role of impact statements in environmental planning in Britain

Environmental Impact Statements have been required in the United States for "major federal projects likely to have significant effects on the human environment"; since the National Environmental Policy Act became law on 1st January 1970. In most states private developments are excluded fro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental studies 1976, Vol.9 (3), p.165-168
1. Verfasser: Wathern, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 168
container_issue 3
container_start_page 165
container_title International journal of environmental studies
container_volume 9
creator Wathern, P
description Environmental Impact Statements have been required in the United States for "major federal projects likely to have significant effects on the human environment"; since the National Environmental Policy Act became law on 1st January 1970. In most states private developments are excluded from impact analysis even though their effects may be equally profound. Only environmental factors are considered, yet in many instances, the major impacts of development have been social, particularly in sparsely populated areas. The major cirticism of impact analysis in the United States is that impact statements are not used as the factual basis for planning decisions, but simply seek to justify decisions already taken. As impact analysis is extending into British planning on an ad hoc basis, careful consideration must be given to their role.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00207237608737624
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201302981068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201302981068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-de3488c972337faaceb5d6a523a979d295445f832231b25aa4411838473f98263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KxDAQhYMouK4-gFf2BaqTn6YpiKCLf7Dghe51mG2TJdImJQnKvr0t653gXMwwnPMNwyHkksI1BQU3AAxqxmsJqp46E0dkQYE1JQiAY7KY9XIy8FNyltInTCWlXJC7GHpTBFu4YcQ2FyljNoPxORXOF8Z_uRj8vGNfjD167_xuVh6iy-j8OTmx2Cdz8TuXZPP0-LF6Kddvz6-r-3XZsprlsjNcKNU28wO1RWzNtuokVoxjUzcdayohKqs4Y5xuWYUoBKWKK1Fz2ygm-ZLQw902hpSisXqMbsC41xT0HID-E8DE3B4Y522IA36H2Hc6474P0Ub0rUua_4dfHXCLQeMuTu7NOwPKp1QVBan4DwYoaHE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>role of impact statements in environmental planning in Britain</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Wathern, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Wathern, P</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental Impact Statements have been required in the United States for "major federal projects likely to have significant effects on the human environment"; since the National Environmental Policy Act became law on 1st January 1970. In most states private developments are excluded from impact analysis even though their effects may be equally profound. Only environmental factors are considered, yet in many instances, the major impacts of development have been social, particularly in sparsely populated areas. The major cirticism of impact analysis in the United States is that impact statements are not used as the factual basis for planning decisions, but simply seek to justify decisions already taken. As impact analysis is extending into British planning on an ad hoc basis, careful consideration must be given to their role.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1029-0400</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00207237608737624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>International journal of environmental studies, 1976, Vol.9 (3), p.165-168</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1976</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00207237608737624$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207237608737624$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wathern, P</creatorcontrib><title>role of impact statements in environmental planning in Britain</title><title>International journal of environmental studies</title><description>Environmental Impact Statements have been required in the United States for "major federal projects likely to have significant effects on the human environment"; since the National Environmental Policy Act became law on 1st January 1970. In most states private developments are excluded from impact analysis even though their effects may be equally profound. Only environmental factors are considered, yet in many instances, the major impacts of development have been social, particularly in sparsely populated areas. The major cirticism of impact analysis in the United States is that impact statements are not used as the factual basis for planning decisions, but simply seek to justify decisions already taken. As impact analysis is extending into British planning on an ad hoc basis, careful consideration must be given to their role.</description><issn>0020-7233</issn><issn>1029-0400</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KxDAQhYMouK4-gFf2BaqTn6YpiKCLf7Dghe51mG2TJdImJQnKvr0t653gXMwwnPMNwyHkksI1BQU3AAxqxmsJqp46E0dkQYE1JQiAY7KY9XIy8FNyltInTCWlXJC7GHpTBFu4YcQ2FyljNoPxORXOF8Z_uRj8vGNfjD167_xuVh6iy-j8OTmx2Cdz8TuXZPP0-LF6Kddvz6-r-3XZsprlsjNcKNU28wO1RWzNtuokVoxjUzcdayohKqs4Y5xuWYUoBKWKK1Fz2ygm-ZLQw902hpSisXqMbsC41xT0HID-E8DE3B4Y522IA36H2Hc6474P0Ub0rUua_4dfHXCLQeMuTu7NOwPKp1QVBan4DwYoaHE</recordid><startdate>1976</startdate><enddate>1976</enddate><creator>Wathern, P</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1976</creationdate><title>role of impact statements in environmental planning in Britain</title><author>Wathern, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-de3488c972337faaceb5d6a523a979d295445f832231b25aa4411838473f98263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wathern, P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wathern, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>role of impact statements in environmental planning in Britain</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental studies</jtitle><date>1976</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>165-168</pages><issn>0020-7233</issn><eissn>1029-0400</eissn><abstract>Environmental Impact Statements have been required in the United States for "major federal projects likely to have significant effects on the human environment"; since the National Environmental Policy Act became law on 1st January 1970. In most states private developments are excluded from impact analysis even though their effects may be equally profound. Only environmental factors are considered, yet in many instances, the major impacts of development have been social, particularly in sparsely populated areas. The major cirticism of impact analysis in the United States is that impact statements are not used as the factual basis for planning decisions, but simply seek to justify decisions already taken. As impact analysis is extending into British planning on an ad hoc basis, careful consideration must be given to their role.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00207237608737624</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7233
ispartof International journal of environmental studies, 1976, Vol.9 (3), p.165-168
issn 0020-7233
1029-0400
language eng
recordid cdi_fao_agris_US201302981068
source Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)
title role of impact statements in environmental planning in Britain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A37%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=role%20of%20impact%20statements%20in%20environmental%20planning%20in%20Britain&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20studies&rft.au=Wathern,%20P&rft.date=1976&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=165-168&rft.issn=0020-7233&rft.eissn=1029-0400&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00207237608737624&rft_dat=%3Cfao_infor%3EUS201302981068%3C/fao_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true