DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement

Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of case studies 2018-05, Vol.36 (1), p.20
Hauptverfasser: Osland, Asbjorn, Clinch, Nanette, Yang, In Ae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Journal of case studies
container_volume 36
creator Osland, Asbjorn
Clinch, Nanette
Yang, In Ae
description Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guidelines and procedures to deal with campus sexual misconduct. The DCL of 2011 so limited due process and other rights of the accused that over 200 lawsuits resulted. Obama's approach was to impose the DCL of 2011 as though it were law, without following the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process where public hearings had to be held. This shortcoming invited change by DeVos since nothing in the DCL of 2011 was law because the APA had not been followed. DeVos and her staff, in July 2017, held hearings to listen to various stakeholders. Then the Department of Education's (DOE) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) drafted a series of temporary changes explicated in the "Q&A on Campus Sexual Misconduct" (2017). To draft policies and procedures that satisfied the various stakeholders was the challenge. What should she finally recommend as policy? How could the policy be fair to the various stakeholders when the opposing sides held such differing views? One side was concerned with reducing campus harassment and sexual violence while the other wanted to also ensure that the accused enjoyed due process. The case is decision oriented in that students are to problem solve.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A600450112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A600450112</galeid><sourcerecordid>A600450112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_businessinsightsgauss_A6004501123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz0jU2NDdkQWJzMPAWF2cZAIGloZGJpTkng7pLalh-sXqxgnNGYl56arFCSb5CSGZJTqqCZ4SCa15aflFyam5qXgkPA2taYk5xKi-U5mbQcXMNcfbQTU_MSY1PKi3OzEstBhLFmekZJcXpiaXFxfGOZgYGJqYGhoZGxiQqBwAjrDfn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Osland, Asbjorn ; Clinch, Nanette ; Yang, In Ae</creator><creatorcontrib>Osland, Asbjorn ; Clinch, Nanette ; Yang, In Ae</creatorcontrib><description>Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guidelines and procedures to deal with campus sexual misconduct. The DCL of 2011 so limited due process and other rights of the accused that over 200 lawsuits resulted. Obama's approach was to impose the DCL of 2011 as though it were law, without following the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process where public hearings had to be held. This shortcoming invited change by DeVos since nothing in the DCL of 2011 was law because the APA had not been followed. DeVos and her staff, in July 2017, held hearings to listen to various stakeholders. Then the Department of Education's (DOE) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) drafted a series of temporary changes explicated in the "Q&amp;A on Campus Sexual Misconduct" (2017). To draft policies and procedures that satisfied the various stakeholders was the challenge. What should she finally recommend as policy? How could the policy be fair to the various stakeholders when the opposing sides held such differing views? One side was concerned with reducing campus harassment and sexual violence while the other wanted to also ensure that the accused enjoyed due process. The case is decision oriented in that students are to problem solve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2162-3171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-3171</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society for Case Research</publisher><subject>Case studies ; College sports ; Education ; Education policy ; Educational discrimination ; Harassment ; Hearings ; Litigation ; Powers and duties ; Secretaries of education ; Sex crimes ; Sexual abuse ; Universities and colleges ; Vice presidents (Organizations) ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of case studies, 2018-05, Vol.36 (1), p.20</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Society for Case Research</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osland, Asbjorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinch, Nanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, In Ae</creatorcontrib><title>DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement</title><title>Journal of case studies</title><description>Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guidelines and procedures to deal with campus sexual misconduct. The DCL of 2011 so limited due process and other rights of the accused that over 200 lawsuits resulted. Obama's approach was to impose the DCL of 2011 as though it were law, without following the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process where public hearings had to be held. This shortcoming invited change by DeVos since nothing in the DCL of 2011 was law because the APA had not been followed. DeVos and her staff, in July 2017, held hearings to listen to various stakeholders. Then the Department of Education's (DOE) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) drafted a series of temporary changes explicated in the "Q&amp;A on Campus Sexual Misconduct" (2017). To draft policies and procedures that satisfied the various stakeholders was the challenge. What should she finally recommend as policy? How could the policy be fair to the various stakeholders when the opposing sides held such differing views? One side was concerned with reducing campus harassment and sexual violence while the other wanted to also ensure that the accused enjoyed due process. The case is decision oriented in that students are to problem solve.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>College sports</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational discrimination</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Hearings</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Powers and duties</subject><subject>Secretaries of education</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual abuse</subject><subject>Universities and colleges</subject><subject>Vice presidents (Organizations)</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>2162-3171</issn><issn>2162-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz0jU2NDdkQWJzMPAWF2cZAIGloZGJpTkng7pLalh-sXqxgnNGYl56arFCSb5CSGZJTqqCZ4SCa15aflFyam5qXgkPA2taYk5xKi-U5mbQcXMNcfbQTU_MSY1PKi3OzEstBhLFmekZJcXpiaXFxfGOZgYGJqYGhoZGxiQqBwAjrDfn</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Osland, Asbjorn</creator><creator>Clinch, Nanette</creator><creator>Yang, In Ae</creator><general>Society for Case Research</general><scope>N95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement</title><author>Osland, Asbjorn ; Clinch, Nanette ; Yang, In Ae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_businessinsightsgauss_A6004501123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>College sports</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational discrimination</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Hearings</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Powers and duties</topic><topic>Secretaries of education</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual abuse</topic><topic>Universities and colleges</topic><topic>Vice presidents (Organizations)</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osland, Asbjorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinch, Nanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, In Ae</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><jtitle>Journal of case studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osland, Asbjorn</au><au>Clinch, Nanette</au><au>Yang, In Ae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of case studies</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><pages>20-</pages><issn>2162-3171</issn><eissn>2162-3171</eissn><abstract>Betsy DeVos barely was confirmed as Secretary of Education with Vice President Pence casting the tie-breaking vote. She knew she had to address the contentious Title IX issue. The Dear Colleague Letter of 2011 (DCL of 2011), written during the Obama administration, forced universities to adopt guidelines and procedures to deal with campus sexual misconduct. The DCL of 2011 so limited due process and other rights of the accused that over 200 lawsuits resulted. Obama's approach was to impose the DCL of 2011 as though it were law, without following the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process where public hearings had to be held. This shortcoming invited change by DeVos since nothing in the DCL of 2011 was law because the APA had not been followed. DeVos and her staff, in July 2017, held hearings to listen to various stakeholders. Then the Department of Education's (DOE) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) drafted a series of temporary changes explicated in the "Q&amp;A on Campus Sexual Misconduct" (2017). To draft policies and procedures that satisfied the various stakeholders was the challenge. What should she finally recommend as policy? How could the policy be fair to the various stakeholders when the opposing sides held such differing views? One side was concerned with reducing campus harassment and sexual violence while the other wanted to also ensure that the accused enjoyed due process. The case is decision oriented in that students are to problem solve.</abstract><pub>Society for Case Research</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2162-3171
ispartof Journal of case studies, 2018-05, Vol.36 (1), p.20
issn 2162-3171
2162-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A600450112
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Case studies
College sports
Education
Education policy
Educational discrimination
Harassment
Hearings
Litigation
Powers and duties
Secretaries of education
Sex crimes
Sexual abuse
Universities and colleges
Vice presidents (Organizations)
Violence
title DeVos's Changes to Title IX Enforcement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A35%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DeVos's%20Changes%20to%20Title%20IX%20Enforcement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20case%20studies&rft.au=Osland,%20Asbjorn&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.pages=20-&rft.issn=2162-3171&rft.eissn=2162-3171&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA600450112%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A600450112&rfr_iscdi=true