The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset
The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcendin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Texas education review (Austin, Tex.) Tex.), 2022, Vol.10 (1), p.92 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Texas education review (Austin, Tex.) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Schuetze, Brendan A |
description | The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcending the research-practice divide tend to be those that align with the professional commitments of educators. Concretely, mindset theory was accepted into the language of K-12 education due in part to a perceived alignment between academic research concerning growth mindset and pedagogical values commonly held by educators. Resulting from this superficial overlap, growth mindset has often been taken up too quickly in applied settings as an ill-defined, uncritically positive, and expansive pedagogical orientation. Social scientific evidence does not warrant such an understanding of growth mindset. Failure to acknowledge the importance of educational values in the uptake of educational research may lead to continued misunderstandings between teachers and education researchers. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1343389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1343389</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1343389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ13433893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjMsKwjAURIMoKOonCPcDLNSkPrf1DT6Q4lZivNJIm0huqvj3PnDhztXMnBmmxGpc8GHQ7fOo_OOrrEl0CcOQ847oRWGN5UmKsENC6VQabJ1UXiuEsb7pE8KCYG09bEz2AGlekQoEe4bY5nlhtJJeW9OGY-HfdC-zAmkE78tY0mc5c_buU1hpcyL0DVY5y4yw-dU6a00nSTwP0Gl1uDqdS_c4TJYdEQkxGIp__RPjt0TL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Schuetze, Brendan A</creator><creatorcontrib>Schuetze, Brendan A</creatorcontrib><description>The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcending the research-practice divide tend to be those that align with the professional commitments of educators. Concretely, mindset theory was accepted into the language of K-12 education due in part to a perceived alignment between academic research concerning growth mindset and pedagogical values commonly held by educators. Resulting from this superficial overlap, growth mindset has often been taken up too quickly in applied settings as an ill-defined, uncritically positive, and expansive pedagogical orientation. Social scientific evidence does not warrant such an understanding of growth mindset. Failure to acknowledge the importance of educational values in the uptake of educational research may lead to continued misunderstandings between teachers and education researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-5724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-5724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Texas Education Review</publisher><subject>Educational Research ; Educational Theories ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Misconceptions ; Social Science Research ; Social Sciences ; Theory Practice Relationship ; Values</subject><ispartof>Texas education review (Austin, Tex.), 2022, Vol.10 (1), p.92</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,881,4009</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1343389$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schuetze, Brendan A</creatorcontrib><title>The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset</title><title>Texas education review (Austin, Tex.)</title><description>The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcending the research-practice divide tend to be those that align with the professional commitments of educators. Concretely, mindset theory was accepted into the language of K-12 education due in part to a perceived alignment between academic research concerning growth mindset and pedagogical values commonly held by educators. Resulting from this superficial overlap, growth mindset has often been taken up too quickly in applied settings as an ill-defined, uncritically positive, and expansive pedagogical orientation. Social scientific evidence does not warrant such an understanding of growth mindset. Failure to acknowledge the importance of educational values in the uptake of educational research may lead to continued misunderstandings between teachers and education researchers.</description><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Theory Practice Relationship</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>2329-5724</issn><issn>2329-5724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjMsKwjAURIMoKOonCPcDLNSkPrf1DT6Q4lZivNJIm0huqvj3PnDhztXMnBmmxGpc8GHQ7fOo_OOrrEl0CcOQ847oRWGN5UmKsENC6VQabJ1UXiuEsb7pE8KCYG09bEz2AGlekQoEe4bY5nlhtJJeW9OGY-HfdC-zAmkE78tY0mc5c_buU1hpcyL0DVY5y4yw-dU6a00nSTwP0Gl1uDqdS_c4TJYdEQkxGIp__RPjt0TL</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Schuetze, Brendan A</creator><general>Texas Education Review</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset</title><author>Schuetze, Brendan A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ13433893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Theory Practice Relationship</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schuetze, Brendan A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Texas education review (Austin, Tex.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schuetze, Brendan A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1343389</ericid><atitle>The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset</atitle><jtitle>Texas education review (Austin, Tex.)</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><pages>92-</pages><issn>2329-5724</issn><eissn>2329-5724</eissn><abstract>The research-practice divide between social scientists and educators is a persistent problem for the accurate communication and translation of social scientific research into pedagogical practice. This paper uses mindset theory as a case study, arguing that the social scientific theories transcending the research-practice divide tend to be those that align with the professional commitments of educators. Concretely, mindset theory was accepted into the language of K-12 education due in part to a perceived alignment between academic research concerning growth mindset and pedagogical values commonly held by educators. Resulting from this superficial overlap, growth mindset has often been taken up too quickly in applied settings as an ill-defined, uncritically positive, and expansive pedagogical orientation. Social scientific evidence does not warrant such an understanding of growth mindset. Failure to acknowledge the importance of educational values in the uptake of educational research may lead to continued misunderstandings between teachers and education researchers.</abstract><pub>Texas Education Review</pub><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2329-5724 |
ispartof | Texas education review (Austin, Tex.), 2022, Vol.10 (1), p.92 |
issn | 2329-5724 2329-5724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1343389 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Educational Research Educational Theories Elementary Secondary Education Misconceptions Social Science Research Social Sciences Theory Practice Relationship Values |
title | The Research-Practice Divide Is Not Only an Issue of Communication, but of Values: The Case of Growth Mindset |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A16%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Research-Practice%20Divide%20Is%20Not%20Only%20an%20Issue%20of%20Communication,%20but%20of%20Values:%20The%20Case%20of%20Growth%20Mindset&rft.jtitle=Texas%20education%20review%20(Austin,%20Tex.)&rft.au=Schuetze,%20Brendan%20A&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.pages=92-&rft.issn=2329-5724&rft.eissn=2329-5724&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1343389%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1343389&rfr_iscdi=true |