DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement
Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of case studies 2018-05, Vol.36 (1), p.20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Journal of case studies |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Osland, Asbjorn Clinch, Nanette Yang, In Ae |
description | Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guidelines and procedures to deal with campus sexual misconduct. The DCL of 2011 so limited due process and other rights of the accused that over 200 lawsuits resulted. Obama's approach was to impose the DCL of 2011 as though it were law, without following the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process where public hearings had to be held. This shortcoming invited change by DeVos since nothing in the DCL of 2011 was law because the APA had not been followed. DeVos and her staff, in July 2017, held hearings to listen to various stakeholders. Then the Department of Education's (DOE) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) drafted a series of temporary changes explicated in the "Q&A on Campus Sexual Misconduct" (2017). To draft policies and procedures that satisfied the various stakeholders was the challenge. What should she finally recommend as policy? How could the policy be fair to the various stakeholders when the opposing sides held such differing views? One side was concerned with reducing campus harassment and sexual violence while the other wanted to also ensure that the accused enjoyed due process. The case is decision oriented in that students are to problem solve. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A600450112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A600450112</galeid><sourcerecordid>A600450112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_businessinsightsgauss_A6004501123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz0jU2NDdkQWJzMPAWF2cZAIGloZGJpTkng7pLalh-sXqxgnNGYl56arFCSb5CSGZJTqqCZ4SCa15aflFyam5qXgkPA2taYk5xKi-U5mbQcXMNcfbQTU_MSY1PKi3OzEstBhLFmekZJcXpiaXFxfGOZgYGJqYGhoZGxiQqBwAjrDfn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Osland, Asbjorn ; Clinch, Nanette ; Yang, In Ae</creator><creatorcontrib>Osland, Asbjorn ; Clinch, Nanette ; Yang, In Ae</creatorcontrib><description>Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guidelines and procedures to deal with campus sexual misconduct. The DCL of 2011 so limited due process and other rights of the accused that over 200 lawsuits resulted. Obama's approach was to impose the DCL of 2011 as though it were law, without following the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process where public hearings had to be held. This shortcoming invited change by DeVos since nothing in the DCL of 2011 was law because the APA had not been followed. DeVos and her staff, in July 2017, held hearings to listen to various stakeholders. Then the Department of Education's (DOE) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) drafted a series of temporary changes explicated in the "Q&A on Campus Sexual Misconduct" (2017). To draft policies and procedures that satisfied the various stakeholders was the challenge. What should she finally recommend as policy? How could the policy be fair to the various stakeholders when the opposing sides held such differing views? One side was concerned with reducing campus harassment and sexual violence while the other wanted to also ensure that the accused enjoyed due process. The case is decision oriented in that students are to problem solve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2162-3171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-3171</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society for Case Research</publisher><subject>Case studies ; College sports ; Education ; Education policy ; Educational discrimination ; Harassment ; Hearings ; Litigation ; Powers and duties ; Secretaries of education ; Sex crimes ; Sexual abuse ; Universities and colleges ; Vice presidents (Organizations) ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of case studies, 2018-05, Vol.36 (1), p.20</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Society for Case Research</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osland, Asbjorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinch, Nanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, In Ae</creatorcontrib><title>DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement</title><title>Journal of case studies</title><description>Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guidelines and procedures to deal with campus sexual misconduct. The DCL of 2011 so limited due process and other rights of the accused that over 200 lawsuits resulted. Obama's approach was to impose the DCL of 2011 as though it were law, without following the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process where public hearings had to be held. This shortcoming invited change by DeVos since nothing in the DCL of 2011 was law because the APA had not been followed. DeVos and her staff, in July 2017, held hearings to listen to various stakeholders. Then the Department of Education's (DOE) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) drafted a series of temporary changes explicated in the "Q&A on Campus Sexual Misconduct" (2017). To draft policies and procedures that satisfied the various stakeholders was the challenge. What should she finally recommend as policy? How could the policy be fair to the various stakeholders when the opposing sides held such differing views? One side was concerned with reducing campus harassment and sexual violence while the other wanted to also ensure that the accused enjoyed due process. The case is decision oriented in that students are to problem solve.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>College sports</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational discrimination</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Hearings</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Powers and duties</subject><subject>Secretaries of education</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual abuse</subject><subject>Universities and colleges</subject><subject>Vice presidents (Organizations)</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>2162-3171</issn><issn>2162-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz0jU2NDdkQWJzMPAWF2cZAIGloZGJpTkng7pLalh-sXqxgnNGYl56arFCSb5CSGZJTqqCZ4SCa15aflFyam5qXgkPA2taYk5xKi-U5mbQcXMNcfbQTU_MSY1PKi3OzEstBhLFmekZJcXpiaXFxfGOZgYGJqYGhoZGxiQqBwAjrDfn</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Osland, Asbjorn</creator><creator>Clinch, Nanette</creator><creator>Yang, In Ae</creator><general>Society for Case Research</general><scope>N95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement</title><author>Osland, Asbjorn ; Clinch, Nanette ; Yang, In Ae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_businessinsightsgauss_A6004501123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>College sports</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational discrimination</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Hearings</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Powers and duties</topic><topic>Secretaries of education</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual abuse</topic><topic>Universities and colleges</topic><topic>Vice presidents (Organizations)</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osland, Asbjorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinch, Nanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, In Ae</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><jtitle>Journal of case studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osland, Asbjorn</au><au>Clinch, Nanette</au><au>Yang, In Ae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of case studies</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><pages>20-</pages><issn>2162-3171</issn><eissn>2162-3171</eissn><abstract>Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guidelines and procedures to deal with campus sexual misconduct. The DCL of 2011 so limited due process and other rights of the accused that over 200 lawsuits resulted. Obama's approach was to impose the DCL of 2011 as though it were law, without following the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process where public hearings had to be held. This shortcoming invited change by DeVos since nothing in the DCL of 2011 was law because the APA had not been followed. DeVos and her staff, in July 2017, held hearings to listen to various stakeholders. Then the Department of Education's (DOE) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) drafted a series of temporary changes explicated in the "Q&A on Campus Sexual Misconduct" (2017). To draft policies and procedures that satisfied the various stakeholders was the challenge. What should she finally recommend as policy? How could the policy be fair to the various stakeholders when the opposing sides held such differing views? One side was concerned with reducing campus harassment and sexual violence while the other wanted to also ensure that the accused enjoyed due process. The case is decision oriented in that students are to problem solve.</abstract><pub>Society for Case Research</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2162-3171 |
ispartof | Journal of case studies, 2018-05, Vol.36 (1), p.20 |
issn | 2162-3171 2162-3171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A600450112 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Case studies College sports Education Education policy Educational discrimination Harassment Hearings Litigation Powers and duties Secretaries of education Sex crimes Sexual abuse Universities and colleges Vice presidents (Organizations) Violence |
title | DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A35%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DeVos's%20Changes%20to%20Title%20IX%20Enforcement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20case%20studies&rft.au=Osland,%20Asbjorn&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.pages=20-&rft.issn=2162-3171&rft.eissn=2162-3171&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA600450112%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A600450112&rfr_iscdi=true |