Validation of Abbreviated Form of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index

Purpose: To screen multidimensional frailty in older people, using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) tool such as the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), is a public health priority. Unfortunately, the screening tools available are not able to capture multidimensional frailty. In this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical interventions in aging 2022-05, Vol.17, p.789
Hauptverfasser: Cella, Alberto, Custodero, Carlo, Capitano, Walter M, Cammalleri, Lisa A, Ruotolo, Giovanni, Pilotto, Alberto, Barbagallo, Mario, Veronese, Nicola, Solimando, Luisa, Carruba, Luca, Sabba, Carlo, Castagna, Alberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To screen multidimensional frailty in older people, using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) tool such as the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), is a public health priority. Unfortunately, the screening tools available are not able to capture multidimensional frailty. In this work, we aimed to evaluate in a population of hospitalized and ambulatory older patients, the agreement between an abbreviated form of the MPI (ie, BRIEF-MPI) and the standard/full version. Participants and Methods: All participants included in the study completed both versions of the MPI, brief and full, which share the following domains: 1) basic and 2) instrumental activities of daily living, 3) mobility/risk of pressure sores, 4) cognition, 5) nutrition, 6) comorbidity, 7) social and 8) number of medications. The agreement between the two instruments was reported using either the mean comparisons with a t-test matched sample, a simple correlation analysis and the Bland-Altman methodology. Results: The study sample included 110 participants (mean age=83.2 years, 51.8% women). The mean difference was statistically and clinically irrelevant (mean difference=0.01[+ or -]0.10; p=0.27). The correlation between brief and full MPI versions was optimal (R=0.82, p0.66, was optimal (area under the curve=0.92, p
ISSN:1178-1998