Components of Collective Argumentation in Geometric Construction Tasks

This study aims to examine the components of collective argumentation of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers during geometric construction activities. To scrutinize this issue, case study research was utilized. The participants were 14 pre-service middle school mathematics teachers who wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkish Journal of Education 2023, Vol.12 (1), p.50
Hauptverfasser: Demiray, Esra, Isiksal-Bostan, Mine, Saygi, Elif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 50
container_title Turkish Journal of Education
container_volume 12
creator Demiray, Esra
Isiksal-Bostan, Mine
Saygi, Elif
description This study aims to examine the components of collective argumentation of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers during geometric construction activities. To scrutinize this issue, case study research was utilized. The participants were 14 pre-service middle school mathematics teachers who worked collectively by forming four groups. During the data collection process, the groups worked on four geometric construction tasks by using compass-straightedge or GeoGebra. The findings presented that the collective argumentation processes were depicted by means of eleven components. In more detail, the six components of Toulmin's argument model which are data, warrant, claim, backing, rebuttal, and qualifier were insufficient to represent collective argumentation. Instead of claim, the term conclusion was used in this study since the associated data and warrant were provided in the argumentation. The collective argumentation processes of the groups involved not only the mentioned six components but also the five additional components, which were named conclusion/data, target conclusion, guidance, challenger, and objection. The new components might be used while investigating the argumentation process in other disciplines.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1376326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1376326</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1376326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ13763263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZHBzzs8tyM9LzSspVshPU3DOz8lJTS7JLEtVcCxKL80FiieWZObnKWTmKbin5uemlhRlJgNV5RWXFJUmg2VCEouzi3kYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Osm2uIs4duKlB9fEFRZm5iUWW8q5ehsbmZsZGZMSF5AMalMfc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Components of Collective Argumentation in Geometric Construction Tasks</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Demiray, Esra ; Isiksal-Bostan, Mine ; Saygi, Elif</creator><creatorcontrib>Demiray, Esra ; Isiksal-Bostan, Mine ; Saygi, Elif</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to examine the components of collective argumentation of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers during geometric construction activities. To scrutinize this issue, case study research was utilized. The participants were 14 pre-service middle school mathematics teachers who worked collectively by forming four groups. During the data collection process, the groups worked on four geometric construction tasks by using compass-straightedge or GeoGebra. The findings presented that the collective argumentation processes were depicted by means of eleven components. In more detail, the six components of Toulmin's argument model which are data, warrant, claim, backing, rebuttal, and qualifier were insufficient to represent collective argumentation. Instead of claim, the term conclusion was used in this study since the associated data and warrant were provided in the argumentation. The collective argumentation processes of the groups involved not only the mentioned six components but also the five additional components, which were named conclusion/data, target conclusion, guidance, challenger, and objection. The new components might be used while investigating the argumentation process in other disciplines.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkish Journal of Education</publisher><subject>Foreign Countries ; Geometric Concepts ; Geometry ; Group Activities ; Group Discussion ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mathematics Teachers ; Middle School Teachers ; Persuasive Discourse ; Preservice Teachers</subject><ispartof>Turkish Journal of Education, 2023, Vol.12 (1), p.50</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-7619-1390 ; 0000-0002-1839-5376 ; 0000-0001-8811-4747</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1376326$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1376326$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demiray, Esra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isiksal-Bostan, Mine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saygi, Elif</creatorcontrib><title>Components of Collective Argumentation in Geometric Construction Tasks</title><title>Turkish Journal of Education</title><description>This study aims to examine the components of collective argumentation of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers during geometric construction activities. To scrutinize this issue, case study research was utilized. The participants were 14 pre-service middle school mathematics teachers who worked collectively by forming four groups. During the data collection process, the groups worked on four geometric construction tasks by using compass-straightedge or GeoGebra. The findings presented that the collective argumentation processes were depicted by means of eleven components. In more detail, the six components of Toulmin's argument model which are data, warrant, claim, backing, rebuttal, and qualifier were insufficient to represent collective argumentation. Instead of claim, the term conclusion was used in this study since the associated data and warrant were provided in the argumentation. The collective argumentation processes of the groups involved not only the mentioned six components but also the five additional components, which were named conclusion/data, target conclusion, guidance, challenger, and objection. The new components might be used while investigating the argumentation process in other disciplines.</description><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Geometric Concepts</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Group Activities</subject><subject>Group Discussion</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Teachers</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZHBzzs8tyM9LzSspVshPU3DOz8lJTS7JLEtVcCxKL80FiieWZObnKWTmKbin5uemlhRlJgNV5RWXFJUmg2VCEouzi3kYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Osm2uIs4duKlB9fEFRZm5iUWW8q5ehsbmZsZGZMSF5AMalMfc</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Demiray, Esra</creator><creator>Isiksal-Bostan, Mine</creator><creator>Saygi, Elif</creator><general>Turkish Journal of Education</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-1390</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-5376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8811-4747</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Components of Collective Argumentation in Geometric Construction Tasks</title><author>Demiray, Esra ; Isiksal-Bostan, Mine ; Saygi, Elif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ13763263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Geometric Concepts</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Group Activities</topic><topic>Group Discussion</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Teachers</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demiray, Esra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isiksal-Bostan, Mine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saygi, Elif</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Turkish Journal of Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demiray, Esra</au><au>Isiksal-Bostan, Mine</au><au>Saygi, Elif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1376326</ericid><atitle>Components of Collective Argumentation in Geometric Construction Tasks</atitle><jtitle>Turkish Journal of Education</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><pages>50-</pages><abstract>This study aims to examine the components of collective argumentation of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers during geometric construction activities. To scrutinize this issue, case study research was utilized. The participants were 14 pre-service middle school mathematics teachers who worked collectively by forming four groups. During the data collection process, the groups worked on four geometric construction tasks by using compass-straightedge or GeoGebra. The findings presented that the collective argumentation processes were depicted by means of eleven components. In more detail, the six components of Toulmin's argument model which are data, warrant, claim, backing, rebuttal, and qualifier were insufficient to represent collective argumentation. Instead of claim, the term conclusion was used in this study since the associated data and warrant were provided in the argumentation. The collective argumentation processes of the groups involved not only the mentioned six components but also the five additional components, which were named conclusion/data, target conclusion, guidance, challenger, and objection. The new components might be used while investigating the argumentation process in other disciplines.</abstract><pub>Turkish Journal of Education</pub><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-1390</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-5376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8811-4747</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Turkish Journal of Education, 2023, Vol.12 (1), p.50
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1376326
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Foreign Countries
Geometric Concepts
Geometry
Group Activities
Group Discussion
Mathematics Instruction
Mathematics Teachers
Middle School Teachers
Persuasive Discourse
Preservice Teachers
title Components of Collective Argumentation in Geometric Construction Tasks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Components%20of%20Collective%20Argumentation%20in%20Geometric%20Construction%20Tasks&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20Journal%20of%20Education&rft.au=Demiray,%20Esra&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.pages=50-&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EEJ1376326%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1376326&rfr_iscdi=true