Standardized Testing and School Accountability
This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational psychologist 2010-04, Vol.45 (2), p.107-122 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 122 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Educational psychologist |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | WILIAM, DYLAN |
description | This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals is small compared to the spread of achievement within an age cohort, and, possibly, due to lack of alignment between instruction and assessment. A review of the literature on the effects of the introduction of such tests in high-stakes accountability regimes suggests that the effects can be positive and the size of the effects is substantial. Therefore, although the validity of such tests may be problematic in terms of the intended inferences, their introduction may nevertheless be justified by their impact. The article concludes with a number of suggestions on improving tests for high-stakes accountability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00461521003703060 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ882031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ882031</ericid><sourcerecordid>2013012051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2d3476e54b13375b5e32d60126ea8aac42530c0585e048f196230adaed11046b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQPCweN86k2x2U_BSSv1HwUPrOWSzWU3Zbmo2ReunN2XFS0FPA_Peb-bxCLlEGCEIuAHIcuQUAVgBDHI4IgPkjKb5WPBjMtjraTTAKTnruhUAIHI-IKNFUG2lfGW_TJUsTRds-5rEVbLQb841yURrt22DKm1jw-6cnNSq6czFzxySl7vZcvqQzp_vH6eTeaozVoSUViwrcsOzEhkreMkNo1UOSHOjhFI6o5yBBi64gUzUOM4pA1UpUyHGoCUbkuv-7sa7921MJVdu69v4UlLIkHHORDRhb9LedZ03tdx4u1Z-JxHkvhV50EpkrnrGeKt__bMnISgwjPJtL9u2dn6tPpxvKhnUrnG-9qrVtpPsr-vFv_gBJcNnYN83ToA7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204135538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardized Testing and School Accountability</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>WILIAM, DYLAN</creator><creatorcontrib>WILIAM, DYLAN</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals is small compared to the spread of achievement within an age cohort, and, possibly, due to lack of alignment between instruction and assessment. A review of the literature on the effects of the introduction of such tests in high-stakes accountability regimes suggests that the effects can be positive and the size of the effects is substantial. Therefore, although the validity of such tests may be problematic in terms of the intended inferences, their introduction may nevertheless be justified by their impact. The article concludes with a number of suggestions on improving tests for high-stakes accountability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-1520</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6985</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00461521003703060</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDPSDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Accountability ; Comparative Analysis ; Effect Size ; Effects ; High Stakes Tests ; Inferences ; Scores ; Standardized Tests ; Test Validity ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Educational psychologist, 2010-04, Vol.45 (2), p.107-122</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2d3476e54b13375b5e32d60126ea8aac42530c0585e048f196230adaed11046b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2d3476e54b13375b5e32d60126ea8aac42530c0585e048f196230adaed11046b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00461521003703060$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00461521003703060$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ882031$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WILIAM, DYLAN</creatorcontrib><title>Standardized Testing and School Accountability</title><title>Educational psychologist</title><description>This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals is small compared to the spread of achievement within an age cohort, and, possibly, due to lack of alignment between instruction and assessment. A review of the literature on the effects of the introduction of such tests in high-stakes accountability regimes suggests that the effects can be positive and the size of the effects is substantial. Therefore, although the validity of such tests may be problematic in terms of the intended inferences, their introduction may nevertheless be justified by their impact. The article concludes with a number of suggestions on improving tests for high-stakes accountability.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>High Stakes Tests</subject><subject>Inferences</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0046-1520</issn><issn>1532-6985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQPCweN86k2x2U_BSSv1HwUPrOWSzWU3Zbmo2ReunN2XFS0FPA_Peb-bxCLlEGCEIuAHIcuQUAVgBDHI4IgPkjKb5WPBjMtjraTTAKTnruhUAIHI-IKNFUG2lfGW_TJUsTRds-5rEVbLQb841yURrt22DKm1jw-6cnNSq6czFzxySl7vZcvqQzp_vH6eTeaozVoSUViwrcsOzEhkreMkNo1UOSHOjhFI6o5yBBi64gUzUOM4pA1UpUyHGoCUbkuv-7sa7921MJVdu69v4UlLIkHHORDRhb9LedZ03tdx4u1Z-JxHkvhV50EpkrnrGeKt__bMnISgwjPJtL9u2dn6tPpxvKhnUrnG-9qrVtpPsr-vFv_gBJcNnYN83ToA7</recordid><startdate>20100415</startdate><enddate>20100415</enddate><creator>WILIAM, DYLAN</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100415</creationdate><title>Standardized Testing and School Accountability</title><author>WILIAM, DYLAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-2d3476e54b13375b5e32d60126ea8aac42530c0585e048f196230adaed11046b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>High Stakes Tests</topic><topic>Inferences</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WILIAM, DYLAN</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WILIAM, DYLAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ882031</ericid><atitle>Standardized Testing and School Accountability</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle><date>2010-04-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>107-122</pages><issn>0046-1520</issn><eissn>1532-6985</eissn><coden>EDPSDT</coden><abstract>This article explores the use of standardized tests to hold schools accountable. The history of testing for accountability is reviewed, and it is shown that currently between-school differences account for less than 10% of the variance in student scores, in part because the progress of individuals is small compared to the spread of achievement within an age cohort, and, possibly, due to lack of alignment between instruction and assessment. A review of the literature on the effects of the introduction of such tests in high-stakes accountability regimes suggests that the effects can be positive and the size of the effects is substantial. Therefore, although the validity of such tests may be problematic in terms of the intended inferences, their introduction may nevertheless be justified by their impact. The article concludes with a number of suggestions on improving tests for high-stakes accountability.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00461521003703060</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-1520 |
ispartof | Educational psychologist, 2010-04, Vol.45 (2), p.107-122 |
issn | 0046-1520 1532-6985 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ882031 |
source | Taylor & Francis; Education Source |
subjects | Academic Achievement Accountability Comparative Analysis Effect Size Effects High Stakes Tests Inferences Scores Standardized Tests Test Validity Testing |
title | Standardized Testing and School Accountability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A55%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardized%20Testing%20and%20School%20Accountability&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychologist&rft.au=WILIAM,%20DYLAN&rft.date=2010-04-15&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=107-122&rft.issn=0046-1520&rft.eissn=1532-6985&rft.coden=EDPSDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00461521003703060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2013012051%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204135538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ882031&rfr_iscdi=true |