The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset

The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcendin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Texas education review (Austin, Tex.) Tex.), 2022, Vol.10 (1), p.92
1. Verfasser: Schuetze, Brendan A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 92
container_title Texas education review (Austin, Tex.)
container_volume 10
creator Schuetze, Brendan A
description The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcending the research-practice divide tend to be those that align with the professional commitments of educators. Concretely, mindset theory was accepted into the language of K-12 education due in part to a perceived alignment between academic research concerning growth mindset and pedagogical values commonly held by educators. Resulting from this superficial overlap, growth mindset has often been taken up too quickly in applied settings as an ill-defined, uncritically positive, and expansive pedagogical orientation. Social scientific evidence does not warrant such an understanding of growth mindset. Failure to acknowledge the importance of educational values in the uptake of educational research may lead to continued misunderstandings between teachers and education researchers.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1343389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1343389</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1343389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ13433893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjMsKwjAURIMoKOonCPcDLNSkPrf1DT6Q4lZivNJIm0huqvj3PnDhztXMnBmmxGpc8GHQ7fOo_OOrrEl0CcOQ847oRWGN5UmKsENC6VQabJ1UXiuEsb7pE8KCYG09bEz2AGlekQoEe4bY5nlhtJJeW9OGY-HfdC-zAmkE78tY0mc5c_buU1hpcyL0DVY5y4yw-dU6a00nSTwP0Gl1uDqdS_c4TJYdEQkxGIp__RPjt0TL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Schuetze, Brendan A</creator><creatorcontrib>Schuetze, Brendan A</creatorcontrib><description>The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcending the research-practice divide tend to be those that align with the professional commitments of educators. Concretely, mindset theory was accepted into the language of K-12 education due in part to a perceived alignment between academic research concerning growth mindset and pedagogical values commonly held by educators. Resulting from this superficial overlap, growth mindset has often been taken up too quickly in applied settings as an ill-defined, uncritically positive, and expansive pedagogical orientation. Social scientific evidence does not warrant such an understanding of growth mindset. Failure to acknowledge the importance of educational values in the uptake of educational research may lead to continued misunderstandings between teachers and education researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-5724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-5724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Texas Education Review</publisher><subject>Educational Research ; Educational Theories ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Misconceptions ; Social Science Research ; Social Sciences ; Theory Practice Relationship ; Values</subject><ispartof>Texas education review (Austin, Tex.), 2022, Vol.10 (1), p.92</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,881,4009</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1343389$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schuetze, Brendan A</creatorcontrib><title>The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset</title><title>Texas education review (Austin, Tex.)</title><description>The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcending the research-practice divide tend to be those that align with the professional commitments of educators. Concretely, mindset theory was accepted into the language of K-12 education due in part to a perceived alignment between academic research concerning growth mindset and pedagogical values commonly held by educators. Resulting from this superficial overlap, growth mindset has often been taken up too quickly in applied settings as an ill-defined, uncritically positive, and expansive pedagogical orientation. Social scientific evidence does not warrant such an understanding of growth mindset. Failure to acknowledge the importance of educational values in the uptake of educational research may lead to continued misunderstandings between teachers and education researchers.</description><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Theory Practice Relationship</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>2329-5724</issn><issn>2329-5724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjMsKwjAURIMoKOonCPcDLNSkPrf1DT6Q4lZivNJIm0huqvj3PnDhztXMnBmmxGpc8GHQ7fOo_OOrrEl0CcOQ847oRWGN5UmKsENC6VQabJ1UXiuEsb7pE8KCYG09bEz2AGlekQoEe4bY5nlhtJJeW9OGY-HfdC-zAmkE78tY0mc5c_buU1hpcyL0DVY5y4yw-dU6a00nSTwP0Gl1uDqdS_c4TJYdEQkxGIp__RPjt0TL</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Schuetze, Brendan A</creator><general>Texas Education Review</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset</title><author>Schuetze, Brendan A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ13433893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Theory Practice Relationship</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schuetze, Brendan A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Texas education review (Austin, Tex.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schuetze, Brendan A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1343389</ericid><atitle>The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset</atitle><jtitle>Texas education review (Austin, Tex.)</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><pages>92-</pages><issn>2329-5724</issn><eissn>2329-5724</eissn><abstract>The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcending the research-practice divide tend to be those that align with the professional commitments of educators. Concretely, mindset theory was accepted into the language of K-12 education due in part to a perceived alignment between academic research concerning growth mindset and pedagogical values commonly held by educators. Resulting from this superficial overlap, growth mindset has often been taken up too quickly in applied settings as an ill-defined, uncritically positive, and expansive pedagogical orientation. Social scientific evidence does not warrant such an understanding of growth mindset. Failure to acknowledge the importance of educational values in the uptake of educational research may lead to continued misunderstandings between teachers and education researchers.</abstract><pub>Texas Education Review</pub><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2329-5724
ispartof Texas education review (Austin, Tex.), 2022, Vol.10 (1), p.92
issn 2329-5724
2329-5724
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1343389
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Educational Research
Educational Theories
Elementary Secondary Education
Misconceptions
Social Science Research
Social Sciences
Theory Practice Relationship
Values
title The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A16%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Research-Practice%20Divide%20Is%20Not%20Only%20an%20Issue%20of%20Communication,%20but%20of%20Values:%20The%20Case%20of%20Growth%20Mindset&rft.jtitle=Texas%20education%20review%20(Austin,%20Tex.)&rft.au=Schuetze,%20Brendan%20A&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.pages=92-&rft.issn=2329-5724&rft.eissn=2329-5724&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1343389%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1343389&rfr_iscdi=true