Assessment of compensatory predation and re-colonisation using long-term duck nest predator removal data

Removal of predators has been often found ineffective to increase duck nest success. Most often failures were explained by compensatory predation by other predator species and/or rapid recolonisation of the target area by new individuals by the same predator species. We used 13-year data of removing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Latvijas Universitates raksti 2005, Vol.691, p.17-29
Hauptverfasser: Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv, Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology), Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue
container_start_page 17
container_title Latvijas Universitates raksti
container_volume 691
creator Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv
Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)
Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))
description Removal of predators has been often found ineffective to increase duck nest success. Most often failures were explained by compensatory predation by other predator species and/or rapid recolonisation of the target area by new individuals by the same predator species. We used 13-year data of removing marsh harriers Circus aeruginosus, corvids Corvidae and American minks Mustela vision to test whether (i) removal of an individual predator species increased duck nest success; (ii) removal of an individual predator species decreased subsequent duck nest depredation rates by the same predator species; (iii) removal of one predator species increased subsequent proportion of duck nests depredated by other predator species. We removed 1 590 predators and followed the fates of 3 019 duck nests. Predator removal was measured using a concept-free days, expressed as the number of days of active duck nests during exposure to the removed predator's search if the removal would not happen. Predators were removed from the main duck breeding area and from its surroundings which altogether formed the entire predator removal area. Harrier removal was positively correlated with the apparent duck nest success (P is less than 0.05). However, this was true considering removed from the entire predator removal area, but not when they were removed only from the duck breeding area, thus suggesting that arrival of new harriers from the surroundings was an important factor in determining nest success in the much smaller duck nesting area. Removal of corvids and American mink were not correlated with duck nest success nor the subsequent predation rates of the same species. Mink removal was positively correlated with the proportion of nests depredated by harriers (P is less than 0.05) suggesting that harriers were compensatory predators after mink removal. Re-colonisation and compensatory predation after removing certain predator species may occur in many predator communities thus causing waste of management efforts. We suggest ways of how to evaluate past and ongoing management programmes and to plan future programmes with the aim of providing early diagnostics of a predator problem.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_fao_agris_LV2006000378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>LV2006000378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-fao_agris_LV20060003783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFi7EKwjAURTMoWLSfILwfCCStmjqKKA6O4lpim9Zgk1fyUsG_t2B3p8s9hzNjidwIxTO5VQuWEtmHkHtVCCllwp4HIkPkjI-ADVToeuNJRwwf6IOpdbToQfsaguEVdugt_dhA1rcwgpZHExzUQ_UCbyhOHYYxcfjWHYxPr9i80R2ZdNolW59Pt-OFNxpL3QZL5fWeCbETQuSqyP_5L4VbQv0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of compensatory predation and re-colonisation using long-term duck nest predator removal data</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv ; Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology) ; Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))</creator><creatorcontrib>Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv ; Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology) ; Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))</creatorcontrib><description>Removal of predators has been often found ineffective to increase duck nest success. Most often failures were explained by compensatory predation by other predator species and/or rapid recolonisation of the target area by new individuals by the same predator species. We used 13-year data of removing marsh harriers Circus aeruginosus, corvids Corvidae and American minks Mustela vision to test whether (i) removal of an individual predator species increased duck nest success; (ii) removal of an individual predator species decreased subsequent duck nest depredation rates by the same predator species; (iii) removal of one predator species increased subsequent proportion of duck nests depredated by other predator species. We removed 1 590 predators and followed the fates of 3 019 duck nests. Predator removal was measured using a concept-free days, expressed as the number of days of active duck nests during exposure to the removed predator's search if the removal would not happen. Predators were removed from the main duck breeding area and from its surroundings which altogether formed the entire predator removal area. Harrier removal was positively correlated with the apparent duck nest success (P is less than 0.05). However, this was true considering removed from the entire predator removal area, but not when they were removed only from the duck breeding area, thus suggesting that arrival of new harriers from the surroundings was an important factor in determining nest success in the much smaller duck nesting area. Removal of corvids and American mink were not correlated with duck nest success nor the subsequent predation rates of the same species. Mink removal was positively correlated with the proportion of nests depredated by harriers (P is less than 0.05) suggesting that harriers were compensatory predators after mink removal. Re-colonisation and compensatory predation after removing certain predator species may occur in many predator communities thus causing waste of management efforts. We suggest ways of how to evaluate past and ongoing management programmes and to plan future programmes with the aim of providing early diagnostics of a predator problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1407-2157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riga (Latvia): Latvijas Universitate</publisher><subject>Batería de nidales ; Boîte à nid ; Canard ; Damage ; Daños ; Diminution de la population ; Disminución de la población ; Ducks ; Dégât ; Investigación ; Latvia ; Letonia ; Lettonie ; Minks ; Nest boxes ; Nesting ; Nidificación ; Nidification ; Pato ; Population decrease ; Recherche ; Vison ; Visón</subject><ispartof>Latvijas Universitates raksti, 2005, Vol.691, p.17-29</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of compensatory predation and re-colonisation using long-term duck nest predator removal data</title><title>Latvijas Universitates raksti</title><description>Removal of predators has been often found ineffective to increase duck nest success. Most often failures were explained by compensatory predation by other predator species and/or rapid recolonisation of the target area by new individuals by the same predator species. We used 13-year data of removing marsh harriers Circus aeruginosus, corvids Corvidae and American minks Mustela vision to test whether (i) removal of an individual predator species increased duck nest success; (ii) removal of an individual predator species decreased subsequent duck nest depredation rates by the same predator species; (iii) removal of one predator species increased subsequent proportion of duck nests depredated by other predator species. We removed 1 590 predators and followed the fates of 3 019 duck nests. Predator removal was measured using a concept-free days, expressed as the number of days of active duck nests during exposure to the removed predator's search if the removal would not happen. Predators were removed from the main duck breeding area and from its surroundings which altogether formed the entire predator removal area. Harrier removal was positively correlated with the apparent duck nest success (P is less than 0.05). However, this was true considering removed from the entire predator removal area, but not when they were removed only from the duck breeding area, thus suggesting that arrival of new harriers from the surroundings was an important factor in determining nest success in the much smaller duck nesting area. Removal of corvids and American mink were not correlated with duck nest success nor the subsequent predation rates of the same species. Mink removal was positively correlated with the proportion of nests depredated by harriers (P is less than 0.05) suggesting that harriers were compensatory predators after mink removal. Re-colonisation and compensatory predation after removing certain predator species may occur in many predator communities thus causing waste of management efforts. We suggest ways of how to evaluate past and ongoing management programmes and to plan future programmes with the aim of providing early diagnostics of a predator problem.</description><subject>Batería de nidales</subject><subject>Boîte à nid</subject><subject>Canard</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Daños</subject><subject>Diminution de la population</subject><subject>Disminución de la población</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Dégât</subject><subject>Investigación</subject><subject>Latvia</subject><subject>Letonia</subject><subject>Lettonie</subject><subject>Minks</subject><subject>Nest boxes</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nidificación</subject><subject>Nidification</subject><subject>Pato</subject><subject>Population decrease</subject><subject>Recherche</subject><subject>Vison</subject><subject>Visón</subject><issn>1407-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFi7EKwjAURTMoWLSfILwfCCStmjqKKA6O4lpim9Zgk1fyUsG_t2B3p8s9hzNjidwIxTO5VQuWEtmHkHtVCCllwp4HIkPkjI-ADVToeuNJRwwf6IOpdbToQfsaguEVdugt_dhA1rcwgpZHExzUQ_UCbyhOHYYxcfjWHYxPr9i80R2ZdNolW59Pt-OFNxpL3QZL5fWeCbETQuSqyP_5L4VbQv0</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv</creator><creator>Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)</creator><creator>Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))</creator><general>Latvijas Universitate</general><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Assessment of compensatory predation and re-colonisation using long-term duck nest predator removal data</title><author>Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv ; Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology) ; Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-fao_agris_LV20060003783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Batería de nidales</topic><topic>Boîte à nid</topic><topic>Canard</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Daños</topic><topic>Diminution de la population</topic><topic>Disminución de la población</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Dégât</topic><topic>Investigación</topic><topic>Latvia</topic><topic>Letonia</topic><topic>Lettonie</topic><topic>Minks</topic><topic>Nest boxes</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nidificación</topic><topic>Nidification</topic><topic>Pato</topic><topic>Population decrease</topic><topic>Recherche</topic><topic>Vison</topic><topic>Visón</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Latvijas Universitates raksti</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Opermanis, O.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv</au><au>Mednis, A.(University of Latvia, Salaspils (Latvia). Inst. of Biology. Lab. of Ornithology)</au><au>Bauga, I.(Lukstenieki, Marupe, Riga reg. (Latvia))</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of compensatory predation and re-colonisation using long-term duck nest predator removal data</atitle><jtitle>Latvijas Universitates raksti</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>691</volume><spage>17</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>17-29</pages><issn>1407-2157</issn><abstract>Removal of predators has been often found ineffective to increase duck nest success. Most often failures were explained by compensatory predation by other predator species and/or rapid recolonisation of the target area by new individuals by the same predator species. We used 13-year data of removing marsh harriers Circus aeruginosus, corvids Corvidae and American minks Mustela vision to test whether (i) removal of an individual predator species increased duck nest success; (ii) removal of an individual predator species decreased subsequent duck nest depredation rates by the same predator species; (iii) removal of one predator species increased subsequent proportion of duck nests depredated by other predator species. We removed 1 590 predators and followed the fates of 3 019 duck nests. Predator removal was measured using a concept-free days, expressed as the number of days of active duck nests during exposure to the removed predator's search if the removal would not happen. Predators were removed from the main duck breeding area and from its surroundings which altogether formed the entire predator removal area. Harrier removal was positively correlated with the apparent duck nest success (P is less than 0.05). However, this was true considering removed from the entire predator removal area, but not when they were removed only from the duck breeding area, thus suggesting that arrival of new harriers from the surroundings was an important factor in determining nest success in the much smaller duck nesting area. Removal of corvids and American mink were not correlated with duck nest success nor the subsequent predation rates of the same species. Mink removal was positively correlated with the proportion of nests depredated by harriers (P is less than 0.05) suggesting that harriers were compensatory predators after mink removal. Re-colonisation and compensatory predation after removing certain predator species may occur in many predator communities thus causing waste of management efforts. We suggest ways of how to evaluate past and ongoing management programmes and to plan future programmes with the aim of providing early diagnostics of a predator problem.</abstract><cop>Riga (Latvia)</cop><pub>Latvijas Universitate</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1407-2157
ispartof Latvijas Universitates raksti, 2005, Vol.691, p.17-29
issn 1407-2157
language eng
recordid cdi_fao_agris_LV2006000378
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Batería de nidales
Boîte à nid
Canard
Damage
Daños
Diminution de la population
Disminución de la población
Ducks
Dégât
Investigación
Latvia
Letonia
Lettonie
Minks
Nest boxes
Nesting
Nidificación
Nidification
Pato
Population decrease
Recherche
Vison
Visón
title Assessment of compensatory predation and re-colonisation using long-term duck nest predator removal data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A43%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20compensatory%20predation%20and%20re-colonisation%20using%20long-term%20duck%20nest%20predator%20removal%20data&rft.jtitle=Latvijas%20Universitates%20raksti&rft.au=Opermanis,%20O.(University%20of%20Latvia,%20Salaspils%20(Latvia).%20Inst.%20of%20Biology.%20Lab.%20of%20Ornithology)E-mail:otars.opermanis@undp.riga.lv&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=691&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=17-29&rft.issn=1407-2157&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cfao%3ELV2006000378%3C/fao%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true