Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste
Although many recent studies have emphasized the multiplicity of institutional logics and the competition among them, how some institutional logics become prioritized over others in shaping organizational decisions is undertheorized. Drawing on panel data of 118 industrial facilities across 34 commu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Organization science (Providence, R.I.) R.I.), 2015-05, Vol.26 (3), p.847-866 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 866 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 847 |
| container_title | Organization science (Providence, R.I.) |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Lee, Min-Dong Paul Lounsbury, Michael |
| description | Although many recent studies have emphasized the multiplicity of institutional logics and the competition among them, how some institutional logics become prioritized over others in shaping organizational decisions is undertheorized. Drawing on panel data of 118 industrial facilities across 34 communities in Texas and Louisiana, we show that the saliency of different kinds of community logics significantly affects environmental practices—specifically, toxic waste emissions—of facilities in a community. Our results show that community logics not only have direct effects but also have indirect effects by filtering organizational reactions to broader field-level institutional logics. We theorize how community logics can amplify or dampen the influence of broader field-level logics and discuss the implications for the study of institutional complexity, social movements, and values in the configuration of institutional logics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1287/orsc.2014.0959 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A418226131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A418226131</galeid><jstor_id>43661024</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A418226131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-cd777e3548a41c254517f2b6ce611dc2dbd89ad452fd28a9c8a9be521e9bb15c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2LFDEQxRtRcF29ehMCXu0xn_3hbZl1dWFAkFWPIZ2u7s3QnYypNOye_cdNM-KqDEhIKhTv_aiCVxQvGd0w3tRvQ0S74ZTJDW1V-6g4Y4pXpZJKPc5_KuuypqJ9WjxD3FNKpVDtWfHjyk0JovMjufaYXFqSC95MZBdGZ_Ed2YZ5XrxL98cO-WqiM6uGGN-TSzcMEMEnly2fAQ_BIyBJgaRb-IeYSYcJ7lZUGMhNuMu0bwYTPC-eDGZCePGrnhdfrt7fbD-Wu08frrcXu9IqSlNp-7quQSjZGMksz4uxeuBdZaFirLe87_qmNb1UfOh5Y1qbbweKM2i7jikrzovXR-4hhu8LYNL7sMQ8GmrWtoIqQbl4UI1mAu38EFI0dnZo9YVkDecVEyyryhOqETxEMwUPg8vtv_SbE_p8epidPWl484ehW9B5wPygG28TjmZBPMm3MSBGGPQhutnEe82oXuOh13joNR56jUc2vDoa9phC_K2WoqoY5fJhwXXWOOP_eD8B4fPHFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993053023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lee, Min-Dong Paul ; Lounsbury, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Min-Dong Paul ; Lounsbury, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Although many recent studies have emphasized the multiplicity of institutional logics and the competition among them, how some institutional logics become prioritized over others in shaping organizational decisions is undertheorized. Drawing on panel data of 118 industrial facilities across 34 communities in Texas and Louisiana, we show that the saliency of different kinds of community logics significantly affects environmental practices—specifically, toxic waste emissions—of facilities in a community. Our results show that community logics not only have direct effects but also have indirect effects by filtering organizational reactions to broader field-level institutional logics. We theorize how community logics can amplify or dampen the influence of broader field-level logics and discuss the implications for the study of institutional complexity, social movements, and values in the configuration of institutional logics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-7039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Community ; Corporate social responsibility ; Economic sociology ; Environmentalism ; Indirect effects ; Industrial districts ; Influence ; Institutional theory ; Logic ; Organization theory ; Panel data ; Social activism ; Social movements ; Social responsibility ; Social values ; Studies ; sustainability/corporate environmentalism</subject><ispartof>Organization science (Providence, R.I.), 2015-05, Vol.26 (3), p.847-866</ispartof><rights>2015 INFORMS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences May/Jun 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-cd777e3548a41c254517f2b6ce611dc2dbd89ad452fd28a9c8a9be521e9bb15c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-cd777e3548a41c254517f2b6ce611dc2dbd89ad452fd28a9c8a9be521e9bb15c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/epdf/10.1287/orsc.2014.0959$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/orsc.2014.0959$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3679,27903,27904,33753,57995,58228,62592,62594</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Min-Dong Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lounsbury, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste</title><title>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</title><description>Although many recent studies have emphasized the multiplicity of institutional logics and the competition among them, how some institutional logics become prioritized over others in shaping organizational decisions is undertheorized. Drawing on panel data of 118 industrial facilities across 34 communities in Texas and Louisiana, we show that the saliency of different kinds of community logics significantly affects environmental practices—specifically, toxic waste emissions—of facilities in a community. Our results show that community logics not only have direct effects but also have indirect effects by filtering organizational reactions to broader field-level institutional logics. We theorize how community logics can amplify or dampen the influence of broader field-level logics and discuss the implications for the study of institutional complexity, social movements, and values in the configuration of institutional logics.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>Environmentalism</subject><subject>Indirect effects</subject><subject>Industrial districts</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Institutional theory</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Social values</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>sustainability/corporate environmentalism</subject><issn>1047-7039</issn><issn>1526-5455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks2LFDEQxRtRcF29ehMCXu0xn_3hbZl1dWFAkFWPIZ2u7s3QnYypNOye_cdNM-KqDEhIKhTv_aiCVxQvGd0w3tRvQ0S74ZTJDW1V-6g4Y4pXpZJKPc5_KuuypqJ9WjxD3FNKpVDtWfHjyk0JovMjufaYXFqSC95MZBdGZ_Ed2YZ5XrxL98cO-WqiM6uGGN-TSzcMEMEnly2fAQ_BIyBJgaRb-IeYSYcJ7lZUGMhNuMu0bwYTPC-eDGZCePGrnhdfrt7fbD-Wu08frrcXu9IqSlNp-7quQSjZGMksz4uxeuBdZaFirLe87_qmNb1UfOh5Y1qbbweKM2i7jikrzovXR-4hhu8LYNL7sMQ8GmrWtoIqQbl4UI1mAu38EFI0dnZo9YVkDecVEyyryhOqETxEMwUPg8vtv_SbE_p8epidPWl484ehW9B5wPygG28TjmZBPMm3MSBGGPQhutnEe82oXuOh13joNR56jUc2vDoa9phC_K2WoqoY5fJhwXXWOOP_eD8B4fPHFg</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Lee, Min-Dong Paul</creator><creator>Lounsbury, Michael</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste</title><author>Lee, Min-Dong Paul ; Lounsbury, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-cd777e3548a41c254517f2b6ce611dc2dbd89ad452fd28a9c8a9be521e9bb15c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>Environmentalism</topic><topic>Indirect effects</topic><topic>Industrial districts</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Institutional theory</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Social values</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>sustainability/corporate environmentalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Min-Dong Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lounsbury, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Min-Dong Paul</au><au>Lounsbury, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste</atitle><jtitle>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</jtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>866</epage><pages>847-866</pages><issn>1047-7039</issn><eissn>1526-5455</eissn><abstract>Although many recent studies have emphasized the multiplicity of institutional logics and the competition among them, how some institutional logics become prioritized over others in shaping organizational decisions is undertheorized. Drawing on panel data of 118 industrial facilities across 34 communities in Texas and Louisiana, we show that the saliency of different kinds of community logics significantly affects environmental practices—specifically, toxic waste emissions—of facilities in a community. Our results show that community logics not only have direct effects but also have indirect effects by filtering organizational reactions to broader field-level institutional logics. We theorize how community logics can amplify or dampen the influence of broader field-level logics and discuss the implications for the study of institutional complexity, social movements, and values in the configuration of institutional logics.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/orsc.2014.0959</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1047-7039 |
| ispartof | Organization science (Providence, R.I.), 2015-05, Vol.26 (3), p.847-866 |
| issn | 1047-7039 1526-5455 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A418226131 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; INFORMS PubsOnLine; Education Source; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Analysis Community Corporate social responsibility Economic sociology Environmentalism Indirect effects Industrial districts Influence Institutional theory Logic Organization theory Panel data Social activism Social movements Social responsibility Social values Studies sustainability/corporate environmentalism |
| title | Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A12%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Filtering%20Institutional%20Logics:%20Community%20Logic%20Variation%20and%20Differential%20Responses%20to%20the%20Institutional%20Complexity%20of%20Toxic%20Waste&rft.jtitle=Organization%20science%20(Providence,%20R.I.)&rft.au=Lee,%20Min-Dong%20Paul&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=866&rft.pages=847-866&rft.issn=1047-7039&rft.eissn=1526-5455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/orsc.2014.0959&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA418226131%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993053023&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A418226131&rft_jstor_id=43661024&rfr_iscdi=true |