Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated?

Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated?

There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data -neurodata- is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hallinan, Dara, Schütz, Philip, Friedewald, Michael, Hert, Paul de
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
BCIs
data protection
neurodata
personal data
privacy
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Hallinan, Dara
Schütz, Philip
Friedewald, Michael
Hert, Paul de
description There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data -neurodata- is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this paper is that neurodata is a unique form of data and that this will raise questions for the application of data protection law. Issues may arise on two levels. On a legal technical level, it is uncertain whether the definitions and mechanisms used in the data protection framework can be easily applied to neurodata. On a more fundamental level, there may be interests in neurodata, particularly those related to the protection of the mind, the framework was not designed to represent and may be insufficiently equipped, or constructed, to deal with.
doi_str_mv 10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fraunhofer_E3A</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fraunhofer_primary_oai_fraunhofer_de_N_283673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_fraunhofer_de_N_283673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fraunhofer_primary_oai_fraunhofer_de_N_2836733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAzNNAzMrE0sNAvLtYrMzTKNNQzMTUw4GQw9UstLcpPSSxJVEjMS1HIA_EKijLLEpMrrRRcQMIFRfklqcklmfl5CvmlJUCVqSn2PAysaYk5xam8UJqbwcTNNcTZQzetKLE0LyM_LbUoHmhKbmJRZXx-YmY8knBKarxfvJGFsZm5sTGZ2gCC1ERq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated?</title><source>Fraunhofer-ePrints</source><creator>Hallinan, Dara ; Schütz, Philip ; Friedewald, Michael ; Hert, Paul de</creator><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Dara ; Schütz, Philip ; Friedewald, Michael ; Hert, Paul de</creatorcontrib><description>There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data -neurodata- is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this paper is that neurodata is a unique form of data and that this will raise questions for the application of data protection law. Issues may arise on two levels. On a legal technical level, it is uncertain whether the definitions and mechanisms used in the data protection framework can be easily applied to neurodata. On a more fundamental level, there may be interests in neurodata, particularly those related to the protection of the mind, the framework was not designed to represent and may be insufficiently equipped, or constructed, to deal with.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>BCIs ; data protection ; neurodata ; personal data ; privacy</subject><creationdate>2014</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,780,27860</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-283673.html$$EView_record_in_Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft$$FView_record_in_$$GFraunhofer-Gesellschaft$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Dara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütz, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedewald, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hert, Paul de</creatorcontrib><title>Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated?</title><description>There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data -neurodata- is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this paper is that neurodata is a unique form of data and that this will raise questions for the application of data protection law. Issues may arise on two levels. On a legal technical level, it is uncertain whether the definitions and mechanisms used in the data protection framework can be easily applied to neurodata. On a more fundamental level, there may be interests in neurodata, particularly those related to the protection of the mind, the framework was not designed to represent and may be insufficiently equipped, or constructed, to deal with.</description><subject>BCIs</subject><subject>data protection</subject><subject>neurodata</subject><subject>personal data</subject><subject>privacy</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFSUM</sourceid><sourceid>E3A</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBAzNNAzMrE0sNAvLtYrMzTKNNQzMTUw4GQw9UstLcpPSSxJVEjMS1HIA_EKijLLEpMrrRRcQMIFRfklqcklmfl5CvmlJUCVqSn2PAysaYk5xam8UJqbwcTNNcTZQzetKLE0LyM_LbUoHmhKbmJRZXx-YmY8knBKarxfvJGFsZm5sTGZ2gCC1ERq</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Hallinan, Dara</creator><creator>Schütz, Philip</creator><creator>Friedewald, Michael</creator><creator>Hert, Paul de</creator><scope>AFSUM</scope><scope>E3A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated?</title><author>Hallinan, Dara ; Schütz, Philip ; Friedewald, Michael ; Hert, Paul de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fraunhofer_primary_oai_fraunhofer_de_N_2836733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>BCIs</topic><topic>data protection</topic><topic>neurodata</topic><topic>personal data</topic><topic>privacy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Dara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütz, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedewald, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hert, Paul de</creatorcontrib><collection>Fraunhofer-ePrints - FT</collection><collection>Fraunhofer-ePrints</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallinan, Dara</au><au>Schütz, Philip</au><au>Friedewald, Michael</au><au>Hert, Paul de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated?</atitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><abstract>There are a number of novel technologies and a broad range of research aimed at the collection and use of data drawn directly from the human brain. Given that this data -neurodata- is data collected from individuals, one area of law which will be of relevance is data protection. The thesis of this paper is that neurodata is a unique form of data and that this will raise questions for the application of data protection law. Issues may arise on two levels. On a legal technical level, it is uncertain whether the definitions and mechanisms used in the data protection framework can be easily applied to neurodata. On a more fundamental level, there may be interests in neurodata, particularly those related to the protection of the mind, the framework was not designed to represent and may be insufficiently equipped, or constructed, to deal with.</abstract><doi>10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_fraunhofer_primary_oai_fraunhofer_de_N_283673
source Fraunhofer-ePrints
subjects BCIs
data protection
neurodata
personal data
privacy
title Neurodata and neuroprivacy: Data protection outdated?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A00%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fraunhofer_E3A&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neurodata%20and%20neuroprivacy:%20Data%20protection%20outdated?&rft.au=Hallinan,%20Dara&rft.date=2014&rft_id=info:doi/10.24908/ss.v12i1.4500&rft_dat=%3Cfraunhofer_E3A%3Eoai_fraunhofer_de_N_283673%3C/fraunhofer_E3A%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true