STEP Parenting: A Review of the Research
In response to Dinkmeyer, McKay, and Dinkmeyer Jr.'s (1990) claim that individuals were incorrectly reporting Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) as being ineffective and recent claims of STEP being ineffective (e.g., Taylor & Biglan, 1998), the purpose of this article was to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of counselling 2003-10, Vol.37 (4), p.270 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 270 |
| container_title | Canadian journal of counselling |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Robinson, Paul W Robinson, Michael P W Dunn, Todd W |
| description | In response to Dinkmeyer, McKay, and Dinkmeyer Jr.'s (1990) claim that individuals were incorrectly reporting Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) as being ineffective and recent claims of STEP being ineffective (e.g., Taylor & Biglan, 1998), the purpose of this article was to review the research and statements made about STEP's effectiveness. This review looked at the issue of STEP being effective from several research perspectives and concluded Dinkmeyer et al.'s claims of STEP being effective were not supported by the research. Additional suggestions for improving practitioner's acceptance of parenting systems and procedures with scientific validation are also included. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ822278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ822278</ericid><sourcerecordid>1378514701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e485-2d3781569dae509267c43f2ffc32e021e936db447b81b2dfb320dc4427f302c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjlFLwzAUhfOg4Jz-Ax-CT74U0nuTJvVtjKqTgWPre0mTG9eh7Uw6xX9vYT4dDh9851ywmTBgMjQlXrHrlA5CoCxyPWMPu7ra8I2N1I9d__7IF3xL3x398CHwcU9TS2Sj29-wy2A_Et3-55zVT1W9fMnWb8-r5WKdkTQqA4_a5KoovSUlSii0kxggBIdAAnIqsfCtlLo1eQs-tAjCOylBBxTgEOfs7qyl2LnmGLtPG3-b6tUAgDYTvj_jYxy-TpTG5jCcYj8davJSmWlRKvwDyuFCJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195809245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STEP Parenting: A Review of the Research</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Robinson, Paul W ; Robinson, Michael P W ; Dunn, Todd W</creator><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Paul W ; Robinson, Michael P W ; Dunn, Todd W</creatorcontrib><description>In response to Dinkmeyer, McKay, and Dinkmeyer Jr.'s (1990) claim that individuals were incorrectly reporting Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) as being ineffective and recent claims of STEP being ineffective (e.g., Taylor & Biglan, 1998), the purpose of this article was to review the research and statements made about STEP's effectiveness. This review looked at the issue of STEP being effective from several research perspectives and concluded Dinkmeyer et al.'s claims of STEP being effective were not supported by the research. Additional suggestions for improving practitioner's acceptance of parenting systems and procedures with scientific validation are also included.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0828-3893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kanata: Canadian Counselling and Psychotherapy Association</publisher><subject>Behavior modification ; Child Rearing ; Effectiveness studies ; Evaluation Methods ; Evaluation Problems ; Mental health ; Parent Counseling ; Parent Education ; Parenting Skills ; Parents & parenting ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Psychology ; Research Methodology ; Research Problems ; Social research ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of counselling, 2003-10, Vol.37 (4), p.270</ispartof><rights>Copyright Canadian Counselling Association Oct 2003</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ822278$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Paul W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Michael P W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Todd W</creatorcontrib><title>STEP Parenting: A Review of the Research</title><title>Canadian journal of counselling</title><description>In response to Dinkmeyer, McKay, and Dinkmeyer Jr.'s (1990) claim that individuals were incorrectly reporting Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) as being ineffective and recent claims of STEP being ineffective (e.g., Taylor & Biglan, 1998), the purpose of this article was to review the research and statements made about STEP's effectiveness. This review looked at the issue of STEP being effective from several research perspectives and concluded Dinkmeyer et al.'s claims of STEP being effective were not supported by the research. Additional suggestions for improving practitioner's acceptance of parenting systems and procedures with scientific validation are also included.</description><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evaluation Problems</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Parent Counseling</subject><subject>Parent Education</subject><subject>Parenting Skills</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Problems</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0828-3893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNotjlFLwzAUhfOg4Jz-Ax-CT74U0nuTJvVtjKqTgWPre0mTG9eh7Uw6xX9vYT4dDh9851ywmTBgMjQlXrHrlA5CoCxyPWMPu7ra8I2N1I9d__7IF3xL3x398CHwcU9TS2Sj29-wy2A_Et3-55zVT1W9fMnWb8-r5WKdkTQqA4_a5KoovSUlSii0kxggBIdAAnIqsfCtlLo1eQs-tAjCOylBBxTgEOfs7qyl2LnmGLtPG3-b6tUAgDYTvj_jYxy-TpTG5jCcYj8davJSmWlRKvwDyuFCJw</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Robinson, Paul W</creator><creator>Robinson, Michael P W</creator><creator>Dunn, Todd W</creator><general>Canadian Counselling and Psychotherapy Association</general><general>Canadian Counselling Association</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>STEP Parenting: A Review of the Research</title><author>Robinson, Paul W ; Robinson, Michael P W ; Dunn, Todd W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e485-2d3781569dae509267c43f2ffc32e021e936db447b81b2dfb320dc4427f302c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evaluation Problems</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Parent Counseling</topic><topic>Parent Education</topic><topic>Parenting Skills</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Problems</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Paul W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Michael P W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Todd W</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of counselling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robinson, Paul W</au><au>Robinson, Michael P W</au><au>Dunn, Todd W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ822278</ericid><atitle>STEP Parenting: A Review of the Research</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of counselling</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>270</spage><pages>270-</pages><issn>0828-3893</issn><abstract>In response to Dinkmeyer, McKay, and Dinkmeyer Jr.'s (1990) claim that individuals were incorrectly reporting Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) as being ineffective and recent claims of STEP being ineffective (e.g., Taylor & Biglan, 1998), the purpose of this article was to review the research and statements made about STEP's effectiveness. This review looked at the issue of STEP being effective from several research perspectives and concluded Dinkmeyer et al.'s claims of STEP being effective were not supported by the research. Additional suggestions for improving practitioner's acceptance of parenting systems and procedures with scientific validation are also included.</abstract><cop>Kanata</cop><pub>Canadian Counselling and Psychotherapy Association</pub><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0828-3893 |
| ispartof | Canadian journal of counselling, 2003-10, Vol.37 (4), p.270 |
| issn | 0828-3893 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ822278 |
| source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Behavior modification Child Rearing Effectiveness studies Evaluation Methods Evaluation Problems Mental health Parent Counseling Parent Education Parenting Skills Parents & parenting Program Effectiveness Program Evaluation Psychology Research Methodology Research Problems Social research Validity |
| title | STEP Parenting: A Review of the Research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A37%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STEP%20Parenting:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Research&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20counselling&rft.au=Robinson,%20Paul%20W&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=270&rft.pages=270-&rft.issn=0828-3893&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1378514701%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195809245&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ822278&rfr_iscdi=true |