Revalorizing the Critical Attitude for Critical Education

This article argues that at a moment of crisis in education, the defence of critical pedagogy is vitally important. However, it also suggests that such a defence should be more than a "cri de coeur" that asserts principles and methods of criticality against those of neoliberal or conservat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for critical education policy studies 2011-11, Vol.9 (2), p.60
1. Verfasser: Amsler, Sarah S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 60
container_title Journal for critical education policy studies
container_volume 9
creator Amsler, Sarah S
description This article argues that at a moment of crisis in education, the defence of critical pedagogy is vitally important. However, it also suggests that such a defence should be more than a "cri de coeur" that asserts principles and methods of criticality against those of neoliberal or conservative education policy. Narratives of a totalising "crisis of critique" in education and the wider society are now ubiquitous in the critical pedagogical literature. But while these may mobilize the defence of critical education, they can also obscure tensions between different approaches to critical pedagogy, the history of "the crisis;" the co-optation of critical discourses; the proliferation of radical educational projects that do not draw inspiration from orthodox forms of critical pedagogy; the professional investments that critical educators may have in maintaining the status quo; and the possible relationships between formal education, popular education and broader "public pedagogies." The article concludes by suggesting that, in addition to defending specific pedagogical projects, it is also important to cultivate a critical attitude that interrogates the politics of critical pedagogy itself, even as we work to defend its necessity for democratic public life. (Contains 9 footnotes.)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ960598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ960598</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ960598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e106t-b4887a29387c271249295aaec605336b9e7f756ab26955759e39b29b8fc551a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFzMtKw0AUgOFZVGitfQMXeYHAZG5nzrKEeKNQEF2XM9MTOyVtZDIV9OkVFFz98C--mVg0YGStwOi5uJ6mo5QKJfiFwGf-oGHM6Sud36py4KrNqaRIQ7UuJZXLnqt-zP-3218ilTSeb8RVT8PEq78uxetd99I-1Jvt_WO73tTcSFfqYLwHUqg9RAWNMqjQEnF00mrtAjL0YB0F5dBasMgag8Lg-2htQ0Yvxe2vyznF3XtOJ8qfu-4JfwD0-hvmRz48</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revalorizing the Critical Attitude for Critical Education</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Amsler, Sarah S</creator><creatorcontrib>Amsler, Sarah S</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues that at a moment of crisis in education, the defence of critical pedagogy is vitally important. However, it also suggests that such a defence should be more than a "cri de coeur" that asserts principles and methods of criticality against those of neoliberal or conservative education policy. Narratives of a totalising "crisis of critique" in education and the wider society are now ubiquitous in the critical pedagogical literature. But while these may mobilize the defence of critical education, they can also obscure tensions between different approaches to critical pedagogy, the history of "the crisis;" the co-optation of critical discourses; the proliferation of radical educational projects that do not draw inspiration from orthodox forms of critical pedagogy; the professional investments that critical educators may have in maintaining the status quo; and the possible relationships between formal education, popular education and broader "public pedagogies." The article concludes by suggesting that, in addition to defending specific pedagogical projects, it is also important to cultivate a critical attitude that interrogates the politics of critical pedagogy itself, even as we work to defend its necessity for democratic public life. (Contains 9 footnotes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-2743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Institute for Education Policy Studies</publisher><subject>Critical Theory ; Democratic Values ; Higher Education ; Politics of Education ; Popular Education ; Teaching Methods ; Transformative Learning</subject><ispartof>Journal for critical education policy studies, 2011-11, Vol.9 (2), p.60</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ960598$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amsler, Sarah S</creatorcontrib><title>Revalorizing the Critical Attitude for Critical Education</title><title>Journal for critical education policy studies</title><description>This article argues that at a moment of crisis in education, the defence of critical pedagogy is vitally important. However, it also suggests that such a defence should be more than a "cri de coeur" that asserts principles and methods of criticality against those of neoliberal or conservative education policy. Narratives of a totalising "crisis of critique" in education and the wider society are now ubiquitous in the critical pedagogical literature. But while these may mobilize the defence of critical education, they can also obscure tensions between different approaches to critical pedagogy, the history of "the crisis;" the co-optation of critical discourses; the proliferation of radical educational projects that do not draw inspiration from orthodox forms of critical pedagogy; the professional investments that critical educators may have in maintaining the status quo; and the possible relationships between formal education, popular education and broader "public pedagogies." The article concludes by suggesting that, in addition to defending specific pedagogical projects, it is also important to cultivate a critical attitude that interrogates the politics of critical pedagogy itself, even as we work to defend its necessity for democratic public life. (Contains 9 footnotes.)</description><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Democratic Values</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Politics of Education</subject><subject>Popular Education</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Transformative Learning</subject><issn>1740-2743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFzMtKw0AUgOFZVGitfQMXeYHAZG5nzrKEeKNQEF2XM9MTOyVtZDIV9OkVFFz98C--mVg0YGStwOi5uJ6mo5QKJfiFwGf-oGHM6Sud36py4KrNqaRIQ7UuJZXLnqt-zP-3218ilTSeb8RVT8PEq78uxetd99I-1Jvt_WO73tTcSFfqYLwHUqg9RAWNMqjQEnF00mrtAjL0YB0F5dBasMgag8Lg-2htQ0Yvxe2vyznF3XtOJ8qfu-4JfwD0-hvmRz48</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Amsler, Sarah S</creator><general>Institute for Education Policy Studies</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Revalorizing the Critical Attitude for Critical Education</title><author>Amsler, Sarah S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e106t-b4887a29387c271249295aaec605336b9e7f756ab26955759e39b29b8fc551a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Democratic Values</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Politics of Education</topic><topic>Popular Education</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Transformative Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amsler, Sarah S</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Journal for critical education policy studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amsler, Sarah S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ960598</ericid><atitle>Revalorizing the Critical Attitude for Critical Education</atitle><jtitle>Journal for critical education policy studies</jtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>60</spage><pages>60-</pages><issn>1740-2743</issn><abstract>This article argues that at a moment of crisis in education, the defence of critical pedagogy is vitally important. However, it also suggests that such a defence should be more than a "cri de coeur" that asserts principles and methods of criticality against those of neoliberal or conservative education policy. Narratives of a totalising "crisis of critique" in education and the wider society are now ubiquitous in the critical pedagogical literature. But while these may mobilize the defence of critical education, they can also obscure tensions between different approaches to critical pedagogy, the history of "the crisis;" the co-optation of critical discourses; the proliferation of radical educational projects that do not draw inspiration from orthodox forms of critical pedagogy; the professional investments that critical educators may have in maintaining the status quo; and the possible relationships between formal education, popular education and broader "public pedagogies." The article concludes by suggesting that, in addition to defending specific pedagogical projects, it is also important to cultivate a critical attitude that interrogates the politics of critical pedagogy itself, even as we work to defend its necessity for democratic public life. (Contains 9 footnotes.)</abstract><pub>Institute for Education Policy Studies</pub><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1740-2743
ispartof Journal for critical education policy studies, 2011-11, Vol.9 (2), p.60
issn 1740-2743
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ960598
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Critical Theory
Democratic Values
Higher Education
Politics of Education
Popular Education
Teaching Methods
Transformative Learning
title Revalorizing the Critical Attitude for Critical Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T12%3A49%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revalorizing%20the%20Critical%20Attitude%20for%20Critical%20Education&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20critical%20education%20policy%20studies&rft.au=Amsler,%20Sarah%20S&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=60&rft.pages=60-&rft.issn=1740-2743&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ960598%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ960598&rfr_iscdi=true