Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy

We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement 2022-04, Vol.12 (2), p.174-191
Hauptverfasser: Koswatta, Taniya J., Parrella, J. A., Leggette, H. R., Ramasubramanian, S., Rutherford, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 191
container_issue 2
container_start_page 174
container_title International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement
container_volume 12
creator Koswatta, Taniya J.
Parrella, J. A.
Leggette, H. R.
Ramasubramanian, S.
Rutherford, T.
description We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need to engage effectively. We conducted a case study and collected data from scientists across five colleges (n = 266). Results suggest that scientists who do not engage in PSC need external support from their institution, and scientists who do engage in PSC continue to engage because they feel intrinsically motivated. Results revealed that communication skills development training is needed to improve scientists' perceived ability to mitigate science controversies, evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies, and manage science communications projects. We also found that scientists who used social media for PSC enjoy and contribute to PSC more than those who did not use social media. However, PSC contribution varied based on scientists' ethnicity, years of research experience, faculty title, and college. Female scientists need more help than males do in developing their confidence and increasing their enjoyment in PSC. These results can help provide insight into the PSC environment at universities of similar stature.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1354652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1354652</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1354652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-491a7930b61cc140c17545319dc4949c737088186561551d3debb5339194d6e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1PwzAMjRBITGM_YVJunDry2TacQNOAoUlc4BylScqC2mRKOqb-ezp1TJzwwbb8_J7lB8AcowVGJbojmLOScb4giJAhcY4FvgCT4zwrWU4vzz3n12CW0hcaggqREzwBYd3uYvh2_hPu9lXjNEzaWa8t1KFt995p1bng76GCWiULU7c3PQz1uNa51KVb6K01CR621v9lDZKV7YM3sNtaqLQytu1vwFWtmmRnpzoFH0-r9-VLtnl7Xi8fN5kmOekyJrAqBEVVjrXGDGlccMYpFkYzwYQuaIHKEpc5z_HwsaHGVhWnVGDBTG4FnQI-6uoYUoq2lrvoWhV7iZE8Gid_jZNH4-TJuIE3H3k2On3mrF4x5SznZMAfRtz5OsRWHUJsjOxU34RYR-W1S5L-f-IHnup-Og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Koswatta, Taniya J. ; Parrella, J. A. ; Leggette, H. R. ; Ramasubramanian, S. ; Rutherford, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koswatta, Taniya J. ; Parrella, J. A. ; Leggette, H. R. ; Ramasubramanian, S. ; Rutherford, T.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need to engage effectively. We conducted a case study and collected data from scientists across five colleges (n = 266). Results suggest that scientists who do not engage in PSC need external support from their institution, and scientists who do engage in PSC continue to engage because they feel intrinsically motivated. Results revealed that communication skills development training is needed to improve scientists' perceived ability to mitigate science controversies, evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies, and manage science communications projects. We also found that scientists who used social media for PSC enjoy and contribute to PSC more than those who did not use social media. However, PSC contribution varied based on scientists' ethnicity, years of research experience, faculty title, and college. Female scientists need more help than males do in developing their confidence and increasing their enjoyment in PSC. These results can help provide insight into the PSC environment at universities of similar stature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2154-8455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2154-8463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Case study ; College Faculty ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Communication Skills ; Gender Differences ; Interests ; Public Relations ; science communication ; Science Education ; Scientists ; survey</subject><ispartof>International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement, 2022-04, Vol.12 (2), p.174-191</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-491a7930b61cc140c17545319dc4949c737088186561551d3debb5339194d6e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-491a7930b61cc140c17545319dc4949c737088186561551d3debb5339194d6e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9120-0451 ; 0000-0003-3875-4791 ; 0000-0003-2140-8008 ; 0000-0001-9765-6708 ; 0000-0003-1339-1947</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1354652$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koswatta, Taniya J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrella, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leggette, H. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramasubramanian, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy</title><title>International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement</title><description>We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need to engage effectively. We conducted a case study and collected data from scientists across five colleges (n = 266). Results suggest that scientists who do not engage in PSC need external support from their institution, and scientists who do engage in PSC continue to engage because they feel intrinsically motivated. Results revealed that communication skills development training is needed to improve scientists' perceived ability to mitigate science controversies, evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies, and manage science communications projects. We also found that scientists who used social media for PSC enjoy and contribute to PSC more than those who did not use social media. However, PSC contribution varied based on scientists' ethnicity, years of research experience, faculty title, and college. Female scientists need more help than males do in developing their confidence and increasing their enjoyment in PSC. These results can help provide insight into the PSC environment at universities of similar stature.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Case study</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Interests</subject><subject>Public Relations</subject><subject>science communication</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>survey</subject><issn>2154-8455</issn><issn>2154-8463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1PwzAMjRBITGM_YVJunDry2TacQNOAoUlc4BylScqC2mRKOqb-ezp1TJzwwbb8_J7lB8AcowVGJbojmLOScb4giJAhcY4FvgCT4zwrWU4vzz3n12CW0hcaggqREzwBYd3uYvh2_hPu9lXjNEzaWa8t1KFt995p1bng76GCWiULU7c3PQz1uNa51KVb6K01CR621v9lDZKV7YM3sNtaqLQytu1vwFWtmmRnpzoFH0-r9-VLtnl7Xi8fN5kmOekyJrAqBEVVjrXGDGlccMYpFkYzwYQuaIHKEpc5z_HwsaHGVhWnVGDBTG4FnQI-6uoYUoq2lrvoWhV7iZE8Gid_jZNH4-TJuIE3H3k2On3mrF4x5SznZMAfRtz5OsRWHUJsjOxU34RYR-W1S5L-f-IHnup-Og</recordid><startdate>20220403</startdate><enddate>20220403</enddate><creator>Koswatta, Taniya J.</creator><creator>Parrella, J. A.</creator><creator>Leggette, H. R.</creator><creator>Ramasubramanian, S.</creator><creator>Rutherford, T.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-0451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-4791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-8008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-6708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-1947</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220403</creationdate><title>Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy</title><author>Koswatta, Taniya J. ; Parrella, J. A. ; Leggette, H. R. ; Ramasubramanian, S. ; Rutherford, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-491a7930b61cc140c17545319dc4949c737088186561551d3debb5339194d6e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Case study</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Interests</topic><topic>Public Relations</topic><topic>science communication</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>survey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koswatta, Taniya J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrella, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leggette, H. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramasubramanian, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koswatta, Taniya J.</au><au>Parrella, J. A.</au><au>Leggette, H. R.</au><au>Ramasubramanian, S.</au><au>Rutherford, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1354652</ericid><atitle>Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement</jtitle><date>2022-04-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>174-191</pages><issn>2154-8455</issn><eissn>2154-8463</eissn><abstract>We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need to engage effectively. We conducted a case study and collected data from scientists across five colleges (n = 266). Results suggest that scientists who do not engage in PSC need external support from their institution, and scientists who do engage in PSC continue to engage because they feel intrinsically motivated. Results revealed that communication skills development training is needed to improve scientists' perceived ability to mitigate science controversies, evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies, and manage science communications projects. We also found that scientists who used social media for PSC enjoy and contribute to PSC more than those who did not use social media. However, PSC contribution varied based on scientists' ethnicity, years of research experience, faculty title, and college. Female scientists need more help than males do in developing their confidence and increasing their enjoyment in PSC. These results can help provide insight into the PSC environment at universities of similar stature.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-0451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-4791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-8008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-6708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-1947</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2154-8455
ispartof International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement, 2022-04, Vol.12 (2), p.174-191
issn 2154-8455
2154-8463
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1354652
source Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Attitudes
Case study
College Faculty
Communication (Thought Transfer)
Communication Skills
Gender Differences
Interests
Public Relations
science communication
Science Education
Scientists
survey
title Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20public%20science%20communication:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20scientists'%20needs%20when%20communicating%20beyond%20the%20academy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20science%20education.%20Part%20B.%20Communication%20and%20public%20engagement&rft.au=Koswatta,%20Taniya%20J.&rft.date=2022-04-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=174-191&rft.issn=2154-8455&rft.eissn=2154-8463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191&rft_dat=%3Ceric_infor%3EEJ1354652%3C/eric_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1354652&rfr_iscdi=true