Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis

A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tree physiology 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.417-421
Hauptverfasser: Svenson, S.E, Davies, F.T. Jr
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 421
container_issue 4
container_start_page 417
container_title Tree physiology
container_volume 10
creator Svenson, S.E
Davies, F.T. Jr
description A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.94) were found between surface area estimated in this way and surface area calculated (a) from needle displacement, also on the assumption that needles are segments of a cylinder, and (b) from needle dry weight using a regression between dry weight and surface area estimated from needle displacement. The caliper-radius method gave slightly lower estimates of surface area than the other methods. However, differences among surface area estimates made with the three methods and between estimates made on water-stressed and fully hydrated needles were small relative to variances of leaf gas exchange measurements.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201301763082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301763082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fao_agris_US2013017630823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj81qAjEUhUNpoVPrM_S-wEDi-JNZi8W9FrqTi7nJRDKJ5Ebq7PvgjrR7V2dxPj7OeRKVWi10PZ8v22dRST1r60bp71fxxnySUi20bivxu079GbPnFCFZ6Kl0yTDYlIG4-B6Ljw74ki0eCTAT3rEfLJRrLpmYyQBGA_YSwgDdYPLYwdlHgkhkAgGT6ymWP6lDBroeO4xu1EUMA3t-Fy8WA9P0Pyfi43OzX29ri-mAblx3-NrNpGqkWi2b8UrzmLgBjG9PNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Svenson, S.E ; Davies, F.T. Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>Svenson, S.E ; Davies, F.T. Jr</creatorcontrib><description>A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.94) were found between surface area estimated in this way and surface area calculated (a) from needle displacement, also on the assumption that needles are segments of a cylinder, and (b) from needle dry weight using a regression between dry weight and surface area estimated from needle displacement. The caliper-radius method gave slightly lower estimates of surface area than the other methods. However, differences among surface area estimates made with the three methods and between estimates made on water-stressed and fully hydrated needles were small relative to variances of leaf gas exchange measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0829-318X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4469</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>conifer needles ; drought ; gas exchange ; hydration ; measurement ; Pinus taeda ; provenance ; surface area ; water stress</subject><ispartof>Tree physiology, 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.417-421</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Svenson, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, F.T. Jr</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis</title><title>Tree physiology</title><description>A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.94) were found between surface area estimated in this way and surface area calculated (a) from needle displacement, also on the assumption that needles are segments of a cylinder, and (b) from needle dry weight using a regression between dry weight and surface area estimated from needle displacement. The caliper-radius method gave slightly lower estimates of surface area than the other methods. However, differences among surface area estimates made with the three methods and between estimates made on water-stressed and fully hydrated needles were small relative to variances of leaf gas exchange measurements.</description><subject>conifer needles</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>gas exchange</subject><subject>hydration</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>Pinus taeda</subject><subject>provenance</subject><subject>surface area</subject><subject>water stress</subject><issn>0829-318X</issn><issn>1758-4469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj81qAjEUhUNpoVPrM_S-wEDi-JNZi8W9FrqTi7nJRDKJ5Ebq7PvgjrR7V2dxPj7OeRKVWi10PZ8v22dRST1r60bp71fxxnySUi20bivxu079GbPnFCFZ6Kl0yTDYlIG4-B6Ljw74ki0eCTAT3rEfLJRrLpmYyQBGA_YSwgDdYPLYwdlHgkhkAgGT6ymWP6lDBroeO4xu1EUMA3t-Fy8WA9P0Pyfi43OzX29ri-mAblx3-NrNpGqkWi2b8UrzmLgBjG9PNw</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>Svenson, S.E</creator><creator>Davies, F.T. Jr</creator><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis</title><author>Svenson, S.E ; Davies, F.T. Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fao_agris_US2013017630823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>conifer needles</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>gas exchange</topic><topic>hydration</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>Pinus taeda</topic><topic>provenance</topic><topic>surface area</topic><topic>water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Svenson, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, F.T. Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Tree physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Svenson, S.E</au><au>Davies, F.T. Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis</atitle><jtitle>Tree physiology</jtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>417-421</pages><issn>0829-318X</issn><eissn>1758-4469</eissn><abstract>A nondestructive technique for repeatedly estimating total surface area of water-stressed pine (Pinus taeda L.) fascicle segments was evaluated. Fascicle radius was measured with a digital caliper and needle surface area calculated on the assumption that the needles were segments of a cylinder. High correlations (r greater than or equal to 0.94) were found between surface area estimated in this way and surface area calculated (a) from needle displacement, also on the assumption that needles are segments of a cylinder, and (b) from needle dry weight using a regression between dry weight and surface area estimated from needle displacement. The caliper-radius method gave slightly lower estimates of surface area than the other methods. However, differences among surface area estimates made with the three methods and between estimates made on water-stressed and fully hydrated needles were small relative to variances of leaf gas exchange measurements.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0829-318X
ispartof Tree physiology, 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.417-421
issn 0829-318X
1758-4469
language eng
recordid cdi_fao_agris_US201301763082
source Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy
subjects conifer needles
drought
gas exchange
hydration
measurement
Pinus taeda
provenance
surface area
water stress
title Comparison of methods for estimating surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrate pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20methods%20for%20estimating%20surface%20area%20of%20water-stressed%20and%20fully%20hydrate%20pine%20needle%20segments%20for%20gas%20exchange%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Tree%20physiology&rft.au=Svenson,%20S.E&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=417-421&rft.issn=0829-318X&rft.eissn=1758-4469&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3EUS201301763082%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true