WTO, GMO and the precautionary principle the conflict between trade liberalisation and environmental protection

This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper, Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences
Format: Web Resource
Sprache:eng ; swe
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper
Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences
description This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. The study focuses on the international trade with genetically modified organisms and discusses probable needs of reformulating the principles and/or conventions concerned if these are to function as tools of equal importance when handling environmental problems through policy making. The controversy is illustrated through a case-study of a trade dispute where the conflicting principles: the Precautionary Principle and WTO agreements on trade are involved, namely a dispute where a formal complaint to the WTO by the US, Canada and Argentina about the European Community supposedly applying a de facto moratorium on genetically modified organisms had the final outcome of the European Community being found to contravene international trade rules. The study concludes that actors on the international arena are still opinions apart concerning the way to perceive possible risks connected to biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. This incongruence is also found to apply to the status of the Precautionary Principle as a rule of international law as well as to which of the conventions that were applicable to the concerned dispute. Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (yrkesexamen) 20 poäng / 30 hp Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (yrkesexamen) 20 poäng / 30 hp This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. The study focuses on the international trade with genetically modified organisms and discusses probable needs of reformulating the principles and/or conventions concerned if these are to function as tools of equal importance when handling environmental problems through policy making. The controversy is illustrated through a case-study of a trade dispute where the conflicting principles: the Precautionary Principle and WTO agreements on trade are involved, namely a dispute where a formal complaint to the WTO by the US, Canada and Argentina about the European Community supposedly applying a de facto moratorium on geneti
format Web Resource
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>europeana_1GC</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_europeana_collections_9200111_BibliographicResource_1000085956093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9200111_BibliographicResource_1000085956093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-europeana_collections_9200111_BibliographicResource_10000859560933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtjM0KglAQhd20iOod7gMUaFLktqjchBBCSxmvYw5MM3K9Fr199vMInc3hcM75xoFe8mxujqfMgFTGN2hahxZ6TyrgnkMisdQyfjqrUjNZb0r0D0Qx3kGFhqlEB0wdvG8fEsqdnMoNxQMPFPVo3-U0GNXAHc5-PgnSwz7fpQvsnbYIAoVV5u-4K5JlGEZRVGypZNKrg7Yhe8ZOe2exiMJBm1WyWodJHP8R9QKgAl9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>web_resource</recordtype></control><display><type>web_resource</type><title>WTO, GMO and the precautionary principle the conflict between trade liberalisation and environmental protection</title><source>Europeana Collections</source><creator>Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper ; Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences</creator><creatorcontrib>Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper ; Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. The study focuses on the international trade with genetically modified organisms and discusses probable needs of reformulating the principles and/or conventions concerned if these are to function as tools of equal importance when handling environmental problems through policy making. The controversy is illustrated through a case-study of a trade dispute where the conflicting principles: the Precautionary Principle and WTO agreements on trade are involved, namely a dispute where a formal complaint to the WTO by the US, Canada and Argentina about the European Community supposedly applying a de facto moratorium on genetically modified organisms had the final outcome of the European Community being found to contravene international trade rules. The study concludes that actors on the international arena are still opinions apart concerning the way to perceive possible risks connected to biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. This incongruence is also found to apply to the status of the Precautionary Principle as a rule of international law as well as to which of the conventions that were applicable to the concerned dispute. Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (yrkesexamen) 20 poäng / 30 hp Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (yrkesexamen) 20 poäng / 30 hp This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. The study focuses on the international trade with genetically modified organisms and discusses probable needs of reformulating the principles and/or conventions concerned if these are to function as tools of equal importance when handling environmental problems through policy making. The controversy is illustrated through a case-study of a trade dispute where the conflicting principles: the Precautionary Principle and WTO agreements on trade are involved, namely a dispute where a formal complaint to the WTO by the US, Canada and Argentina about the European Community supposedly applying a de facto moratorium on genetically modified organisms had the final outcome of the European Community being found to contravene international trade rules. The study concludes that actors on the international arena are still opinions apart concerning the way to perceive possible risks connected to biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. This incongruence is also found to apply to the status of the Precautionary Principle as a rule of international law as well as to which of the conventions that were applicable to the concerned dispute.</description><language>eng ; swe</language><publisher>Department of Life Sciences</publisher><creationdate>2007</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://data.europeana.eu/item/9200111/BibliographicResource_1000085956093$$EHTML$$P50$$Geuropeana$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,38496,75923</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://data.europeana.eu/item/9200111/BibliographicResource_1000085956093$$EView_record_in_Europeana$$FView_record_in_$$GEuropeana$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences</creatorcontrib><title>WTO, GMO and the precautionary principle the conflict between trade liberalisation and environmental protection</title><description>This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. The study focuses on the international trade with genetically modified organisms and discusses probable needs of reformulating the principles and/or conventions concerned if these are to function as tools of equal importance when handling environmental problems through policy making. The controversy is illustrated through a case-study of a trade dispute where the conflicting principles: the Precautionary Principle and WTO agreements on trade are involved, namely a dispute where a formal complaint to the WTO by the US, Canada and Argentina about the European Community supposedly applying a de facto moratorium on genetically modified organisms had the final outcome of the European Community being found to contravene international trade rules. The study concludes that actors on the international arena are still opinions apart concerning the way to perceive possible risks connected to biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. This incongruence is also found to apply to the status of the Precautionary Principle as a rule of international law as well as to which of the conventions that were applicable to the concerned dispute. Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (yrkesexamen) 20 poäng / 30 hp Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (yrkesexamen) 20 poäng / 30 hp This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. The study focuses on the international trade with genetically modified organisms and discusses probable needs of reformulating the principles and/or conventions concerned if these are to function as tools of equal importance when handling environmental problems through policy making. The controversy is illustrated through a case-study of a trade dispute where the conflicting principles: the Precautionary Principle and WTO agreements on trade are involved, namely a dispute where a formal complaint to the WTO by the US, Canada and Argentina about the European Community supposedly applying a de facto moratorium on genetically modified organisms had the final outcome of the European Community being found to contravene international trade rules. The study concludes that actors on the international arena are still opinions apart concerning the way to perceive possible risks connected to biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. This incongruence is also found to apply to the status of the Precautionary Principle as a rule of international law as well as to which of the conventions that were applicable to the concerned dispute.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>web_resource</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>web_resource</recordtype><sourceid>1GC</sourceid><recordid>eNqtjM0KglAQhd20iOod7gMUaFLktqjchBBCSxmvYw5MM3K9Fr199vMInc3hcM75xoFe8mxujqfMgFTGN2hahxZ6TyrgnkMisdQyfjqrUjNZb0r0D0Qx3kGFhqlEB0wdvG8fEsqdnMoNxQMPFPVo3-U0GNXAHc5-PgnSwz7fpQvsnbYIAoVV5u-4K5JlGEZRVGypZNKrg7Yhe8ZOe2exiMJBm1WyWodJHP8R9QKgAl9M</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper</creator><creator>Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences</creator><general>Department of Life Sciences</general><general>Institutionen för livsvetenskaper</general><scope>1GC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>WTO, GMO and the precautionary principle the conflict between trade liberalisation and environmental protection</title><author>Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper ; Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-europeana_collections_9200111_BibliographicResource_10000859560933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>web_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>web_resources</prefilter><language>eng ; swe</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences</creatorcontrib><collection>Europeana Collections</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Börjeson Natasja , Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för livsvetenskaper</au><au>Begeson Natasja, Södertörns College, Department of Life Sciences</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><btitle>WTO, GMO and the precautionary principle the conflict between trade liberalisation and environmental protection</btitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><abstract>This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. The study focuses on the international trade with genetically modified organisms and discusses probable needs of reformulating the principles and/or conventions concerned if these are to function as tools of equal importance when handling environmental problems through policy making. The controversy is illustrated through a case-study of a trade dispute where the conflicting principles: the Precautionary Principle and WTO agreements on trade are involved, namely a dispute where a formal complaint to the WTO by the US, Canada and Argentina about the European Community supposedly applying a de facto moratorium on genetically modified organisms had the final outcome of the European Community being found to contravene international trade rules. The study concludes that actors on the international arena are still opinions apart concerning the way to perceive possible risks connected to biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. This incongruence is also found to apply to the status of the Precautionary Principle as a rule of international law as well as to which of the conventions that were applicable to the concerned dispute. Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (yrkesexamen) 20 poäng / 30 hp Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (yrkesexamen) 20 poäng / 30 hp This study examines the possible incompatibility between environmental conventions and agreements promoting international trade. More specifically, it aims at discussing the Precautionary Principle and the WTO agreements on trade and how they might contradict each other on the international arena. The study focuses on the international trade with genetically modified organisms and discusses probable needs of reformulating the principles and/or conventions concerned if these are to function as tools of equal importance when handling environmental problems through policy making. The controversy is illustrated through a case-study of a trade dispute where the conflicting principles: the Precautionary Principle and WTO agreements on trade are involved, namely a dispute where a formal complaint to the WTO by the US, Canada and Argentina about the European Community supposedly applying a de facto moratorium on genetically modified organisms had the final outcome of the European Community being found to contravene international trade rules. The study concludes that actors on the international arena are still opinions apart concerning the way to perceive possible risks connected to biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. This incongruence is also found to apply to the status of the Precautionary Principle as a rule of international law as well as to which of the conventions that were applicable to the concerned dispute.</abstract><pub>Department of Life Sciences</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng ; swe
recordid cdi_europeana_collections_9200111_BibliographicResource_1000085956093
source Europeana Collections
title WTO, GMO and the precautionary principle the conflict between trade liberalisation and environmental protection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A53%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-europeana_1GC&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=WTO,%20GMO%20and%20the%20precautionary%20principle%20the%20conflict%20between%20trade%20liberalisation%20and%20environmental%20protection&rft.au=B%C3%B6rjeson%20Natasja%20,%20S%C3%B6dert%C3%B6rns%20h%C3%B6gskola,%20Institutionen%20f%C3%B6r%20livsvetenskaper&rft.date=2007&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceuropeana_1GC%3E9200111_BibliographicResource_1000085956093%3C/europeana_1GC%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true