Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis

The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked simi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2002-10, Vol.27 (4), p.405-417
Hauptverfasser: Neumann, Ruth, Parry, Sharon, Becher, Tony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 417
container_issue 4
container_start_page 405
container_title Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)
container_volume 27
creator Neumann, Ruth
Parry, Sharon
Becher, Tony
description The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked similarities and differences between the various research findings. In doing so, it draws extensively on the relevant literature, offering separate analyses of knowledge-related and socially related studies. The former embody curriculum, assessment and cognitive purpose, while the latter encompass group characteristics of teachers, types of teaching method and student learning requirements. The concluding section draws out the main implications for policy and practice related to staff development, computer-based learning, assessment of student learning and quality measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0307507022000011525
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ655992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ655992</ericid><sourcerecordid>653128781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-273dc5042af9ad78f08ca294c875f142555411b076e0b52b7dba3e35e303416f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAMgCMEEmPwC-BQcS84r6blgDSN8ZzEZUjcqjRNWaYuHUkmtn9PpiJOE_hiWf4-yzZC5xiuMORwDRQEBwGEQAyMOeEHaICZgBQL9n6IBjsijUhxjE68X0QqEzkboJeZlmpu7EcibZ1MtXR2VxibhLk2LrkzXplVa6x022Tc2aA3wd8ko0R1VulVWMs2mrLdeuNP0VEjW6_PfvIQvd1PZuPHdPr68DQeTVPFAEJKBK0VB0ZkU8ha5A3kSpKCqVzwBjPCOWcYVyAyDRUnlagrSTXlmgJlOGvoEF32c1eu-1xrH8pFt3ZxCV8SXPAcBKYRoj2kXOe90025cmYZrygxlLunlXueFq2L3tLOqF9j8pxxXhQktou-bWzTuaX86lxbl0Fu2841Tlpl_L6xZdiE6N7-69K_dvsG7bSMwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219580713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Neumann, Ruth ; Parry, Sharon ; Becher, Tony</creator><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Ruth ; Parry, Sharon ; Becher, Tony</creatorcontrib><description>The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked similarities and differences between the various research findings. In doing so, it draws extensively on the relevant literature, offering separate analyses of knowledge-related and socially related studies. The former embody curriculum, assessment and cognitive purpose, while the latter encompass group characteristics of teachers, types of teaching method and student learning requirements. The concluding section draws out the main implications for policy and practice related to staff development, computer-based learning, assessment of student learning and quality measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0307507022000011525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Cognitive style ; College Instruction ; Educational Research ; Higher education ; Intellectual Disciplines ; Learning ; Literature Reviews ; Teaching ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2002-10, Vol.27 (4), p.405-417</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Oct 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-273dc5042af9ad78f08ca294c875f142555411b076e0b52b7dba3e35e303416f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-273dc5042af9ad78f08ca294c875f142555411b076e0b52b7dba3e35e303416f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ655992$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becher, Tony</creatorcontrib><title>Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked similarities and differences between the various research findings. In doing so, it draws extensively on the relevant literature, offering separate analyses of knowledge-related and socially related studies. The former embody curriculum, assessment and cognitive purpose, while the latter encompass group characteristics of teachers, types of teaching method and student learning requirements. The concluding section draws out the main implications for policy and practice related to staff development, computer-based learning, assessment of student learning and quality measures.</description><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>College Instruction</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Intellectual Disciplines</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAMgCMEEmPwC-BQcS84r6blgDSN8ZzEZUjcqjRNWaYuHUkmtn9PpiJOE_hiWf4-yzZC5xiuMORwDRQEBwGEQAyMOeEHaICZgBQL9n6IBjsijUhxjE68X0QqEzkboJeZlmpu7EcibZ1MtXR2VxibhLk2LrkzXplVa6x022Tc2aA3wd8ko0R1VulVWMs2mrLdeuNP0VEjW6_PfvIQvd1PZuPHdPr68DQeTVPFAEJKBK0VB0ZkU8ha5A3kSpKCqVzwBjPCOWcYVyAyDRUnlagrSTXlmgJlOGvoEF32c1eu-1xrH8pFt3ZxCV8SXPAcBKYRoj2kXOe90025cmYZrygxlLunlXueFq2L3tLOqF9j8pxxXhQktou-bWzTuaX86lxbl0Fu2841Tlpl_L6xZdiE6N7-69K_dvsG7bSMwQ</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Neumann, Ruth</creator><creator>Parry, Sharon</creator><creator>Becher, Tony</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis</title><author>Neumann, Ruth ; Parry, Sharon ; Becher, Tony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-273dc5042af9ad78f08ca294c875f142555411b076e0b52b7dba3e35e303416f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>College Instruction</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Intellectual Disciplines</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becher, Tony</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neumann, Ruth</au><au>Parry, Sharon</au><au>Becher, Tony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ655992</ericid><atitle>Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>405-417</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked similarities and differences between the various research findings. In doing so, it draws extensively on the relevant literature, offering separate analyses of knowledge-related and socially related studies. The former embody curriculum, assessment and cognitive purpose, while the latter encompass group characteristics of teachers, types of teaching method and student learning requirements. The concluding section draws out the main implications for policy and practice related to staff development, computer-based learning, assessment of student learning and quality measures.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/0307507022000011525</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0307-5079
ispartof Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2002-10, Vol.27 (4), p.405-417
issn 0307-5079
1470-174X
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ655992
source EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Cognitive style
College Instruction
Educational Research
Higher education
Intellectual Disciplines
Learning
Literature Reviews
Teaching
Undergraduate Study
title Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A03%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teaching%20and%20Learning%20in%20their%20Disciplinary%20Contexts:%20A%20conceptual%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Neumann,%20Ruth&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=405-417&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0307507022000011525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E653128781%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219580713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ655992&rfr_iscdi=true