Ökobau.dat 3.0 - Quo Vadis?

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the standard method for the quantification of environmental impacts within the construction sector, relying on available generic LCA databases. New developments, such as the increased influence of the building construction for LCA and the forthcoming of building inform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Gantner, Johannes, Lenz, Katrin, Horn, Rafael, Both, Petra von, Ebertshäuser, Sebastian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Gantner, Johannes
Lenz, Katrin
Horn, Rafael
Both, Petra von
Ebertshäuser, Sebastian
description Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the standard method for the quantification of environmental impacts within the construction sector, relying on available generic LCA databases. New developments, such as the increased influence of the building construction for LCA and the forthcoming of building information modeling (BIM), implicate new requirements on multiscale levels of development and complexity for LCA construction databases. At the example of the German “Ökobau.dat”, one of the leading LCA construction databases, this publication discusses whether the database is able to meet these requirements. The analysis shows the strengths of the Ökobau.dat with regard to standardization conformity (EN 15804, ILCD), data provision in machine-readable XML format, and the provision of an application programming interface. Shortcomings include incorrect linking of building life cycle inventory data with environmental information, incorrect documentation of functional units, missing generic datasets, the modeling of energy use data or the lack of a uniform structuring, or material classification. The authors propose solutions such as the provision of appropriate functional units, the implementation of a top-down approach to investigate the completeness of data based on existing nomenclatures or the extension with an appropriate material classification. This would allow for future viability and adaptability of Ökobau.dat for digital LCA.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/buildings8090129
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fraunhofer_E3A</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fraunhofer_primary_oai_fraunhofer_de_N_555309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_fraunhofer_de_N_555309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fraunhofer_primary_oai_fraunhofer_de_N_5553093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJAwNNAzNrY00E8qzcxJycxLL7YwsDQwNLLkZJA5PC07PymxVC8lsUTBWM9AQVchsDRfISwxJbPYnoeBNS0xpziVF0pzM5i4uYY4e-imFSWW5mXkp6UWxRcUZeYmFlXG5ydmxiMJp6TG-8WbmpoaG1gak6kNABSUOxE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ökobau.dat 3.0 - Quo Vadis?</title><source>Fraunhofer-ePrints</source><creator>Gantner, Johannes ; Lenz, Katrin ; Horn, Rafael ; Both, Petra von ; Ebertshäuser, Sebastian</creator><creatorcontrib>Gantner, Johannes ; Lenz, Katrin ; Horn, Rafael ; Both, Petra von ; Ebertshäuser, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><description>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the standard method for the quantification of environmental impacts within the construction sector, relying on available generic LCA databases. New developments, such as the increased influence of the building construction for LCA and the forthcoming of building information modeling (BIM), implicate new requirements on multiscale levels of development and complexity for LCA construction databases. At the example of the German “Ökobau.dat”, one of the leading LCA construction databases, this publication discusses whether the database is able to meet these requirements. The analysis shows the strengths of the Ökobau.dat with regard to standardization conformity (EN 15804, ILCD), data provision in machine-readable XML format, and the provision of an application programming interface. Shortcomings include incorrect linking of building life cycle inventory data with environmental information, incorrect documentation of functional units, missing generic datasets, the modeling of energy use data or the lack of a uniform structuring, or material classification. The authors propose solutions such as the provision of appropriate functional units, the implementation of a top-down approach to investigate the completeness of data based on existing nomenclatures or the extension with an appropriate material classification. This would allow for future viability and adaptability of Ökobau.dat for digital LCA.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/buildings8090129</identifier><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,780,27860</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-555309.html$$EView_record_in_Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft$$FView_record_in_$$GFraunhofer-Gesellschaft$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gantner, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Both, Petra von</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebertshäuser, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><title>Ökobau.dat 3.0 - Quo Vadis?</title><description>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the standard method for the quantification of environmental impacts within the construction sector, relying on available generic LCA databases. New developments, such as the increased influence of the building construction for LCA and the forthcoming of building information modeling (BIM), implicate new requirements on multiscale levels of development and complexity for LCA construction databases. At the example of the German “Ökobau.dat”, one of the leading LCA construction databases, this publication discusses whether the database is able to meet these requirements. The analysis shows the strengths of the Ökobau.dat with regard to standardization conformity (EN 15804, ILCD), data provision in machine-readable XML format, and the provision of an application programming interface. Shortcomings include incorrect linking of building life cycle inventory data with environmental information, incorrect documentation of functional units, missing generic datasets, the modeling of energy use data or the lack of a uniform structuring, or material classification. The authors propose solutions such as the provision of appropriate functional units, the implementation of a top-down approach to investigate the completeness of data based on existing nomenclatures or the extension with an appropriate material classification. This would allow for future viability and adaptability of Ökobau.dat for digital LCA.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFSUM</sourceid><sourceid>E3A</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJAwNNAzNrY00E8qzcxJycxLL7YwsDQwNLLkZJA5PC07PymxVC8lsUTBWM9AQVchsDRfISwxJbPYnoeBNS0xpziVF0pzM5i4uYY4e-imFSWW5mXkp6UWxRcUZeYmFlXG5ydmxiMJp6TG-8WbmpoaG1gak6kNABSUOxE</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Gantner, Johannes</creator><creator>Lenz, Katrin</creator><creator>Horn, Rafael</creator><creator>Both, Petra von</creator><creator>Ebertshäuser, Sebastian</creator><scope>AFSUM</scope><scope>E3A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Ökobau.dat 3.0 - Quo Vadis?</title><author>Gantner, Johannes ; Lenz, Katrin ; Horn, Rafael ; Both, Petra von ; Ebertshäuser, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fraunhofer_primary_oai_fraunhofer_de_N_5553093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gantner, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Both, Petra von</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebertshäuser, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><collection>Fraunhofer-ePrints - FT</collection><collection>Fraunhofer-ePrints</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gantner, Johannes</au><au>Lenz, Katrin</au><au>Horn, Rafael</au><au>Both, Petra von</au><au>Ebertshäuser, Sebastian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ökobau.dat 3.0 - Quo Vadis?</atitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><abstract>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the standard method for the quantification of environmental impacts within the construction sector, relying on available generic LCA databases. New developments, such as the increased influence of the building construction for LCA and the forthcoming of building information modeling (BIM), implicate new requirements on multiscale levels of development and complexity for LCA construction databases. At the example of the German “Ökobau.dat”, one of the leading LCA construction databases, this publication discusses whether the database is able to meet these requirements. The analysis shows the strengths of the Ökobau.dat with regard to standardization conformity (EN 15804, ILCD), data provision in machine-readable XML format, and the provision of an application programming interface. Shortcomings include incorrect linking of building life cycle inventory data with environmental information, incorrect documentation of functional units, missing generic datasets, the modeling of energy use data or the lack of a uniform structuring, or material classification. The authors propose solutions such as the provision of appropriate functional units, the implementation of a top-down approach to investigate the completeness of data based on existing nomenclatures or the extension with an appropriate material classification. This would allow for future viability and adaptability of Ökobau.dat for digital LCA.</abstract><doi>10.3390/buildings8090129</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.3390/buildings8090129
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_fraunhofer_primary_oai_fraunhofer_de_N_555309
source Fraunhofer-ePrints
title Ökobau.dat 3.0 - Quo Vadis?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A13%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fraunhofer_E3A&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%C3%96kobau.dat%203.0%20-%20Quo%20Vadis?&rft.au=Gantner,%20Johannes&rft.date=2018&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/buildings8090129&rft_dat=%3Cfraunhofer_E3A%3Eoai_fraunhofer_de_N_555309%3C/fraunhofer_E3A%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true