A Comparison of Accuracy and Rate of Transcription by Adults with Learning Disabilities Using a Continuous Speech Recognition System and a Traditional Computer Keyboard

A single-subject, alternating-treatments design was implemented for three adults with learning disabilities to compare the transcription of college-level texts using a speech recognition system and a traditional keyboard. The accuracy and rate of transcribing after editing was calculated for each tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 2005, Vol.18 (1), p.12
Hauptverfasser: Millar, Diane C, McNaughton, David B, Light, Janice C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12
container_title Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability
container_volume 18
creator Millar, Diane C
McNaughton, David B
Light, Janice C
description A single-subject, alternating-treatments design was implemented for three adults with learning disabilities to compare the transcription of college-level texts using a speech recognition system and a traditional keyboard. The accuracy and rate of transcribing after editing was calculated for each transcribed passage. The results provide evidence that the accuracy of transcription using the speech recognition system was slightly lower than the accuracy of transcription using the traditional keyboard for all of the participants. The rate of transcription using the speech recognition system was very similar to the keyboard for two of the participants. For the third participant, the transcription rate using the keyboard exceeded the rate using the speech recognition system for all four sessions. Following the fourth and final session, 1 participant indicated that she preferred the speech recognition system, and the others participants stated that they had no preference between the speech recognition system and the keyboard. Educational implications and directions for future research are discussed. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 1 endnote.)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ846377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ846377</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ846377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ8463773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjr0KwkAQhNNYiPoGFvsCVoqxDf4gapVoHTaXVReSu7B7h9wb-ZiaYG818M0wM-PkncHWtR0Kq7Pg7pAZEwRNBLQ15Oiph1dBq0a48_xNVRGyOjRe4cX-CRdCsWwfsGPFihv2TAo37RF-261nG1xQKDoi84ScjHtYHqqKqJ7aYQv7lXrA2AyngieBM8XKodTTZHTHRmn200kyP-yv2-OChE3ZCbcosdyfNqv1Mk2Xf-wPEDhVEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Accuracy and Rate of Transcription by Adults with Learning Disabilities Using a Continuous Speech Recognition System and a Traditional Computer Keyboard</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Millar, Diane C ; McNaughton, David B ; Light, Janice C</creator><creatorcontrib>Millar, Diane C ; McNaughton, David B ; Light, Janice C</creatorcontrib><description>A single-subject, alternating-treatments design was implemented for three adults with learning disabilities to compare the transcription of college-level texts using a speech recognition system and a traditional keyboard. The accuracy and rate of transcribing after editing was calculated for each transcribed passage. The results provide evidence that the accuracy of transcription using the speech recognition system was slightly lower than the accuracy of transcription using the traditional keyboard for all of the participants. The rate of transcription using the speech recognition system was very similar to the keyboard for two of the participants. For the third participant, the transcription rate using the keyboard exceeded the rate using the speech recognition system for all four sessions. Following the fourth and final session, 1 participant indicated that she preferred the speech recognition system, and the others participants stated that they had no preference between the speech recognition system and the keyboard. Educational implications and directions for future research are discussed. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 1 endnote.)</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Association on Higher Education and Disability</publisher><subject>Adults ; Information Technology ; Keyboarding (Data Entry) ; Learning Disabilities ; Office Occupations ; Reliability ; Word Processing ; Writing Skills</subject><ispartof>Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 2005, Vol.18 (1), p.12</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ846377$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ846377$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Millar, Diane C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Light, Janice C</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Accuracy and Rate of Transcription by Adults with Learning Disabilities Using a Continuous Speech Recognition System and a Traditional Computer Keyboard</title><title>Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability</title><description>A single-subject, alternating-treatments design was implemented for three adults with learning disabilities to compare the transcription of college-level texts using a speech recognition system and a traditional keyboard. The accuracy and rate of transcribing after editing was calculated for each transcribed passage. The results provide evidence that the accuracy of transcription using the speech recognition system was slightly lower than the accuracy of transcription using the traditional keyboard for all of the participants. The rate of transcription using the speech recognition system was very similar to the keyboard for two of the participants. For the third participant, the transcription rate using the keyboard exceeded the rate using the speech recognition system for all four sessions. Following the fourth and final session, 1 participant indicated that she preferred the speech recognition system, and the others participants stated that they had no preference between the speech recognition system and the keyboard. Educational implications and directions for future research are discussed. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 1 endnote.)</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Information Technology</subject><subject>Keyboarding (Data Entry)</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Office Occupations</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Word Processing</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjr0KwkAQhNNYiPoGFvsCVoqxDf4gapVoHTaXVReSu7B7h9wb-ZiaYG818M0wM-PkncHWtR0Kq7Pg7pAZEwRNBLQ15Oiph1dBq0a48_xNVRGyOjRe4cX-CRdCsWwfsGPFihv2TAo37RF-261nG1xQKDoi84ScjHtYHqqKqJ7aYQv7lXrA2AyngieBM8XKodTTZHTHRmn200kyP-yv2-OChE3ZCbcosdyfNqv1Mk2Xf-wPEDhVEA</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Millar, Diane C</creator><creator>McNaughton, David B</creator><creator>Light, Janice C</creator><general>Association on Higher Education and Disability</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Accuracy and Rate of Transcription by Adults with Learning Disabilities Using a Continuous Speech Recognition System and a Traditional Computer Keyboard</title><author>Millar, Diane C ; McNaughton, David B ; Light, Janice C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ8463773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Information Technology</topic><topic>Keyboarding (Data Entry)</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Office Occupations</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Word Processing</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Millar, Diane C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Light, Janice C</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Millar, Diane C</au><au>McNaughton, David B</au><au>Light, Janice C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ846377</ericid><atitle>A Comparison of Accuracy and Rate of Transcription by Adults with Learning Disabilities Using a Continuous Speech Recognition System and a Traditional Computer Keyboard</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><pages>12-</pages><abstract>A single-subject, alternating-treatments design was implemented for three adults with learning disabilities to compare the transcription of college-level texts using a speech recognition system and a traditional keyboard. The accuracy and rate of transcribing after editing was calculated for each transcribed passage. The results provide evidence that the accuracy of transcription using the speech recognition system was slightly lower than the accuracy of transcription using the traditional keyboard for all of the participants. The rate of transcription using the speech recognition system was very similar to the keyboard for two of the participants. For the third participant, the transcription rate using the keyboard exceeded the rate using the speech recognition system for all four sessions. Following the fourth and final session, 1 participant indicated that she preferred the speech recognition system, and the others participants stated that they had no preference between the speech recognition system and the keyboard. Educational implications and directions for future research are discussed. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 1 endnote.)</abstract><pub>Association on Higher Education and Disability</pub><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 2005, Vol.18 (1), p.12
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ846377
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Adults
Information Technology
Keyboarding (Data Entry)
Learning Disabilities
Office Occupations
Reliability
Word Processing
Writing Skills
title A Comparison of Accuracy and Rate of Transcription by Adults with Learning Disabilities Using a Continuous Speech Recognition System and a Traditional Computer Keyboard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A03%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Accuracy%20and%20Rate%20of%20Transcription%20by%20Adults%20with%20Learning%20Disabilities%20Using%20a%20Continuous%20Speech%20Recognition%20System%20and%20a%20Traditional%20Computer%20Keyboard&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Postsecondary%20Education%20and%20Disability&rft.au=Millar,%20Diane%20C&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.pages=12-&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EEJ846377%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ846377&rfr_iscdi=true