Model-based policy support in nature conservation: determining the “optimal” land use pattern in the agrarian landscape of the MAB biosphere reserve “Mittlere Elbe”
Using the example of the MAB Biosphere Preserve “Mittlere Elbe”, this article demonstrates how an “optimal” land-use pattern – a pattern aimed at combining ecological, economic and social objectives in an adequate way – can be determined. The focus is on the definition of alternative nature conserva...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | German journal of agricultural economics 2004 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | German journal of agricultural economics |
container_volume | |
creator | Hillert, Daniel Ahrens, Heinz Harth, Michael Horlitz, Thomas Sander, Achim |
description | Using the example of the MAB Biosphere Preserve “Mittlere Elbe”, this article demonstrates how an “optimal” land-use pattern – a pattern aimed at combining ecological, economic and social objectives in an adequate way – can be determined. The focus is on the definition of alternative nature conservation approaches, the scenario technique, the definition of landscape functions, the utility analysis and the adaptive conjoint analysis. In addition, the authors demonstrate which quantitative methods can be used to obtain the information needed for utility and conjoint analyses on the ecological and economic effects of the conservation scenarios as well as on the weighting of the landscape functions, and how they can be integrated. Finally, it is shown that the conflict between ecological and economic objectives cannot only be reduced by a regional differentiation of the extent of resource protection – as shown in the literature –, but also by a spatial variation of the type of environment conservation. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US2016223086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US2016223086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fao_agris_US20162230863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjUFOwzAQRb0AqRX0CEhzgUiOU0UVO0BFbLIC1tUkmbRTubblcZDY9SBwA07Vk-BE7FmN_vyn96_UUmttirI05UKtRI456nVt6mqzVD-N78kWLQr1ELzl7hNkDMHHBOzAYRojQeedUPzAxN7dQ0-J4okduz2kA8Hl_OVD4hPay_kbLLoeRiEImDLnJs1E4T5iZHQzIB0GAj_MTfPwCC17CQfKW5GmqdnacEp2-m1tS9l9q64HtEKrv3uj7p63b08vxYB-l_0su_dXo8vamEpv6uq__hcLoV61</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model-based policy support in nature conservation: determining the “optimal” land use pattern in the agrarian landscape of the MAB biosphere reserve “Mittlere Elbe”</title><source>AgEcon</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hillert, Daniel ; Ahrens, Heinz ; Harth, Michael ; Horlitz, Thomas ; Sander, Achim</creator><creatorcontrib>Hillert, Daniel ; Ahrens, Heinz ; Harth, Michael ; Horlitz, Thomas ; Sander, Achim</creatorcontrib><description>Using the example of the MAB Biosphere Preserve “Mittlere Elbe”, this article demonstrates how an “optimal” land-use pattern – a pattern aimed at combining ecological, economic and social objectives in an adequate way – can be determined. The focus is on the definition of alternative nature conservation approaches, the scenario technique, the definition of landscape functions, the utility analysis and the adaptive conjoint analysis. In addition, the authors demonstrate which quantitative methods can be used to obtain the information needed for utility and conjoint analyses on the ecological and economic effects of the conservation scenarios as well as on the weighting of the landscape functions, and how they can be integrated. Finally, it is shown that the conflict between ecological and economic objectives cannot only be reduced by a regional differentiation of the extent of resource protection – as shown in the literature –, but also by a spatial variation of the type of environment conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1121</identifier><language>ger</language><subject>Conjoint analysis ; conservation scenarios ; Environmental Economics and Policy ; Land Economics/Use ; landscape function ; MAB Biophere Reserves ; nature conservation models ; optimal land use ; Repertory Grid technique ; riverside protection ; utility analysis</subject><ispartof>German journal of agricultural economics, 2004</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hillert, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harth, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horlitz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, Achim</creatorcontrib><title>Model-based policy support in nature conservation: determining the “optimal” land use pattern in the agrarian landscape of the MAB biosphere reserve “Mittlere Elbe”</title><title>German journal of agricultural economics</title><description>Using the example of the MAB Biosphere Preserve “Mittlere Elbe”, this article demonstrates how an “optimal” land-use pattern – a pattern aimed at combining ecological, economic and social objectives in an adequate way – can be determined. The focus is on the definition of alternative nature conservation approaches, the scenario technique, the definition of landscape functions, the utility analysis and the adaptive conjoint analysis. In addition, the authors demonstrate which quantitative methods can be used to obtain the information needed for utility and conjoint analyses on the ecological and economic effects of the conservation scenarios as well as on the weighting of the landscape functions, and how they can be integrated. Finally, it is shown that the conflict between ecological and economic objectives cannot only be reduced by a regional differentiation of the extent of resource protection – as shown in the literature –, but also by a spatial variation of the type of environment conservation.</description><subject>Conjoint analysis</subject><subject>conservation scenarios</subject><subject>Environmental Economics and Policy</subject><subject>Land Economics/Use</subject><subject>landscape function</subject><subject>MAB Biophere Reserves</subject><subject>nature conservation models</subject><subject>optimal land use</subject><subject>Repertory Grid technique</subject><subject>riverside protection</subject><subject>utility analysis</subject><issn>0002-1121</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjUFOwzAQRb0AqRX0CEhzgUiOU0UVO0BFbLIC1tUkmbRTubblcZDY9SBwA07Vk-BE7FmN_vyn96_UUmttirI05UKtRI456nVt6mqzVD-N78kWLQr1ELzl7hNkDMHHBOzAYRojQeedUPzAxN7dQ0-J4okduz2kA8Hl_OVD4hPay_kbLLoeRiEImDLnJs1E4T5iZHQzIB0GAj_MTfPwCC17CQfKW5GmqdnacEp2-m1tS9l9q64HtEKrv3uj7p63b08vxYB-l_0su_dXo8vamEpv6uq__hcLoV61</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Hillert, Daniel</creator><creator>Ahrens, Heinz</creator><creator>Harth, Michael</creator><creator>Horlitz, Thomas</creator><creator>Sander, Achim</creator><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Model-based policy support in nature conservation: determining the “optimal” land use pattern in the agrarian landscape of the MAB biosphere reserve “Mittlere Elbe”</title><author>Hillert, Daniel ; Ahrens, Heinz ; Harth, Michael ; Horlitz, Thomas ; Sander, Achim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fao_agris_US20162230863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Conjoint analysis</topic><topic>conservation scenarios</topic><topic>Environmental Economics and Policy</topic><topic>Land Economics/Use</topic><topic>landscape function</topic><topic>MAB Biophere Reserves</topic><topic>nature conservation models</topic><topic>optimal land use</topic><topic>Repertory Grid technique</topic><topic>riverside protection</topic><topic>utility analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillert, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harth, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horlitz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, Achim</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>German journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillert, Daniel</au><au>Ahrens, Heinz</au><au>Harth, Michael</au><au>Horlitz, Thomas</au><au>Sander, Achim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model-based policy support in nature conservation: determining the “optimal” land use pattern in the agrarian landscape of the MAB biosphere reserve “Mittlere Elbe”</atitle><jtitle>German journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><issn>0002-1121</issn><abstract>Using the example of the MAB Biosphere Preserve “Mittlere Elbe”, this article demonstrates how an “optimal” land-use pattern – a pattern aimed at combining ecological, economic and social objectives in an adequate way – can be determined. The focus is on the definition of alternative nature conservation approaches, the scenario technique, the definition of landscape functions, the utility analysis and the adaptive conjoint analysis. In addition, the authors demonstrate which quantitative methods can be used to obtain the information needed for utility and conjoint analyses on the ecological and economic effects of the conservation scenarios as well as on the weighting of the landscape functions, and how they can be integrated. Finally, it is shown that the conflict between ecological and economic objectives cannot only be reduced by a regional differentiation of the extent of resource protection – as shown in the literature –, but also by a spatial variation of the type of environment conservation.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1121 |
ispartof | German journal of agricultural economics, 2004 |
issn | 0002-1121 |
language | ger |
recordid | cdi_fao_agris_US2016223086 |
source | AgEcon; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Conjoint analysis conservation scenarios Environmental Economics and Policy Land Economics/Use landscape function MAB Biophere Reserves nature conservation models optimal land use Repertory Grid technique riverside protection utility analysis |
title | Model-based policy support in nature conservation: determining the “optimal” land use pattern in the agrarian landscape of the MAB biosphere reserve “Mittlere Elbe” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model-based%20policy%20support%20in%20nature%20conservation:%20determining%20the%20%E2%80%9Coptimal%E2%80%9D%20land%20use%20pattern%20in%20the%20agrarian%20landscape%20of%20the%20MAB%20biosphere%20reserve%20%E2%80%9CMittlere%20Elbe%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=German%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Hillert,%20Daniel&rft.date=2004&rft.issn=0002-1121&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3EUS2016223086%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |