Correcting grade deflation caused by multiple-choice scoring
In a study involving three sections of 181 pre-calculus students at a four-year college, partial credit scoring on multiple-choice questions was examined over an entire semester. Questions were constructed by experienced teachers to pose carefully designed, incorrect alternatives, many of which impl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of mathematical education in science and technology 2000-05, Vol.31 (3), p.371-380 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 380 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | International journal of mathematical education in science and technology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Baranchik, Alvin Cherkas, Barry |
description | In a study involving three sections of 181 pre-calculus students at a four-year college, partial credit scoring on multiple-choice questions was examined over an entire semester. Questions were constructed by experienced teachers to pose carefully designed, incorrect alternatives, many of which implicitly suggested varying degrees of partial knowledge or understanding. Computing students' course grades based solely on percentage correct scoring resulted in a course-wide GPA of 1.38. This seemed inconsistent with the fact that students were screened for entry into the course. To avert apparent grade deflation due to such right/wrong scoring, student scores were recomputed based on supplementing percentage correct scores with partial credit. This resulted in a course-wide increase in GPA to 1.92. Using that same letter grade distribution, and curving percentage correct averages to achieve the 1.92 GPA, it was found that 10% of the students were given different grades from those determined by the partial credit scoring. Regarding the efficacy of awarding partial credit points, it was found that partial credit by itself measured achievement of relevant mathematical skills that were missed by percentage correct scoring. Overall, grades determined by partial credit scoring seemed more reflective of both the quantity and quality of student knowledge than grades determined by either traditional percentage correct scoring or any corrective curving. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/002073900287147 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ608793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ608793</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ608793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-92249888ef542d5dae67dd74e50f15b2ca594f86273af46bb07618473f8d9d463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj0tLAzEUhYMoOFbXblzMHxibZPIUN1JaHxTcKLgbMnnUyHRSkhTtv3fKiIuCuDqL736HewC4RPAaQQGnEGLIazmE4IjwI1AgwkhFMULHoNjTasBvp-AspQ8IISJEFuB2FmK0Ovt-Va6iMrY01nUq-9CXWm2TNWW7K9fbLvtNZyv9Hry2ZdIhDsY5OHGqS_biJyfgdTF_mT1Uy-f7x9ndstKYk1xJjIkUQlhHCTbUKMu4MZxYCh2iLdaKSuIEw7xWjrC2hZwhQXjthJGGsHoCpmOvjiGlaF2ziX6t4q5BsNmPbw7GD8bVaNjo9e_1_IlBwWU9YDpi37sQ1-ozxM40We26EF1UvfbpsLLJX3nwbv716r9--gYPYXlm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correcting grade deflation caused by multiple-choice scoring</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Baranchik, Alvin ; Cherkas, Barry</creator><creatorcontrib>Baranchik, Alvin ; Cherkas, Barry</creatorcontrib><description>In a study involving three sections of 181 pre-calculus students at a four-year college, partial credit scoring on multiple-choice questions was examined over an entire semester. Questions were constructed by experienced teachers to pose carefully designed, incorrect alternatives, many of which implicitly suggested varying degrees of partial knowledge or understanding. Computing students' course grades based solely on percentage correct scoring resulted in a course-wide GPA of 1.38. This seemed inconsistent with the fact that students were screened for entry into the course. To avert apparent grade deflation due to such right/wrong scoring, student scores were recomputed based on supplementing percentage correct scores with partial credit. This resulted in a course-wide increase in GPA to 1.92. Using that same letter grade distribution, and curving percentage correct averages to achieve the 1.92 GPA, it was found that 10% of the students were given different grades from those determined by the partial credit scoring. Regarding the efficacy of awarding partial credit points, it was found that partial credit by itself measured achievement of relevant mathematical skills that were missed by percentage correct scoring. Overall, grades determined by partial credit scoring seemed more reflective of both the quantity and quality of student knowledge than grades determined by either traditional percentage correct scoring or any corrective curving.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-739X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/002073900287147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Higher Education ; Mathematics Education ; Multiple Choice Tests ; Scores ; Scoring</subject><ispartof>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 2000-05, Vol.31 (3), p.371-380</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-92249888ef542d5dae67dd74e50f15b2ca594f86273af46bb07618473f8d9d463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-92249888ef542d5dae67dd74e50f15b2ca594f86273af46bb07618473f8d9d463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/002073900287147$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/002073900287147$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ608793$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baranchik, Alvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherkas, Barry</creatorcontrib><title>Correcting grade deflation caused by multiple-choice scoring</title><title>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</title><description>In a study involving three sections of 181 pre-calculus students at a four-year college, partial credit scoring on multiple-choice questions was examined over an entire semester. Questions were constructed by experienced teachers to pose carefully designed, incorrect alternatives, many of which implicitly suggested varying degrees of partial knowledge or understanding. Computing students' course grades based solely on percentage correct scoring resulted in a course-wide GPA of 1.38. This seemed inconsistent with the fact that students were screened for entry into the course. To avert apparent grade deflation due to such right/wrong scoring, student scores were recomputed based on supplementing percentage correct scores with partial credit. This resulted in a course-wide increase in GPA to 1.92. Using that same letter grade distribution, and curving percentage correct averages to achieve the 1.92 GPA, it was found that 10% of the students were given different grades from those determined by the partial credit scoring. Regarding the efficacy of awarding partial credit points, it was found that partial credit by itself measured achievement of relevant mathematical skills that were missed by percentage correct scoring. Overall, grades determined by partial credit scoring seemed more reflective of both the quantity and quality of student knowledge than grades determined by either traditional percentage correct scoring or any corrective curving.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Multiple Choice Tests</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Scoring</subject><issn>0020-739X</issn><issn>1464-5211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj0tLAzEUhYMoOFbXblzMHxibZPIUN1JaHxTcKLgbMnnUyHRSkhTtv3fKiIuCuDqL736HewC4RPAaQQGnEGLIazmE4IjwI1AgwkhFMULHoNjTasBvp-AspQ8IISJEFuB2FmK0Ovt-Va6iMrY01nUq-9CXWm2TNWW7K9fbLvtNZyv9Hry2ZdIhDsY5OHGqS_biJyfgdTF_mT1Uy-f7x9ndstKYk1xJjIkUQlhHCTbUKMu4MZxYCh2iLdaKSuIEw7xWjrC2hZwhQXjthJGGsHoCpmOvjiGlaF2ziX6t4q5BsNmPbw7GD8bVaNjo9e_1_IlBwWU9YDpi37sQ1-ozxM40We26EF1UvfbpsLLJX3nwbv716r9--gYPYXlm</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Baranchik, Alvin</creator><creator>Cherkas, Barry</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Correcting grade deflation caused by multiple-choice scoring</title><author>Baranchik, Alvin ; Cherkas, Barry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-92249888ef542d5dae67dd74e50f15b2ca594f86273af46bb07618473f8d9d463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Multiple Choice Tests</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Scoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baranchik, Alvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherkas, Barry</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baranchik, Alvin</au><au>Cherkas, Barry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ608793</ericid><atitle>Correcting grade deflation caused by multiple-choice scoring</atitle><jtitle>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</jtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>371-380</pages><issn>0020-739X</issn><eissn>1464-5211</eissn><abstract>In a study involving three sections of 181 pre-calculus students at a four-year college, partial credit scoring on multiple-choice questions was examined over an entire semester. Questions were constructed by experienced teachers to pose carefully designed, incorrect alternatives, many of which implicitly suggested varying degrees of partial knowledge or understanding. Computing students' course grades based solely on percentage correct scoring resulted in a course-wide GPA of 1.38. This seemed inconsistent with the fact that students were screened for entry into the course. To avert apparent grade deflation due to such right/wrong scoring, student scores were recomputed based on supplementing percentage correct scores with partial credit. This resulted in a course-wide increase in GPA to 1.92. Using that same letter grade distribution, and curving percentage correct averages to achieve the 1.92 GPA, it was found that 10% of the students were given different grades from those determined by the partial credit scoring. Regarding the efficacy of awarding partial credit points, it was found that partial credit by itself measured achievement of relevant mathematical skills that were missed by percentage correct scoring. Overall, grades determined by partial credit scoring seemed more reflective of both the quantity and quality of student knowledge than grades determined by either traditional percentage correct scoring or any corrective curving.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/002073900287147</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-739X |
ispartof | International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 2000-05, Vol.31 (3), p.371-380 |
issn | 0020-739X 1464-5211 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ608793 |
source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Evaluation Higher Education Mathematics Education Multiple Choice Tests Scores Scoring |
title | Correcting grade deflation caused by multiple-choice scoring |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A17%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correcting%20grade%20deflation%20caused%20by%20multiple-choice%20scoring&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20mathematical%20education%20in%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Baranchik,%20Alvin&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=371-380&rft.issn=0020-739X&rft.eissn=1464-5211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/002073900287147&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ608793%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ608793&rfr_iscdi=true |