The Intolerableness of All Earthly Effort of Futility and Ahab as the Absurd Hero in Melville's Moby Dick

Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen) 10 poäng / 15 hp In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen
Format: Web Resource
Sprache:eng ; swe
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen
description Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen) 10 poäng / 15 hp In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, was the result of the absence of a god, and consequently of any meaning beyond life itself. Without a god, without an entity greater than man, man has no higher purpose than himself and he himself is inevitably transient. As such, man, so long as he lives, is cursed with the inability to create or partake in anything lasting. The absurd is life without a tomorrow, a life of futility. As one of the main precursors of this view of life and of the human experience, Camus mentioned Herman Melville and Captain Ahab’s chase for the white whale - Moby Dick. Now, as will be indicated in the following, the most common critical position holds that the white whale of Moby-Dick, Melville’s magnum opus, is to be interpreted as a symbol of God, and thus Ahab’s chase is tragic by virtue of its impossibility for success. As such, the tragedy is entailed by the futility vis-à-vis its impermanence. However, the ambiguity of Moby-Dick allows for the possibility of several alternative interpretations as to the role of the whale: for instance that of the devil, evil incarnate or merely a "dumb brute". As such, Ahab’s quest might as well be the pursuit of a creature which understands nothing of vengeance, thus rendering his objective equally, if not more fruitless, than the pursuit of a god. In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, was the result of the absence of a god, and consequently of any meaning beyond life itself. Without a god, without an entity greater than man, man has no higher purpose than himself and he himself is inevitably transient. As such, man, so long as he lives, is cursed with the inability to create or partake in anything lasting. The absurd is life without a tomorrow, a life of futility. As one of the main precursors of this view of life and of the human experience, Camus mentioned Herman Melville and Captain Ahab’s chase for the white whale - Moby Dick. Now, as will be indicated in the following, the most common critical position holds that the white whale of Moby-Dick, Melvi
format Web Resource
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>europeana_1GC</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_europeana_collections_9200111_BibliographicResource_1000085958996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9200111_BibliographicResource_1000085958996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-europeana_collections_9200111_BibliographicResource_10000859589963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtjDEKwkAQRdNYiHqH6ayERFFMGTUSCxuxD7ObiRkcdmR3I-T2RvAIvubDg_-mCd87gouLKuTRCDkKAbSFQgRK9LGTAcq2VR-_9txHFo4DoGug6NAABohjoTCh9w1U5BXYwZXkzSK0DHBVM8CJ7XOeTFqUQIvfzpLqXN6P1Yp6ry9Ch7XV8WMjqwt1vk7TLMvqAxthfXh8dWxvFLT3luosHdlv8-0-z3ebP6Y-mLFaxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>web_resource</recordtype></control><display><type>web_resource</type><title>The Intolerableness of All Earthly Effort of Futility and Ahab as the Absurd Hero in Melville's Moby Dick</title><source>Europeana Collections</source><creator>Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen</creator><creatorcontrib>Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen</creatorcontrib><description>Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen) 10 poäng / 15 hp In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, was the result of the absence of a god, and consequently of any meaning beyond life itself. Without a god, without an entity greater than man, man has no higher purpose than himself and he himself is inevitably transient. As such, man, so long as he lives, is cursed with the inability to create or partake in anything lasting. The absurd is life without a tomorrow, a life of futility. As one of the main precursors of this view of life and of the human experience, Camus mentioned Herman Melville and Captain Ahab’s chase for the white whale - Moby Dick. Now, as will be indicated in the following, the most common critical position holds that the white whale of Moby-Dick, Melville’s magnum opus, is to be interpreted as a symbol of God, and thus Ahab’s chase is tragic by virtue of its impossibility for success. As such, the tragedy is entailed by the futility vis-à-vis its impermanence. However, the ambiguity of Moby-Dick allows for the possibility of several alternative interpretations as to the role of the whale: for instance that of the devil, evil incarnate or merely a "dumb brute". As such, Ahab’s quest might as well be the pursuit of a creature which understands nothing of vengeance, thus rendering his objective equally, if not more fruitless, than the pursuit of a god. In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, was the result of the absence of a god, and consequently of any meaning beyond life itself. Without a god, without an entity greater than man, man has no higher purpose than himself and he himself is inevitably transient. As such, man, so long as he lives, is cursed with the inability to create or partake in anything lasting. The absurd is life without a tomorrow, a life of futility. As one of the main precursors of this view of life and of the human experience, Camus mentioned Herman Melville and Captain Ahab’s chase for the white whale - Moby Dick. Now, as will be indicated in the following, the most common critical position holds that the white whale of Moby-Dick, Melville’s magnum opus, is to be interpreted as a symbol of God, and thus Ahab’s chase is tragic by virtue of its impossibility for success. As such, the tragedy is entailed by the futility vis-à-vis its impermanence. However, the ambiguity of Moby-Dick allows for the possibility of several alternative interpretations as to the role of the whale: for instance that of the devil, evil incarnate or merely a "dumb brute". As such, Ahab’s quest might as well be the pursuit of a creature which understands nothing of vengeance, thus rendering his objective equally, if not more fruitless, than the pursuit of a god. Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen) 10 poäng / 15 hp</description><language>eng ; swe</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://data.europeana.eu/item/9200111/BibliographicResource_1000085958996$$EHTML$$P50$$Geuropeana$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,38496,75922</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://data.europeana.eu/item/9200111/BibliographicResource_1000085958996$$EView_record_in_Europeana$$FView_record_in_$$GEuropeana$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen</creatorcontrib><title>The Intolerableness of All Earthly Effort of Futility and Ahab as the Absurd Hero in Melville's Moby Dick</title><description>Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen) 10 poäng / 15 hp In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, was the result of the absence of a god, and consequently of any meaning beyond life itself. Without a god, without an entity greater than man, man has no higher purpose than himself and he himself is inevitably transient. As such, man, so long as he lives, is cursed with the inability to create or partake in anything lasting. The absurd is life without a tomorrow, a life of futility. As one of the main precursors of this view of life and of the human experience, Camus mentioned Herman Melville and Captain Ahab’s chase for the white whale - Moby Dick. Now, as will be indicated in the following, the most common critical position holds that the white whale of Moby-Dick, Melville’s magnum opus, is to be interpreted as a symbol of God, and thus Ahab’s chase is tragic by virtue of its impossibility for success. As such, the tragedy is entailed by the futility vis-à-vis its impermanence. However, the ambiguity of Moby-Dick allows for the possibility of several alternative interpretations as to the role of the whale: for instance that of the devil, evil incarnate or merely a "dumb brute". As such, Ahab’s quest might as well be the pursuit of a creature which understands nothing of vengeance, thus rendering his objective equally, if not more fruitless, than the pursuit of a god. In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, was the result of the absence of a god, and consequently of any meaning beyond life itself. Without a god, without an entity greater than man, man has no higher purpose than himself and he himself is inevitably transient. As such, man, so long as he lives, is cursed with the inability to create or partake in anything lasting. The absurd is life without a tomorrow, a life of futility. As one of the main precursors of this view of life and of the human experience, Camus mentioned Herman Melville and Captain Ahab’s chase for the white whale - Moby Dick. Now, as will be indicated in the following, the most common critical position holds that the white whale of Moby-Dick, Melville’s magnum opus, is to be interpreted as a symbol of God, and thus Ahab’s chase is tragic by virtue of its impossibility for success. As such, the tragedy is entailed by the futility vis-à-vis its impermanence. However, the ambiguity of Moby-Dick allows for the possibility of several alternative interpretations as to the role of the whale: for instance that of the devil, evil incarnate or merely a "dumb brute". As such, Ahab’s quest might as well be the pursuit of a creature which understands nothing of vengeance, thus rendering his objective equally, if not more fruitless, than the pursuit of a god. Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen) 10 poäng / 15 hp</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>web_resource</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>web_resource</recordtype><sourceid>1GC</sourceid><recordid>eNqtjDEKwkAQRdNYiHqH6ayERFFMGTUSCxuxD7ObiRkcdmR3I-T2RvAIvubDg_-mCd87gouLKuTRCDkKAbSFQgRK9LGTAcq2VR-_9txHFo4DoGug6NAABohjoTCh9w1U5BXYwZXkzSK0DHBVM8CJ7XOeTFqUQIvfzpLqXN6P1Yp6ry9Ch7XV8WMjqwt1vk7TLMvqAxthfXh8dWxvFLT3luosHdlv8-0-z3ebP6Y-mLFaxQ</recordid><startdate>20080615</startdate><enddate>20080615</enddate><creator>Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen</creator><scope>1GC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080615</creationdate><title>The Intolerableness of All Earthly Effort of Futility and Ahab as the Absurd Hero in Melville's Moby Dick</title><author>Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-europeana_collections_9200111_BibliographicResource_10000859589963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>web_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>web_resources</prefilter><language>eng ; swe</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen</creatorcontrib><collection>Europeana Collections</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mittermaier Sten , Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><btitle>The Intolerableness of All Earthly Effort of Futility and Ahab as the Absurd Hero in Melville's Moby Dick</btitle><date>2008-06-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><abstract>Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen) 10 poäng / 15 hp In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, was the result of the absence of a god, and consequently of any meaning beyond life itself. Without a god, without an entity greater than man, man has no higher purpose than himself and he himself is inevitably transient. As such, man, so long as he lives, is cursed with the inability to create or partake in anything lasting. The absurd is life without a tomorrow, a life of futility. As one of the main precursors of this view of life and of the human experience, Camus mentioned Herman Melville and Captain Ahab’s chase for the white whale - Moby Dick. Now, as will be indicated in the following, the most common critical position holds that the white whale of Moby-Dick, Melville’s magnum opus, is to be interpreted as a symbol of God, and thus Ahab’s chase is tragic by virtue of its impossibility for success. As such, the tragedy is entailed by the futility vis-à-vis its impermanence. However, the ambiguity of Moby-Dick allows for the possibility of several alternative interpretations as to the role of the whale: for instance that of the devil, evil incarnate or merely a "dumb brute". As such, Ahab’s quest might as well be the pursuit of a creature which understands nothing of vengeance, thus rendering his objective equally, if not more fruitless, than the pursuit of a god. In 1942, Algerian writer Albert Camus published a philosophical essay called The Myth of Sisyphus along with a fictional counterpart, The Stranger, wherein he presumed the human condition to be an absurd one. This, Camus claimed, was the result of the absence of a god, and consequently of any meaning beyond life itself. Without a god, without an entity greater than man, man has no higher purpose than himself and he himself is inevitably transient. As such, man, so long as he lives, is cursed with the inability to create or partake in anything lasting. The absurd is life without a tomorrow, a life of futility. As one of the main precursors of this view of life and of the human experience, Camus mentioned Herman Melville and Captain Ahab’s chase for the white whale - Moby Dick. Now, as will be indicated in the following, the most common critical position holds that the white whale of Moby-Dick, Melville’s magnum opus, is to be interpreted as a symbol of God, and thus Ahab’s chase is tragic by virtue of its impossibility for success. As such, the tragedy is entailed by the futility vis-à-vis its impermanence. However, the ambiguity of Moby-Dick allows for the possibility of several alternative interpretations as to the role of the whale: for instance that of the devil, evil incarnate or merely a "dumb brute". As such, Ahab’s quest might as well be the pursuit of a creature which understands nothing of vengeance, thus rendering his objective equally, if not more fruitless, than the pursuit of a god. Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen) 10 poäng / 15 hp</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng ; swe
recordid cdi_europeana_collections_9200111_BibliographicResource_1000085958996
source Europeana Collections
title The Intolerableness of All Earthly Effort of Futility and Ahab as the Absurd Hero in Melville's Moby Dick
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-europeana_1GC&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=The%20Intolerableness%20of%20All%20Earthly%20Effort%20of%20Futility%20and%20Ahab%20as%20the%20Absurd%20Hero%20in%20Melville's%20Moby%20Dick&rft.au=Mittermaier%20Sten%20,%20Stockholms%20universitet,%20Engelska%20institutionen&rft.date=2008-06-15&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceuropeana_1GC%3E9200111_BibliographicResource_1000085958996%3C/europeana_1GC%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true