Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material
Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (per...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current research in social psychology 2011-01, Vol.18 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Current research in social psychology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Peturson, Elizabeth D Cramer, Kenneth M Pomerleau, Chantal M |
description | Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (personally knowing the answers) or to situational factors (reading the answers), and whether this varied by the gender of the topic. Participants listened to a staged quiz show that varied the sex of the quizmaster (male or female) and the stereotypical gender of the quiz topic (masculine or feminine). When the topic was masculine, female quizmasters were rated as having less knowledge and expertise. Male participants rated female quizmasters as less knowledgeable than male quizmasters, regardless of the topic. (Contains 1 note.) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ956401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ956401</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ956401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e91t-1289506f36578f54c5572ef3f91b25ffe7f17f8c09d570636f351e388e2aea793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjc9KAzEYxIMoWFvfwENeIJA_m03irZRtVSoWuveS7n6Ble3u8iVC-_am6sHTDMxvZm7ITHBrmSmkuv3n78lDjJ-cS85dMSPdMiXsjl-pGwff0wpxxEj90NINDC0g3SdAGNNlgvhMd4ANTFc20jHQd9_DD7uG09VW5wkw5WigezizOpfaDOWFzvcLchd8H-HxT-ekXlf16oVtPzavq-WWgROJCWmd5mVQpTY26KLR2kgIKjhxlDoEMEGYYBvuWm14qTKpBShrQXrwxqk5efqdzafNYcLu5PFyqN6cLgsu1Ddv61GR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Peturson, Elizabeth D ; Cramer, Kenneth M ; Pomerleau, Chantal M</creator><creatorcontrib>Peturson, Elizabeth D ; Cramer, Kenneth M ; Pomerleau, Chantal M</creatorcontrib><description>Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (personally knowing the answers) or to situational factors (reading the answers), and whether this varied by the gender of the topic. Participants listened to a staged quiz show that varied the sex of the quizmaster (male or female) and the stereotypical gender of the quiz topic (masculine or feminine). When the topic was masculine, female quizmasters were rated as having less knowledge and expertise. Male participants rated female quizmasters as less knowledgeable than male quizmasters, regardless of the topic. (Contains 1 note.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-7423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1088-7423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Center for the Study of Group Processes</publisher><subject>Attribution Theory ; Context Effect ; Error Patterns ; Expertise ; Gender Differences ; Sex Role ; Sex Stereotypes ; Tests</subject><ispartof>Current research in social psychology, 2011-01, Vol.18 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ956401$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peturson, Elizabeth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Kenneth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomerleau, Chantal M</creatorcontrib><title>Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material</title><title>Current research in social psychology</title><description>Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (personally knowing the answers) or to situational factors (reading the answers), and whether this varied by the gender of the topic. Participants listened to a staged quiz show that varied the sex of the quizmaster (male or female) and the stereotypical gender of the quiz topic (masculine or feminine). When the topic was masculine, female quizmasters were rated as having less knowledge and expertise. Male participants rated female quizmasters as less knowledgeable than male quizmasters, regardless of the topic. (Contains 1 note.)</description><subject>Attribution Theory</subject><subject>Context Effect</subject><subject>Error Patterns</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Sex Role</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Tests</subject><issn>1088-7423</issn><issn>1088-7423</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNjc9KAzEYxIMoWFvfwENeIJA_m03irZRtVSoWuveS7n6Ble3u8iVC-_am6sHTDMxvZm7ITHBrmSmkuv3n78lDjJ-cS85dMSPdMiXsjl-pGwff0wpxxEj90NINDC0g3SdAGNNlgvhMd4ANTFc20jHQd9_DD7uG09VW5wkw5WigezizOpfaDOWFzvcLchd8H-HxT-ekXlf16oVtPzavq-WWgROJCWmd5mVQpTY26KLR2kgIKjhxlDoEMEGYYBvuWm14qTKpBShrQXrwxqk5efqdzafNYcLu5PFyqN6cLgsu1Ddv61GR</recordid><startdate>20110106</startdate><enddate>20110106</enddate><creator>Peturson, Elizabeth D</creator><creator>Cramer, Kenneth M</creator><creator>Pomerleau, Chantal M</creator><general>Center for the Study of Group Processes</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110106</creationdate><title>Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material</title><author>Peturson, Elizabeth D ; Cramer, Kenneth M ; Pomerleau, Chantal M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e91t-1289506f36578f54c5572ef3f91b25ffe7f17f8c09d570636f351e388e2aea793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attribution Theory</topic><topic>Context Effect</topic><topic>Error Patterns</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Sex Role</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peturson, Elizabeth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Kenneth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomerleau, Chantal M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Current research in social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peturson, Elizabeth D</au><au>Cramer, Kenneth M</au><au>Pomerleau, Chantal M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ956401</ericid><atitle>Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material</atitle><jtitle>Current research in social psychology</jtitle><date>2011-01-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1088-7423</issn><eissn>1088-7423</eissn><abstract>Observers frequently commit the fundamental attribution error by failing to make adequate allowance for contextual influences in favour of dispositional explanations. The present experiment tested whether people would attribute a quizmaster's knowledge of the quiz topic to personal factors (personally knowing the answers) or to situational factors (reading the answers), and whether this varied by the gender of the topic. Participants listened to a staged quiz show that varied the sex of the quizmaster (male or female) and the stereotypical gender of the quiz topic (masculine or feminine). When the topic was masculine, female quizmasters were rated as having less knowledge and expertise. Male participants rated female quizmasters as less knowledgeable than male quizmasters, regardless of the topic. (Contains 1 note.)</abstract><pub>Center for the Study of Group Processes</pub><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1088-7423 |
ispartof | Current research in social psychology, 2011-01, Vol.18 (1) |
issn | 1088-7423 1088-7423 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ956401 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Attribution Theory Context Effect Error Patterns Expertise Gender Differences Sex Role Sex Stereotypes Tests |
title | Attributional Errors and Gender Stereotypes: Perceptions of Male and Female Experts on Sex-Typed Material |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A45%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attributional%20Errors%20and%20Gender%20Stereotypes:%20Perceptions%20of%20Male%20and%20Female%20Experts%20on%20Sex-Typed%20Material&rft.jtitle=Current%20research%20in%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Peturson,%20Elizabeth%20D&rft.date=2011-01-06&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1088-7423&rft.eissn=1088-7423&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ956401%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ956401&rfr_iscdi=true |