Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees
The study of human and primate altruism faces an evolutionary anomaly: There is ample evidence for altruistic preferences in our own species and growing evidence in monkeys, but one of our closest relatives, the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), is viewed as a reluctant altruist, acting only in response...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2011-08, Vol.108 (33), p.13847-13851 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13851 |
---|---|
container_issue | 33 |
container_start_page | 13847 |
container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Horner, Victoria Carter, J. Devyn Suchak, Malini de Waal, Frans B. M |
description | The study of human and primate altruism faces an evolutionary anomaly: There is ample evidence for altruistic preferences in our own species and growing evidence in monkeys, but one of our closest relatives, the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), is viewed as a reluctant altruist, acting only in response to pressure and solicitation. Although chimpanzee prosocial behavior has been reported both in observational captive studies and in the wild, thus far Prosocial Choice Tests have failed to produce evidence. However, methodologies of previous Prosocial Choice Tests may have handicapped the apes unintentionally. Here we present findings of a paradigm in which chimpanzees chose between two differently colored tokens: one "selfish" token resulting in a reward for the actor only (1/0), and the other "prosocial" token rewarding both the actor and a partner (1/1). Seven female chimpanzees, each tested with three different partners, showed a significant bias for the prosocial option. Prosocial choices occurred both in response to solicitation by the partner and spontaneously without solicitation. However, directed requests and pressure by the partner reduced the actor's prosocial tendency. These results draw into question previous conclusions indicating that chimpanzees have a limited sensitivity to the needs of others and behave prosocially only in response to significant prompting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.1111088108 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201400069026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27979286</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27979286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-cf2c8178c5e063b95ccafa54f222d0c5ea0746e044c559413e3fc4750fcd21a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstLxDAQxoMouj7OntTFi4JUJ68muQgivkDwoJ5DNptql25Tk66gf72pXV31YCAkZH7zMfNNENrGcIxB0JOmNvEYpwVSpr2EBhgUznKmYBkNAIjIJCNsDa3HOAEAxSWsojWCJeFY8AE6um983Zra-VkcNsFHb0tTDe2zL60bjt7SrZw2pn53Lm6ilcJU0W3Nzw30eHnxcH6d3d5d3Zyf3WaWS9VmtiBWYiEtd5DTkeLWmsJwVhBCxpBeDQiWO2DMcq4Ypo4WlgkOhR0TbCjdQKe9bjMbTd3YuroNptJNKKcmvGlvSv07UpfP-sm_aoq5JCRPAgdzgeBfZi62elpG66qq71PL5EmuiBCJPPyXxJwqxgimXVX7f9CJn4U6GfGpp5SgPEEnPWSTlTG44rtqDLqbmO4mphcTSxm7P5v95r9GlIDhHOgyF3JSU6oxlazrYqdHJrH1YSEhlFBEdn7s9fHCeG2eQhn14z0BzNKPyBUkxz4AyoquVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884299735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Horner, Victoria ; Carter, J. Devyn ; Suchak, Malini ; de Waal, Frans B. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Horner, Victoria ; Carter, J. Devyn ; Suchak, Malini ; de Waal, Frans B. M</creatorcontrib><description>The study of human and primate altruism faces an evolutionary anomaly: There is ample evidence for altruistic preferences in our own species and growing evidence in monkeys, but one of our closest relatives, the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), is viewed as a reluctant altruist, acting only in response to pressure and solicitation. Although chimpanzee prosocial behavior has been reported both in observational captive studies and in the wild, thus far Prosocial Choice Tests have failed to produce evidence. However, methodologies of previous Prosocial Choice Tests may have handicapped the apes unintentionally. Here we present findings of a paradigm in which chimpanzees chose between two differently colored tokens: one "selfish" token resulting in a reward for the actor only (1/0), and the other "prosocial" token rewarding both the actor and a partner (1/1). Seven female chimpanzees, each tested with three different partners, showed a significant bias for the prosocial option. Prosocial choices occurred both in response to solicitation by the partner and spontaneously without solicitation. However, directed requests and pressure by the partner reduced the actor's prosocial tendency. These results draw into question previous conclusions indicating that chimpanzees have a limited sensitivity to the needs of others and behave prosocially only in response to significant prompting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111088108</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21825175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal ; Biological altruism ; Biological Sciences ; Chimpanzees ; Choice Behavior ; Evolution ; Experimentation ; Female ; Food consumption ; Humans ; monkeys ; Monkeys & apes ; Pan troglodytes ; Pan troglodytes - psychology ; Primates ; Prosocial behavior ; Research facilities ; Social Behavior</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2011-08, Vol.108 (33), p.13847-13851</ispartof><rights>copyright © 1993–2008 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Aug 16, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-cf2c8178c5e063b95ccafa54f222d0c5ea0746e044c559413e3fc4750fcd21a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-cf2c8178c5e063b95ccafa54f222d0c5ea0746e044c559413e3fc4750fcd21a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/108/33.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27979286$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27979286$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,801,883,27911,27912,53778,53780,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21825175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horner, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, J. Devyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suchak, Malini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Waal, Frans B. M</creatorcontrib><title>Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>The study of human and primate altruism faces an evolutionary anomaly: There is ample evidence for altruistic preferences in our own species and growing evidence in monkeys, but one of our closest relatives, the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), is viewed as a reluctant altruist, acting only in response to pressure and solicitation. Although chimpanzee prosocial behavior has been reported both in observational captive studies and in the wild, thus far Prosocial Choice Tests have failed to produce evidence. However, methodologies of previous Prosocial Choice Tests may have handicapped the apes unintentionally. Here we present findings of a paradigm in which chimpanzees chose between two differently colored tokens: one "selfish" token resulting in a reward for the actor only (1/0), and the other "prosocial" token rewarding both the actor and a partner (1/1). Seven female chimpanzees, each tested with three different partners, showed a significant bias for the prosocial option. Prosocial choices occurred both in response to solicitation by the partner and spontaneously without solicitation. However, directed requests and pressure by the partner reduced the actor's prosocial tendency. These results draw into question previous conclusions indicating that chimpanzees have a limited sensitivity to the needs of others and behave prosocially only in response to significant prompting.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Biological altruism</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Chimpanzees</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>monkeys</subject><subject>Monkeys & apes</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes - psychology</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Prosocial behavior</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstLxDAQxoMouj7OntTFi4JUJ68muQgivkDwoJ5DNptql25Tk66gf72pXV31YCAkZH7zMfNNENrGcIxB0JOmNvEYpwVSpr2EBhgUznKmYBkNAIjIJCNsDa3HOAEAxSWsojWCJeFY8AE6um983Zra-VkcNsFHb0tTDe2zL60bjt7SrZw2pn53Lm6ilcJU0W3Nzw30eHnxcH6d3d5d3Zyf3WaWS9VmtiBWYiEtd5DTkeLWmsJwVhBCxpBeDQiWO2DMcq4Ypo4WlgkOhR0TbCjdQKe9bjMbTd3YuroNptJNKKcmvGlvSv07UpfP-sm_aoq5JCRPAgdzgeBfZi62elpG66qq71PL5EmuiBCJPPyXxJwqxgimXVX7f9CJn4U6GfGpp5SgPEEnPWSTlTG44rtqDLqbmO4mphcTSxm7P5v95r9GlIDhHOgyF3JSU6oxlazrYqdHJrH1YSEhlFBEdn7s9fHCeG2eQhn14z0BzNKPyBUkxz4AyoquVQ</recordid><startdate>20110816</startdate><enddate>20110816</enddate><creator>Horner, Victoria</creator><creator>Carter, J. Devyn</creator><creator>Suchak, Malini</creator><creator>de Waal, Frans B. M</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110816</creationdate><title>Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees</title><author>Horner, Victoria ; Carter, J. Devyn ; Suchak, Malini ; de Waal, Frans B. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-cf2c8178c5e063b95ccafa54f222d0c5ea0746e044c559413e3fc4750fcd21a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Biological altruism</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Chimpanzees</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>monkeys</topic><topic>Monkeys & apes</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes - psychology</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Prosocial behavior</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horner, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, J. Devyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suchak, Malini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Waal, Frans B. M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horner, Victoria</au><au>Carter, J. Devyn</au><au>Suchak, Malini</au><au>de Waal, Frans B. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2011-08-16</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>33</issue><spage>13847</spage><epage>13851</epage><pages>13847-13851</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>The study of human and primate altruism faces an evolutionary anomaly: There is ample evidence for altruistic preferences in our own species and growing evidence in monkeys, but one of our closest relatives, the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), is viewed as a reluctant altruist, acting only in response to pressure and solicitation. Although chimpanzee prosocial behavior has been reported both in observational captive studies and in the wild, thus far Prosocial Choice Tests have failed to produce evidence. However, methodologies of previous Prosocial Choice Tests may have handicapped the apes unintentionally. Here we present findings of a paradigm in which chimpanzees chose between two differently colored tokens: one "selfish" token resulting in a reward for the actor only (1/0), and the other "prosocial" token rewarding both the actor and a partner (1/1). Seven female chimpanzees, each tested with three different partners, showed a significant bias for the prosocial option. Prosocial choices occurred both in response to solicitation by the partner and spontaneously without solicitation. However, directed requests and pressure by the partner reduced the actor's prosocial tendency. These results draw into question previous conclusions indicating that chimpanzees have a limited sensitivity to the needs of others and behave prosocially only in response to significant prompting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>21825175</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1111088108</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8424 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2011-08, Vol.108 (33), p.13847-13851 |
issn | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_fao_agris_US201400069026 |
source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Altruism Animal behavior Animal cognition Animals Behavior, Animal Biological altruism Biological Sciences Chimpanzees Choice Behavior Evolution Experimentation Female Food consumption Humans monkeys Monkeys & apes Pan troglodytes Pan troglodytes - psychology Primates Prosocial behavior Research facilities Social Behavior |
title | Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spontaneous%20prosocial%20choice%20by%20chimpanzees&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Horner,%20Victoria&rft.date=2011-08-16&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=33&rft.spage=13847&rft.epage=13851&rft.pages=13847-13851&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1111088108&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_fao_a%3E27979286%3C/jstor_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884299735&rft_id=info:pmid/21825175&rft_jstor_id=27979286&rfr_iscdi=true |