Deep loosening of clay loam subsoil in a moist climate and some effect of traffic management

Two experiments on the same site in different years compared the effects of different intensities of deep loosening on soil properties and crop yield. Both experiments included subsoiling and one experiment, with potatoes, also included double digging and a comparison of conventional and zero traffi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil use and management 1992, Vol.8 (2), p.60-67
1. Verfasser: O'Sullivan, M.F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 2
container_start_page 60
container_title Soil use and management
container_volume 8
creator O'Sullivan, M.F
description Two experiments on the same site in different years compared the effects of different intensities of deep loosening on soil properties and crop yield. Both experiments included subsoiling and one experiment, with potatoes, also included double digging and a comparison of conventional and zero traffic. The site was in a moist climate area (S.E. Scotland) on an imperfectly drained Gleysol with a clay loam subsoil. Cone resistance, soil water content and potential, bulk density and crop yield were measured to assess the effects of the treatments. Subsoiling did not loosen the soil very effectively because the subsoil was wetter than the plastic limit at the time of cultivation, even though the growing season prior to subsoiling was drier than average in both years. Double digging was more effective than subsoiling. Zero traffic gave a large yield benefit, especially when combined with double digging. There was no crop response to deep loosening in the presence of conventional traffic. Deep loosening had little effect on the drainage status of the topsoil.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201301781248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301781248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fao_agris_US2013017812483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFi8sKwjAQRYMoWB_f4PxAIY_adu8D9-pOKGOdlEiTSCcu_HsV3Lu6cM65I5GpolrnuirMWGRSl2UupdFTMWO-S6lVVcpMXLZED-hjZAoudBAttD2-PgQ98PPK0fXgAiD46Dh9pPOYCDDcgKMnIGupTd9fGtBa14LHgB15CmkhJhZ7puVv52K13502h9xibLAbHDfno5bKSFXVShe1-V-8AQbzPtk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep loosening of clay loam subsoil in a moist climate and some effect of traffic management</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>O'Sullivan, M.F</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, M.F</creatorcontrib><description>Two experiments on the same site in different years compared the effects of different intensities of deep loosening on soil properties and crop yield. Both experiments included subsoiling and one experiment, with potatoes, also included double digging and a comparison of conventional and zero traffic. The site was in a moist climate area (S.E. Scotland) on an imperfectly drained Gleysol with a clay loam subsoil. Cone resistance, soil water content and potential, bulk density and crop yield were measured to assess the effects of the treatments. Subsoiling did not loosen the soil very effectively because the subsoil was wetter than the plastic limit at the time of cultivation, even though the growing season prior to subsoiling was drier than average in both years. Double digging was more effective than subsoiling. Zero traffic gave a large yield benefit, especially when combined with double digging. There was no crop response to deep loosening in the presence of conventional traffic. Deep loosening had little effect on the drainage status of the topsoil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-0032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2743</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>bulk density ; clay loam soils ; climatic factors ; crop yield ; loosening ; soil mechanics ; soil water content ; soil water potential ; subsoil ; traffic</subject><ispartof>Soil use and management, 1992, Vol.8 (2), p.60-67</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, M.F</creatorcontrib><title>Deep loosening of clay loam subsoil in a moist climate and some effect of traffic management</title><title>Soil use and management</title><description>Two experiments on the same site in different years compared the effects of different intensities of deep loosening on soil properties and crop yield. Both experiments included subsoiling and one experiment, with potatoes, also included double digging and a comparison of conventional and zero traffic. The site was in a moist climate area (S.E. Scotland) on an imperfectly drained Gleysol with a clay loam subsoil. Cone resistance, soil water content and potential, bulk density and crop yield were measured to assess the effects of the treatments. Subsoiling did not loosen the soil very effectively because the subsoil was wetter than the plastic limit at the time of cultivation, even though the growing season prior to subsoiling was drier than average in both years. Double digging was more effective than subsoiling. Zero traffic gave a large yield benefit, especially when combined with double digging. There was no crop response to deep loosening in the presence of conventional traffic. Deep loosening had little effect on the drainage status of the topsoil.</description><subject>bulk density</subject><subject>clay loam soils</subject><subject>climatic factors</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>loosening</subject><subject>soil mechanics</subject><subject>soil water content</subject><subject>soil water potential</subject><subject>subsoil</subject><subject>traffic</subject><issn>0266-0032</issn><issn>1475-2743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFi8sKwjAQRYMoWB_f4PxAIY_adu8D9-pOKGOdlEiTSCcu_HsV3Lu6cM65I5GpolrnuirMWGRSl2UupdFTMWO-S6lVVcpMXLZED-hjZAoudBAttD2-PgQ98PPK0fXgAiD46Dh9pPOYCDDcgKMnIGupTd9fGtBa14LHgB15CmkhJhZ7puVv52K13502h9xibLAbHDfno5bKSFXVShe1-V-8AQbzPtk</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>O'Sullivan, M.F</creator><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Deep loosening of clay loam subsoil in a moist climate and some effect of traffic management</title><author>O'Sullivan, M.F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fao_agris_US2013017812483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>bulk density</topic><topic>clay loam soils</topic><topic>climatic factors</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>loosening</topic><topic>soil mechanics</topic><topic>soil water content</topic><topic>soil water potential</topic><topic>subsoil</topic><topic>traffic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, M.F</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Soil use and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Sullivan, M.F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep loosening of clay loam subsoil in a moist climate and some effect of traffic management</atitle><jtitle>Soil use and management</jtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>60-67</pages><issn>0266-0032</issn><eissn>1475-2743</eissn><abstract>Two experiments on the same site in different years compared the effects of different intensities of deep loosening on soil properties and crop yield. Both experiments included subsoiling and one experiment, with potatoes, also included double digging and a comparison of conventional and zero traffic. The site was in a moist climate area (S.E. Scotland) on an imperfectly drained Gleysol with a clay loam subsoil. Cone resistance, soil water content and potential, bulk density and crop yield were measured to assess the effects of the treatments. Subsoiling did not loosen the soil very effectively because the subsoil was wetter than the plastic limit at the time of cultivation, even though the growing season prior to subsoiling was drier than average in both years. Double digging was more effective than subsoiling. Zero traffic gave a large yield benefit, especially when combined with double digging. There was no crop response to deep loosening in the presence of conventional traffic. Deep loosening had little effect on the drainage status of the topsoil.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-0032
ispartof Soil use and management, 1992, Vol.8 (2), p.60-67
issn 0266-0032
1475-2743
language eng
recordid cdi_fao_agris_US201301781248
source Wiley Journals
subjects bulk density
clay loam soils
climatic factors
crop yield
loosening
soil mechanics
soil water content
soil water potential
subsoil
traffic
title Deep loosening of clay loam subsoil in a moist climate and some effect of traffic management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A41%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20loosening%20of%20clay%20loam%20subsoil%20in%20a%20moist%20climate%20and%20some%20effect%20of%20traffic%20management&rft.jtitle=Soil%20use%20and%20management&rft.au=O'Sullivan,%20M.F&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=60-67&rft.issn=0266-0032&rft.eissn=1475-2743&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3EUS201301781248%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true