Uncertainty analysis of delta 13C method in soil organic matter studies

The delta 13C method is becoming increasingly popular to calculate turnover rates in soil organic matter studies. The method requires a lot input data, all of which exhibit a natural variability. We performed an uncertainty analysis on the calculations in the delta 13C method to evaluate the influen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil biology & biochemistry 1994, Vol.26 (2), p.153-160
Hauptverfasser: Veldkamp, E, Weitz, A.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
container_title Soil biology & biochemistry
container_volume 26
creator Veldkamp, E
Weitz, A.M
description The delta 13C method is becoming increasingly popular to calculate turnover rates in soil organic matter studies. The method requires a lot input data, all of which exhibit a natural variability. We performed an uncertainty analysis on the calculations in the delta 13C method to evaluate the influence of uncertainty in the input data on the results of the calculations. Based on field measurements, we estimated the frequency distributions of the input data required for the delta 13C method (soil organic carbon, bulk density and delta 13C). From these frequency distributions, 200 randomly chosen data combinations were sampled, taking into account their mutual correlations (Monte Carlo sampling). The data combinations were used to calculate the soil organic C pools in the forest and pasture and the C loss since forest clearing. The uncertainty in output was described using frequency distributions. Uncertainty in the output was high, especially for net C loss (ranging between -79.3 and +63.5 Mg ha-1). An estimation of the C pools within +/- 10% of the estimated mean at the 90% confidence level requires 5 measurements in the forest and 7 in the pasture. Heterogeneity in delta 13C values of soil organic matter was the main reason for the higher sample number requirement in the pasture, compared to the forest. To estimate the C loss with the same precision requires 170 measurements in forest and pasture. Spatial variability of organic C and bulk density in forest and pasture was described by semivariograms. The semivariograms of forest and pasture differed mainly by the distance to which organic C and bulk density displayed spatial dependence (the range). The larger range of the pasture semivariograms was explained by the absence of trees. Spatial variability was the main source of the uncertainty in input data. However, variations due to sampling error and short scale variability (the nugget of a semivariogram) are considerable and should not be ignored.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201301488499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301488499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fao_agris_US2013014884993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFyrsOgjAUANDGaCI-vsH7AyS3FEOZiY9dmckNFKwpbdJbB_7exd3pLGclMqmrOldlodciQ1Q6x0pWW7FjfiNicZYqE7fW9yYmsj4tQJ7cwpYhjDAYlwikamA26RUGsB44WAchTuRtDzOlZCJw-gzW8EFsRnJsjj_34nS9PJt7PlLoaIqWu_ZRoFQoS63Lulb_xxeaBTdr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty analysis of delta 13C method in soil organic matter studies</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Veldkamp, E ; Weitz, A.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, E ; Weitz, A.M</creatorcontrib><description>The delta 13C method is becoming increasingly popular to calculate turnover rates in soil organic matter studies. The method requires a lot input data, all of which exhibit a natural variability. We performed an uncertainty analysis on the calculations in the delta 13C method to evaluate the influence of uncertainty in the input data on the results of the calculations. Based on field measurements, we estimated the frequency distributions of the input data required for the delta 13C method (soil organic carbon, bulk density and delta 13C). From these frequency distributions, 200 randomly chosen data combinations were sampled, taking into account their mutual correlations (Monte Carlo sampling). The data combinations were used to calculate the soil organic C pools in the forest and pasture and the C loss since forest clearing. The uncertainty in output was described using frequency distributions. Uncertainty in the output was high, especially for net C loss (ranging between -79.3 and +63.5 Mg ha-1). An estimation of the C pools within +/- 10% of the estimated mean at the 90% confidence level requires 5 measurements in the forest and 7 in the pasture. Heterogeneity in delta 13C values of soil organic matter was the main reason for the higher sample number requirement in the pasture, compared to the forest. To estimate the C loss with the same precision requires 170 measurements in forest and pasture. Spatial variability of organic C and bulk density in forest and pasture was described by semivariograms. The semivariograms of forest and pasture differed mainly by the distance to which organic C and bulk density displayed spatial dependence (the range). The larger range of the pasture semivariograms was explained by the absence of trees. Spatial variability was the main source of the uncertainty in input data. However, variations due to sampling error and short scale variability (the nugget of a semivariogram) are considerable and should not be ignored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3428</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>analytical methods ; carbon ; carbon budgets ; degradation ; errors ; forest soils ; frequency distribution ; grassland soils ; losses from soil ; measurement ; soil analysis ; soil organic matter ; spatial variation</subject><ispartof>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry, 1994, Vol.26 (2), p.153-160</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitz, A.M</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty analysis of delta 13C method in soil organic matter studies</title><title>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</title><description>The delta 13C method is becoming increasingly popular to calculate turnover rates in soil organic matter studies. The method requires a lot input data, all of which exhibit a natural variability. We performed an uncertainty analysis on the calculations in the delta 13C method to evaluate the influence of uncertainty in the input data on the results of the calculations. Based on field measurements, we estimated the frequency distributions of the input data required for the delta 13C method (soil organic carbon, bulk density and delta 13C). From these frequency distributions, 200 randomly chosen data combinations were sampled, taking into account their mutual correlations (Monte Carlo sampling). The data combinations were used to calculate the soil organic C pools in the forest and pasture and the C loss since forest clearing. The uncertainty in output was described using frequency distributions. Uncertainty in the output was high, especially for net C loss (ranging between -79.3 and +63.5 Mg ha-1). An estimation of the C pools within +/- 10% of the estimated mean at the 90% confidence level requires 5 measurements in the forest and 7 in the pasture. Heterogeneity in delta 13C values of soil organic matter was the main reason for the higher sample number requirement in the pasture, compared to the forest. To estimate the C loss with the same precision requires 170 measurements in forest and pasture. Spatial variability of organic C and bulk density in forest and pasture was described by semivariograms. The semivariograms of forest and pasture differed mainly by the distance to which organic C and bulk density displayed spatial dependence (the range). The larger range of the pasture semivariograms was explained by the absence of trees. Spatial variability was the main source of the uncertainty in input data. However, variations due to sampling error and short scale variability (the nugget of a semivariogram) are considerable and should not be ignored.</description><subject>analytical methods</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>carbon budgets</subject><subject>degradation</subject><subject>errors</subject><subject>forest soils</subject><subject>frequency distribution</subject><subject>grassland soils</subject><subject>losses from soil</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>soil analysis</subject><subject>soil organic matter</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><issn>0038-0717</issn><issn>1879-3428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFyrsOgjAUANDGaCI-vsH7AyS3FEOZiY9dmckNFKwpbdJbB_7exd3pLGclMqmrOldlodciQ1Q6x0pWW7FjfiNicZYqE7fW9yYmsj4tQJ7cwpYhjDAYlwikamA26RUGsB44WAchTuRtDzOlZCJw-gzW8EFsRnJsjj_34nS9PJt7PlLoaIqWu_ZRoFQoS63Lulb_xxeaBTdr</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Veldkamp, E</creator><creator>Weitz, A.M</creator><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Uncertainty analysis of delta 13C method in soil organic matter studies</title><author>Veldkamp, E ; Weitz, A.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fao_agris_US2013014884993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>analytical methods</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>carbon budgets</topic><topic>degradation</topic><topic>errors</topic><topic>forest soils</topic><topic>frequency distribution</topic><topic>grassland soils</topic><topic>losses from soil</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>soil analysis</topic><topic>soil organic matter</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitz, A.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veldkamp, E</au><au>Weitz, A.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty analysis of delta 13C method in soil organic matter studies</atitle><jtitle>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</jtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>153-160</pages><issn>0038-0717</issn><eissn>1879-3428</eissn><abstract>The delta 13C method is becoming increasingly popular to calculate turnover rates in soil organic matter studies. The method requires a lot input data, all of which exhibit a natural variability. We performed an uncertainty analysis on the calculations in the delta 13C method to evaluate the influence of uncertainty in the input data on the results of the calculations. Based on field measurements, we estimated the frequency distributions of the input data required for the delta 13C method (soil organic carbon, bulk density and delta 13C). From these frequency distributions, 200 randomly chosen data combinations were sampled, taking into account their mutual correlations (Monte Carlo sampling). The data combinations were used to calculate the soil organic C pools in the forest and pasture and the C loss since forest clearing. The uncertainty in output was described using frequency distributions. Uncertainty in the output was high, especially for net C loss (ranging between -79.3 and +63.5 Mg ha-1). An estimation of the C pools within +/- 10% of the estimated mean at the 90% confidence level requires 5 measurements in the forest and 7 in the pasture. Heterogeneity in delta 13C values of soil organic matter was the main reason for the higher sample number requirement in the pasture, compared to the forest. To estimate the C loss with the same precision requires 170 measurements in forest and pasture. Spatial variability of organic C and bulk density in forest and pasture was described by semivariograms. The semivariograms of forest and pasture differed mainly by the distance to which organic C and bulk density displayed spatial dependence (the range). The larger range of the pasture semivariograms was explained by the absence of trees. Spatial variability was the main source of the uncertainty in input data. However, variations due to sampling error and short scale variability (the nugget of a semivariogram) are considerable and should not be ignored.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0717
ispartof Soil biology & biochemistry, 1994, Vol.26 (2), p.153-160
issn 0038-0717
1879-3428
language eng
recordid cdi_fao_agris_US201301488499
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects analytical methods
carbon
carbon budgets
degradation
errors
forest soils
frequency distribution
grassland soils
losses from soil
measurement
soil analysis
soil organic matter
spatial variation
title Uncertainty analysis of delta 13C method in soil organic matter studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20analysis%20of%20delta%2013C%20method%20in%20soil%20organic%20matter%20studies&rft.jtitle=Soil%20biology%20&%20biochemistry&rft.au=Veldkamp,%20E&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=153-160&rft.issn=0038-0717&rft.eissn=1879-3428&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3EUS201301488499%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true