Standardized Testing and School Accountability

This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational psychologist 2010-04, Vol.45 (2), p.107-122
1. Verfasser: WILIAM, DYLAN
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 2
container_start_page 107
container_title Educational psychologist
container_volume 45
creator WILIAM, DYLAN
description This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals is small compared to the spread of achievement within an age cohort, and, possibly, due to lack of alignment between instruction and assessment. A review of the literature on the effects of the introduction of such tests in high-stakes accountability regimes suggests that the effects can be positive and the size of the effects is substantial. Therefore, although the validity of such tests may be problematic in terms of the intended inferences, their introduction may nevertheless be justified by their impact. The article concludes with a number of suggestions on improving tests for high-stakes accountability.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00461521003703060
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ882031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ882031</ericid><sourcerecordid>2013012051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2d3476e54b13375b5e32d60126ea8aac42530c0585e048f196230adaed11046b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQPCweN86k2x2U_BSSv1HwUPrOWSzWU3Zbmo2ReunN2XFS0FPA_Peb-bxCLlEGCEIuAHIcuQUAVgBDHI4IgPkjKb5WPBjMtjraTTAKTnruhUAIHI-IKNFUG2lfGW_TJUsTRds-5rEVbLQb841yURrt22DKm1jw-6cnNSq6czFzxySl7vZcvqQzp_vH6eTeaozVoSUViwrcsOzEhkreMkNo1UOSHOjhFI6o5yBBi64gUzUOM4pA1UpUyHGoCUbkuv-7sa7921MJVdu69v4UlLIkHHORDRhb9LedZ03tdx4u1Z-JxHkvhV50EpkrnrGeKt__bMnISgwjPJtL9u2dn6tPpxvKhnUrnG-9qrVtpPsr-vFv_gBJcNnYN83ToA7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204135538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardized Testing and School Accountability</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>WILIAM, DYLAN</creator><creatorcontrib>WILIAM, DYLAN</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals is small compared to the spread of achievement within an age cohort, and, possibly, due to lack of alignment between instruction and assessment. A review of the literature on the effects of the introduction of such tests in high-stakes accountability regimes suggests that the effects can be positive and the size of the effects is substantial. Therefore, although the validity of such tests may be problematic in terms of the intended inferences, their introduction may nevertheless be justified by their impact. The article concludes with a number of suggestions on improving tests for high-stakes accountability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-1520</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6985</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00461521003703060</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDPSDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Accountability ; Comparative Analysis ; Effect Size ; Effects ; High Stakes Tests ; Inferences ; Scores ; Standardized Tests ; Test Validity ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Educational psychologist, 2010-04, Vol.45 (2), p.107-122</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2d3476e54b13375b5e32d60126ea8aac42530c0585e048f196230adaed11046b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2d3476e54b13375b5e32d60126ea8aac42530c0585e048f196230adaed11046b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00461521003703060$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00461521003703060$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ882031$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WILIAM, DYLAN</creatorcontrib><title>Standardized Testing and School Accountability</title><title>Educational psychologist</title><description>This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals is small compared to the spread of achievement within an age cohort, and, possibly, due to lack of alignment between instruction and assessment. A review of the literature on the effects of the introduction of such tests in high-stakes accountability regimes suggests that the effects can be positive and the size of the effects is substantial. Therefore, although the validity of such tests may be problematic in terms of the intended inferences, their introduction may nevertheless be justified by their impact. The article concludes with a number of suggestions on improving tests for high-stakes accountability.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>High Stakes Tests</subject><subject>Inferences</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0046-1520</issn><issn>1532-6985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQPCweN86k2x2U_BSSv1HwUPrOWSzWU3Zbmo2ReunN2XFS0FPA_Peb-bxCLlEGCEIuAHIcuQUAVgBDHI4IgPkjKb5WPBjMtjraTTAKTnruhUAIHI-IKNFUG2lfGW_TJUsTRds-5rEVbLQb841yURrt22DKm1jw-6cnNSq6czFzxySl7vZcvqQzp_vH6eTeaozVoSUViwrcsOzEhkreMkNo1UOSHOjhFI6o5yBBi64gUzUOM4pA1UpUyHGoCUbkuv-7sa7921MJVdu69v4UlLIkHHORDRhb9LedZ03tdx4u1Z-JxHkvhV50EpkrnrGeKt__bMnISgwjPJtL9u2dn6tPpxvKhnUrnG-9qrVtpPsr-vFv_gBJcNnYN83ToA7</recordid><startdate>20100415</startdate><enddate>20100415</enddate><creator>WILIAM, DYLAN</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100415</creationdate><title>Standardized Testing and School Accountability</title><author>WILIAM, DYLAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2d3476e54b13375b5e32d60126ea8aac42530c0585e048f196230adaed11046b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>High Stakes Tests</topic><topic>Inferences</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WILIAM, DYLAN</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WILIAM, DYLAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ882031</ericid><atitle>Standardized Testing and School Accountability</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle><date>2010-04-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>107-122</pages><issn>0046-1520</issn><eissn>1532-6985</eissn><coden>EDPSDT</coden><abstract>This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals is small compared to the spread of achievement within an age cohort, and, possibly, due to lack of alignment between instruction and assessment. A review of the literature on the effects of the introduction of such tests in high-stakes accountability regimes suggests that the effects can be positive and the size of the effects is substantial. Therefore, although the validity of such tests may be problematic in terms of the intended inferences, their introduction may nevertheless be justified by their impact. The article concludes with a number of suggestions on improving tests for high-stakes accountability.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00461521003703060</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-1520
ispartof Educational psychologist, 2010-04, Vol.45 (2), p.107-122
issn 0046-1520
1532-6985
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ882031
source Taylor & Francis; Education Source
subjects Academic Achievement
Accountability
Comparative Analysis
Effect Size
Effects
High Stakes Tests
Inferences
Scores
Standardized Tests
Test Validity
Testing
title Standardized Testing and School Accountability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A55%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardized%20Testing%20and%20School%20Accountability&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychologist&rft.au=WILIAM,%20DYLAN&rft.date=2010-04-15&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=107-122&rft.issn=0046-1520&rft.eissn=1532-6985&rft.coden=EDPSDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00461521003703060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2013012051%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204135538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ882031&rfr_iscdi=true