Classroom Assessments That Inform Instruction
The accountability movement in education has caused school administrators and teachers to think differently about how they report, interpret, and use student assessment data. For example, legislative measures such as No Child Left Behind require school officials to report how all students are progre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kappa Delta Pi record 2012-10, Vol.48 (4), p.162-168 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 168 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Kappa Delta Pi record |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Conderman, Greg Hedin, Laura |
description | The accountability movement in education has caused school administrators and teachers to think differently about how they report, interpret, and use student assessment data. For example, legislative measures such as No Child Left Behind require school officials to report how all students are progressing toward established standards typically measured by state and district tests (Goertz and Duffy 2003). In addition to analyzing student scores on state and district tests, teachers are revising their day-to-day classroom assessment practices. No longer can teachers wait until the conclusion of an instructional sequence or grading period to review student data, provide feedback to students, or inform parents about their child's progress. Waiting to conduct assessments until after an instructional period misses opportunities for parents to provide ongoing support regarding their child's learning; teachers to reflect critically about their instruction and make important instructional adjustments; and students to adjust their thinking processes, engage in self-assessment, and have multiple opportunities to improve and demonstrate their learning. Because using information from ongoing assessments is so important, this article offers representative formative assessments that elementary, middle, and high school teachers can use in their classrooms to inform their instructional practices. Specifically, the authors illustrate assessments teachers can use before, during, and after instruction that will help them understand their students' learning and reflect upon their own instructional effectiveness. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00228958.2012.733964 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ993452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ993452</ericid><sourcerecordid>3686177651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2010-d37a70dfd43e2ff1da3e3e3dc6e4af9b81cc739527544edf7d6b20b948eada8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIf9FCJc8r6Ecc-oaoqL1XiUs6W64dIlcTFToX69zgEOKI9zGFmdncGoRmGBQYBdwCECFmKBQFMFhWlkrMzNCGY0wJzjM_RZJAUg-YSXaW0BwAuBZ2gYtXolGII7XyZkkupdV2f5tt33c-fOx9imyH18Wj6OnTX6MLrJrmbH5yit4f1dvVUbF4fn1fLTWHyB1BYWukKrLeMOuI9tpq6PNZwx7SXO4GNqagsSVUy5qyvLN8R2EkmnLZaGDpFt-PeQwwfR5d6tQ_H2OWTCnOBcU4tIKvYqDIx5AzOq0OsWx1PCoMailG_xaihGDUWk22z0eZibf4s6xcpKStJpu9Huv6Orz9DbKzq9akJ0UfdmTop-u-BL86Rcqs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1681110880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classroom Assessments That Inform Instruction</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Conderman, Greg ; Hedin, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Conderman, Greg ; Hedin, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>The accountability movement in education has caused school administrators and teachers to think differently about how they report, interpret, and use student assessment data. For example, legislative measures such as No Child Left Behind require school officials to report how all students are progressing toward established standards typically measured by state and district tests (Goertz and Duffy 2003). In addition to analyzing student scores on state and district tests, teachers are revising their day-to-day classroom assessment practices. No longer can teachers wait until the conclusion of an instructional sequence or grading period to review student data, provide feedback to students, or inform parents about their child's progress. Waiting to conduct assessments until after an instructional period misses opportunities for parents to provide ongoing support regarding their child's learning; teachers to reflect critically about their instruction and make important instructional adjustments; and students to adjust their thinking processes, engage in self-assessment, and have multiple opportunities to improve and demonstrate their learning. Because using information from ongoing assessments is so important, this article offers representative formative assessments that elementary, middle, and high school teachers can use in their classrooms to inform their instructional practices. Specifically, the authors illustrate assessments teachers can use before, during, and after instruction that will help them understand their students' learning and reflect upon their own instructional effectiveness. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-8958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00228958.2012.733964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Indianapolis: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Classroom Techniques ; Data Analysis ; Data Collection ; Data Interpretation ; Educational Practices ; Evaluation Methods ; Federal Legislation ; Feedback (Response) ; Formative Evaluation ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Instructional Innovation ; No Child Left Behind Act 2001 ; No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US ; Student Evaluation ; Students ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Kappa Delta Pi record, 2012-10, Vol.48 (4), p.162-168</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2010-d37a70dfd43e2ff1da3e3e3dc6e4af9b81cc739527544edf7d6b20b948eada8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2010-d37a70dfd43e2ff1da3e3e3dc6e4af9b81cc739527544edf7d6b20b948eada8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ993452$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conderman, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedin, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Classroom Assessments That Inform Instruction</title><title>Kappa Delta Pi record</title><description>The accountability movement in education has caused school administrators and teachers to think differently about how they report, interpret, and use student assessment data. For example, legislative measures such as No Child Left Behind require school officials to report how all students are progressing toward established standards typically measured by state and district tests (Goertz and Duffy 2003). In addition to analyzing student scores on state and district tests, teachers are revising their day-to-day classroom assessment practices. No longer can teachers wait until the conclusion of an instructional sequence or grading period to review student data, provide feedback to students, or inform parents about their child's progress. Waiting to conduct assessments until after an instructional period misses opportunities for parents to provide ongoing support regarding their child's learning; teachers to reflect critically about their instruction and make important instructional adjustments; and students to adjust their thinking processes, engage in self-assessment, and have multiple opportunities to improve and demonstrate their learning. Because using information from ongoing assessments is so important, this article offers representative formative assessments that elementary, middle, and high school teachers can use in their classrooms to inform their instructional practices. Specifically, the authors illustrate assessments teachers can use before, during, and after instruction that will help them understand their students' learning and reflect upon their own instructional effectiveness. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.)</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Data Interpretation</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Instructional Innovation</subject><subject>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</subject><subject>No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0022-8958</issn><issn>2163-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIf9FCJc8r6Ecc-oaoqL1XiUs6W64dIlcTFToX69zgEOKI9zGFmdncGoRmGBQYBdwCECFmKBQFMFhWlkrMzNCGY0wJzjM_RZJAUg-YSXaW0BwAuBZ2gYtXolGII7XyZkkupdV2f5tt33c-fOx9imyH18Wj6OnTX6MLrJrmbH5yit4f1dvVUbF4fn1fLTWHyB1BYWukKrLeMOuI9tpq6PNZwx7SXO4GNqagsSVUy5qyvLN8R2EkmnLZaGDpFt-PeQwwfR5d6tQ_H2OWTCnOBcU4tIKvYqDIx5AzOq0OsWx1PCoMailG_xaihGDUWk22z0eZibf4s6xcpKStJpu9Huv6Orz9DbKzq9akJ0UfdmTop-u-BL86Rcqs</recordid><startdate>20121026</startdate><enddate>20121026</enddate><creator>Conderman, Greg</creator><creator>Hedin, Laura</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121026</creationdate><title>Classroom Assessments That Inform Instruction</title><author>Conderman, Greg ; Hedin, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2010-d37a70dfd43e2ff1da3e3e3dc6e4af9b81cc739527544edf7d6b20b948eada8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Data Interpretation</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Instructional Innovation</topic><topic>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</topic><topic>No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conderman, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedin, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><jtitle>Kappa Delta Pi record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conderman, Greg</au><au>Hedin, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ993452</ericid><atitle>Classroom Assessments That Inform Instruction</atitle><jtitle>Kappa Delta Pi record</jtitle><date>2012-10-26</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>162-168</pages><issn>0022-8958</issn><eissn>2163-1611</eissn><abstract>The accountability movement in education has caused school administrators and teachers to think differently about how they report, interpret, and use student assessment data. For example, legislative measures such as No Child Left Behind require school officials to report how all students are progressing toward established standards typically measured by state and district tests (Goertz and Duffy 2003). In addition to analyzing student scores on state and district tests, teachers are revising their day-to-day classroom assessment practices. No longer can teachers wait until the conclusion of an instructional sequence or grading period to review student data, provide feedback to students, or inform parents about their child's progress. Waiting to conduct assessments until after an instructional period misses opportunities for parents to provide ongoing support regarding their child's learning; teachers to reflect critically about their instruction and make important instructional adjustments; and students to adjust their thinking processes, engage in self-assessment, and have multiple opportunities to improve and demonstrate their learning. Because using information from ongoing assessments is so important, this article offers representative formative assessments that elementary, middle, and high school teachers can use in their classrooms to inform their instructional practices. Specifically, the authors illustrate assessments teachers can use before, during, and after instruction that will help them understand their students' learning and reflect upon their own instructional effectiveness. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.)</abstract><cop>Indianapolis</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00228958.2012.733964</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-8958 |
ispartof | Kappa Delta Pi record, 2012-10, Vol.48 (4), p.162-168 |
issn | 0022-8958 2163-1611 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ993452 |
source | Education Source |
subjects | Accountability Classroom Techniques Data Analysis Data Collection Data Interpretation Educational Practices Evaluation Methods Federal Legislation Feedback (Response) Formative Evaluation Instructional Effectiveness Instructional Innovation No Child Left Behind Act 2001 No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US Student Evaluation Students Teachers Teaching Methods |
title | Classroom Assessments That Inform Instruction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T07%3A57%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classroom%20Assessments%20That%20Inform%20Instruction&rft.jtitle=Kappa%20Delta%20Pi%20record&rft.au=Conderman,%20Greg&rft.date=2012-10-26&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=162-168&rft.issn=0022-8958&rft.eissn=2163-1611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00228958.2012.733964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3686177651%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1681110880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ993452&rfr_iscdi=true |