Can we get an operational indicator of forest carbon sequestration? A case study from two forest regions in Spain

Indicators for sustainable forest management are considered to be key tools for the implementation of regional, national and international forest policies. The Montreal process identified the “maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles” as an essential component in sustainable manage...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological indicators 2012-06, Vol.17, p.120-126
Hauptverfasser: Herrero, C, Bravo, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue
container_start_page 120
container_title Ecological indicators
container_volume 17
creator Herrero, C
Bravo, F
description Indicators for sustainable forest management are considered to be key tools for the implementation of regional, national and international forest policies. The Montreal process identified the “maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles” as an essential component in sustainable management of forest ecosystems. Carbon sink evaluations provide reference information to policy-makers, stakeholders, resource managers and concerned citizens about the sustainable use of our forests for present and future generations. Two forest areas in northern and central Spain (‘Páramos y Valles’ and Central Mountain Range) were chosen as pilot areas to test the use of the National Forest Inventory to calculate carbon biomass forest sink at operational level. Data from the Second and Third National Forest Inventory (2NFI and 3NFI, respectively), together with biomass equations were used. Total carbon biomass sink was calculated as a balance between carbon dioxide inputs and outputs in forest biomass. Tree growth between 2NFI and 3NFI, new plots and ingrowth (recruitment and upgrowth) biomass were considered as inputs, while forest harvesting and natural mortality were considered as outputs. In ‘Páramos y Valles’, 2.46MgCO₂ha⁻¹year⁻¹ was fixed in the tree biomass of forest ecosystems from 2NFI to 3NFI, whereas in the Central Mountain Range the fixation was 0.72MgCO₂ha⁻¹year⁻¹ in the period between inventories. The balance of CO₂ in the two areas was positive in 3NFI, with more than four million Mg of CO₂ accumulated in ‘Páramos y Valles’ and more than 72 million Mg of CO₂ fixed in the Central Mountain Range. Forest ecosystems are carbon sinks in the tree biomass in the two areas considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201500162813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201500162813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f179t-6722e2f5cfb19c657eece8071f7d7bed65bf68a505c4c402248f35878b19550a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kN1KAzEQhYMoWKuPIM4L7JpkNz97JaVoFQpe1IJ3JZudLFvqpk1Sim9vpHo1Z4bvHDhDyD2jJaNMPm5LtH43jF3JKWMlrUvK2QWZMK14oWhVX2ZdK1owST-vyU2MW5p9TSMn5DA3I5wQekyQld9jMGnwo9lBDhysST6Ad-B8wJjAmtD6ESIejnk9o08wy_eIENOx-wYX_Bekk_-3BOwzFHMcrPZmGG_JlTO7iHd_c0rWL88f89di-b54m8-WhWOqSYVUnCN3wrqWNVYKhWhRU8Wc6lSLnRStk9oIKmxta8p5rV0ltNIZF4KaakoezrnO-I3pwxA361V-kPjtzjWrqh8D2Fzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can we get an operational indicator of forest carbon sequestration? A case study from two forest regions in Spain</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Herrero, C ; Bravo, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrero, C ; Bravo, F</creatorcontrib><description>Indicators for sustainable forest management are considered to be key tools for the implementation of regional, national and international forest policies. The Montreal process identified the “maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles” as an essential component in sustainable management of forest ecosystems. Carbon sink evaluations provide reference information to policy-makers, stakeholders, resource managers and concerned citizens about the sustainable use of our forests for present and future generations. Two forest areas in northern and central Spain (‘Páramos y Valles’ and Central Mountain Range) were chosen as pilot areas to test the use of the National Forest Inventory to calculate carbon biomass forest sink at operational level. Data from the Second and Third National Forest Inventory (2NFI and 3NFI, respectively), together with biomass equations were used. Total carbon biomass sink was calculated as a balance between carbon dioxide inputs and outputs in forest biomass. Tree growth between 2NFI and 3NFI, new plots and ingrowth (recruitment and upgrowth) biomass were considered as inputs, while forest harvesting and natural mortality were considered as outputs. In ‘Páramos y Valles’, 2.46MgCO₂ha⁻¹year⁻¹ was fixed in the tree biomass of forest ecosystems from 2NFI to 3NFI, whereas in the Central Mountain Range the fixation was 0.72MgCO₂ha⁻¹year⁻¹ in the period between inventories. The balance of CO₂ in the two areas was positive in 3NFI, with more than four million Mg of CO₂ accumulated in ‘Páramos y Valles’ and more than 72 million Mg of CO₂ fixed in the Central Mountain Range. Forest ecosystems are carbon sinks in the tree biomass in the two areas considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-160X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>biomass ; carbon ; carbon dioxide ; carbon sequestration ; carbon sinks ; case studies ; equations ; forest ecosystems ; forest inventory ; forest policy ; forests ; logging ; managers ; mortality ; recruitment ; stakeholders ; sustainable forestry ; tree growth ; trees</subject><ispartof>Ecological indicators, 2012-06, Vol.17, p.120-126</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrero, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravo, F</creatorcontrib><title>Can we get an operational indicator of forest carbon sequestration? A case study from two forest regions in Spain</title><title>Ecological indicators</title><description>Indicators for sustainable forest management are considered to be key tools for the implementation of regional, national and international forest policies. The Montreal process identified the “maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles” as an essential component in sustainable management of forest ecosystems. Carbon sink evaluations provide reference information to policy-makers, stakeholders, resource managers and concerned citizens about the sustainable use of our forests for present and future generations. Two forest areas in northern and central Spain (‘Páramos y Valles’ and Central Mountain Range) were chosen as pilot areas to test the use of the National Forest Inventory to calculate carbon biomass forest sink at operational level. Data from the Second and Third National Forest Inventory (2NFI and 3NFI, respectively), together with biomass equations were used. Total carbon biomass sink was calculated as a balance between carbon dioxide inputs and outputs in forest biomass. Tree growth between 2NFI and 3NFI, new plots and ingrowth (recruitment and upgrowth) biomass were considered as inputs, while forest harvesting and natural mortality were considered as outputs. In ‘Páramos y Valles’, 2.46MgCO₂ha⁻¹year⁻¹ was fixed in the tree biomass of forest ecosystems from 2NFI to 3NFI, whereas in the Central Mountain Range the fixation was 0.72MgCO₂ha⁻¹year⁻¹ in the period between inventories. The balance of CO₂ in the two areas was positive in 3NFI, with more than four million Mg of CO₂ accumulated in ‘Páramos y Valles’ and more than 72 million Mg of CO₂ fixed in the Central Mountain Range. Forest ecosystems are carbon sinks in the tree biomass in the two areas considered.</description><subject>biomass</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>carbon sequestration</subject><subject>carbon sinks</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>equations</subject><subject>forest ecosystems</subject><subject>forest inventory</subject><subject>forest policy</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>logging</subject><subject>managers</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>sustainable forestry</subject><subject>tree growth</subject><subject>trees</subject><issn>1470-160X</issn><issn>1872-7034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kN1KAzEQhYMoWKuPIM4L7JpkNz97JaVoFQpe1IJ3JZudLFvqpk1Sim9vpHo1Z4bvHDhDyD2jJaNMPm5LtH43jF3JKWMlrUvK2QWZMK14oWhVX2ZdK1owST-vyU2MW5p9TSMn5DA3I5wQekyQld9jMGnwo9lBDhysST6Ad-B8wJjAmtD6ESIejnk9o08wy_eIENOx-wYX_Bekk_-3BOwzFHMcrPZmGG_JlTO7iHd_c0rWL88f89di-b54m8-WhWOqSYVUnCN3wrqWNVYKhWhRU8Wc6lSLnRStk9oIKmxta8p5rV0ltNIZF4KaakoezrnO-I3pwxA361V-kPjtzjWrqh8D2Fzg</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Herrero, C</creator><creator>Bravo, F</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Can we get an operational indicator of forest carbon sequestration? A case study from two forest regions in Spain</title><author>Herrero, C ; Bravo, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f179t-6722e2f5cfb19c657eece8071f7d7bed65bf68a505c4c402248f35878b19550a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>biomass</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>carbon sequestration</topic><topic>carbon sinks</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>equations</topic><topic>forest ecosystems</topic><topic>forest inventory</topic><topic>forest policy</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>logging</topic><topic>managers</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>sustainable forestry</topic><topic>tree growth</topic><topic>trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrero, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravo, F</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Ecological indicators</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrero, C</au><au>Bravo, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can we get an operational indicator of forest carbon sequestration? A case study from two forest regions in Spain</atitle><jtitle>Ecological indicators</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><spage>120</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>120-126</pages><issn>1470-160X</issn><eissn>1872-7034</eissn><abstract>Indicators for sustainable forest management are considered to be key tools for the implementation of regional, national and international forest policies. The Montreal process identified the “maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles” as an essential component in sustainable management of forest ecosystems. Carbon sink evaluations provide reference information to policy-makers, stakeholders, resource managers and concerned citizens about the sustainable use of our forests for present and future generations. Two forest areas in northern and central Spain (‘Páramos y Valles’ and Central Mountain Range) were chosen as pilot areas to test the use of the National Forest Inventory to calculate carbon biomass forest sink at operational level. Data from the Second and Third National Forest Inventory (2NFI and 3NFI, respectively), together with biomass equations were used. Total carbon biomass sink was calculated as a balance between carbon dioxide inputs and outputs in forest biomass. Tree growth between 2NFI and 3NFI, new plots and ingrowth (recruitment and upgrowth) biomass were considered as inputs, while forest harvesting and natural mortality were considered as outputs. In ‘Páramos y Valles’, 2.46MgCO₂ha⁻¹year⁻¹ was fixed in the tree biomass of forest ecosystems from 2NFI to 3NFI, whereas in the Central Mountain Range the fixation was 0.72MgCO₂ha⁻¹year⁻¹ in the period between inventories. The balance of CO₂ in the two areas was positive in 3NFI, with more than four million Mg of CO₂ accumulated in ‘Páramos y Valles’ and more than 72 million Mg of CO₂ fixed in the Central Mountain Range. Forest ecosystems are carbon sinks in the tree biomass in the two areas considered.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.021</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-160X
ispartof Ecological indicators, 2012-06, Vol.17, p.120-126
issn 1470-160X
1872-7034
language eng
recordid cdi_fao_agris_US201500162813
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects biomass
carbon
carbon dioxide
carbon sequestration
carbon sinks
case studies
equations
forest ecosystems
forest inventory
forest policy
forests
logging
managers
mortality
recruitment
stakeholders
sustainable forestry
tree growth
trees
title Can we get an operational indicator of forest carbon sequestration? A case study from two forest regions in Spain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A13%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20we%20get%20an%20operational%20indicator%20of%20forest%20carbon%20sequestration?%20A%20case%20study%20from%20two%20forest%20regions%20in%20Spain&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20indicators&rft.au=Herrero,%20C&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=120-126&rft.issn=1470-160X&rft.eissn=1872-7034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.021&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3EUS201500162813%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true