The QUIPPED Project: exploring relevance and rigor of action research using established principles and criteria
This paper is the last in a series of three manuscripts published in the TQR journal over the past few years. This work is part of a larger program of research that has been carried out by a team of researchers detailing various aspects of a three year action research project carried out from 2005 a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative report 2011-01, Vol.16 (1), p.208-228 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 228 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 208 |
| container_title | Qualitative report |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Chapman, Christine Paterson, Margo Medves, Jennifer M |
| description | This paper is the last in a series of three manuscripts published in the TQR journal over the past few years. This work is part of a larger program of research that has been carried out by a team of researchers detailing various aspects of a three year action research project carried out from 2005 and 2008. This particular paper addresses issues of quality in action research by critiquing our research against five interdependent principles and criteria raised in the literature specifically by Davison, Martinson and Kock which was published in 2004. Our action research project aimed to facilitate interprofessional education for health care learners in the Faculty of Health Sciences at a Canadian University. Key Words: Interprofessional Education and Action Research |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ914037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A251725297</galeid><ericid>EJ914037</ericid><sourcerecordid>A251725297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e274t-57d7af9aa7f2823f71fa86fd34c81e56c9b11a971208818ecb89f797b4f7352d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLAzEQhYMoWKv_wEPw4mllk2w2ibdSq1YKVmjPSzY7aVO2mzXZiv57o_UkcxiY972Zx5ygESVlnjFB-CkakZzTLCeFOEcXMe7ynDJGxQj51Rbw23q-XM4e8DL4HZjhHsNn3_rgug0O0MKH7gxg3TU4uI0P2FuszeB8l9QIOpgtPsQfGOKg69bFLTS4T3bj-hbir9MEN0Bw-hKdWd1GuPrrY7R-nK2mz9ni9Wk-nSwyoKIYMi4aoa3SWlgqKbOCWC1L27DCSAK8NKomRCtBaC4lkWBqqaxQoi6sYJw2bIyuj3vTUVOlMHsdvqrZiyJFzkSSb49yH_z7IeWu9i4aaFvdgT_ESpaUq5KkL43RzT9y5w-hS9kryQslCyl5gu6O0Ea3ULnO-iFok6qBvTO-A-vSfEI5EZRTJdg3klx9hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>854984885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The QUIPPED Project: exploring relevance and rigor of action research using established principles and criteria</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Chapman, Christine ; Paterson, Margo ; Medves, Jennifer M</creator><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Christine ; Paterson, Margo ; Medves, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is the last in a series of three manuscripts published in the TQR journal over the past few years. This work is part of a larger program of research that has been carried out by a team of researchers detailing various aspects of a three year action research project carried out from 2005 and 2008. This particular paper addresses issues of quality in action research by critiquing our research against five interdependent principles and criteria raised in the literature specifically by Davison, Martinson and Kock which was published in 2004. Our action research project aimed to facilitate interprofessional education for health care learners in the Faculty of Health Sciences at a Canadian University. Key Words: Interprofessional Education and Action Research</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-3715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Lauderdale: Nova Southeastern University, Inc</publisher><subject>Action Research ; Canada ; Design ; Education ; Educational Environment ; Educational Principles ; Educational Quality ; Evaluation Criteria ; Evaluation Research ; Foreign Countries ; Health Care Services ; Health Education ; Health Personnel ; Health sciences ; Health Services ; Organizational Development ; Principles ; Quality Control ; Quality of Health Care ; Relevance (Education) ; Research Projects ; Researchers ; Stakeholders ; Student Attitudes ; Teamwork ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Qualitative report, 2011-01, Vol.16 (1), p.208-228</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Nova Southeastern University, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright The Qualitative Report Jan 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,27343,33773,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ914037$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Margo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medves, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><title>The QUIPPED Project: exploring relevance and rigor of action research using established principles and criteria</title><title>Qualitative report</title><description>This paper is the last in a series of three manuscripts published in the TQR journal over the past few years. This work is part of a larger program of research that has been carried out by a team of researchers detailing various aspects of a three year action research project carried out from 2005 and 2008. This particular paper addresses issues of quality in action research by critiquing our research against five interdependent principles and criteria raised in the literature specifically by Davison, Martinson and Kock which was published in 2004. Our action research project aimed to facilitate interprofessional education for health care learners in the Faculty of Health Sciences at a Canadian University. Key Words: Interprofessional Education and Action Research</description><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Principles</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Evaluation Criteria</subject><subject>Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Health Education</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Organizational Development</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Relevance (Education)</subject><subject>Research Projects</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>1052-0147</issn><issn>2160-3715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEFLAzEQhYMoWKv_wEPw4mllk2w2ibdSq1YKVmjPSzY7aVO2mzXZiv57o_UkcxiY972Zx5ygESVlnjFB-CkakZzTLCeFOEcXMe7ynDJGxQj51Rbw23q-XM4e8DL4HZjhHsNn3_rgug0O0MKH7gxg3TU4uI0P2FuszeB8l9QIOpgtPsQfGOKg69bFLTS4T3bj-hbir9MEN0Bw-hKdWd1GuPrrY7R-nK2mz9ni9Wk-nSwyoKIYMi4aoa3SWlgqKbOCWC1L27DCSAK8NKomRCtBaC4lkWBqqaxQoi6sYJw2bIyuj3vTUVOlMHsdvqrZiyJFzkSSb49yH_z7IeWu9i4aaFvdgT_ESpaUq5KkL43RzT9y5w-hS9kryQslCyl5gu6O0Ea3ULnO-iFok6qBvTO-A-vSfEI5EZRTJdg3klx9hg</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Chapman, Christine</creator><creator>Paterson, Margo</creator><creator>Medves, Jennifer M</creator><general>Nova Southeastern University, Inc</general><general>The Qualitative Report</general><general>Nova Southeastern University</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>The QUIPPED Project: exploring relevance and rigor of action research using established principles and criteria</title><author>Chapman, Christine ; Paterson, Margo ; Medves, Jennifer M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e274t-57d7af9aa7f2823f71fa86fd34c81e56c9b11a971208818ecb89f797b4f7352d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Principles</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Evaluation Criteria</topic><topic>Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Health Education</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Organizational Development</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Relevance (Education)</topic><topic>Research Projects</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Margo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medves, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Qualitative report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chapman, Christine</au><au>Paterson, Margo</au><au>Medves, Jennifer M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ914037</ericid><atitle>The QUIPPED Project: exploring relevance and rigor of action research using established principles and criteria</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative report</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>208-228</pages><issn>1052-0147</issn><eissn>2160-3715</eissn><abstract>This paper is the last in a series of three manuscripts published in the TQR journal over the past few years. This work is part of a larger program of research that has been carried out by a team of researchers detailing various aspects of a three year action research project carried out from 2005 and 2008. This particular paper addresses issues of quality in action research by critiquing our research against five interdependent principles and criteria raised in the literature specifically by Davison, Martinson and Kock which was published in 2004. Our action research project aimed to facilitate interprofessional education for health care learners in the Faculty of Health Sciences at a Canadian University. Key Words: Interprofessional Education and Action Research</abstract><cop>Fort Lauderdale</cop><pub>Nova Southeastern University, Inc</pub><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1052-0147 |
| ispartof | Qualitative report, 2011-01, Vol.16 (1), p.208-228 |
| issn | 1052-0147 2160-3715 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ914037 |
| source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Action Research Canada Design Education Educational Environment Educational Principles Educational Quality Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Research Foreign Countries Health Care Services Health Education Health Personnel Health sciences Health Services Organizational Development Principles Quality Control Quality of Health Care Relevance (Education) Research Projects Researchers Stakeholders Student Attitudes Teamwork Universities |
| title | The QUIPPED Project: exploring relevance and rigor of action research using established principles and criteria |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A20%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20QUIPPED%20Project:%20exploring%20relevance%20and%20rigor%20of%20action%20research%20using%20established%20principles%20and%20criteria&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20report&rft.au=Chapman,%20Christine&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=208-228&rft.issn=1052-0147&rft.eissn=2160-3715&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA251725297%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=854984885&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A251725297&rft_ericid=EJ914037&rfr_iscdi=true |