Rapid Multiplex Nested PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Respiratory tract infections can be caused by a heterogeneous group of viruses and bacteria that produce similar clinical presentations. Specific diagnosis therefore relies on laboratory investigation. This study developed and evaluated five groups of multiplex nested PCR assays that could simultane...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2007-11, Vol.45 (11), p.3631-3640 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3640 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3631 |
container_title | Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Lam, W.Y Yeung, Apple C.M Tang, Julian W Ip, Margaret Chan, Edward W.C Hui, Mamie Chan, Paul K.S |
description | Respiratory tract infections can be caused by a heterogeneous group of viruses and bacteria that produce similar clinical presentations. Specific diagnosis therefore relies on laboratory investigation. This study developed and evaluated five groups of multiplex nested PCR assays that could simultaneously detect 21 different respiratory pathogens: influenza A virus (H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1); influenza B virus; parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, 3, 4a, and 4b; respiratory syncytial virus A and B; human rhinoviruses; human enteroviruses; human coronaviruses OC43 and 229E; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus; human metapneumoviruses; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Legionella pneumophila; and adenoviruses (A to F). These multiplex nested PCRs adopted fast PCR technology. The high speed of fast PCR (within 35 min) greatly improved the efficiency of these assays. The results show that these multiplex nested PCR assays are specific and more sensitive (100- to 1,000-fold) than conventional methods. Among the 303 clinical specimens tested, the multiplex nested PCR achieved an overall positive rate of 48.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.9 to 54.1%), which was significantly higher than that of virus isolation (20.1% [95% CI, 15.6 to 24.6%]) and that of direct detection by immunofluorescence assay (13.5% [95% CI, 9.7 to 17.4%]). The improved sensitivity was partly due to the higher sensitivity of multiplex nested PCR than that of conventional methods in detecting cultivatable viruses. Moreover, the ability of the multiplex nested PCR to detect noncultivatable viruses, particularly rhinoviruses, coronavirus OC43, and metapneumoviruses, contributed a major gain (15.6%) in the overall positive rate. In conclusion, rapid multiplex nested PCR assays can improve the diagnostic yield for respiratory infections to allow prompt interventive actions to be taken. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/jcm.00280-07 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_US201300825842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20124557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-b05b29e72f47a9fb46eaa7fa435ff6078399a969f7c2b065b89d326f5421b4eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0s1v0zAYB2ALgVgZ3DhDhAQnMl5_2xcQKt_aABWGuFlOareekjjYCbD_HpdWDE6cfPCjn98PI3QXwwnGRD25aPsTAKKgBnkNLTBoVQsBX6-jBYDmNcZUHqFbOV8AYMY4v4mOsFTABNcL9Gxlx7CuzuZuCmPnflbvXZ7cuvq4XFU-puqFm1w7hThU0Vcrl8eQ7BTTZfUlpDm7fBvd8LbL7s7hPEbnr15-Xr6pTz-8frt8flq3XMBUN8Abop0knkmrfcOEs1Z6yyj3XoBUVGurhfayJQ0I3ii9pkR4zghumGvoMXq6zx3npnfr1g1Tsp0ZU-htujTRBvPvzRC2ZhO_G4KF4liVgEeHgBS_zaVJ04fcuq6zg4tzNkIxRSjm_4UEMClTlAU-3sM2xZyT83-qwWB2qzHvlmfm92oM7Pi9vzu4woddFPDwAGxubeeTHdqQr5ymknC6K_DB3m3DZvsjJGds7k35Bobx8q6hguKC7u-Rt9HYTSpB559K6RRAEa4Yob8AB3qrFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20124557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Multiplex Nested PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lam, W.Y ; Yeung, Apple C.M ; Tang, Julian W ; Ip, Margaret ; Chan, Edward W.C ; Hui, Mamie ; Chan, Paul K.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Lam, W.Y ; Yeung, Apple C.M ; Tang, Julian W ; Ip, Margaret ; Chan, Edward W.C ; Hui, Mamie ; Chan, Paul K.S</creatorcontrib><description>Respiratory tract infections can be caused by a heterogeneous group of viruses and bacteria that produce similar clinical presentations. Specific diagnosis therefore relies on laboratory investigation. This study developed and evaluated five groups of multiplex nested PCR assays that could simultaneously detect 21 different respiratory pathogens: influenza A virus (H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1); influenza B virus; parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, 3, 4a, and 4b; respiratory syncytial virus A and B; human rhinoviruses; human enteroviruses; human coronaviruses OC43 and 229E; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus; human metapneumoviruses; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Legionella pneumophila; and adenoviruses (A to F). These multiplex nested PCRs adopted fast PCR technology. The high speed of fast PCR (within 35 min) greatly improved the efficiency of these assays. The results show that these multiplex nested PCR assays are specific and more sensitive (100- to 1,000-fold) than conventional methods. Among the 303 clinical specimens tested, the multiplex nested PCR achieved an overall positive rate of 48.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.9 to 54.1%), which was significantly higher than that of virus isolation (20.1% [95% CI, 15.6 to 24.6%]) and that of direct detection by immunofluorescence assay (13.5% [95% CI, 9.7 to 17.4%]). The improved sensitivity was partly due to the higher sensitivity of multiplex nested PCR than that of conventional methods in detecting cultivatable viruses. Moreover, the ability of the multiplex nested PCR to detect noncultivatable viruses, particularly rhinoviruses, coronavirus OC43, and metapneumoviruses, contributed a major gain (15.6%) in the overall positive rate. In conclusion, rapid multiplex nested PCR assays can improve the diagnostic yield for respiratory infections to allow prompt interventive actions to be taken.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-5530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00280-07</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17804659</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMIDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chlamydophila pneumoniae ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human rhinovirus ; Humans ; Influenza A virus ; Influenza A virus - isolation & purification ; Influenza B virus ; Influenza B virus - isolation & purification ; Legionella pneumophila ; Metapneumovirus - isolation & purification ; Microbiology ; Mycoplasma pneumoniae ; Parainfluenza virus ; Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - isolation & purification ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Respiratory syncytial virus ; Respiratory Syncytial Viruses - isolation & purification ; Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis ; Respiratory Tract Infections - virology ; Rhinovirus ; SARS coronavirus ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007-11, Vol.45 (11), p.3631-3640</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-b05b29e72f47a9fb46eaa7fa435ff6078399a969f7c2b065b89d326f5421b4eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-b05b29e72f47a9fb46eaa7fa435ff6078399a969f7c2b065b89d326f5421b4eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2168518/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2168518/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3175,3176,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19372535$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17804659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lam, W.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Apple C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Julian W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ip, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Edward W.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Mamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Paul K.S</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Multiplex Nested PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses</title><title>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Respiratory tract infections can be caused by a heterogeneous group of viruses and bacteria that produce similar clinical presentations. Specific diagnosis therefore relies on laboratory investigation. This study developed and evaluated five groups of multiplex nested PCR assays that could simultaneously detect 21 different respiratory pathogens: influenza A virus (H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1); influenza B virus; parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, 3, 4a, and 4b; respiratory syncytial virus A and B; human rhinoviruses; human enteroviruses; human coronaviruses OC43 and 229E; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus; human metapneumoviruses; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Legionella pneumophila; and adenoviruses (A to F). These multiplex nested PCRs adopted fast PCR technology. The high speed of fast PCR (within 35 min) greatly improved the efficiency of these assays. The results show that these multiplex nested PCR assays are specific and more sensitive (100- to 1,000-fold) than conventional methods. Among the 303 clinical specimens tested, the multiplex nested PCR achieved an overall positive rate of 48.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.9 to 54.1%), which was significantly higher than that of virus isolation (20.1% [95% CI, 15.6 to 24.6%]) and that of direct detection by immunofluorescence assay (13.5% [95% CI, 9.7 to 17.4%]). The improved sensitivity was partly due to the higher sensitivity of multiplex nested PCR than that of conventional methods in detecting cultivatable viruses. Moreover, the ability of the multiplex nested PCR to detect noncultivatable viruses, particularly rhinoviruses, coronavirus OC43, and metapneumoviruses, contributed a major gain (15.6%) in the overall positive rate. In conclusion, rapid multiplex nested PCR assays can improve the diagnostic yield for respiratory infections to allow prompt interventive actions to be taken.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlamydophila pneumoniae</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human rhinovirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influenza A virus</subject><subject>Influenza A virus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Influenza B virus</subject><subject>Influenza B virus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Legionella pneumophila</subject><subject>Metapneumovirus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</subject><subject>Parainfluenza virus</subject><subject>Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Respiratory syncytial virus</subject><subject>Respiratory Syncytial Viruses - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - virology</subject><subject>Rhinovirus</subject><subject>SARS coronavirus</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><issn>1098-5530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0s1v0zAYB2ALgVgZ3DhDhAQnMl5_2xcQKt_aABWGuFlOareekjjYCbD_HpdWDE6cfPCjn98PI3QXwwnGRD25aPsTAKKgBnkNLTBoVQsBX6-jBYDmNcZUHqFbOV8AYMY4v4mOsFTABNcL9Gxlx7CuzuZuCmPnflbvXZ7cuvq4XFU-puqFm1w7hThU0Vcrl8eQ7BTTZfUlpDm7fBvd8LbL7s7hPEbnr15-Xr6pTz-8frt8flq3XMBUN8Abop0knkmrfcOEs1Z6yyj3XoBUVGurhfayJQ0I3ii9pkR4zghumGvoMXq6zx3npnfr1g1Tsp0ZU-htujTRBvPvzRC2ZhO_G4KF4liVgEeHgBS_zaVJ04fcuq6zg4tzNkIxRSjm_4UEMClTlAU-3sM2xZyT83-qwWB2qzHvlmfm92oM7Pi9vzu4woddFPDwAGxubeeTHdqQr5ymknC6K_DB3m3DZvsjJGds7k35Bobx8q6hguKC7u-Rt9HYTSpB559K6RRAEa4Yob8AB3qrFQ</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Lam, W.Y</creator><creator>Yeung, Apple C.M</creator><creator>Tang, Julian W</creator><creator>Ip, Margaret</creator><creator>Chan, Edward W.C</creator><creator>Hui, Mamie</creator><creator>Chan, Paul K.S</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><general>American Society for Microbiology (ASM)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Rapid Multiplex Nested PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses</title><author>Lam, W.Y ; Yeung, Apple C.M ; Tang, Julian W ; Ip, Margaret ; Chan, Edward W.C ; Hui, Mamie ; Chan, Paul K.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-b05b29e72f47a9fb46eaa7fa435ff6078399a969f7c2b065b89d326f5421b4eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlamydophila pneumoniae</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human rhinovirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influenza A virus</topic><topic>Influenza A virus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Influenza B virus</topic><topic>Influenza B virus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Legionella pneumophila</topic><topic>Metapneumovirus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</topic><topic>Parainfluenza virus</topic><topic>Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Respiratory syncytial virus</topic><topic>Respiratory Syncytial Viruses - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - virology</topic><topic>Rhinovirus</topic><topic>SARS coronavirus</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lam, W.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Apple C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Julian W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ip, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Edward W.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Mamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Paul K.S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lam, W.Y</au><au>Yeung, Apple C.M</au><au>Tang, Julian W</au><au>Ip, Margaret</au><au>Chan, Edward W.C</au><au>Hui, Mamie</au><au>Chan, Paul K.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Multiplex Nested PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3631</spage><epage>3640</epage><pages>3631-3640</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><eissn>1098-5530</eissn><coden>JCMIDW</coden><abstract>Respiratory tract infections can be caused by a heterogeneous group of viruses and bacteria that produce similar clinical presentations. Specific diagnosis therefore relies on laboratory investigation. This study developed and evaluated five groups of multiplex nested PCR assays that could simultaneously detect 21 different respiratory pathogens: influenza A virus (H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1); influenza B virus; parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, 3, 4a, and 4b; respiratory syncytial virus A and B; human rhinoviruses; human enteroviruses; human coronaviruses OC43 and 229E; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus; human metapneumoviruses; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Legionella pneumophila; and adenoviruses (A to F). These multiplex nested PCRs adopted fast PCR technology. The high speed of fast PCR (within 35 min) greatly improved the efficiency of these assays. The results show that these multiplex nested PCR assays are specific and more sensitive (100- to 1,000-fold) than conventional methods. Among the 303 clinical specimens tested, the multiplex nested PCR achieved an overall positive rate of 48.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.9 to 54.1%), which was significantly higher than that of virus isolation (20.1% [95% CI, 15.6 to 24.6%]) and that of direct detection by immunofluorescence assay (13.5% [95% CI, 9.7 to 17.4%]). The improved sensitivity was partly due to the higher sensitivity of multiplex nested PCR than that of conventional methods in detecting cultivatable viruses. Moreover, the ability of the multiplex nested PCR to detect noncultivatable viruses, particularly rhinoviruses, coronavirus OC43, and metapneumoviruses, contributed a major gain (15.6%) in the overall positive rate. In conclusion, rapid multiplex nested PCR assays can improve the diagnostic yield for respiratory infections to allow prompt interventive actions to be taken.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>17804659</pmid><doi>10.1128/jcm.00280-07</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007-11, Vol.45 (11), p.3631-3640 |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X 1098-5530 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_fao_agris_US201300825842 |
source | American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Chlamydophila pneumoniae Fluorescent Antibody Technique Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human rhinovirus Humans Influenza A virus Influenza A virus - isolation & purification Influenza B virus Influenza B virus - isolation & purification Legionella pneumophila Metapneumovirus - isolation & purification Microbiology Mycoplasma pneumoniae Parainfluenza virus Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - isolation & purification Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Respiratory syncytial virus Respiratory Syncytial Viruses - isolation & purification Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis Respiratory Tract Infections - virology Rhinovirus SARS coronavirus Sensitivity and Specificity Time Factors Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies Virology |
title | Rapid Multiplex Nested PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Multiplex%20Nested%20PCR%20for%20Detection%20of%20Respiratory%20Viruses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Microbiology&rft.au=Lam,%20W.Y&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3631&rft.epage=3640&rft.pages=3631-3640&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft.coden=JCMIDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/jcm.00280-07&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_fao_a%3E20124557%3C/proquest_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20124557&rft_id=info:pmid/17804659&rfr_iscdi=true |