Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management
Policy-makers and managers in natural resource management (NRM) often complain that researchers are out of touch. Researchers often complain that policy-makers and managers make poorly informed decisions. In this article, we report on a meeting between researchers, policy-makers and managers convene...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological management & restoration 2008-12, Vol.9 (3), p.182-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 182 |
container_title | Ecological management & restoration |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Gibbons, Philip Zammit, Charlie Youngentob, Kara Possingham, Hugh P. Lindenmayer, David B. Bekessy, Sarah Burgman, Mark Colyvan, Mark Considine, Margaret Felton, Adam Hobbs, Richard J. Hurley, Karen McAlpine, Clive McCarthy, Michael A. Moore, Joslin Robinson, Doug Salt, David Wintle, Brendan |
description | Policy-makers and managers in natural resource management (NRM) often complain that researchers are out of touch. Researchers often complain that policy-makers and managers make poorly informed decisions. In this article, we report on a meeting between researchers, policy-makers and managers convened to identify practical solutions to improve engagement between these camps. A necessary starting point is that every researcher and policy-maker should understand, and tap into, the motivations and reward systems of the other when seeking engagement. For example, researchers can be motivated to engage in policy development if there is a promise of outputs that align with their reward systems such as co-authored publications. Successful research-policy partnerships are built around personal relationships. As a researcher, you cannot therefore expect your results to inform policy by only publishing in journals. As a policy-maker, you cannot guarantee engagement from researchers by publicly inviting comment on a document. Actively building and maintaining relationships with key individuals through discussions, meetings, workshops or field days will increase the likelihood that research outcomes will inform policy decisions. We identified secondments, sabbaticals, fellowships and 'buddies', an annual national NRM conference and 'contact mapping' (a Facebook-type network) as forums that can catalyse new relationships between researchers and policy-makers. We challenge every researcher, policy-maker and manager in NRM to build one new cross-cultural relationship each year. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00416.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201301569027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.200903820</informt_id><sourcerecordid>20292750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-3e4062c0cda553a2c6d29715f6d12b637f1af5819ed47e7b4aede2e682fed9503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEEqXwG7A4cMvij8RJJC6odAtSKRL9AHEZeZ1J6m1iB9tLd_89TlNx4IQvHo2f99WM3ywjjK5YOu-2K1YUPK8bKlac0npFacHkav8kO2K1aHIhBH2a6hmqKGXPsxchbFNRCdkcZftLNyKZvNLRaDWQsOt7DNE4G0jnPDHj5N1vY3uCtlc9jmgj2WC8R7TEY0Dl9S36QJRtyeQGow_5qO7mjrHEqrjzyTWBbuc1klHZR5OX2bNODQFfPd7H2fX69OrkU37-9ezzyYfzXBeMylxgQSXXVLeqLIXiWra8qVjZyZbxjRRVx1RX1qzBtqiw2hQKW-Qoa95h25RUHGdvF9-0x69dWg1GEzQOg7LodgE45Q2vHsA3_4DbNLNNswFnjeQVLXiC6gXS3oXgsYPJm1H5AzAKcx6whfmrYc4D5jzgIQ_YJ-n7RXpvBjz8tw5Ov3xLRZKvF7kfTQQ1qS7CbYxTgFZFBcamtOYX53tonZl9hUgGBocEz5bJuebznvliZELE_d85lL8DWYmqhO8XZ_Dz5uai_nG1ho-Jf73wnXKgem8CXF9yygRlpWwor8QfI9bErw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219627042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Gibbons, Philip ; Zammit, Charlie ; Youngentob, Kara ; Possingham, Hugh P. ; Lindenmayer, David B. ; Bekessy, Sarah ; Burgman, Mark ; Colyvan, Mark ; Considine, Margaret ; Felton, Adam ; Hobbs, Richard J. ; Hurley, Karen ; McAlpine, Clive ; McCarthy, Michael A. ; Moore, Joslin ; Robinson, Doug ; Salt, David ; Wintle, Brendan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Philip ; Zammit, Charlie ; Youngentob, Kara ; Possingham, Hugh P. ; Lindenmayer, David B. ; Bekessy, Sarah ; Burgman, Mark ; Colyvan, Mark ; Considine, Margaret ; Felton, Adam ; Hobbs, Richard J. ; Hurley, Karen ; McAlpine, Clive ; McCarthy, Michael A. ; Moore, Joslin ; Robinson, Doug ; Salt, David ; Wintle, Brendan</creatorcontrib><description>Policy-makers and managers in natural resource management (NRM) often complain that researchers are out of touch. Researchers often complain that policy-makers and managers make poorly informed decisions. In this article, we report on a meeting between researchers, policy-makers and managers convened to identify practical solutions to improve engagement between these camps. A necessary starting point is that every researcher and policy-maker should understand, and tap into, the motivations and reward systems of the other when seeking engagement. For example, researchers can be motivated to engage in policy development if there is a promise of outputs that align with their reward systems such as co-authored publications. Successful research-policy partnerships are built around personal relationships. As a researcher, you cannot therefore expect your results to inform policy by only publishing in journals. As a policy-maker, you cannot guarantee engagement from researchers by publicly inviting comment on a document. Actively building and maintaining relationships with key individuals through discussions, meetings, workshops or field days will increase the likelihood that research outcomes will inform policy decisions. We identified secondments, sabbaticals, fellowships and 'buddies', an annual national NRM conference and 'contact mapping' (a Facebook-type network) as forums that can catalyse new relationships between researchers and policy-makers. We challenge every researcher, policy-maker and manager in NRM to build one new cross-cultural relationship each year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-7001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-3330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-8903</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00416.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne, Australia : Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Australia: Economic policy ; Communication ; Cooperation ; Environmental management ; Environmental policy ; issues and policy ; Knowledge transfer ; Motivation ; Partnerships ; policy ; Publishing ; Resource management ; science ; Scientific research</subject><ispartof>Ecological management & restoration, 2008-12, Vol.9 (3), p.182-186</ispartof><rights>2008 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2008 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-3e4062c0cda553a2c6d29715f6d12b637f1af5819ed47e7b4aede2e682fed9503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-3e4062c0cda553a2c6d29715f6d12b637f1af5819ed47e7b4aede2e682fed9503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1442-8903.2008.00416.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1442-8903.2008.00416.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammit, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youngentob, Kara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possingham, Hugh P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgman, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colyvan, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Considine, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felton, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, Clive</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Joslin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintle, Brendan</creatorcontrib><title>Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management</title><title>Ecological management & restoration</title><description>Policy-makers and managers in natural resource management (NRM) often complain that researchers are out of touch. Researchers often complain that policy-makers and managers make poorly informed decisions. In this article, we report on a meeting between researchers, policy-makers and managers convened to identify practical solutions to improve engagement between these camps. A necessary starting point is that every researcher and policy-maker should understand, and tap into, the motivations and reward systems of the other when seeking engagement. For example, researchers can be motivated to engage in policy development if there is a promise of outputs that align with their reward systems such as co-authored publications. Successful research-policy partnerships are built around personal relationships. As a researcher, you cannot therefore expect your results to inform policy by only publishing in journals. As a policy-maker, you cannot guarantee engagement from researchers by publicly inviting comment on a document. Actively building and maintaining relationships with key individuals through discussions, meetings, workshops or field days will increase the likelihood that research outcomes will inform policy decisions. We identified secondments, sabbaticals, fellowships and 'buddies', an annual national NRM conference and 'contact mapping' (a Facebook-type network) as forums that can catalyse new relationships between researchers and policy-makers. We challenge every researcher, policy-maker and manager in NRM to build one new cross-cultural relationship each year.</description><subject>Australia: Economic policy</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Knowledge transfer</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>science</subject><subject>Scientific research</subject><issn>1442-7001</issn><issn>1839-3330</issn><issn>1442-8903</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEEqXwG7A4cMvij8RJJC6odAtSKRL9AHEZeZ1J6m1iB9tLd_89TlNx4IQvHo2f99WM3ywjjK5YOu-2K1YUPK8bKlac0npFacHkav8kO2K1aHIhBH2a6hmqKGXPsxchbFNRCdkcZftLNyKZvNLRaDWQsOt7DNE4G0jnPDHj5N1vY3uCtlc9jmgj2WC8R7TEY0Dl9S36QJRtyeQGow_5qO7mjrHEqrjzyTWBbuc1klHZR5OX2bNODQFfPd7H2fX69OrkU37-9ezzyYfzXBeMylxgQSXXVLeqLIXiWra8qVjZyZbxjRRVx1RX1qzBtqiw2hQKW-Qoa95h25RUHGdvF9-0x69dWg1GEzQOg7LodgE45Q2vHsA3_4DbNLNNswFnjeQVLXiC6gXS3oXgsYPJm1H5AzAKcx6whfmrYc4D5jzgIQ_YJ-n7RXpvBjz8tw5Ov3xLRZKvF7kfTQQ1qS7CbYxTgFZFBcamtOYX53tonZl9hUgGBocEz5bJuebznvliZELE_d85lL8DWYmqhO8XZ_Dz5uai_nG1ho-Jf73wnXKgem8CXF9yygRlpWwor8QfI9bErw</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Gibbons, Philip</creator><creator>Zammit, Charlie</creator><creator>Youngentob, Kara</creator><creator>Possingham, Hugh P.</creator><creator>Lindenmayer, David B.</creator><creator>Bekessy, Sarah</creator><creator>Burgman, Mark</creator><creator>Colyvan, Mark</creator><creator>Considine, Margaret</creator><creator>Felton, Adam</creator><creator>Hobbs, Richard J.</creator><creator>Hurley, Karen</creator><creator>McAlpine, Clive</creator><creator>McCarthy, Michael A.</creator><creator>Moore, Joslin</creator><creator>Robinson, Doug</creator><creator>Salt, David</creator><creator>Wintle, Brendan</creator><general>Melbourne, Australia : Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management</title><author>Gibbons, Philip ; Zammit, Charlie ; Youngentob, Kara ; Possingham, Hugh P. ; Lindenmayer, David B. ; Bekessy, Sarah ; Burgman, Mark ; Colyvan, Mark ; Considine, Margaret ; Felton, Adam ; Hobbs, Richard J. ; Hurley, Karen ; McAlpine, Clive ; McCarthy, Michael A. ; Moore, Joslin ; Robinson, Doug ; Salt, David ; Wintle, Brendan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-3e4062c0cda553a2c6d29715f6d12b637f1af5819ed47e7b4aede2e682fed9503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Australia: Economic policy</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Knowledge transfer</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>science</topic><topic>Scientific research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammit, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youngentob, Kara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possingham, Hugh P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgman, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colyvan, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Considine, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felton, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, Clive</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Joslin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintle, Brendan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological management & restoration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibbons, Philip</au><au>Zammit, Charlie</au><au>Youngentob, Kara</au><au>Possingham, Hugh P.</au><au>Lindenmayer, David B.</au><au>Bekessy, Sarah</au><au>Burgman, Mark</au><au>Colyvan, Mark</au><au>Considine, Margaret</au><au>Felton, Adam</au><au>Hobbs, Richard J.</au><au>Hurley, Karen</au><au>McAlpine, Clive</au><au>McCarthy, Michael A.</au><au>Moore, Joslin</au><au>Robinson, Doug</au><au>Salt, David</au><au>Wintle, Brendan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management</atitle><jtitle>Ecological management & restoration</jtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>182-186</pages><issn>1442-7001</issn><eissn>1839-3330</eissn><eissn>1442-8903</eissn><abstract>Policy-makers and managers in natural resource management (NRM) often complain that researchers are out of touch. Researchers often complain that policy-makers and managers make poorly informed decisions. In this article, we report on a meeting between researchers, policy-makers and managers convened to identify practical solutions to improve engagement between these camps. A necessary starting point is that every researcher and policy-maker should understand, and tap into, the motivations and reward systems of the other when seeking engagement. For example, researchers can be motivated to engage in policy development if there is a promise of outputs that align with their reward systems such as co-authored publications. Successful research-policy partnerships are built around personal relationships. As a researcher, you cannot therefore expect your results to inform policy by only publishing in journals. As a policy-maker, you cannot guarantee engagement from researchers by publicly inviting comment on a document. Actively building and maintaining relationships with key individuals through discussions, meetings, workshops or field days will increase the likelihood that research outcomes will inform policy decisions. We identified secondments, sabbaticals, fellowships and 'buddies', an annual national NRM conference and 'contact mapping' (a Facebook-type network) as forums that can catalyse new relationships between researchers and policy-makers. We challenge every researcher, policy-maker and manager in NRM to build one new cross-cultural relationship each year.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Melbourne, Australia : Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00416.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1442-7001 |
ispartof | Ecological management & restoration, 2008-12, Vol.9 (3), p.182-186 |
issn | 1442-7001 1839-3330 1442-8903 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_fao_agris_US201301569027 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Australia: Economic policy Communication Cooperation Environmental management Environmental policy issues and policy Knowledge transfer Motivation Partnerships policy Publishing Resource management science Scientific research |
title | Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A58%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20practical%20suggestions%20for%20improving%20engagement%20between%20researchers%20and%20policy-makers%20in%20natural%20resource%20management&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20management%20&%20restoration&rft.au=Gibbons,%20Philip&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=182-186&rft.issn=1442-7001&rft.eissn=1839-3330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00416.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_fao_a%3E20292750%3C/proquest_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219627042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.200903820&rfr_iscdi=true |