Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis
The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked simi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2002-10, Vol.27 (4), p.405-417 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 417 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Neumann, Ruth Parry, Sharon Becher, Tony |
description | The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked similarities and differences between the various research findings. In doing so, it draws extensively on the relevant literature, offering separate analyses of knowledge-related and socially related studies. The former embody curriculum, assessment and cognitive purpose, while the latter encompass group characteristics of teachers, types of teaching method and student learning requirements. The concluding section draws out the main implications for policy and practice related to staff development, computer-based learning, assessment of student learning and quality measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0307507022000011525 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ655992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ655992</ericid><sourcerecordid>653128781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-273dc5042af9ad78f08ca294c875f142555411b076e0b52b7dba3e35e303416f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAMgCMEEmPwC-BQcS84r6blgDSN8ZzEZUjcqjRNWaYuHUkmtn9PpiJOE_hiWf4-yzZC5xiuMORwDRQEBwGEQAyMOeEHaICZgBQL9n6IBjsijUhxjE68X0QqEzkboJeZlmpu7EcibZ1MtXR2VxibhLk2LrkzXplVa6x022Tc2aA3wd8ko0R1VulVWMs2mrLdeuNP0VEjW6_PfvIQvd1PZuPHdPr68DQeTVPFAEJKBK0VB0ZkU8ha5A3kSpKCqVzwBjPCOWcYVyAyDRUnlagrSTXlmgJlOGvoEF32c1eu-1xrH8pFt3ZxCV8SXPAcBKYRoj2kXOe90025cmYZrygxlLunlXueFq2L3tLOqF9j8pxxXhQktou-bWzTuaX86lxbl0Fu2841Tlpl_L6xZdiE6N7-69K_dvsG7bSMwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219580713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Neumann, Ruth ; Parry, Sharon ; Becher, Tony</creator><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Ruth ; Parry, Sharon ; Becher, Tony</creatorcontrib><description>The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked similarities and differences between the various research findings. In doing so, it draws extensively on the relevant literature, offering separate analyses of knowledge-related and socially related studies. The former embody curriculum, assessment and cognitive purpose, while the latter encompass group characteristics of teachers, types of teaching method and student learning requirements. The concluding section draws out the main implications for policy and practice related to staff development, computer-based learning, assessment of student learning and quality measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0307507022000011525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Cognitive style ; College Instruction ; Educational Research ; Higher education ; Intellectual Disciplines ; Learning ; Literature Reviews ; Teaching ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2002-10, Vol.27 (4), p.405-417</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Oct 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-273dc5042af9ad78f08ca294c875f142555411b076e0b52b7dba3e35e303416f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-273dc5042af9ad78f08ca294c875f142555411b076e0b52b7dba3e35e303416f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ655992$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becher, Tony</creatorcontrib><title>Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked similarities and differences between the various research findings. In doing so, it draws extensively on the relevant literature, offering separate analyses of knowledge-related and socially related studies. The former embody curriculum, assessment and cognitive purpose, while the latter encompass group characteristics of teachers, types of teaching method and student learning requirements. The concluding section draws out the main implications for policy and practice related to staff development, computer-based learning, assessment of student learning and quality measures.</description><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>College Instruction</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Intellectual Disciplines</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAMgCMEEmPwC-BQcS84r6blgDSN8ZzEZUjcqjRNWaYuHUkmtn9PpiJOE_hiWf4-yzZC5xiuMORwDRQEBwGEQAyMOeEHaICZgBQL9n6IBjsijUhxjE68X0QqEzkboJeZlmpu7EcibZ1MtXR2VxibhLk2LrkzXplVa6x022Tc2aA3wd8ko0R1VulVWMs2mrLdeuNP0VEjW6_PfvIQvd1PZuPHdPr68DQeTVPFAEJKBK0VB0ZkU8ha5A3kSpKCqVzwBjPCOWcYVyAyDRUnlagrSTXlmgJlOGvoEF32c1eu-1xrH8pFt3ZxCV8SXPAcBKYRoj2kXOe90025cmYZrygxlLunlXueFq2L3tLOqF9j8pxxXhQktou-bWzTuaX86lxbl0Fu2841Tlpl_L6xZdiE6N7-69K_dvsG7bSMwQ</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Neumann, Ruth</creator><creator>Parry, Sharon</creator><creator>Becher, Tony</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis</title><author>Neumann, Ruth ; Parry, Sharon ; Becher, Tony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-273dc5042af9ad78f08ca294c875f142555411b076e0b52b7dba3e35e303416f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>College Instruction</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Intellectual Disciplines</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becher, Tony</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neumann, Ruth</au><au>Parry, Sharon</au><au>Becher, Tony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ655992</ericid><atitle>Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>405-417</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>The growing literature on undergraduate teaching and learning currently lacks an organising framework. This article sets out to provide one, distinguishing between hard pure, soft pure, hard applied and soft applied fields of study, and hence making it possible to highlight generally unremarked similarities and differences between the various research findings. In doing so, it draws extensively on the relevant literature, offering separate analyses of knowledge-related and socially related studies. The former embody curriculum, assessment and cognitive purpose, while the latter encompass group characteristics of teachers, types of teaching method and student learning requirements. The concluding section draws out the main implications for policy and practice related to staff development, computer-based learning, assessment of student learning and quality measures.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/0307507022000011525</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-5079 |
ispartof | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2002-10, Vol.27 (4), p.405-417 |
issn | 0307-5079 1470-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ655992 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Cognitive style College Instruction Educational Research Higher education Intellectual Disciplines Learning Literature Reviews Teaching Undergraduate Study |
title | Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A03%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teaching%20and%20Learning%20in%20their%20Disciplinary%20Contexts:%20A%20conceptual%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Neumann,%20Ruth&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=405-417&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0307507022000011525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E653128781%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219580713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ655992&rfr_iscdi=true |