Teacher self-evaluation and power
Positive claims are made for the adoption of practices that permit greater levels of involvement in teacher appraisals. The assumption is that when teachers are more involved in observing and evaluating their teaching, corresponding increases in empowerment and autonomy occur as a direct result. Thi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Teacher development 2009-08, Vol.13 (3), p.285-295 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 295 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 285 |
| container_title | Teacher development |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Towndrow, Phillip A. Tan, Kelvin |
| description | Positive claims are made for the adoption of practices that permit greater levels of involvement in teacher appraisals. The assumption is that when teachers are more involved in observing and evaluating their teaching, corresponding increases in empowerment and autonomy occur as a direct result. This paper challenges this claim by arguing that teacher empowerment is much more complex when the nature of power is considered from three contrasting perspectives (sovereign, epistemological and disciplinary). Each notion of power is used to explain how power is exercised in self-evaluation practices in ways that either enhance or curb teacher empowerment and development. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13664530903335616 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ864688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ864688</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ864688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-6c8e9da4c3396e5762982859a6616a113a6fd18b9714fa6daa326f090cf7a2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj1FLwzAUhYMoOOZ-gOBD_QHV3Ca9ScAXGXMqA1_6Xu7SBAtdO5Lq3L83Y-LLEJ_uhXO-wzmMXQO_A675PQhEWQpuuBCiRMAzNgElVV5Cwc_Tn_T8YLhksxjbNZcSUBcGJ-y2cmTfXcii63zuPqn7oLEd-oz6JtsOOxeu2IWnLrrZz52y6mlRzZ_z1dvyZf64yq1ANeZotTMNSSuEQVcqLIwudGkIUx8CEIS-Ab02CqQnbIhEgT5Vtl5RYcWUwTHWhiHG4Hy9De2Gwr4GXh9W1icrE3NzZFxo7a9_8apRotZJVke57f0QNrQbQtfUI-27IfhAvW3jaWg9fo2JfPiXFH_3-ga1h3Fs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teacher self-evaluation and power</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Towndrow, Phillip A. ; Tan, Kelvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Towndrow, Phillip A. ; Tan, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><description>Positive claims are made for the adoption of practices that permit greater levels of involvement in teacher appraisals. The assumption is that when teachers are more involved in observing and evaluating their teaching, corresponding increases in empowerment and autonomy occur as a direct result. This paper challenges this claim by arguing that teacher empowerment is much more complex when the nature of power is considered from three contrasting perspectives (sovereign, epistemological and disciplinary). Each notion of power is used to explain how power is exercised in self-evaluation practices in ways that either enhance or curb teacher empowerment and development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-4530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-5120</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13664530903335616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>disciplinary power ; epistemological power ; Leadership Styles ; Perspective Taking ; Power Structure ; Professional Autonomy ; Professional Development ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; sovereign power ; Supervisory Methods ; Teacher Empowerment ; Teacher Evaluation ; teacher professional development and empowerment ; teacher self-evaluation</subject><ispartof>Teacher development, 2009-08, Vol.13 (3), p.285-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright Teacher Development 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-6c8e9da4c3396e5762982859a6616a113a6fd18b9714fa6daa326f090cf7a2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-6c8e9da4c3396e5762982859a6616a113a6fd18b9714fa6daa326f090cf7a2c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ864688$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Towndrow, Phillip A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><title>Teacher self-evaluation and power</title><title>Teacher development</title><description>Positive claims are made for the adoption of practices that permit greater levels of involvement in teacher appraisals. The assumption is that when teachers are more involved in observing and evaluating their teaching, corresponding increases in empowerment and autonomy occur as a direct result. This paper challenges this claim by arguing that teacher empowerment is much more complex when the nature of power is considered from three contrasting perspectives (sovereign, epistemological and disciplinary). Each notion of power is used to explain how power is exercised in self-evaluation practices in ways that either enhance or curb teacher empowerment and development.</description><subject>disciplinary power</subject><subject>epistemological power</subject><subject>Leadership Styles</subject><subject>Perspective Taking</subject><subject>Power Structure</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>sovereign power</subject><subject>Supervisory Methods</subject><subject>Teacher Empowerment</subject><subject>Teacher Evaluation</subject><subject>teacher professional development and empowerment</subject><subject>teacher self-evaluation</subject><issn>1366-4530</issn><issn>1747-5120</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj1FLwzAUhYMoOOZ-gOBD_QHV3Ca9ScAXGXMqA1_6Xu7SBAtdO5Lq3L83Y-LLEJ_uhXO-wzmMXQO_A675PQhEWQpuuBCiRMAzNgElVV5Cwc_Tn_T8YLhksxjbNZcSUBcGJ-y2cmTfXcii63zuPqn7oLEd-oz6JtsOOxeu2IWnLrrZz52y6mlRzZ_z1dvyZf64yq1ANeZotTMNSSuEQVcqLIwudGkIUx8CEIS-Ab02CqQnbIhEgT5Vtl5RYcWUwTHWhiHG4Hy9De2Gwr4GXh9W1icrE3NzZFxo7a9_8apRotZJVke57f0QNrQbQtfUI-27IfhAvW3jaWg9fo2JfPiXFH_3-ga1h3Fs</recordid><startdate>200908</startdate><enddate>200908</enddate><creator>Towndrow, Phillip A.</creator><creator>Tan, Kelvin</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200908</creationdate><title>Teacher self-evaluation and power</title><author>Towndrow, Phillip A. ; Tan, Kelvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-6c8e9da4c3396e5762982859a6616a113a6fd18b9714fa6daa326f090cf7a2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>disciplinary power</topic><topic>epistemological power</topic><topic>Leadership Styles</topic><topic>Perspective Taking</topic><topic>Power Structure</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>sovereign power</topic><topic>Supervisory Methods</topic><topic>Teacher Empowerment</topic><topic>Teacher Evaluation</topic><topic>teacher professional development and empowerment</topic><topic>teacher self-evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Towndrow, Phillip A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Teacher development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Towndrow, Phillip A.</au><au>Tan, Kelvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ864688</ericid><atitle>Teacher self-evaluation and power</atitle><jtitle>Teacher development</jtitle><date>2009-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>285-295</pages><issn>1366-4530</issn><eissn>1747-5120</eissn><abstract>Positive claims are made for the adoption of practices that permit greater levels of involvement in teacher appraisals. The assumption is that when teachers are more involved in observing and evaluating their teaching, corresponding increases in empowerment and autonomy occur as a direct result. This paper challenges this claim by arguing that teacher empowerment is much more complex when the nature of power is considered from three contrasting perspectives (sovereign, epistemological and disciplinary). Each notion of power is used to explain how power is exercised in self-evaluation practices in ways that either enhance or curb teacher empowerment and development.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13664530903335616</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1366-4530 |
| ispartof | Teacher development, 2009-08, Vol.13 (3), p.285-295 |
| issn | 1366-4530 1747-5120 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ864688 |
| source | EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | disciplinary power epistemological power Leadership Styles Perspective Taking Power Structure Professional Autonomy Professional Development Self Evaluation (Individuals) sovereign power Supervisory Methods Teacher Empowerment Teacher Evaluation teacher professional development and empowerment teacher self-evaluation |
| title | Teacher self-evaluation and power |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A27%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teacher%20self-evaluation%20and%20power&rft.jtitle=Teacher%20development&rft.au=Towndrow,%20Phillip%20A.&rft.date=2009-08&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=285-295&rft.issn=1366-4530&rft.eissn=1747-5120&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13664530903335616&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ864688%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ864688&rfr_iscdi=true |