicine
container_volume 19
creator Chowdhury, Kashfia
Shah, Divya
Lennon, Alexander
Checkley, Anna
Standing, Joseph F
Davey, Stephanie
Yee, Philip
Ndoutoumou, Amalia
Ikeji, Felicia
Breuer, Judith
Agyeman, Akosua A
Lowe, David M
Rai, Abhulya
Brown, Li-An K
Freemantle, Nick
Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay
Longley, Nicola
description Background Early antiviral treatment is effective for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) but currently available agents are expensive. Favipiravir is routinely used in many countries, but efficacy is unproven. Antiviral combinations have not been systematically studied. We aimed to evaluate the effect of favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir or the combination of both agents on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load trajectory when administered early. Methods and findings We conducted a Phase 2, proof of principle, randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial, double-blind trial of ambulatory outpatients with early COVID-19 (within 7 days of symptom onset) at 2 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants were randomised using a centralised online process to receive: favipiravir (1,800 mg twice daily on Day 1 followed by 400 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7) plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200 mg/50 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7), favipiravir plus lopinavir-ritonavir placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir plus favipiravir placebo, or both placebos. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 viral load at Day 5, accounting for baseline viral load. Between 6 October 2020 and 4 November 2021, we recruited 240 participants. For the favipiravir+lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir+placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo, and placebo-only arms, we recruited 61, 59, 60, and 60 participants and analysed 55, 56, 55, and 58 participants, respectively, who provided viral load measures at Day 1 and Day 5. In the primary analysis, the mean viral load in the favipiravir+placebo arm had changed by -0.57 log.sub.10 (95% CI -1.21 to 0.07, p = 0.08) and in the lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo arm by -0.18 log.sub.10 (95% CI -0.82 to 0.46, p = 0.58) compared to the placebo arm at Day 5. There was no significant interaction between favipiravir and lopinavir-ritonavir (interaction coefficient term: 0.59 log.sub.10, 95% CI -0.32 to 1.50, p = 0.20). More participants had undetectable virus at Day 5 in the favipiravir+placebo arm compared to placebo only (46.3% versus 26.9%, odds ratio (OR): 2.47, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.65; p = 0.03). Adverse events were observed more frequently with lopinavir-ritonavir, mainly gastrointestinal disturbance. Favipiravir drug levels were lower in the combination arm than the favipiravir monotherapy arm, possibly due to poor absorption. The major limitation was that the study population was relatively young and he
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_healthsolutions_A724756571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724756571</galeid><sourcerecordid>A724756571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_healthsolutions_A7247565713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDWx1DU0MjfnYOAqLs4yMDCyNLA04GSwcEssyyzILAKSRToKOfkFmXkgpm5RZkl-HkQwv0ghOT83CShRkpmfp1CSkVqUWFDJw8CalphTnMoLpbkZ1NxcQ5w9dNMTc1LjM1ITc0oyivNzSkF6iuMdzY1MzE3NTM0NjYlWCACI0Dh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Chowdhury, Kashfia ; Shah, Divya ; Lennon, Alexander ; Checkley, Anna ; Standing, Joseph F ; Davey, Stephanie ; Yee, Philip ; Ndoutoumou, Amalia ; Ikeji, Felicia ; Breuer, Judith ; Agyeman, Akosua A ; Lowe, David M ; Rai, Abhulya ; Brown, Li-An K ; Freemantle, Nick ; Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay ; Longley, Nicola</creator><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Kashfia ; Shah, Divya ; Lennon, Alexander ; Checkley, Anna ; Standing, Joseph F ; Davey, Stephanie ; Yee, Philip ; Ndoutoumou, Amalia ; Ikeji, Felicia ; Breuer, Judith ; Agyeman, Akosua A ; Lowe, David M ; Rai, Abhulya ; Brown, Li-An K ; Freemantle, Nick ; Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay ; Longley, Nicola</creatorcontrib><description>Background Early antiviral treatment is effective for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) but currently available agents are expensive. Favipiravir is routinely used in many countries, but efficacy is unproven. Antiviral combinations have not been systematically studied. We aimed to evaluate the effect of favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir or the combination of both agents on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load trajectory when administered early. Methods and findings We conducted a Phase 2, proof of principle, randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial, double-blind trial of ambulatory outpatients with early COVID-19 (within 7 days of symptom onset) at 2 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants were randomised using a centralised online process to receive: favipiravir (1,800 mg twice daily on Day 1 followed by 400 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7) plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200 mg/50 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7), favipiravir plus lopinavir-ritonavir placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir plus favipiravir placebo, or both placebos. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 viral load at Day 5, accounting for baseline viral load. Between 6 October 2020 and 4 November 2021, we recruited 240 participants. For the favipiravir+lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir+placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo, and placebo-only arms, we recruited 61, 59, 60, and 60 participants and analysed 55, 56, 55, and 58 participants, respectively, who provided viral load measures at Day 1 and Day 5. In the primary analysis, the mean viral load in the favipiravir+placebo arm had changed by -0.57 log.sub.10 (95% CI -1.21 to 0.07, p = 0.08) and in the lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo arm by -0.18 log.sub.10 (95% CI -0.82 to 0.46, p = 0.58) compared to the placebo arm at Day 5. There was no significant interaction between favipiravir and lopinavir-ritonavir (interaction coefficient term: 0.59 log.sub.10, 95% CI -0.32 to 1.50, p = 0.20). More participants had undetectable virus at Day 5 in the favipiravir+placebo arm compared to placebo only (46.3% versus 26.9%, odds ratio (OR): 2.47, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.65; p = 0.03). Adverse events were observed more frequently with lopinavir-ritonavir, mainly gastrointestinal disturbance. Favipiravir drug levels were lower in the combination arm than the favipiravir monotherapy arm, possibly due to poor absorption. The major limitation was that the study population was relatively young and healthy compared to those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions At the current doses, no treatment significantly reduced viral load in the primary analysis. Favipiravir requires further evaluation with consideration of dose escalation. Lopinavir-ritonavir administration was associated with lower plasma favipiravir concentrations. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04499677 EudraCT: 2020-002106-68</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Dosage and administration ; Drug therapy, Combination ; Lopinavir ; Methods ; Patient outcomes ; Ritonavir</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2022-10, Vol.19 (10)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Kashfia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Divya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennon, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checkley, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Standing, Joseph F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndoutoumou, Amalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeji, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agyeman, Akosua A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Abhulya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Li-An K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freemantle, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longley, Nicola</creatorcontrib><title>Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><description>Background Early antiviral treatment is effective for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) but currently available agents are expensive. Favipiravir is routinely used in many countries, but efficacy is unproven. Antiviral combinations have not been systematically studied. We aimed to evaluate the effect of favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir or the combination of both agents on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load trajectory when administered early. Methods and findings We conducted a Phase 2, proof of principle, randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial, double-blind trial of ambulatory outpatients with early COVID-19 (within 7 days of symptom onset) at 2 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants were randomised using a centralised online process to receive: favipiravir (1,800 mg twice daily on Day 1 followed by 400 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7) plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200 mg/50 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7), favipiravir plus lopinavir-ritonavir placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir plus favipiravir placebo, or both placebos. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 viral load at Day 5, accounting for baseline viral load. Between 6 October 2020 and 4 November 2021, we recruited 240 participants. For the favipiravir+lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir+placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo, and placebo-only arms, we recruited 61, 59, 60, and 60 participants and analysed 55, 56, 55, and 58 participants, respectively, who provided viral load measures at Day 1 and Day 5. In the primary analysis, the mean viral load in the favipiravir+placebo arm had changed by -0.57 log.sub.10 (95% CI -1.21 to 0.07, p = 0.08) and in the lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo arm by -0.18 log.sub.10 (95% CI -0.82 to 0.46, p = 0.58) compared to the placebo arm at Day 5. There was no significant interaction between favipiravir and lopinavir-ritonavir (interaction coefficient term: 0.59 log.sub.10, 95% CI -0.32 to 1.50, p = 0.20). More participants had undetectable virus at Day 5 in the favipiravir+placebo arm compared to placebo only (46.3% versus 26.9%, odds ratio (OR): 2.47, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.65; p = 0.03). Adverse events were observed more frequently with lopinavir-ritonavir, mainly gastrointestinal disturbance. Favipiravir drug levels were lower in the combination arm than the favipiravir monotherapy arm, possibly due to poor absorption. The major limitation was that the study population was relatively young and healthy compared to those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions At the current doses, no treatment significantly reduced viral load in the primary analysis. Favipiravir requires further evaluation with consideration of dose escalation. Lopinavir-ritonavir administration was associated with lower plasma favipiravir concentrations. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04499677 EudraCT: 2020-002106-68</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Lopinavir</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Ritonavir</subject><issn>1549-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDWx1DU0MjfnYOAqLs4yMDCyNLA04GSwcEssyyzILAKSRToKOfkFmXkgpm5RZkl-HkQwv0ghOT83CShRkpmfp1CSkVqUWFDJw8CalphTnMoLpbkZ1NxcQ5w9dNMTc1LjM1ITc0oyivNzSkF6iuMdzY1MzE3NTM0NjYlWCACI0Dh0</recordid><startdate>20221019</startdate><enddate>20221019</enddate><creator>Chowdhury, Kashfia</creator><creator>Shah, Divya</creator><creator>Lennon, Alexander</creator><creator>Checkley, Anna</creator><creator>Standing, Joseph F</creator><creator>Davey, Stephanie</creator><creator>Yee, Philip</creator><creator>Ndoutoumou, Amalia</creator><creator>Ikeji, Felicia</creator><creator>Breuer, Judith</creator><creator>Agyeman, Akosua A</creator><creator>Lowe, David M</creator><creator>Rai, Abhulya</creator><creator>Brown, Li-An K</creator><creator>Freemantle, Nick</creator><creator>Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay</creator><creator>Longley, Nicola</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20221019</creationdate><title>Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy</title><author>Chowdhury, Kashfia ; Shah, Divya ; Lennon, Alexander ; Checkley, Anna ; Standing, Joseph F ; Davey, Stephanie ; Yee, Philip ; Ndoutoumou, Amalia ; Ikeji, Felicia ; Breuer, Judith ; Agyeman, Akosua A ; Lowe, David M ; Rai, Abhulya ; Brown, Li-An K ; Freemantle, Nick ; Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay ; Longley, Nicola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_healthsolutions_A7247565713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Lopinavir</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Ritonavir</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Kashfia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Divya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennon, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checkley, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Standing, Joseph F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndoutoumou, Amalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeji, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agyeman, Akosua A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Abhulya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Li-An K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freemantle, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longley, Nicola</creatorcontrib><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chowdhury, Kashfia</au><au>Shah, Divya</au><au>Lennon, Alexander</au><au>Checkley, Anna</au><au>Standing, Joseph F</au><au>Davey, Stephanie</au><au>Yee, Philip</au><au>Ndoutoumou, Amalia</au><au>Ikeji, Felicia</au><au>Breuer, Judith</au><au>Agyeman, Akosua A</au><au>Lowe, David M</au><au>Rai, Abhulya</au><au>Brown, Li-An K</au><au>Freemantle, Nick</au><au>Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay</au><au>Longley, Nicola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><date>2022-10-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><issn>1549-1277</issn><abstract>Background Early antiviral treatment is effective for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) but currently available agents are expensive. Favipiravir is routinely used in many countries, but efficacy is unproven. Antiviral combinations have not been systematically studied. We aimed to evaluate the effect of favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir or the combination of both agents on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load trajectory when administered early. Methods and findings We conducted a Phase 2, proof of principle, randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial, double-blind trial of ambulatory outpatients with early COVID-19 (within 7 days of symptom onset) at 2 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants were randomised using a centralised online process to receive: favipiravir (1,800 mg twice daily on Day 1 followed by 400 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7) plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200 mg/50 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7), favipiravir plus lopinavir-ritonavir placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir plus favipiravir placebo, or both placebos. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 viral load at Day 5, accounting for baseline viral load. Between 6 October 2020 and 4 November 2021, we recruited 240 participants. For the favipiravir+lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir+placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo, and placebo-only arms, we recruited 61, 59, 60, and 60 participants and analysed 55, 56, 55, and 58 participants, respectively, who provided viral load measures at Day 1 and Day 5. In the primary analysis, the mean viral load in the favipiravir+placebo arm had changed by -0.57 log.sub.10 (95% CI -1.21 to 0.07, p = 0.08) and in the lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo arm by -0.18 log.sub.10 (95% CI -0.82 to 0.46, p = 0.58) compared to the placebo arm at Day 5. There was no significant interaction between favipiravir and lopinavir-ritonavir (interaction coefficient term: 0.59 log.sub.10, 95% CI -0.32 to 1.50, p = 0.20). More participants had undetectable virus at Day 5 in the favipiravir+placebo arm compared to placebo only (46.3% versus 26.9%, odds ratio (OR): 2.47, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.65; p = 0.03). Adverse events were observed more frequently with lopinavir-ritonavir, mainly gastrointestinal disturbance. Favipiravir drug levels were lower in the combination arm than the favipiravir monotherapy arm, possibly due to poor absorption. The major limitation was that the study population was relatively young and healthy compared to those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions At the current doses, no treatment significantly reduced viral load in the primary analysis. Favipiravir requires further evaluation with consideration of dose escalation. Lopinavir-ritonavir administration was associated with lower plasma favipiravir concentrations. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04499677 EudraCT: 2020-002106-68</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-1277
ispartof PLoS medicine, 2022-10, Vol.19 (10)
issn 1549-1277
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_healthsolutions_A724756571
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Clinical trials
Dosage and administration
Drug therapy, Combination
Lopinavir
Methods
Patient outcomes
Ritonavir
title Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T21%3A09%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Favipiravir,%20lopinavir-ritonavir,%20or%20combination%20therapy&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Chowdhury,%20Kashfia&rft.date=2022-10-19&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.issn=1549-1277&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA724756571%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A724756571&rfr_iscdi=true