Assistive Technology in the Individualized Education Plan: Analysis of Policies across Ten States

With the heightened emphasis of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 on inclusion in the general curriculum and meeting the associated standards, assistive technology (AT) has become a necessary consideration to ensure a free appropriate public education and to promote...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of special education leadership 2009-03, Vol.22 (1), p.9
Hauptverfasser: Bausch, Margaret E, Quinn, Brianna Stegall, Chung, Yoosun, Ault, Melinda Jones, Behrmann, Michael M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title Journal of special education leadership
container_volume 22
creator Bausch, Margaret E
Quinn, Brianna Stegall
Chung, Yoosun
Ault, Melinda Jones
Behrmann, Michael M
description With the heightened emphasis of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 on inclusion in the general curriculum and meeting the associated standards, assistive technology (AT) has become a necessary consideration to ensure a free appropriate public education and to promote education in the least restrictive environment for students with disabilities. An analysis of 10 states revealed that most of the states provided a combination of information that related specifically to AT and information that related generally to the individualized education program (IEP). Recommended practice in AT supports the development of clear guidelines related to AT in the IEP to promote consistency and improved AT decisions. However, this can occur at the local level. Despite differences in how AT was addressed, the 10 states offered examples of quality AT policies that can directly impact directors of special education, IEP teams, AT teams, teachers, service providers, and, ultimately, students with disabilities. The summary includes 12 frequently overlooked topics that all states and districts should include to strengthen their AT policies. (Contains 4 tables.)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ839509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ839509</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ839509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ8395093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjMEKgkAURWdRkJR_0OL9gKCJoO0kjGol5F4eM2O-mGbCNwr29blo392cxeHclQiS7JBFSZ7EGxEyP-NlaV7kcRoILJmJPU0aGi1764x7zEAWfK_hahVNpEY09NEKKjVK9OQs1AbtEUqLZl5qcB3UzpAkzYBycMzLmYW7R695J9YdGtbhj1uxP1fN6RLpgWT7HuiFw9xWtzwtsrhI_-gvca9AIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assistive Technology in the Individualized Education Plan: Analysis of Policies across Ten States</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Bausch, Margaret E ; Quinn, Brianna Stegall ; Chung, Yoosun ; Ault, Melinda Jones ; Behrmann, Michael M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bausch, Margaret E ; Quinn, Brianna Stegall ; Chung, Yoosun ; Ault, Melinda Jones ; Behrmann, Michael M</creatorcontrib><description>With the heightened emphasis of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 on inclusion in the general curriculum and meeting the associated standards, assistive technology (AT) has become a necessary consideration to ensure a free appropriate public education and to promote education in the least restrictive environment for students with disabilities. An analysis of 10 states revealed that most of the states provided a combination of information that related specifically to AT and information that related generally to the individualized education program (IEP). Recommended practice in AT supports the development of clear guidelines related to AT in the IEP to promote consistency and improved AT decisions. However, this can occur at the local level. Despite differences in how AT was addressed, the 10 states offered examples of quality AT policies that can directly impact directors of special education, IEP teams, AT teams, teachers, service providers, and, ultimately, students with disabilities. The summary includes 12 frequently overlooked topics that all states and districts should include to strengthen their AT policies. (Contains 4 tables.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-1810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Council of Administrators of Special Education</publisher><subject>Access to Education ; Assistive Technology ; California ; Decision Making ; Disabilities ; Educational Policy ; Educational Quality ; Educational Technology ; Federal Legislation ; Florida ; Individualized Education Programs ; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ; Kansas ; Kentucky ; Mainstreaming ; Massachusetts ; Montana ; Oregon ; Public Education ; Rural Areas ; Special Needs Students ; State Standards ; Texas ; Urban Areas ; Virginia ; Wisconsin</subject><ispartof>Journal of special education leadership, 2009-03, Vol.22 (1), p.9</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ839509$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bausch, Margaret E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Brianna Stegall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Yoosun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ault, Melinda Jones</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behrmann, Michael M</creatorcontrib><title>Assistive Technology in the Individualized Education Plan: Analysis of Policies across Ten States</title><title>Journal of special education leadership</title><description>With the heightened emphasis of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 on inclusion in the general curriculum and meeting the associated standards, assistive technology (AT) has become a necessary consideration to ensure a free appropriate public education and to promote education in the least restrictive environment for students with disabilities. An analysis of 10 states revealed that most of the states provided a combination of information that related specifically to AT and information that related generally to the individualized education program (IEP). Recommended practice in AT supports the development of clear guidelines related to AT in the IEP to promote consistency and improved AT decisions. However, this can occur at the local level. Despite differences in how AT was addressed, the 10 states offered examples of quality AT policies that can directly impact directors of special education, IEP teams, AT teams, teachers, service providers, and, ultimately, students with disabilities. The summary includes 12 frequently overlooked topics that all states and districts should include to strengthen their AT policies. (Contains 4 tables.)</description><subject>Access to Education</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Individualized Education Programs</subject><subject>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</subject><subject>Kansas</subject><subject>Kentucky</subject><subject>Mainstreaming</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Montana</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Public Education</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Special Needs Students</subject><subject>State Standards</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Urban Areas</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><subject>Wisconsin</subject><issn>1525-1810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjMEKgkAURWdRkJR_0OL9gKCJoO0kjGol5F4eM2O-mGbCNwr29blo392cxeHclQiS7JBFSZ7EGxEyP-NlaV7kcRoILJmJPU0aGi1764x7zEAWfK_hahVNpEY09NEKKjVK9OQs1AbtEUqLZl5qcB3UzpAkzYBycMzLmYW7R695J9YdGtbhj1uxP1fN6RLpgWT7HuiFw9xWtzwtsrhI_-gvca9AIw</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>Bausch, Margaret E</creator><creator>Quinn, Brianna Stegall</creator><creator>Chung, Yoosun</creator><creator>Ault, Melinda Jones</creator><creator>Behrmann, Michael M</creator><general>Council of Administrators of Special Education</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>Assistive Technology in the Individualized Education Plan: Analysis of Policies across Ten States</title><author>Bausch, Margaret E ; Quinn, Brianna Stegall ; Chung, Yoosun ; Ault, Melinda Jones ; Behrmann, Michael M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ8395093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Access to Education</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Individualized Education Programs</topic><topic>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</topic><topic>Kansas</topic><topic>Kentucky</topic><topic>Mainstreaming</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Montana</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Public Education</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Special Needs Students</topic><topic>State Standards</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Urban Areas</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><topic>Wisconsin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bausch, Margaret E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Brianna Stegall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Yoosun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ault, Melinda Jones</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behrmann, Michael M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Journal of special education leadership</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bausch, Margaret E</au><au>Quinn, Brianna Stegall</au><au>Chung, Yoosun</au><au>Ault, Melinda Jones</au><au>Behrmann, Michael M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ839509</ericid><atitle>Assistive Technology in the Individualized Education Plan: Analysis of Policies across Ten States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of special education leadership</jtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><pages>9-</pages><issn>1525-1810</issn><abstract>With the heightened emphasis of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 on inclusion in the general curriculum and meeting the associated standards, assistive technology (AT) has become a necessary consideration to ensure a free appropriate public education and to promote education in the least restrictive environment for students with disabilities. An analysis of 10 states revealed that most of the states provided a combination of information that related specifically to AT and information that related generally to the individualized education program (IEP). Recommended practice in AT supports the development of clear guidelines related to AT in the IEP to promote consistency and improved AT decisions. However, this can occur at the local level. Despite differences in how AT was addressed, the 10 states offered examples of quality AT policies that can directly impact directors of special education, IEP teams, AT teams, teachers, service providers, and, ultimately, students with disabilities. The summary includes 12 frequently overlooked topics that all states and districts should include to strengthen their AT policies. (Contains 4 tables.)</abstract><pub>Council of Administrators of Special Education</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-1810
ispartof Journal of special education leadership, 2009-03, Vol.22 (1), p.9
issn 1525-1810
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ839509
source EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Access to Education
Assistive Technology
California
Decision Making
Disabilities
Educational Policy
Educational Quality
Educational Technology
Federal Legislation
Florida
Individualized Education Programs
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Kansas
Kentucky
Mainstreaming
Massachusetts
Montana
Oregon
Public Education
Rural Areas
Special Needs Students
State Standards
Texas
Urban Areas
Virginia
Wisconsin
title Assistive Technology in the Individualized Education Plan: Analysis of Policies across Ten States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assistive%20Technology%20in%20the%20Individualized%20Education%20Plan:%20Analysis%20of%20Policies%20across%20Ten%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20special%20education%20leadership&rft.au=Bausch,%20Margaret%20E&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.pages=9-&rft.issn=1525-1810&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ839509%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ839509&rfr_iscdi=true