Retention of Economics Principles by Undergraduates on Alternative Curricular Structures
The authors investigated whether the curricular structure of an economics course (semester, trimester, or compressed block schedule) has an effect on an undergraduate's subsequent retention of course material, while controlling for other relevant differences. They tested separately for theoreti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of education for business 2011-08, Vol.86 (6), p.332-338 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 338 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 332 |
container_title | Journal of education for business |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Johnson, Daniel K. N. Lybecker, Kristina M. Taylor, Corrine H. |
description | The authors investigated whether the curricular structure of an economics course (semester, trimester, or compressed block schedule) has an effect on an undergraduate's subsequent retention of course material, while controlling for other relevant differences. They tested separately for theoretical or process comprehension and for graphical construction or interpretation, while separating microeconomics from macroeconomics content as well. They used an instrument to address the no-stakes testing problem, and their Heckman two-stage estimations present some interesting results for educators and institutional policymakers alike. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08832323.2010.532240 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ950622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ950622</ericid><sourcerecordid>2481959481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-c2e924549cb73b67edbb9244ac0b2086b2ded2b8d596e5a7a36d35d6646f3d5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKf_YBfF-840adL0SsaYJwaKOvAupEkqHV0zv6TK_r0pVS8lF4H3e94cHoRmGZ5nWOArLAQlcc0JjhGjhOT4CE2yMscppYwfo8mApANzis6832KMGc6KCXp7tsF2oXFd4upkpV3ndo32yRM0nW72rfVJdUg2nbHwDsr0KsQkwos2WOhUaD5tsuwBGt23CpKXAL0OPVh_jk5q1Xp78bNP0eZm9bq8S9ePt_fLxTrVVPCQamJLkrO81FVBK15YU1UxyJXGFcGCV8RYQyphWMktU4Wi3FBmOM95TQ3TdIoux3P34D5664Pcuj6-rPVSlAXOmaBlhPIR0uC8B1vLPTQ7BQeZYTkolL8K5aBQjgpjbTbWbPzfX2X1UDLMCYnj63HcdLWDnfpy0BoZ1KF1UIOK_ryk_17wDfJbghQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>897045839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention of Economics Principles by Undergraduates on Alternative Curricular Structures</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Johnson, Daniel K. N. ; Lybecker, Kristina M. ; Taylor, Corrine H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Daniel K. N. ; Lybecker, Kristina M. ; Taylor, Corrine H.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors investigated whether the curricular structure of an economics course (semester, trimester, or compressed block schedule) has an effect on an undergraduate's subsequent retention of course material, while controlling for other relevant differences. They tested separately for theoretical or process comprehension and for graphical construction or interpretation, while separating microeconomics from macroeconomics content as well. They used an instrument to address the no-stakes testing problem, and their Heckman two-stage estimations present some interesting results for educators and institutional policymakers alike.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-2323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-3356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2010.532240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Block Scheduling ; Course Organization ; curriculum ; Curriculum development ; economics ; Economics Education ; Educational Principles ; Estimating techniques ; Heckman ; Higher education ; Macroeconomics ; Mail Surveys ; Microeconomics ; Recall (Psychology) ; retention ; Retention (Psychology) ; School Schedules ; Semester System ; Student Attitudes ; Student Surveys ; survey ; Testing Problems ; Trimester System ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of education for business, 2011-08, Vol.86 (6), p.332-338</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Inc. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-c2e924549cb73b67edbb9244ac0b2086b2ded2b8d596e5a7a36d35d6646f3d5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-c2e924549cb73b67edbb9244ac0b2086b2ded2b8d596e5a7a36d35d6646f3d5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ950622$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Daniel K. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lybecker, Kristina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Corrine H.</creatorcontrib><title>Retention of Economics Principles by Undergraduates on Alternative Curricular Structures</title><title>Journal of education for business</title><description>The authors investigated whether the curricular structure of an economics course (semester, trimester, or compressed block schedule) has an effect on an undergraduate's subsequent retention of course material, while controlling for other relevant differences. They tested separately for theoretical or process comprehension and for graphical construction or interpretation, while separating microeconomics from macroeconomics content as well. They used an instrument to address the no-stakes testing problem, and their Heckman two-stage estimations present some interesting results for educators and institutional policymakers alike.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Block Scheduling</subject><subject>Course Organization</subject><subject>curriculum</subject><subject>Curriculum development</subject><subject>economics</subject><subject>Economics Education</subject><subject>Educational Principles</subject><subject>Estimating techniques</subject><subject>Heckman</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Mail Surveys</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>retention</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>School Schedules</subject><subject>Semester System</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Testing Problems</subject><subject>Trimester System</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0883-2323</issn><issn>1940-3356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKf_YBfF-840adL0SsaYJwaKOvAupEkqHV0zv6TK_r0pVS8lF4H3e94cHoRmGZ5nWOArLAQlcc0JjhGjhOT4CE2yMscppYwfo8mApANzis6832KMGc6KCXp7tsF2oXFd4upkpV3ndo32yRM0nW72rfVJdUg2nbHwDsr0KsQkwos2WOhUaD5tsuwBGt23CpKXAL0OPVh_jk5q1Xp78bNP0eZm9bq8S9ePt_fLxTrVVPCQamJLkrO81FVBK15YU1UxyJXGFcGCV8RYQyphWMktU4Wi3FBmOM95TQ3TdIoux3P34D5664Pcuj6-rPVSlAXOmaBlhPIR0uC8B1vLPTQ7BQeZYTkolL8K5aBQjgpjbTbWbPzfX2X1UDLMCYnj63HcdLWDnfpy0BoZ1KF1UIOK_ryk_17wDfJbghQ</recordid><startdate>20110822</startdate><enddate>20110822</enddate><creator>Johnson, Daniel K. N.</creator><creator>Lybecker, Kristina M.</creator><creator>Taylor, Corrine H.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110822</creationdate><title>Retention of Economics Principles by Undergraduates on Alternative Curricular Structures</title><author>Johnson, Daniel K. N. ; Lybecker, Kristina M. ; Taylor, Corrine H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-c2e924549cb73b67edbb9244ac0b2086b2ded2b8d596e5a7a36d35d6646f3d5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Block Scheduling</topic><topic>Course Organization</topic><topic>curriculum</topic><topic>Curriculum development</topic><topic>economics</topic><topic>Economics Education</topic><topic>Educational Principles</topic><topic>Estimating techniques</topic><topic>Heckman</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Mail Surveys</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>retention</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>School Schedules</topic><topic>Semester System</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Testing Problems</topic><topic>Trimester System</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Daniel K. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lybecker, Kristina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Corrine H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of education for business</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Daniel K. N.</au><au>Lybecker, Kristina M.</au><au>Taylor, Corrine H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ950622</ericid><atitle>Retention of Economics Principles by Undergraduates on Alternative Curricular Structures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education for business</jtitle><date>2011-08-22</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>332-338</pages><issn>0883-2323</issn><eissn>1940-3356</eissn><abstract>The authors investigated whether the curricular structure of an economics course (semester, trimester, or compressed block schedule) has an effect on an undergraduate's subsequent retention of course material, while controlling for other relevant differences. They tested separately for theoretical or process comprehension and for graphical construction or interpretation, while separating microeconomics from macroeconomics content as well. They used an instrument to address the no-stakes testing problem, and their Heckman two-stage estimations present some interesting results for educators and institutional policymakers alike.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/08832323.2010.532240</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-2323 |
ispartof | Journal of education for business, 2011-08, Vol.86 (6), p.332-338 |
issn | 0883-2323 1940-3356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ950622 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Achievement Gains Block Scheduling Course Organization curriculum Curriculum development economics Economics Education Educational Principles Estimating techniques Heckman Higher education Macroeconomics Mail Surveys Microeconomics Recall (Psychology) retention Retention (Psychology) School Schedules Semester System Student Attitudes Student Surveys survey Testing Problems Trimester System Undergraduate Students |
title | Retention of Economics Principles by Undergraduates on Alternative Curricular Structures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20of%20Economics%20Principles%20by%20Undergraduates%20on%20Alternative%20Curricular%20Structures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20for%20business&rft.au=Johnson,%20Daniel%20K.%20N.&rft.date=2011-08-22&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=332-338&rft.issn=0883-2323&rft.eissn=1940-3356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08832323.2010.532240&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2481959481%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=897045839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ950622&rfr_iscdi=true |