Risk Management in North Texas Soybean: Mid-March Soybean Plantings Uncertain; Maturity Group IV Cultivars Reliable

The popularity of early (March and April) soybean plantings using maturity groups (MG) 3.9 to 5.1 has become widespread among commercial growers in north Texas due to the adverse impact of hot and dry weather in July and August. The efficacy of April planting is well documented, but there is less co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop management 2005, Vol.2005
Hauptverfasser: Heitholt, J.J, Farr, J.B, Sutton, R.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Crop management
container_volume 2005
creator Heitholt, J.J
Farr, J.B
Sutton, R.L
description The popularity of early (March and April) soybean plantings using maturity groups (MG) 3.9 to 5.1 has become widespread among commercial growers in north Texas due to the adverse impact of hot and dry weather in July and August. The efficacy of April planting is well documented, but there is less consensus on whether March planting is worth the risks associated with potentially cold, wet weather at planting. Likewise, it is not clear whether cultivars maturing earlier than MG 3.9 or later than MG 5.1 would be competitive under March plantings. In 2002 and 2003, we grew 20 soybean cultivars ranging from MG 0.8 to MG 6.1 on low-yielding sites with poor surface drainage and clay soil textures in the northern Texas Blacklands at Prosper, Texas (33.2°N). Four planting dates ranged from mid-March to mid-May and July drought was severe both years. Plant stands from March planting dates were lower than April planting dates. In 2002, the 15 March planting date (12 bu/acre) was out-yielded by later planting dates (16 to 23 bu/acre). In 2003, the 1 April (16 bu/acre) planting out-yielded the other three plantings (11 bu/acre). Although yield was affected by planting date-by-cultivar interactions, MG IV cultivars were generally higher than other MGs regardless of planting date. Early-maturing cultivars planted in March were visibly shorter than the same cultivars planted later. In the 14 March 2003 planting only, fungicide-treated seed resulted in a 3 bu/acre yield increase above the untreated seed. Our results support two ideas. First, mid-March planting dates in this region can often be less competitive than April planting dates if stand loss and poor seedling growth associated with wet (2002) or cold (2003) weather occurs. Second, cultivars from MG 3.7 to 5.1 are likely to be the most competitive cultivars across a wide range of planting dates when grown on heavy clay soils in north Texas.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201301077108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301077108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fao_agris_US2013010771083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjM1OhDAURhujiTjjM3hfgKSlMwF1SfxbMDHAzJZcsMDVWkxvMfL2utBkdq6-k5OT70REarvRcZppfXrE5-KC-VXK5FptZSS4JH6DAh0O5t24AORgN_kwQm2-kKGaltagu4GCXuICfTf-KXi26AK5gWHvOuMDkrv9eQqzp7DAg5_mD3g6QD7bQJ_oGUpjCVtr1uKsR8vm8ndX4ur-rs4f4x6nBgdP3OyrRCotlUxTJTP9f_ENtSNG_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Management in North Texas Soybean: Mid-March Soybean Plantings Uncertain; Maturity Group IV Cultivars Reliable</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Heitholt, J.J ; Farr, J.B ; Sutton, R.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Heitholt, J.J ; Farr, J.B ; Sutton, R.L</creatorcontrib><description>The popularity of early (March and April) soybean plantings using maturity groups (MG) 3.9 to 5.1 has become widespread among commercial growers in north Texas due to the adverse impact of hot and dry weather in July and August. The efficacy of April planting is well documented, but there is less consensus on whether March planting is worth the risks associated with potentially cold, wet weather at planting. Likewise, it is not clear whether cultivars maturing earlier than MG 3.9 or later than MG 5.1 would be competitive under March plantings. In 2002 and 2003, we grew 20 soybean cultivars ranging from MG 0.8 to MG 6.1 on low-yielding sites with poor surface drainage and clay soil textures in the northern Texas Blacklands at Prosper, Texas (33.2°N). Four planting dates ranged from mid-March to mid-May and July drought was severe both years. Plant stands from March planting dates were lower than April planting dates. In 2002, the 15 March planting date (12 bu/acre) was out-yielded by later planting dates (16 to 23 bu/acre). In 2003, the 1 April (16 bu/acre) planting out-yielded the other three plantings (11 bu/acre). Although yield was affected by planting date-by-cultivar interactions, MG IV cultivars were generally higher than other MGs regardless of planting date. Early-maturing cultivars planted in March were visibly shorter than the same cultivars planted later. In the 14 March 2003 planting only, fungicide-treated seed resulted in a 3 bu/acre yield increase above the untreated seed. Our results support two ideas. First, mid-March planting dates in this region can often be less competitive than April planting dates if stand loss and poor seedling growth associated with wet (2002) or cold (2003) weather occurs. Second, cultivars from MG 3.7 to 5.1 are likely to be the most competitive cultivars across a wide range of planting dates when grown on heavy clay soils in north Texas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1543-7833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-7833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Plant Management Network</publisher><subject>cold ; crop damage ; crop yield ; cultivars ; early-maturing cultivars ; genotype-environment interaction ; Glycine max ; maturity groups ; planting date ; risk assessment ; soybeans</subject><ispartof>Crop management, 2005, Vol.2005</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heitholt, J.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farr, J.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, R.L</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Management in North Texas Soybean: Mid-March Soybean Plantings Uncertain; Maturity Group IV Cultivars Reliable</title><title>Crop management</title><description>The popularity of early (March and April) soybean plantings using maturity groups (MG) 3.9 to 5.1 has become widespread among commercial growers in north Texas due to the adverse impact of hot and dry weather in July and August. The efficacy of April planting is well documented, but there is less consensus on whether March planting is worth the risks associated with potentially cold, wet weather at planting. Likewise, it is not clear whether cultivars maturing earlier than MG 3.9 or later than MG 5.1 would be competitive under March plantings. In 2002 and 2003, we grew 20 soybean cultivars ranging from MG 0.8 to MG 6.1 on low-yielding sites with poor surface drainage and clay soil textures in the northern Texas Blacklands at Prosper, Texas (33.2°N). Four planting dates ranged from mid-March to mid-May and July drought was severe both years. Plant stands from March planting dates were lower than April planting dates. In 2002, the 15 March planting date (12 bu/acre) was out-yielded by later planting dates (16 to 23 bu/acre). In 2003, the 1 April (16 bu/acre) planting out-yielded the other three plantings (11 bu/acre). Although yield was affected by planting date-by-cultivar interactions, MG IV cultivars were generally higher than other MGs regardless of planting date. Early-maturing cultivars planted in March were visibly shorter than the same cultivars planted later. In the 14 March 2003 planting only, fungicide-treated seed resulted in a 3 bu/acre yield increase above the untreated seed. Our results support two ideas. First, mid-March planting dates in this region can often be less competitive than April planting dates if stand loss and poor seedling growth associated with wet (2002) or cold (2003) weather occurs. Second, cultivars from MG 3.7 to 5.1 are likely to be the most competitive cultivars across a wide range of planting dates when grown on heavy clay soils in north Texas.</description><subject>cold</subject><subject>crop damage</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>early-maturing cultivars</subject><subject>genotype-environment interaction</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>maturity groups</subject><subject>planting date</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>soybeans</subject><issn>1543-7833</issn><issn>1543-7833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjM1OhDAURhujiTjjM3hfgKSlMwF1SfxbMDHAzJZcsMDVWkxvMfL2utBkdq6-k5OT70REarvRcZppfXrE5-KC-VXK5FptZSS4JH6DAh0O5t24AORgN_kwQm2-kKGaltagu4GCXuICfTf-KXi26AK5gWHvOuMDkrv9eQqzp7DAg5_mD3g6QD7bQJ_oGUpjCVtr1uKsR8vm8ndX4ur-rs4f4x6nBgdP3OyrRCotlUxTJTP9f_ENtSNG_g</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Heitholt, J.J</creator><creator>Farr, J.B</creator><creator>Sutton, R.L</creator><general>Plant Management Network</general><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Risk Management in North Texas Soybean: Mid-March Soybean Plantings Uncertain; Maturity Group IV Cultivars Reliable</title><author>Heitholt, J.J ; Farr, J.B ; Sutton, R.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fao_agris_US2013010771083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>cold</topic><topic>crop damage</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>early-maturing cultivars</topic><topic>genotype-environment interaction</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>maturity groups</topic><topic>planting date</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>soybeans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heitholt, J.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farr, J.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, R.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Crop management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heitholt, J.J</au><au>Farr, J.B</au><au>Sutton, R.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Management in North Texas Soybean: Mid-March Soybean Plantings Uncertain; Maturity Group IV Cultivars Reliable</atitle><jtitle>Crop management</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>2005</volume><issn>1543-7833</issn><eissn>1543-7833</eissn><abstract>The popularity of early (March and April) soybean plantings using maturity groups (MG) 3.9 to 5.1 has become widespread among commercial growers in north Texas due to the adverse impact of hot and dry weather in July and August. The efficacy of April planting is well documented, but there is less consensus on whether March planting is worth the risks associated with potentially cold, wet weather at planting. Likewise, it is not clear whether cultivars maturing earlier than MG 3.9 or later than MG 5.1 would be competitive under March plantings. In 2002 and 2003, we grew 20 soybean cultivars ranging from MG 0.8 to MG 6.1 on low-yielding sites with poor surface drainage and clay soil textures in the northern Texas Blacklands at Prosper, Texas (33.2°N). Four planting dates ranged from mid-March to mid-May and July drought was severe both years. Plant stands from March planting dates were lower than April planting dates. In 2002, the 15 March planting date (12 bu/acre) was out-yielded by later planting dates (16 to 23 bu/acre). In 2003, the 1 April (16 bu/acre) planting out-yielded the other three plantings (11 bu/acre). Although yield was affected by planting date-by-cultivar interactions, MG IV cultivars were generally higher than other MGs regardless of planting date. Early-maturing cultivars planted in March were visibly shorter than the same cultivars planted later. In the 14 March 2003 planting only, fungicide-treated seed resulted in a 3 bu/acre yield increase above the untreated seed. Our results support two ideas. First, mid-March planting dates in this region can often be less competitive than April planting dates if stand loss and poor seedling growth associated with wet (2002) or cold (2003) weather occurs. Second, cultivars from MG 3.7 to 5.1 are likely to be the most competitive cultivars across a wide range of planting dates when grown on heavy clay soils in north Texas.</abstract><pub>Plant Management Network</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1543-7833
ispartof Crop management, 2005, Vol.2005
issn 1543-7833
1543-7833
language eng
recordid cdi_fao_agris_US201301077108
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects cold
crop damage
crop yield
cultivars
early-maturing cultivars
genotype-environment interaction
Glycine max
maturity groups
planting date
risk assessment
soybeans
title Risk Management in North Texas Soybean: Mid-March Soybean Plantings Uncertain; Maturity Group IV Cultivars Reliable
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T16%3A30%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Management%20in%20North%20Texas%20Soybean:%20Mid-March%20Soybean%20Plantings%20Uncertain;%20Maturity%20Group%20IV%20Cultivars%20Reliable&rft.jtitle=Crop%20management&rft.au=Heitholt,%20J.J&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=2005&rft.issn=1543-7833&rft.eissn=1543-7833&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3EUS201301077108%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true