Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis
A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tree physiology 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.417-421 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 421 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 417 |
container_title | Tree physiology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Svenson, S.E Davies, F.T. Jr |
description | A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.94) were found between surface area estimated in this way and surface area calculated (a) from needle displacement, also on the assumption that needles are segments of a cylinder, and (b) from needle dry weight using a regression between dry weight and surface area estimated from needle displacement. The caliper-radius method gave slightly lower estimates of surface area than the other methods. However, differences among surface area estimates made with the three methods and between estimates made on water-stressed and fully hydrated needles were small relative to variances of leaf gas exchange measurements. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201301763082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301763082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fao_agris_US2013017630823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj81qAjEUhUNpoVPrM_S-wEDi-JNZi8W9FrqTi7nJRDKJ5Ebq7PvgjrR7V2dxPj7OeRKVWi10PZ8v22dRST1r60bp71fxxnySUi20bivxu079GbPnFCFZ6Kl0yTDYlIG4-B6Ljw74ki0eCTAT3rEfLJRrLpmYyQBGA_YSwgDdYPLYwdlHgkhkAgGT6ymWP6lDBroeO4xu1EUMA3t-Fy8WA9P0Pyfi43OzX29ri-mAblx3-NrNpGqkWi2b8UrzmLgBjG9PNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Svenson, S.E ; Davies, F.T. Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>Svenson, S.E ; Davies, F.T. Jr</creatorcontrib><description>A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.94) were found between surface area estimated in this way and surface area calculated (a) from needle displacement, also on the assumption that needles are segments of a cylinder, and (b) from needle dry weight using a regression between dry weight and surface area estimated from needle displacement. The caliper-radius method gave slightly lower estimates of surface area than the other methods. However, differences among surface area estimates made with the three methods and between estimates made on water-stressed and fully hydrated needles were small relative to variances of leaf gas exchange measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0829-318X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4469</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>conifer needles ; drought ; gas exchange ; hydration ; measurement ; Pinus taeda ; provenance ; surface area ; water stress</subject><ispartof>Tree physiology, 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.417-421</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Svenson, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, F.T. Jr</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis</title><title>Tree physiology</title><description>A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.94) were found between surface area estimated in this way and surface area calculated (a) from needle displacement, also on the assumption that needles are segments of a cylinder, and (b) from needle dry weight using a regression between dry weight and surface area estimated from needle displacement. The caliper-radius method gave slightly lower estimates of surface area than the other methods. However, differences among surface area estimates made with the three methods and between estimates made on water-stressed and fully hydrated needles were small relative to variances of leaf gas exchange measurements.</description><subject>conifer needles</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>gas exchange</subject><subject>hydration</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>Pinus taeda</subject><subject>provenance</subject><subject>surface area</subject><subject>water stress</subject><issn>0829-318X</issn><issn>1758-4469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj81qAjEUhUNpoVPrM_S-wEDi-JNZi8W9FrqTi7nJRDKJ5Ebq7PvgjrR7V2dxPj7OeRKVWi10PZ8v22dRST1r60bp71fxxnySUi20bivxu079GbPnFCFZ6Kl0yTDYlIG4-B6Ljw74ki0eCTAT3rEfLJRrLpmYyQBGA_YSwgDdYPLYwdlHgkhkAgGT6ymWP6lDBroeO4xu1EUMA3t-Fy8WA9P0Pyfi43OzX29ri-mAblx3-NrNpGqkWi2b8UrzmLgBjG9PNw</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>Svenson, S.E</creator><creator>Davies, F.T. Jr</creator><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis</title><author>Svenson, S.E ; Davies, F.T. Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fao_agris_US2013017630823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>conifer needles</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>gas exchange</topic><topic>hydration</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>Pinus taeda</topic><topic>provenance</topic><topic>surface area</topic><topic>water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Svenson, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, F.T. Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Tree physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Svenson, S.E</au><au>Davies, F.T. Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis</atitle><jtitle>Tree physiology</jtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>417-421</pages><issn>0829-318X</issn><eissn>1758-4469</eissn><abstract>A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.94) were found between surface area estimated in this way and surface area calculated (a) from needle displacement, also on the assumption that needles are segments of a cylinder, and (b) from needle dry weight using a regression between dry weight and surface area estimated from needle displacement. The caliper-radius method gave slightly lower estimates of surface area than the other methods. However, differences among surface area estimates made with the three methods and between estimates made on water-stressed and fully hydrated needles were small relative to variances of leaf gas exchange measurements.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0829-318X |
ispartof | Tree physiology, 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.417-421 |
issn | 0829-318X 1758-4469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_fao_agris_US201301763082 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy |
subjects | conifer needles drought gas exchange hydration measurement Pinus taeda provenance surface area water stress |
title | Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20methods%20for%20estimating%20surface%20area%20of%20water-stressed%20and%20fully%20hydrate%20pine%20needle%20segments%20for%20gas%20exchange%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Tree%20physiology&rft.au=Svenson,%20S.E&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=417-421&rft.issn=0829-318X&rft.eissn=1758-4469&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3EUS201301763082%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |