Is Green Education Blue or Red? State-Level Environmental Education Program Development Through the Lens of Red- and Blue-State Politics
Environmental educators have long dealt with the charge that the practice of teaching about environmental issues is an attempt to introduce a liberal agenda into the classroom curriculum. However, traditionally Republican states and traditionally Democratic states are both among the nation's le...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of environmental education 2009-04, Vol.40 (3), p.52-62 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 62 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | The Journal of environmental education |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Crouch, Richard Craig Abbot, Dorian S. |
description | Environmental educators have long dealt with the charge that the practice of teaching about environmental issues is an attempt to introduce a liberal agenda into the classroom curriculum. However, traditionally Republican states and traditionally Democratic states are both among the nation's leaders and laggards in institutionalizing environmental education (EE) programs at the state level. Because of the political power of the charge of liberal bias in EE politics, it is important for researchers to try to determine the veracity of this charge in some meaningful way. The authors applied quantitative statistical methods to this issue and found that, in general, there were not significant differences among the degrees of state-level EE program activity between Democratic states and Republican states. In short, the political party affiliation of a given state is not a reliable predictor of that state's EE program activities. Thus, the evidence does not support the claim that EE is solely a liberal undertaking. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3200/JOEE.40.3.52-62 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ830535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ830535</ericid><sourcerecordid>746009828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1a8df64059abd3797347bda9df07e3371229468a34935c64f2c3d2218379560b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9rHCEYxqU00G3Scy89SC89uXHU-WMvpU0n_1hIaJKzuOpkDY5u1UnJN8jHjpMtpQRykpfn9_wUXwA-VnhJCcaH5xd9v2RlWNYENeQNWFScYVR1nLwFC4x5jTresHfgfUp3GOMStAvweJbgSTTGw15PSmYbPPzhJgNDhL-M_gavsswGrcy9cbD39zYGPxqfpfuvcBnDbZQj_DlTYTvn8HoTw3S7gXlj4Mr4BMMwCxGUXj_fgJ7N8DI4m61KB2BvkC6ZD3_PfXBz3F8fnaLVxcnZ0fcVUrQlGVWy00PDcM3lWtOWt5S1ay25HnBrKG0rQjhrOkkZp7Vq2EAU1YRUXWHrBq_pPviy825j-D2ZlMVokzLOSW_ClETLmvJXHekK-fkFeRem6MvjBKEU15jyqkCHO0jFkFI0g9hGO8r4ICos5r2IeS-ClUHURDSkND7tGiZa9Y_uz7uipHWJv-5i64cQR_knRKdFlg8uxCFKr2wS9DX3E3FXnAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233050391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Green Education Blue or Red? State-Level Environmental Education Program Development Through the Lens of Red- and Blue-State Politics</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Crouch, Richard Craig ; Abbot, Dorian S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crouch, Richard Craig ; Abbot, Dorian S.</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental educators have long dealt with the charge that the practice of teaching about environmental issues is an attempt to introduce a liberal agenda into the classroom curriculum. However, traditionally Republican states and traditionally Democratic states are both among the nation's leaders and laggards in institutionalizing environmental education (EE) programs at the state level. Because of the political power of the charge of liberal bias in EE politics, it is important for researchers to try to determine the veracity of this charge in some meaningful way. The authors applied quantitative statistical methods to this issue and found that, in general, there were not significant differences among the degrees of state-level EE program activity between Democratic states and Republican states. In short, the political party affiliation of a given state is not a reliable predictor of that state's EE program activities. Thus, the evidence does not support the claim that EE is solely a liberal undertaking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-8964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-1892</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3200/JOEE.40.3.52-62</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVEB9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Heldref</publisher><subject>Bias ; Classrooms ; conservative ; Correlation ; Curriculum ; Data collection ; Educational Environment ; Elections ; Environmental Education ; Environmental management ; Leaders ; liberal ; party affiliation ; policy ; Political activism ; Political Affiliation ; Political Attitudes ; Political leadership ; Political power ; Politics ; Politics of Education ; Presidential elections ; Program Development ; Propaganda ; Researchers ; Special Programs ; state ; State government ; State Programs ; Teaching Methods ; Think tanks</subject><ispartof>The Journal of environmental education, 2009-04, Vol.40 (3), p.52-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Heldref Publications Spring 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1a8df64059abd3797347bda9df07e3371229468a34935c64f2c3d2218379560b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ830535$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crouch, Richard Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbot, Dorian S.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Green Education Blue or Red? State-Level Environmental Education Program Development Through the Lens of Red- and Blue-State Politics</title><title>The Journal of environmental education</title><description>Environmental educators have long dealt with the charge that the practice of teaching about environmental issues is an attempt to introduce a liberal agenda into the classroom curriculum. However, traditionally Republican states and traditionally Democratic states are both among the nation's leaders and laggards in institutionalizing environmental education (EE) programs at the state level. Because of the political power of the charge of liberal bias in EE politics, it is important for researchers to try to determine the veracity of this charge in some meaningful way. The authors applied quantitative statistical methods to this issue and found that, in general, there were not significant differences among the degrees of state-level EE program activity between Democratic states and Republican states. In short, the political party affiliation of a given state is not a reliable predictor of that state's EE program activities. Thus, the evidence does not support the claim that EE is solely a liberal undertaking.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>conservative</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Environmental Education</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Leaders</subject><subject>liberal</subject><subject>party affiliation</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political Affiliation</subject><subject>Political Attitudes</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Politics of Education</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Propaganda</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Special Programs</subject><subject>state</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>State Programs</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Think tanks</subject><issn>0095-8964</issn><issn>1940-1892</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9rHCEYxqU00G3Scy89SC89uXHU-WMvpU0n_1hIaJKzuOpkDY5u1UnJN8jHjpMtpQRykpfn9_wUXwA-VnhJCcaH5xd9v2RlWNYENeQNWFScYVR1nLwFC4x5jTresHfgfUp3GOMStAvweJbgSTTGw15PSmYbPPzhJgNDhL-M_gavsswGrcy9cbD39zYGPxqfpfuvcBnDbZQj_DlTYTvn8HoTw3S7gXlj4Mr4BMMwCxGUXj_fgJ7N8DI4m61KB2BvkC6ZD3_PfXBz3F8fnaLVxcnZ0fcVUrQlGVWy00PDcM3lWtOWt5S1ay25HnBrKG0rQjhrOkkZp7Vq2EAU1YRUXWHrBq_pPviy825j-D2ZlMVokzLOSW_ClETLmvJXHekK-fkFeRem6MvjBKEU15jyqkCHO0jFkFI0g9hGO8r4ICos5r2IeS-ClUHURDSkND7tGiZa9Y_uz7uipHWJv-5i64cQR_knRKdFlg8uxCFKr2wS9DX3E3FXnAw</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Crouch, Richard Craig</creator><creator>Abbot, Dorian S.</creator><general>Heldref</general><general>Heldref Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Is Green Education Blue or Red? State-Level Environmental Education Program Development Through the Lens of Red- and Blue-State Politics</title><author>Crouch, Richard Craig ; Abbot, Dorian S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1a8df64059abd3797347bda9df07e3371229468a34935c64f2c3d2218379560b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>conservative</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Environmental Education</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Leaders</topic><topic>liberal</topic><topic>party affiliation</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political Affiliation</topic><topic>Political Attitudes</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Politics of Education</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Propaganda</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Special Programs</topic><topic>state</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>State Programs</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Think tanks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crouch, Richard Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbot, Dorian S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of environmental education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crouch, Richard Craig</au><au>Abbot, Dorian S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ830535</ericid><atitle>Is Green Education Blue or Red? State-Level Environmental Education Program Development Through the Lens of Red- and Blue-State Politics</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of environmental education</jtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>52-62</pages><issn>0095-8964</issn><eissn>1940-1892</eissn><coden>JEVEB9</coden><abstract>Environmental educators have long dealt with the charge that the practice of teaching about environmental issues is an attempt to introduce a liberal agenda into the classroom curriculum. However, traditionally Republican states and traditionally Democratic states are both among the nation's leaders and laggards in institutionalizing environmental education (EE) programs at the state level. Because of the political power of the charge of liberal bias in EE politics, it is important for researchers to try to determine the veracity of this charge in some meaningful way. The authors applied quantitative statistical methods to this issue and found that, in general, there were not significant differences among the degrees of state-level EE program activity between Democratic states and Republican states. In short, the political party affiliation of a given state is not a reliable predictor of that state's EE program activities. Thus, the evidence does not support the claim that EE is solely a liberal undertaking.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Heldref</pub><doi>10.3200/JOEE.40.3.52-62</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-8964 |
ispartof | The Journal of environmental education, 2009-04, Vol.40 (3), p.52-62 |
issn | 0095-8964 1940-1892 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ830535 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Bias Classrooms conservative Correlation Curriculum Data collection Educational Environment Elections Environmental Education Environmental management Leaders liberal party affiliation policy Political activism Political Affiliation Political Attitudes Political leadership Political power Politics Politics of Education Presidential elections Program Development Propaganda Researchers Special Programs state State government State Programs Teaching Methods Think tanks |
title | Is Green Education Blue or Red? State-Level Environmental Education Program Development Through the Lens of Red- and Blue-State Politics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A02%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Green%20Education%20Blue%20or%20Red?%20State-Level%20Environmental%20Education%20Program%20Development%20Through%20the%20Lens%20of%20Red-%20and%20Blue-State%20Politics&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20environmental%20education&rft.au=Crouch,%20Richard%20Craig&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=52-62&rft.issn=0095-8964&rft.eissn=1940-1892&rft.coden=JEVEB9&rft_id=info:doi/10.3200/JOEE.40.3.52-62&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E746009828%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233050391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ830535&rfr_iscdi=true |