Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form
Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current stud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 2022-01, Vol.25 (1), p.19-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi Newton, Jonathan |
description | Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current study investigated the production of these two forms by Vietnamese EFL learners in oral communication tasks performed in intact classrooms. Vietnamese L1 does not inflectionally mark 3SG–s although the construction of be copula in Vietnamese and English shares some features. These differences motivated the selection of the two target forms. Nine pairs of Vietnamese EFL university students were recorded performing five communicative tasks generated contexts for use of 3SG–s. over three weeks in their normal classes. Performance data were transcribed and analyzed for frequencies of production and omission of the two target forms in obligatory contexts. After completing the tasks, the students were interviewed about what they attended to when performing the tasks. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results show that the learners omitted 3SG–s in most obligatory contexts and across all tasks. They were better at accurately producing be copula than 3SG–s but accuracy rates varied between learners. Interview data revealed the conscious decisions learners made concerning the accuracy of their language production. The findings are discussed with reference to different theoretical models. The study advances understanding of acquisition of 3SG–s and be copula by EFL learners and offers pedagogical implications for how a focus on inflectional forms can be managed in oral communicative task performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.37213/cjal.2022.31466 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>erudit_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1336369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1088053ar</eruid><ericid>EJ1336369</ericid><sourcerecordid>1088053ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-baebdd9343e6ba17c0dc69ce9e073fd82049801f778a765b3f55ddcde3a295453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkctOGzEUhkdVkYqAPZuqlrqe4MuML-yiKClUkUAiIHYjj32mNWTsYM8s2PUdWPJ2fZI6CUWszuU__2dLf1GcEjxhghJ2Zh70ekIxpRNGKs4_FYdEUVwSSeTn3FeSlJLL-y_FSUquxYQKIirBDovX6xjsaAYXPAodWv120ZbXEFOeb5z_Na51RH__vCQ09Ra1gGZhk3fI-dz1_eid0TvzSqfHhNpndOdg8LqHBGi-WKIl6Ogz7xxNzdPokttdX0ULEemMfNPzxoEf9qwhoEWI_XFx0Ol1gpO3elTcLuar2UW5vPpxOZsuS8NqNZSthtZaxSoGvNVEGGwNVwYUYME6KymulMSkE0JqweuWdXVtrbHANFV1VbOj4uueC9GZZhNdr-NzM_9JGOOMq6x_3-ubGJ5GSEPzEMbo85cayiuupMBiS8H7KxNDShG6dxLBzS6lZptSs02p2aWULd_-PzxaN3wwSIlrpiP7B1lQkhY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646987075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form</title><source>Érudit (Freely Accessible)</source><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>REPÈRE - Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi ; Newton, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi ; Newton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current study investigated the production of these two forms by Vietnamese EFL learners in oral communication tasks performed in intact classrooms. Vietnamese L1 does not inflectionally mark 3SG–s although the construction of be copula in Vietnamese and English shares some features. These differences motivated the selection of the two target forms. Nine pairs of Vietnamese EFL university students were recorded performing five communicative tasks generated contexts for use of 3SG–s. over three weeks in their normal classes. Performance data were transcribed and analyzed for frequencies of production and omission of the two target forms in obligatory contexts. After completing the tasks, the students were interviewed about what they attended to when performing the tasks. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results show that the learners omitted 3SG–s in most obligatory contexts and across all tasks. They were better at accurately producing be copula than 3SG–s but accuracy rates varied between learners. Interview data revealed the conscious decisions learners made concerning the accuracy of their language production. The findings are discussed with reference to different theoretical models. The study advances understanding of acquisition of 3SG–s and be copula by EFL learners and offers pedagogical implications for how a focus on inflectional forms can be managed in oral communicative task performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-868X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-1818</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37213/cjal.2022.31466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Québec: University of New Brunswick</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Classroom communication ; College students ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Copulas ; Decision Making ; Educational activities ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; English as a second language learning ; English Language Learners ; Error Analysis (Language) ; Foreign Countries ; Grammar ; Grammatical number ; Hypotheses ; Inflection (Morphology) ; Language ; Literature Reviews ; Morphemes ; Morphology ; Native Language ; Nouns ; Oral Language ; Pedagogy ; Person ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Spoken language ; Task Analysis ; Undergraduate Students ; University students ; Verbal communication ; Verbs ; Vietnamese language ; Vietnamese People</subject><ispartof>Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2022-01, Vol.25 (1), p.19-46</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©, 2022Bao Trang ThiNguyen, JonathanNewton</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-baebdd9343e6ba17c0dc69ce9e073fd82049801f778a765b3f55ddcde3a295453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.erudit.org/en/journals/cjal/2022-cjal06902/1088053ar.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gerudit$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1088053ar$$EHTML$$P50$$Gerudit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,27924,27925,79441,79448</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1336369$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form</title><title>Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics</title><description>Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current study investigated the production of these two forms by Vietnamese EFL learners in oral communication tasks performed in intact classrooms. Vietnamese L1 does not inflectionally mark 3SG–s although the construction of be copula in Vietnamese and English shares some features. These differences motivated the selection of the two target forms. Nine pairs of Vietnamese EFL university students were recorded performing five communicative tasks generated contexts for use of 3SG–s. over three weeks in their normal classes. Performance data were transcribed and analyzed for frequencies of production and omission of the two target forms in obligatory contexts. After completing the tasks, the students were interviewed about what they attended to when performing the tasks. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results show that the learners omitted 3SG–s in most obligatory contexts and across all tasks. They were better at accurately producing be copula than 3SG–s but accuracy rates varied between learners. Interview data revealed the conscious decisions learners made concerning the accuracy of their language production. The findings are discussed with reference to different theoretical models. The study advances understanding of acquisition of 3SG–s and be copula by EFL learners and offers pedagogical implications for how a focus on inflectional forms can be managed in oral communicative task performance.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Classroom communication</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Copulas</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Error Analysis (Language)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatical number</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inflection (Morphology)</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Morphemes</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Native Language</subject><subject>Nouns</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Person</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Spoken language</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Vietnamese language</subject><subject>Vietnamese People</subject><issn>1481-868X</issn><issn>1920-1818</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkctOGzEUhkdVkYqAPZuqlrqe4MuML-yiKClUkUAiIHYjj32mNWTsYM8s2PUdWPJ2fZI6CUWszuU__2dLf1GcEjxhghJ2Zh70ekIxpRNGKs4_FYdEUVwSSeTn3FeSlJLL-y_FSUquxYQKIirBDovX6xjsaAYXPAodWv120ZbXEFOeb5z_Na51RH__vCQ09Ra1gGZhk3fI-dz1_eid0TvzSqfHhNpndOdg8LqHBGi-WKIl6Ogz7xxNzdPokttdX0ULEemMfNPzxoEf9qwhoEWI_XFx0Ol1gpO3elTcLuar2UW5vPpxOZsuS8NqNZSthtZaxSoGvNVEGGwNVwYUYME6KymulMSkE0JqweuWdXVtrbHANFV1VbOj4uueC9GZZhNdr-NzM_9JGOOMq6x_3-ubGJ5GSEPzEMbo85cayiuupMBiS8H7KxNDShG6dxLBzS6lZptSs02p2aWULd_-PzxaN3wwSIlrpiP7B1lQkhY</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi</creator><creator>Newton, Jonathan</creator><general>University of New Brunswick</general><general>Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics</general><general>Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics / Association Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form</title><author>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi ; Newton, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-baebdd9343e6ba17c0dc69ce9e073fd82049801f778a765b3f55ddcde3a295453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Classroom communication</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Copulas</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Error Analysis (Language)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatical number</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inflection (Morphology)</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Morphemes</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Native Language</topic><topic>Nouns</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Person</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Spoken language</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Vietnamese language</topic><topic>Vietnamese People</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi</au><au>Newton, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1336369</ericid><atitle>Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>19-46</pages><issn>1481-868X</issn><eissn>1920-1818</eissn><abstract>Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current study investigated the production of these two forms by Vietnamese EFL learners in oral communication tasks performed in intact classrooms. Vietnamese L1 does not inflectionally mark 3SG–s although the construction of be copula in Vietnamese and English shares some features. These differences motivated the selection of the two target forms. Nine pairs of Vietnamese EFL university students were recorded performing five communicative tasks generated contexts for use of 3SG–s. over three weeks in their normal classes. Performance data were transcribed and analyzed for frequencies of production and omission of the two target forms in obligatory contexts. After completing the tasks, the students were interviewed about what they attended to when performing the tasks. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results show that the learners omitted 3SG–s in most obligatory contexts and across all tasks. They were better at accurately producing be copula than 3SG–s but accuracy rates varied between learners. Interview data revealed the conscious decisions learners made concerning the accuracy of their language production. The findings are discussed with reference to different theoretical models. The study advances understanding of acquisition of 3SG–s and be copula by EFL learners and offers pedagogical implications for how a focus on inflectional forms can be managed in oral communicative task performance.</abstract><cop>Québec</cop><pub>University of New Brunswick</pub><doi>10.37213/cjal.2022.31466</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1481-868X |
ispartof | Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2022-01, Vol.25 (1), p.19-46 |
issn | 1481-868X 1920-1818 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1336369 |
source | Érudit (Freely Accessible); ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); REPÈRE - Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Accuracy Classroom communication College students Communication (Thought Transfer) Copulas Decision Making Educational activities English (Second Language) English as a second language English as a second language learning English Language Learners Error Analysis (Language) Foreign Countries Grammar Grammatical number Hypotheses Inflection (Morphology) Language Literature Reviews Morphemes Morphology Native Language Nouns Oral Language Pedagogy Person Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Spoken language Task Analysis Undergraduate Students University students Verbal communication Verbs Vietnamese language Vietnamese People |
title | Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A07%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Production%20of%20Third-Person%20Singular%20%E2%80%93s%20And%20be%20Copula%20in%20Communication%20Tasks%20by%20Vietnamese%20EFL%20Learners:%20Acquisition%20Order%20and%20Learner%20Orientation%20to%20Form&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Journal%20of%20Applied%20Linguistics&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Bao%20Trang%20Thi&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=19-46&rft.issn=1481-868X&rft.eissn=1920-1818&rft_id=info:doi/10.37213/cjal.2022.31466&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_eric_%3E1088053ar%3C/erudit_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646987075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_eruid=1088053ar&rft_ericid=EJ1336369&rfr_iscdi=true |