Recovery and properties of muscle proteins extracted form tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) light muscle by pH shift processing

Functional proteins can be extracted from fish muscle using acid- or alkali-aided solubilization and recovered with isoelectric precipitation. It was of interest to evaluate acid- and alkali-aided solubilization/precipitation on muscle material from the warm-water fish tilapia. Higher levels of prot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of food science 2006, Vol.71 (3), p.E132-E141
Hauptverfasser: Kristinsson, H.G, Ingadottir, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E141
container_issue 3
container_start_page E132
container_title Journal of food science
container_volume 71
creator Kristinsson, H.G
Ingadottir, B
description Functional proteins can be extracted from fish muscle using acid- or alkali-aided solubilization and recovered with isoelectric precipitation. It was of interest to evaluate acid- and alkali-aided solubilization/precipitation on muscle material from the warm-water fish tilapia. Higher levels of proteins were extracted with high compared with low pH (P < 0.05) because of higher protein solubility at high pH. Protein extraction was not influenced by the specific low or high pH tested or homogenization time. Similar protein types were extracted for the low and high pH solubilization, while proteolysis was observed at low pH. Viscosity was significantly higher at pH 2.3 to 2.9 compared with pH 10.8 to 11.4 (P < 0.05) and varied greatly at low pH indicating a more unstable system. Two different low (pH 2.5 and 2.9) and high (pH 11 and 11.2) solubilization pH values were selected and protein recovery investigated in the pH range 5.1 to 5.7. The alkali-extracted proteins had more solubility at pH 5.1 to 5.7 (P < 0.05) and thus less protein (P < 0.05) was precipitated compared with the acid-aided process. More protein was recovered as pH increased from 5.1 to 5.7 (P < 0.05). More protein types were found in the supernatant after precipitation for the alkali-aided treatment, and soluble proteins were similar to those of untreated tilapia muscle homogenate. Viscosities of the acid- and alkali-extracted proteins at pH 5.1 to 5.7 were significantly higher than the viscosity of native proteins at that pH (P < 0.05). While this study demonstrated significant differences in protein extractability and precipitation of the 2 processes, no statistical difference (P > 0.05) was found for overall protein recovery (61% to 68% for alkali-aided process and 56% to 61% for acid-aided process) of the 2 processes.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201301075521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301075521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fao_agris_US2013010755213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjM2KwjAURoMoWH-ewbscF4Wktda9KO4GnJm1xHjTXkmbkhtFF_PuQ0HXszp8h48zEIkqC5nmm5UaikTKLEuVWpVjMWG-yn7n60T8HtH4O4Yn6PYCXfAdhkjI4C00NzYOexmRWgZ8xKBNxAtYHxqI5HRHGj4-A3pTB98QQ0vORzI3XoKjqo7vyPkJ3QG4Jhv7oEFmaquZGFntGOcvTsViv_veHlKr_UlXgfj085VJlUsly6LIVP7_4w8CYkxi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recovery and properties of muscle proteins extracted form tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) light muscle by pH shift processing</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kristinsson, H.G ; Ingadottir, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Kristinsson, H.G ; Ingadottir, B</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Functional proteins can be extracted from fish muscle using acid- or alkali-aided solubilization and recovered with isoelectric precipitation. It was of interest to evaluate acid- and alkali-aided solubilization/precipitation on muscle material from the warm-water fish tilapia. Higher levels of proteins were extracted with high compared with low pH (P < 0.05) because of higher protein solubility at high pH. Protein extraction was not influenced by the specific low or high pH tested or homogenization time. Similar protein types were extracted for the low and high pH solubilization, while proteolysis was observed at low pH. Viscosity was significantly higher at pH 2.3 to 2.9 compared with pH 10.8 to 11.4 (P < 0.05) and varied greatly at low pH indicating a more unstable system. Two different low (pH 2.5 and 2.9) and high (pH 11 and 11.2) solubilization pH values were selected and protein recovery investigated in the pH range 5.1 to 5.7. The alkali-extracted proteins had more solubility at pH 5.1 to 5.7 (P < 0.05) and thus less protein (P < 0.05) was precipitated compared with the acid-aided process. More protein was recovered as pH increased from 5.1 to 5.7 (P < 0.05). More protein types were found in the supernatant after precipitation for the alkali-aided treatment, and soluble proteins were similar to those of untreated tilapia muscle homogenate. Viscosities of the acid- and alkali-extracted proteins at pH 5.1 to 5.7 were significantly higher than the viscosity of native proteins at that pH (P < 0.05). While this study demonstrated significant differences in protein extractability and precipitation of the 2 processes, no statistical difference (P > 0.05) was found for overall protein recovery (61% to 68% for alkali-aided process and 56% to 61% for acid-aided process) of the 2 processes.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-3841</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>acid treatment ; alkali treatment ; chemical precipitation ; extraction ; fish protein concentrates ; food processing ; muscle protein ; Oreochromis niloticus ; proteolysis ; solubilization ; surimi ; Tilapia (Cichlidae) ; viscosity ; water solubility ; yields</subject><ispartof>Journal of food science, 2006, Vol.71 (3), p.E132-E141</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kristinsson, H.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingadottir, B</creatorcontrib><title>Recovery and properties of muscle proteins extracted form tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) light muscle by pH shift processing</title><title>Journal of food science</title><description><![CDATA[Functional proteins can be extracted from fish muscle using acid- or alkali-aided solubilization and recovered with isoelectric precipitation. It was of interest to evaluate acid- and alkali-aided solubilization/precipitation on muscle material from the warm-water fish tilapia. Higher levels of proteins were extracted with high compared with low pH (P < 0.05) because of higher protein solubility at high pH. Protein extraction was not influenced by the specific low or high pH tested or homogenization time. Similar protein types were extracted for the low and high pH solubilization, while proteolysis was observed at low pH. Viscosity was significantly higher at pH 2.3 to 2.9 compared with pH 10.8 to 11.4 (P < 0.05) and varied greatly at low pH indicating a more unstable system. Two different low (pH 2.5 and 2.9) and high (pH 11 and 11.2) solubilization pH values were selected and protein recovery investigated in the pH range 5.1 to 5.7. The alkali-extracted proteins had more solubility at pH 5.1 to 5.7 (P < 0.05) and thus less protein (P < 0.05) was precipitated compared with the acid-aided process. More protein was recovered as pH increased from 5.1 to 5.7 (P < 0.05). More protein types were found in the supernatant after precipitation for the alkali-aided treatment, and soluble proteins were similar to those of untreated tilapia muscle homogenate. Viscosities of the acid- and alkali-extracted proteins at pH 5.1 to 5.7 were significantly higher than the viscosity of native proteins at that pH (P < 0.05). While this study demonstrated significant differences in protein extractability and precipitation of the 2 processes, no statistical difference (P > 0.05) was found for overall protein recovery (61% to 68% for alkali-aided process and 56% to 61% for acid-aided process) of the 2 processes.]]></description><subject>acid treatment</subject><subject>alkali treatment</subject><subject>chemical precipitation</subject><subject>extraction</subject><subject>fish protein concentrates</subject><subject>food processing</subject><subject>muscle protein</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>proteolysis</subject><subject>solubilization</subject><subject>surimi</subject><subject>Tilapia (Cichlidae)</subject><subject>viscosity</subject><subject>water solubility</subject><subject>yields</subject><issn>0022-1147</issn><issn>1750-3841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjM2KwjAURoMoWH-ewbscF4Wktda9KO4GnJm1xHjTXkmbkhtFF_PuQ0HXszp8h48zEIkqC5nmm5UaikTKLEuVWpVjMWG-yn7n60T8HtH4O4Yn6PYCXfAdhkjI4C00NzYOexmRWgZ8xKBNxAtYHxqI5HRHGj4-A3pTB98QQ0vORzI3XoKjqo7vyPkJ3QG4Jhv7oEFmaquZGFntGOcvTsViv_veHlKr_UlXgfj085VJlUsly6LIVP7_4w8CYkxi</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Kristinsson, H.G</creator><creator>Ingadottir, B</creator><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Recovery and properties of muscle proteins extracted form tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) light muscle by pH shift processing</title><author>Kristinsson, H.G ; Ingadottir, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fao_agris_US2013010755213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>acid treatment</topic><topic>alkali treatment</topic><topic>chemical precipitation</topic><topic>extraction</topic><topic>fish protein concentrates</topic><topic>food processing</topic><topic>muscle protein</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>proteolysis</topic><topic>solubilization</topic><topic>surimi</topic><topic>Tilapia (Cichlidae)</topic><topic>viscosity</topic><topic>water solubility</topic><topic>yields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kristinsson, H.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingadottir, B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kristinsson, H.G</au><au>Ingadottir, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recovery and properties of muscle proteins extracted form tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) light muscle by pH shift processing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>E132</spage><epage>E141</epage><pages>E132-E141</pages><issn>0022-1147</issn><eissn>1750-3841</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Functional proteins can be extracted from fish muscle using acid- or alkali-aided solubilization and recovered with isoelectric precipitation. It was of interest to evaluate acid- and alkali-aided solubilization/precipitation on muscle material from the warm-water fish tilapia. Higher levels of proteins were extracted with high compared with low pH (P < 0.05) because of higher protein solubility at high pH. Protein extraction was not influenced by the specific low or high pH tested or homogenization time. Similar protein types were extracted for the low and high pH solubilization, while proteolysis was observed at low pH. Viscosity was significantly higher at pH 2.3 to 2.9 compared with pH 10.8 to 11.4 (P < 0.05) and varied greatly at low pH indicating a more unstable system. Two different low (pH 2.5 and 2.9) and high (pH 11 and 11.2) solubilization pH values were selected and protein recovery investigated in the pH range 5.1 to 5.7. The alkali-extracted proteins had more solubility at pH 5.1 to 5.7 (P < 0.05) and thus less protein (P < 0.05) was precipitated compared with the acid-aided process. More protein was recovered as pH increased from 5.1 to 5.7 (P < 0.05). More protein types were found in the supernatant after precipitation for the alkali-aided treatment, and soluble proteins were similar to those of untreated tilapia muscle homogenate. Viscosities of the acid- and alkali-extracted proteins at pH 5.1 to 5.7 were significantly higher than the viscosity of native proteins at that pH (P < 0.05). While this study demonstrated significant differences in protein extractability and precipitation of the 2 processes, no statistical difference (P > 0.05) was found for overall protein recovery (61% to 68% for alkali-aided process and 56% to 61% for acid-aided process) of the 2 processes.]]></abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1147
ispartof Journal of food science, 2006, Vol.71 (3), p.E132-E141
issn 0022-1147
1750-3841
language eng
recordid cdi_fao_agris_US201301075521
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects acid treatment
alkali treatment
chemical precipitation
extraction
fish protein concentrates
food processing
muscle protein
Oreochromis niloticus
proteolysis
solubilization
surimi
Tilapia (Cichlidae)
viscosity
water solubility
yields
title Recovery and properties of muscle proteins extracted form tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) light muscle by pH shift processing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A28%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recovery%20and%20properties%20of%20muscle%20proteins%20extracted%20form%20tilapia%20(Oreochromis%20niloticus)%20light%20muscle%20by%20pH%20shift%20processing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20science&rft.au=Kristinsson,%20H.G&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=E132&rft.epage=E141&rft.pages=E132-E141&rft.issn=0022-1147&rft.eissn=1750-3841&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3EUS201301075521%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true