Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy
We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement 2022-04, Vol.12 (2), p.174-191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 191 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 174 |
container_title | International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Koswatta, Taniya J. Parrella, J. A. Leggette, H. R. Ramasubramanian, S. Rutherford, T. |
description | We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need to engage effectively. We conducted a case study and collected data from scientists across five colleges (n = 266). Results suggest that scientists who do not engage in PSC need external support from their institution, and scientists who do engage in PSC continue to engage because they feel intrinsically motivated. Results revealed that communication skills development training is needed to improve scientists' perceived ability to mitigate science controversies, evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies, and manage science communications projects. We also found that scientists who used social media for PSC enjoy and contribute to PSC more than those who did not use social media. However, PSC contribution varied based on scientists' ethnicity, years of research experience, faculty title, and college. Female scientists need more help than males do in developing their confidence and increasing their enjoyment in PSC. These results can help provide insight into the PSC environment at universities of similar stature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1354652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1354652</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1354652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-491a7930b61cc140c17545319dc4949c737088186561551d3debb5339194d6e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1PwzAMjRBITGM_YVJunDry2TacQNOAoUlc4BylScqC2mRKOqb-ezp1TJzwwbb8_J7lB8AcowVGJbojmLOScb4giJAhcY4FvgCT4zwrWU4vzz3n12CW0hcaggqREzwBYd3uYvh2_hPu9lXjNEzaWa8t1KFt995p1bng76GCWiULU7c3PQz1uNa51KVb6K01CR621v9lDZKV7YM3sNtaqLQytu1vwFWtmmRnpzoFH0-r9-VLtnl7Xi8fN5kmOekyJrAqBEVVjrXGDGlccMYpFkYzwYQuaIHKEpc5z_HwsaHGVhWnVGDBTG4FnQI-6uoYUoq2lrvoWhV7iZE8Gid_jZNH4-TJuIE3H3k2On3mrF4x5SznZMAfRtz5OsRWHUJsjOxU34RYR-W1S5L-f-IHnup-Og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Koswatta, Taniya J. ; Parrella, J. A. ; Leggette, H. R. ; Ramasubramanian, S. ; Rutherford, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koswatta, Taniya J. ; Parrella, J. A. ; Leggette, H. R. ; Ramasubramanian, S. ; Rutherford, T.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need to engage effectively. We conducted a case study and collected data from scientists across five colleges (n = 266). Results suggest that scientists who do not engage in PSC need external support from their institution, and scientists who do engage in PSC continue to engage because they feel intrinsically motivated. Results revealed that communication skills development training is needed to improve scientists' perceived ability to mitigate science controversies, evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies, and manage science communications projects. We also found that scientists who used social media for PSC enjoy and contribute to PSC more than those who did not use social media. However, PSC contribution varied based on scientists' ethnicity, years of research experience, faculty title, and college. Female scientists need more help than males do in developing their confidence and increasing their enjoyment in PSC. These results can help provide insight into the PSC environment at universities of similar stature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2154-8455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2154-8463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Case study ; College Faculty ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Communication Skills ; Gender Differences ; Interests ; Public Relations ; science communication ; Science Education ; Scientists ; survey</subject><ispartof>International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement, 2022-04, Vol.12 (2), p.174-191</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-491a7930b61cc140c17545319dc4949c737088186561551d3debb5339194d6e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-491a7930b61cc140c17545319dc4949c737088186561551d3debb5339194d6e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9120-0451 ; 0000-0003-3875-4791 ; 0000-0003-2140-8008 ; 0000-0001-9765-6708 ; 0000-0003-1339-1947</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1354652$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koswatta, Taniya J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrella, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leggette, H. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramasubramanian, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy</title><title>International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement</title><description>We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need to engage effectively. We conducted a case study and collected data from scientists across five colleges (n = 266). Results suggest that scientists who do not engage in PSC need external support from their institution, and scientists who do engage in PSC continue to engage because they feel intrinsically motivated. Results revealed that communication skills development training is needed to improve scientists' perceived ability to mitigate science controversies, evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies, and manage science communications projects. We also found that scientists who used social media for PSC enjoy and contribute to PSC more than those who did not use social media. However, PSC contribution varied based on scientists' ethnicity, years of research experience, faculty title, and college. Female scientists need more help than males do in developing their confidence and increasing their enjoyment in PSC. These results can help provide insight into the PSC environment at universities of similar stature.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Case study</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Interests</subject><subject>Public Relations</subject><subject>science communication</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>survey</subject><issn>2154-8455</issn><issn>2154-8463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1PwzAMjRBITGM_YVJunDry2TacQNOAoUlc4BylScqC2mRKOqb-ezp1TJzwwbb8_J7lB8AcowVGJbojmLOScb4giJAhcY4FvgCT4zwrWU4vzz3n12CW0hcaggqREzwBYd3uYvh2_hPu9lXjNEzaWa8t1KFt995p1bng76GCWiULU7c3PQz1uNa51KVb6K01CR621v9lDZKV7YM3sNtaqLQytu1vwFWtmmRnpzoFH0-r9-VLtnl7Xi8fN5kmOekyJrAqBEVVjrXGDGlccMYpFkYzwYQuaIHKEpc5z_HwsaHGVhWnVGDBTG4FnQI-6uoYUoq2lrvoWhV7iZE8Gid_jZNH4-TJuIE3H3k2On3mrF4x5SznZMAfRtz5OsRWHUJsjOxU34RYR-W1S5L-f-IHnup-Og</recordid><startdate>20220403</startdate><enddate>20220403</enddate><creator>Koswatta, Taniya J.</creator><creator>Parrella, J. A.</creator><creator>Leggette, H. R.</creator><creator>Ramasubramanian, S.</creator><creator>Rutherford, T.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-0451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-4791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-8008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-6708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-1947</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220403</creationdate><title>Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy</title><author>Koswatta, Taniya J. ; Parrella, J. A. ; Leggette, H. R. ; Ramasubramanian, S. ; Rutherford, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-491a7930b61cc140c17545319dc4949c737088186561551d3debb5339194d6e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Case study</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Interests</topic><topic>Public Relations</topic><topic>science communication</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>survey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koswatta, Taniya J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrella, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leggette, H. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramasubramanian, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koswatta, Taniya J.</au><au>Parrella, J. A.</au><au>Leggette, H. R.</au><au>Ramasubramanian, S.</au><au>Rutherford, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1354652</ericid><atitle>Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement</jtitle><date>2022-04-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>174-191</pages><issn>2154-8455</issn><eissn>2154-8463</eissn><abstract>We investigated how to improve PSC at a large, public university with high research activity by examining scientists' interest and enjoyment in PSC, their perceived aptitude of PSC skills, the channels they use for PSC, their reasons for choosing to participate in PSC, and the tools they need to engage effectively. We conducted a case study and collected data from scientists across five colleges (n = 266). Results suggest that scientists who do not engage in PSC need external support from their institution, and scientists who do engage in PSC continue to engage because they feel intrinsically motivated. Results revealed that communication skills development training is needed to improve scientists' perceived ability to mitigate science controversies, evaluate the effectiveness of communication strategies, and manage science communications projects. We also found that scientists who used social media for PSC enjoy and contribute to PSC more than those who did not use social media. However, PSC contribution varied based on scientists' ethnicity, years of research experience, faculty title, and college. Female scientists need more help than males do in developing their confidence and increasing their enjoyment in PSC. These results can help provide insight into the PSC environment at universities of similar stature.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-0451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-4791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-8008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-6708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-1947</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2154-8455 |
ispartof | International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement, 2022-04, Vol.12 (2), p.174-191 |
issn | 2154-8455 2154-8463 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1354652 |
source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Attitudes Case study College Faculty Communication (Thought Transfer) Communication Skills Gender Differences Interests Public Relations science communication Science Education Scientists survey |
title | Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists' needs when communicating beyond the academy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20public%20science%20communication:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20scientists'%20needs%20when%20communicating%20beyond%20the%20academy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20science%20education.%20Part%20B.%20Communication%20and%20public%20engagement&rft.au=Koswatta,%20Taniya%20J.&rft.date=2022-04-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=174-191&rft.issn=2154-8455&rft.eissn=2154-8463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21548455.2022.2055191&rft_dat=%3Ceric_infor%3EEJ1354652%3C/eric_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1354652&rfr_iscdi=true |