Resource Pooling and Cost Allocation Among Independent Service Providers

We study a situation where several independent service providers collaborate by complete pooling of their resources and customer streams into a joint service system. These service providers may represent such diverse organizations as hospitals that pool beds or maintenance firms that pool repairmen....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Operations research 2015-03, Vol.63 (2), p.476-488
Hauptverfasser: Karsten, Frank, Slikker, Marco, van Houtum, Geert-Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 488
container_issue 2
container_start_page 476
container_title Operations research
container_volume 63
creator Karsten, Frank
Slikker, Marco
van Houtum, Geert-Jan
description We study a situation where several independent service providers collaborate by complete pooling of their resources and customer streams into a joint service system. These service providers may represent such diverse organizations as hospitals that pool beds or maintenance firms that pool repairmen. We model the service systems as Erlang delay systems ( M/M/s queues) that face a fixed cost rate per server and homogeneous delay costs for waiting customers. We examine rules to fairly allocate the collective costs of the pooled system amongst the participants by applying concepts from cooperative game theory. We consider both the case where players’ numbers of servers are exogenously given and the scenario where any coalition picks an optimal number of servers. By exploiting new analytical properties of the continuous extension of the classic Erlang delay function, we provide sufficient conditions for the games under consideration to possess a core allocation (i.e., an allocation that gives no group of players an incentive to split off and form a separate pool) and to admit a population monotonic allocation scheme (whereby adding extra players does not make anyone worse off). This is not guaranteed in general, as illustrated via examples.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/opre.2015.1360
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A412120274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A412120274</galeid><jstor_id>24540385</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A412120274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-1da09af94e14176225c47593e7d4b63d432eead3543bc78c74e45c5441ce13da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1rFDEUxYMouLa--iYM-Ops853dx2WxtlCo1BZ8C9nkzphlJllzZwv-92aoWIUFCdxA7u-c3Msh5B2jS8ZX5iIfCiw5ZWrJhKYvyIIprlsltXhJFpQK2gotv70mbxD3lNK10mpBru4A87F4aL7kPMTUNy6FZptxajbDkL2bYk7NZsy1c50CHKCWNDVfoTzGWVXyYwxQ8Jy86tyA8Pb3fUYeLj_db6_am9vP19vNTeuVEVPLgqNr160lMMmM5lx5adRagAlyp0WQggO4IJQUO29W3kiQyispmQcmghNn5MOT76HkH0fAye7r_Kl-abk2hiqm9eqZ6t0ANqYuT8X5MaK3G8k445QbWan2BNVDguKGnKCL9fkffnmCryfAGP1Jwce_BLsjxgRYC8b--4S9OyKe9PclIxbo7KHE0ZWfllE7Z2znjO2csZ0zroL3T4I9Trn8oblUkoqVel5wnrWM-D-_X8iTr5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2677051668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resource Pooling and Cost Allocation Among Independent Service Providers</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Access via Publisher Site</source><creator>Karsten, Frank ; Slikker, Marco ; van Houtum, Geert-Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Karsten, Frank ; Slikker, Marco ; van Houtum, Geert-Jan</creatorcontrib><description>We study a situation where several independent service providers collaborate by complete pooling of their resources and customer streams into a joint service system. These service providers may represent such diverse organizations as hospitals that pool beds or maintenance firms that pool repairmen. We model the service systems as Erlang delay systems ( M/M/s queues) that face a fixed cost rate per server and homogeneous delay costs for waiting customers. We examine rules to fairly allocate the collective costs of the pooled system amongst the participants by applying concepts from cooperative game theory. We consider both the case where players’ numbers of servers are exogenously given and the scenario where any coalition picks an optimal number of servers. By exploiting new analytical properties of the continuous extension of the classic Erlang delay function, we provide sufficient conditions for the games under consideration to possess a core allocation (i.e., an allocation that gives no group of players an incentive to split off and form a separate pool) and to admit a population monotonic allocation scheme (whereby adding extra players does not make anyone worse off). This is not guaranteed in general, as illustrated via examples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-364X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/opre.2015.1360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cost allocation ; Customer services ; Customers ; Delay ; Game theory ; METHODS ; Operations research ; Players ; queueing theory ; Queuing theory ; Repair &amp; maintenance services ; Resource allocation ; service operations ; Stochastic systems</subject><ispartof>Operations research, 2015-03, Vol.63 (2), p.476-488</ispartof><rights>2015 INFORMS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar/Apr 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-1da09af94e14176225c47593e7d4b63d432eead3543bc78c74e45c5441ce13da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-1da09af94e14176225c47593e7d4b63d432eead3543bc78c74e45c5441ce13da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24540385$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/opre.2015.1360$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3679,27901,27902,57992,58225,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karsten, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slikker, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Houtum, Geert-Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Resource Pooling and Cost Allocation Among Independent Service Providers</title><title>Operations research</title><description>We study a situation where several independent service providers collaborate by complete pooling of their resources and customer streams into a joint service system. These service providers may represent such diverse organizations as hospitals that pool beds or maintenance firms that pool repairmen. We model the service systems as Erlang delay systems ( M/M/s queues) that face a fixed cost rate per server and homogeneous delay costs for waiting customers. We examine rules to fairly allocate the collective costs of the pooled system amongst the participants by applying concepts from cooperative game theory. We consider both the case where players’ numbers of servers are exogenously given and the scenario where any coalition picks an optimal number of servers. By exploiting new analytical properties of the continuous extension of the classic Erlang delay function, we provide sufficient conditions for the games under consideration to possess a core allocation (i.e., an allocation that gives no group of players an incentive to split off and form a separate pool) and to admit a population monotonic allocation scheme (whereby adding extra players does not make anyone worse off). This is not guaranteed in general, as illustrated via examples.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cost allocation</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>METHODS</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Players</subject><subject>queueing theory</subject><subject>Queuing theory</subject><subject>Repair &amp; maintenance services</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>service operations</subject><subject>Stochastic systems</subject><issn>0030-364X</issn><issn>1526-5463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd1rFDEUxYMouLa--iYM-Ops853dx2WxtlCo1BZ8C9nkzphlJllzZwv-92aoWIUFCdxA7u-c3Msh5B2jS8ZX5iIfCiw5ZWrJhKYvyIIprlsltXhJFpQK2gotv70mbxD3lNK10mpBru4A87F4aL7kPMTUNy6FZptxajbDkL2bYk7NZsy1c50CHKCWNDVfoTzGWVXyYwxQ8Jy86tyA8Pb3fUYeLj_db6_am9vP19vNTeuVEVPLgqNr160lMMmM5lx5adRagAlyp0WQggO4IJQUO29W3kiQyispmQcmghNn5MOT76HkH0fAye7r_Kl-abk2hiqm9eqZ6t0ANqYuT8X5MaK3G8k445QbWan2BNVDguKGnKCL9fkffnmCryfAGP1Jwce_BLsjxgRYC8b--4S9OyKe9PclIxbo7KHE0ZWfllE7Z2znjO2csZ0zroL3T4I9Trn8oblUkoqVel5wnrWM-D-_X8iTr5A</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Karsten, Frank</creator><creator>Slikker, Marco</creator><creator>van Houtum, Geert-Jan</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Resource Pooling and Cost Allocation Among Independent Service Providers</title><author>Karsten, Frank ; Slikker, Marco ; van Houtum, Geert-Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-1da09af94e14176225c47593e7d4b63d432eead3543bc78c74e45c5441ce13da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cost allocation</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>METHODS</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Players</topic><topic>queueing theory</topic><topic>Queuing theory</topic><topic>Repair &amp; maintenance services</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>service operations</topic><topic>Stochastic systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karsten, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slikker, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Houtum, Geert-Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karsten, Frank</au><au>Slikker, Marco</au><au>van Houtum, Geert-Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resource Pooling and Cost Allocation Among Independent Service Providers</atitle><jtitle>Operations research</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>488</epage><pages>476-488</pages><issn>0030-364X</issn><eissn>1526-5463</eissn><abstract>We study a situation where several independent service providers collaborate by complete pooling of their resources and customer streams into a joint service system. These service providers may represent such diverse organizations as hospitals that pool beds or maintenance firms that pool repairmen. We model the service systems as Erlang delay systems ( M/M/s queues) that face a fixed cost rate per server and homogeneous delay costs for waiting customers. We examine rules to fairly allocate the collective costs of the pooled system amongst the participants by applying concepts from cooperative game theory. We consider both the case where players’ numbers of servers are exogenously given and the scenario where any coalition picks an optimal number of servers. By exploiting new analytical properties of the continuous extension of the classic Erlang delay function, we provide sufficient conditions for the games under consideration to possess a core allocation (i.e., an allocation that gives no group of players an incentive to split off and form a separate pool) and to admit a population monotonic allocation scheme (whereby adding extra players does not make anyone worse off). This is not guaranteed in general, as illustrated via examples.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/opre.2015.1360</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-364X
ispartof Operations research, 2015-03, Vol.63 (2), p.476-488
issn 0030-364X
1526-5463
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A412120274
source Business Source Complete; JSTOR; Access via Publisher Site
subjects Analysis
Cost allocation
Customer services
Customers
Delay
Game theory
METHODS
Operations research
Players
queueing theory
Queuing theory
Repair & maintenance services
Resource allocation
service operations
Stochastic systems
title Resource Pooling and Cost Allocation Among Independent Service Providers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A29%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resource%20Pooling%20and%20Cost%20Allocation%20Among%20Independent%20Service%20Providers&rft.jtitle=Operations%20research&rft.au=Karsten,%20Frank&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=488&rft.pages=476-488&rft.issn=0030-364X&rft.eissn=1526-5463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/opre.2015.1360&rft_dat=%3Cgale_jstor%3EA412120274%3C/gale_jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2677051668&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A412120274&rft_jstor_id=24540385&rfr_iscdi=true