Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses
Research on teaching and learning quantum physics (QP) frequently explores students' conceptual difficulties to identify common patterns in their reasoning. The abstractness of QP is often found to be at the origin of students' conceptual difficulties. Due to this abstract nature students...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in science education 2022-07, Vol.58 (2), p.183-202 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 202 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 183 |
container_title | Studies in science education |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Bouchée, T. de Putter - Smits, L. Thurlings, M. Pepin, B. |
description | Research on teaching and learning quantum physics (QP) frequently explores students' conceptual difficulties to identify common patterns in their reasoning. The abstractness of QP is often found to be at the origin of students' conceptual difficulties. Due to this abstract nature students resort to common sense reasoning or classical thinking when they make meaning of QP phenomena. In this literature review, the 'abstractness' is closely investigated and nuanced to uncover what reasons for the abstractness students experience. Four reasons for students' conceptual difficulties can be categorised under the abstract nature of QP. These reasons are that students struggle a) to relate the mathematical formalism of QP to experiences in the physical world; b) to interpret counterintuitive QP phenomena and concepts; c) to transit from a deterministic to a probabilistic worldview; and d) to understand the limitations of language to express quantum phenomena, concepts, and objects. Combining these four reasons allows us to better understand the origin of conceptual difficulties in QP and why these difficulties persist over time. The implications of these findings for research and teaching practice are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1365632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1365632</ericid><sourcerecordid>2697333193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-d8a484cce77a883cb9a0f70d7b7ea0963e19fea0834a91be551a53854c09fd793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1rGzEQFKWFuml_gkHQ53Ok0-kkvaWYNEkJ9MV9Fmt9NDJnyZZ0BP_7yNjpY2FhF2ZmZ3cQWlKyokSSW8IIF_0oVj3p6YqqkXGhPqAFVQPp5ED7j2hx5nRn0mf0pZQdIZSPUi4QbNIrZFsw4K2r1WU8R-tyqRBtiH9x8tikaNyhzjBhG7wPZp5qcAWH2KrmZGdTUz7h4wyxznt8eDmVYErTzbm48hV98jAV9-3ab9Cfn_eb9WP3_Pvhaf3juTOMidpZCYMcjHFCgJTMbBUQL4gVW-GAtJ8cVb5Nkg2g6NZxToEzyQdDlLdCsRv0_bL3kNNxdqXqXTsgNkvdj0owxqhijcUvLJNTKdl5fchhD_mkKdHnNPV7mvqcpr6m2XTLi87lYP5p7n9RNvKR9Q2_u-Ah-pT38JryZHWF05SyzxBNKJr93-IN59aHSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2697333193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses</title><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Bouchée, T. ; de Putter - Smits, L. ; Thurlings, M. ; Pepin, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouchée, T. ; de Putter - Smits, L. ; Thurlings, M. ; Pepin, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Research on teaching and learning quantum physics (QP) frequently explores students' conceptual difficulties to identify common patterns in their reasoning. The abstractness of QP is often found to be at the origin of students' conceptual difficulties. Due to this abstract nature students resort to common sense reasoning or classical thinking when they make meaning of QP phenomena. In this literature review, the 'abstractness' is closely investigated and nuanced to uncover what reasons for the abstractness students experience. Four reasons for students' conceptual difficulties can be categorised under the abstract nature of QP. These reasons are that students struggle a) to relate the mathematical formalism of QP to experiences in the physical world; b) to interpret counterintuitive QP phenomena and concepts; c) to transit from a deterministic to a probabilistic worldview; and d) to understand the limitations of language to express quantum phenomena, concepts, and objects. Combining these four reasons allows us to better understand the origin of conceptual difficulties in QP and why these difficulties persist over time. The implications of these findings for research and teaching practice are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-8412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leeds: Routledge</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Cognition & reasoning ; College Science ; Concept Formation ; Conceptual difficulties ; conceptual understanding ; Educational Practices ; Language Usage ; Learning ; literature review ; Literature Reviews ; Logical Thinking ; Mechanics (Physics) ; Pedagogy ; Physics ; Probability ; Quantum physics ; quantum physics education ; Relevance (Education) ; Science Instruction ; Scientific Concepts ; secondary and lower undergraduate education ; Secondary School Science ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Studies in science education, 2022-07, Vol.58 (2), p.183-202</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2021</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-d8a484cce77a883cb9a0f70d7b7ea0963e19fea0834a91be551a53854c09fd793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-d8a484cce77a883cb9a0f70d7b7ea0963e19fea0834a91be551a53854c09fd793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7804-145X ; 0000-0002-7447-9750 ; 0000-0001-7877-7328 ; 0000-0003-1507-4785</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1365632$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouchée, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Putter - Smits, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurlings, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepin, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses</title><title>Studies in science education</title><description>Research on teaching and learning quantum physics (QP) frequently explores students' conceptual difficulties to identify common patterns in their reasoning. The abstractness of QP is often found to be at the origin of students' conceptual difficulties. Due to this abstract nature students resort to common sense reasoning or classical thinking when they make meaning of QP phenomena. In this literature review, the 'abstractness' is closely investigated and nuanced to uncover what reasons for the abstractness students experience. Four reasons for students' conceptual difficulties can be categorised under the abstract nature of QP. These reasons are that students struggle a) to relate the mathematical formalism of QP to experiences in the physical world; b) to interpret counterintuitive QP phenomena and concepts; c) to transit from a deterministic to a probabilistic worldview; and d) to understand the limitations of language to express quantum phenomena, concepts, and objects. Combining these four reasons allows us to better understand the origin of conceptual difficulties in QP and why these difficulties persist over time. The implications of these findings for research and teaching practice are discussed.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Conceptual difficulties</subject><subject>conceptual understanding</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>literature review</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Logical Thinking</subject><subject>Mechanics (Physics)</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Quantum physics</subject><subject>quantum physics education</subject><subject>Relevance (Education)</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>secondary and lower undergraduate education</subject><subject>Secondary School Science</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>0305-7267</issn><issn>1940-8412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UF1rGzEQFKWFuml_gkHQ53Ok0-kkvaWYNEkJ9MV9Fmt9NDJnyZZ0BP_7yNjpY2FhF2ZmZ3cQWlKyokSSW8IIF_0oVj3p6YqqkXGhPqAFVQPp5ED7j2hx5nRn0mf0pZQdIZSPUi4QbNIrZFsw4K2r1WU8R-tyqRBtiH9x8tikaNyhzjBhG7wPZp5qcAWH2KrmZGdTUz7h4wyxznt8eDmVYErTzbm48hV98jAV9-3ab9Cfn_eb9WP3_Pvhaf3juTOMidpZCYMcjHFCgJTMbBUQL4gVW-GAtJ8cVb5Nkg2g6NZxToEzyQdDlLdCsRv0_bL3kNNxdqXqXTsgNkvdj0owxqhijcUvLJNTKdl5fchhD_mkKdHnNPV7mvqcpr6m2XTLi87lYP5p7n9RNvKR9Q2_u-Ah-pT38JryZHWF05SyzxBNKJr93-IN59aHSQ</recordid><startdate>20220703</startdate><enddate>20220703</enddate><creator>Bouchée, T.</creator><creator>de Putter - Smits, L.</creator><creator>Thurlings, M.</creator><creator>Pepin, B.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-145X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-9750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7877-7328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-4785</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220703</creationdate><title>Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses</title><author>Bouchée, T. ; de Putter - Smits, L. ; Thurlings, M. ; Pepin, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-d8a484cce77a883cb9a0f70d7b7ea0963e19fea0834a91be551a53854c09fd793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Conceptual difficulties</topic><topic>conceptual understanding</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>literature review</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Logical Thinking</topic><topic>Mechanics (Physics)</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Quantum physics</topic><topic>quantum physics education</topic><topic>Relevance (Education)</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>secondary and lower undergraduate education</topic><topic>Secondary School Science</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouchée, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Putter - Smits, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurlings, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepin, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Studies in science education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouchée, T.</au><au>de Putter - Smits, L.</au><au>Thurlings, M.</au><au>Pepin, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1365632</ericid><atitle>Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses</atitle><jtitle>Studies in science education</jtitle><date>2022-07-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>183-202</pages><issn>0305-7267</issn><eissn>1940-8412</eissn><abstract>Research on teaching and learning quantum physics (QP) frequently explores students' conceptual difficulties to identify common patterns in their reasoning. The abstractness of QP is often found to be at the origin of students' conceptual difficulties. Due to this abstract nature students resort to common sense reasoning or classical thinking when they make meaning of QP phenomena. In this literature review, the 'abstractness' is closely investigated and nuanced to uncover what reasons for the abstractness students experience. Four reasons for students' conceptual difficulties can be categorised under the abstract nature of QP. These reasons are that students struggle a) to relate the mathematical formalism of QP to experiences in the physical world; b) to interpret counterintuitive QP phenomena and concepts; c) to transit from a deterministic to a probabilistic worldview; and d) to understand the limitations of language to express quantum phenomena, concepts, and objects. Combining these four reasons allows us to better understand the origin of conceptual difficulties in QP and why these difficulties persist over time. The implications of these findings for research and teaching practice are discussed.</abstract><cop>Leeds</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-145X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-9750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7877-7328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-4785</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7267 |
ispartof | Studies in science education, 2022-07, Vol.58 (2), p.183-202 |
issn | 0305-7267 1940-8412 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1365632 |
source | Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles) |
subjects | Barriers Cognition & reasoning College Science Concept Formation Conceptual difficulties conceptual understanding Educational Practices Language Usage Learning literature review Literature Reviews Logical Thinking Mechanics (Physics) Pedagogy Physics Probability Quantum physics quantum physics education Relevance (Education) Science Instruction Scientific Concepts secondary and lower undergraduate education Secondary School Science Students Teaching Methods Undergraduate Study |
title | Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20better%20understanding%20of%20conceptual%20difficulties%20in%20introductory%20quantum%20physics%20courses&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20science%20education&rft.au=Bouch%C3%A9e,%20T.&rft.date=2022-07-03&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=183-202&rft.issn=0305-7267&rft.eissn=1940-8412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2697333193%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2697333193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1365632&rfr_iscdi=true |