Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material

Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current research in social psychology 2011-01, Vol.18 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Peturson, Elizabeth D, Cramer, Kenneth M, Pomerleau, Chantal M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Current research in social psychology
container_volume 18
creator Peturson, Elizabeth D
Cramer, Kenneth M
Pomerleau, Chantal M
description Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (personally knowing the answers) or to situational factors (reading the answers), and whether this varied by the gender of the topic. Participants listened to a staged quiz show that varied the sex of the quizmaster (male or female) and the stereotypical gender of the quiz topic (masculine or feminine). When the topic was masculine, female quizmasters were rated as having less knowledge and expertise. Male participants rated female quizmasters as less knowledgeable than male quizmasters, regardless of the topic. (Contains 1 note.)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ956401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ956401</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ956401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e91t-1289506f36578f54c5572ef3f91b25ffe7f17f8c09d570636f351e388e2aea793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjc9KAzEYxIMoWFvfwENeIJA_m03irZRtVSoWuveS7n6Ble3u8iVC-_am6sHTDMxvZm7ITHBrmSmkuv3n78lDjJ-cS85dMSPdMiXsjl-pGwff0wpxxEj90NINDC0g3SdAGNNlgvhMd4ANTFc20jHQd9_DD7uG09VW5wkw5WigezizOpfaDOWFzvcLchd8H-HxT-ekXlf16oVtPzavq-WWgROJCWmd5mVQpTY26KLR2kgIKjhxlDoEMEGYYBvuWm14qTKpBShrQXrwxqk5efqdzafNYcLu5PFyqN6cLgsu1Ddv61GR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Peturson, Elizabeth D ; Cramer, Kenneth M ; Pomerleau, Chantal M</creator><creatorcontrib>Peturson, Elizabeth D ; Cramer, Kenneth M ; Pomerleau, Chantal M</creatorcontrib><description>Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (personally knowing the answers) or to situational factors (reading the answers), and whether this varied by the gender of the topic. Participants listened to a staged quiz show that varied the sex of the quizmaster (male or female) and the stereotypical gender of the quiz topic (masculine or feminine). When the topic was masculine, female quizmasters were rated as having less knowledge and expertise. Male participants rated female quizmasters as less knowledgeable than male quizmasters, regardless of the topic. (Contains 1 note.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-7423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1088-7423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Center for the Study of Group Processes</publisher><subject>Attribution Theory ; Context Effect ; Error Patterns ; Expertise ; Gender Differences ; Sex Role ; Sex Stereotypes ; Tests</subject><ispartof>Current research in social psychology, 2011-01, Vol.18 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ956401$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peturson, Elizabeth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Kenneth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomerleau, Chantal M</creatorcontrib><title>Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material</title><title>Current research in social psychology</title><description>Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (personally knowing the answers) or to situational factors (reading the answers), and whether this varied by the gender of the topic. Participants listened to a staged quiz show that varied the sex of the quizmaster (male or female) and the stereotypical gender of the quiz topic (masculine or feminine). When the topic was masculine, female quizmasters were rated as having less knowledge and expertise. Male participants rated female quizmasters as less knowledgeable than male quizmasters, regardless of the topic. (Contains 1 note.)</description><subject>Attribution Theory</subject><subject>Context Effect</subject><subject>Error Patterns</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Sex Role</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Tests</subject><issn>1088-7423</issn><issn>1088-7423</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNjc9KAzEYxIMoWFvfwENeIJA_m03irZRtVSoWuveS7n6Ble3u8iVC-_am6sHTDMxvZm7ITHBrmSmkuv3n78lDjJ-cS85dMSPdMiXsjl-pGwff0wpxxEj90NINDC0g3SdAGNNlgvhMd4ANTFc20jHQd9_DD7uG09VW5wkw5WigezizOpfaDOWFzvcLchd8H-HxT-ekXlf16oVtPzavq-WWgROJCWmd5mVQpTY26KLR2kgIKjhxlDoEMEGYYBvuWm14qTKpBShrQXrwxqk5efqdzafNYcLu5PFyqN6cLgsu1Ddv61GR</recordid><startdate>20110106</startdate><enddate>20110106</enddate><creator>Peturson, Elizabeth D</creator><creator>Cramer, Kenneth M</creator><creator>Pomerleau, Chantal M</creator><general>Center for the Study of Group Processes</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110106</creationdate><title>Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material</title><author>Peturson, Elizabeth D ; Cramer, Kenneth M ; Pomerleau, Chantal M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e91t-1289506f36578f54c5572ef3f91b25ffe7f17f8c09d570636f351e388e2aea793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attribution Theory</topic><topic>Context Effect</topic><topic>Error Patterns</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Sex Role</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peturson, Elizabeth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Kenneth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomerleau, Chantal M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Current research in social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peturson, Elizabeth D</au><au>Cramer, Kenneth M</au><au>Pomerleau, Chantal M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ956401</ericid><atitle>Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material</atitle><jtitle>Current research in social psychology</jtitle><date>2011-01-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1088-7423</issn><eissn>1088-7423</eissn><abstract>Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (personally knowing the answers) or to situational factors (reading the answers), and whether this varied by the gender of the topic. Participants listened to a staged quiz show that varied the sex of the quizmaster (male or female) and the stereotypical gender of the quiz topic (masculine or feminine). When the topic was masculine, female quizmasters were rated as having less knowledge and expertise. Male participants rated female quizmasters as less knowledgeable than male quizmasters, regardless of the topic. (Contains 1 note.)</abstract><pub>Center for the Study of Group Processes</pub><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-7423
ispartof Current research in social psychology, 2011-01, Vol.18 (1)
issn 1088-7423
1088-7423
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ956401
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Attribution Theory
Context Effect
Error Patterns
Expertise
Gender Differences
Sex Role
Sex Stereotypes
Tests
title Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A45%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attributional%20Errors%20and%20Gender%20Stereotypes:%20Perceptions%20of%20Male%20and%20Female%20Experts%20on%20Sex-Typed%20Material&rft.jtitle=Current%20research%20in%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Peturson,%20Elizabeth%20D&rft.date=2011-01-06&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1088-7423&rft.eissn=1088-7423&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ956401%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ956401&rfr_iscdi=true