Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form

Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 2022-01, Vol.25 (1), p.19-46
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi, Newton, Jonathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
container_volume 25
creator Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi
Newton, Jonathan
description Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current study investigated the production of these two forms by Vietnamese EFL learners in oral communication tasks performed in intact classrooms. Vietnamese L1 does not inflectionally mark 3SG–s although the construction of be copula in Vietnamese and English shares some features. These differences motivated the selection of the two target forms. Nine pairs of Vietnamese EFL university students were recorded performing five communicative tasks generated contexts for use of 3SG–s. over three weeks in their normal classes. Performance data were transcribed and analyzed for frequencies of production and omission of the two target forms in obligatory contexts. After completing the tasks, the students were interviewed about what they attended to when performing the tasks. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results show that the learners omitted 3SG–s in most obligatory contexts and across all tasks. They were better at accurately producing be copula than 3SG–s but accuracy rates varied between learners. Interview data revealed the conscious decisions learners made concerning the accuracy of their language production. The findings are discussed with reference to different theoretical models. The study advances understanding of acquisition of 3SG–s and be copula by EFL learners and offers pedagogical implications for how a focus on inflectional forms can be managed in oral communicative task performance.
doi_str_mv 10.37213/cjal.2022.31466
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>erudit_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1336369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1088053ar</eruid><ericid>EJ1336369</ericid><sourcerecordid>1088053ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-baebdd9343e6ba17c0dc69ce9e073fd82049801f778a765b3f55ddcde3a295453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkctOGzEUhkdVkYqAPZuqlrqe4MuML-yiKClUkUAiIHYjj32mNWTsYM8s2PUdWPJ2fZI6CUWszuU__2dLf1GcEjxhghJ2Zh70ekIxpRNGKs4_FYdEUVwSSeTn3FeSlJLL-y_FSUquxYQKIirBDovX6xjsaAYXPAodWv120ZbXEFOeb5z_Na51RH__vCQ09Ra1gGZhk3fI-dz1_eid0TvzSqfHhNpndOdg8LqHBGi-WKIl6Ogz7xxNzdPokttdX0ULEemMfNPzxoEf9qwhoEWI_XFx0Ol1gpO3elTcLuar2UW5vPpxOZsuS8NqNZSthtZaxSoGvNVEGGwNVwYUYME6KymulMSkE0JqweuWdXVtrbHANFV1VbOj4uueC9GZZhNdr-NzM_9JGOOMq6x_3-ubGJ5GSEPzEMbo85cayiuupMBiS8H7KxNDShG6dxLBzS6lZptSs02p2aWULd_-PzxaN3wwSIlrpiP7B1lQkhY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646987075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form</title><source>Érudit (Freely Accessible)</source><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>REPÈRE - Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi ; Newton, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi ; Newton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current study investigated the production of these two forms by Vietnamese EFL learners in oral communication tasks performed in intact classrooms. Vietnamese L1 does not inflectionally mark 3SG–s although the construction of be copula in Vietnamese and English shares some features. These differences motivated the selection of the two target forms. Nine pairs of Vietnamese EFL university students were recorded performing five communicative tasks generated contexts for use of 3SG–s. over three weeks in their normal classes. Performance data were transcribed and analyzed for frequencies of production and omission of the two target forms in obligatory contexts. After completing the tasks, the students were interviewed about what they attended to when performing the tasks. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results show that the learners omitted 3SG–s in most obligatory contexts and across all tasks. They were better at accurately producing be copula than 3SG–s but accuracy rates varied between learners. Interview data revealed the conscious decisions learners made concerning the accuracy of their language production. The findings are discussed with reference to different theoretical models. The study advances understanding of acquisition of 3SG–s and be copula by EFL learners and offers pedagogical implications for how a focus on inflectional forms can be managed in oral communicative task performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-868X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-1818</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37213/cjal.2022.31466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Québec: University of New Brunswick</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Classroom communication ; College students ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Copulas ; Decision Making ; Educational activities ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; English as a second language learning ; English Language Learners ; Error Analysis (Language) ; Foreign Countries ; Grammar ; Grammatical number ; Hypotheses ; Inflection (Morphology) ; Language ; Literature Reviews ; Morphemes ; Morphology ; Native Language ; Nouns ; Oral Language ; Pedagogy ; Person ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Spoken language ; Task Analysis ; Undergraduate Students ; University students ; Verbal communication ; Verbs ; Vietnamese language ; Vietnamese People</subject><ispartof>Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2022-01, Vol.25 (1), p.19-46</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©, 2022Bao Trang ThiNguyen, JonathanNewton</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-baebdd9343e6ba17c0dc69ce9e073fd82049801f778a765b3f55ddcde3a295453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.erudit.org/en/journals/cjal/2022-cjal06902/1088053ar.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gerudit$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1088053ar$$EHTML$$P50$$Gerudit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,27924,27925,79441,79448</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1336369$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form</title><title>Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics</title><description>Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current study investigated the production of these two forms by Vietnamese EFL learners in oral communication tasks performed in intact classrooms. Vietnamese L1 does not inflectionally mark 3SG–s although the construction of be copula in Vietnamese and English shares some features. These differences motivated the selection of the two target forms. Nine pairs of Vietnamese EFL university students were recorded performing five communicative tasks generated contexts for use of 3SG–s. over three weeks in their normal classes. Performance data were transcribed and analyzed for frequencies of production and omission of the two target forms in obligatory contexts. After completing the tasks, the students were interviewed about what they attended to when performing the tasks. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results show that the learners omitted 3SG–s in most obligatory contexts and across all tasks. They were better at accurately producing be copula than 3SG–s but accuracy rates varied between learners. Interview data revealed the conscious decisions learners made concerning the accuracy of their language production. The findings are discussed with reference to different theoretical models. The study advances understanding of acquisition of 3SG–s and be copula by EFL learners and offers pedagogical implications for how a focus on inflectional forms can be managed in oral communicative task performance.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Classroom communication</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Copulas</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Error Analysis (Language)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatical number</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inflection (Morphology)</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Morphemes</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Native Language</subject><subject>Nouns</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Person</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Spoken language</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Vietnamese language</subject><subject>Vietnamese People</subject><issn>1481-868X</issn><issn>1920-1818</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkctOGzEUhkdVkYqAPZuqlrqe4MuML-yiKClUkUAiIHYjj32mNWTsYM8s2PUdWPJ2fZI6CUWszuU__2dLf1GcEjxhghJ2Zh70ekIxpRNGKs4_FYdEUVwSSeTn3FeSlJLL-y_FSUquxYQKIirBDovX6xjsaAYXPAodWv120ZbXEFOeb5z_Na51RH__vCQ09Ra1gGZhk3fI-dz1_eid0TvzSqfHhNpndOdg8LqHBGi-WKIl6Ogz7xxNzdPokttdX0ULEemMfNPzxoEf9qwhoEWI_XFx0Ol1gpO3elTcLuar2UW5vPpxOZsuS8NqNZSthtZaxSoGvNVEGGwNVwYUYME6KymulMSkE0JqweuWdXVtrbHANFV1VbOj4uueC9GZZhNdr-NzM_9JGOOMq6x_3-ubGJ5GSEPzEMbo85cayiuupMBiS8H7KxNDShG6dxLBzS6lZptSs02p2aWULd_-PzxaN3wwSIlrpiP7B1lQkhY</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi</creator><creator>Newton, Jonathan</creator><general>University of New Brunswick</general><general>Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics</general><general>Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics / Association Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form</title><author>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi ; Newton, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-baebdd9343e6ba17c0dc69ce9e073fd82049801f778a765b3f55ddcde3a295453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Classroom communication</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Copulas</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Error Analysis (Language)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatical number</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inflection (Morphology)</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Morphemes</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Native Language</topic><topic>Nouns</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Person</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Spoken language</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Vietnamese language</topic><topic>Vietnamese People</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi</au><au>Newton, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1336369</ericid><atitle>Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>19-46</pages><issn>1481-868X</issn><eissn>1920-1818</eissn><abstract>Research on the acquisition order of inflectional morphemes in English has shown that third-person singular –s (3SG–s) is challenging to acquire and acquired later than be copula by both L1 and L2 learners of English. In a departure from the usual practice of controlled elicitation, the current study investigated the production of these two forms by Vietnamese EFL learners in oral communication tasks performed in intact classrooms. Vietnamese L1 does not inflectionally mark 3SG–s although the construction of be copula in Vietnamese and English shares some features. These differences motivated the selection of the two target forms. Nine pairs of Vietnamese EFL university students were recorded performing five communicative tasks generated contexts for use of 3SG–s. over three weeks in their normal classes. Performance data were transcribed and analyzed for frequencies of production and omission of the two target forms in obligatory contexts. After completing the tasks, the students were interviewed about what they attended to when performing the tasks. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results show that the learners omitted 3SG–s in most obligatory contexts and across all tasks. They were better at accurately producing be copula than 3SG–s but accuracy rates varied between learners. Interview data revealed the conscious decisions learners made concerning the accuracy of their language production. The findings are discussed with reference to different theoretical models. The study advances understanding of acquisition of 3SG–s and be copula by EFL learners and offers pedagogical implications for how a focus on inflectional forms can be managed in oral communicative task performance.</abstract><cop>Québec</cop><pub>University of New Brunswick</pub><doi>10.37213/cjal.2022.31466</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1481-868X
ispartof Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2022-01, Vol.25 (1), p.19-46
issn 1481-868X
1920-1818
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1336369
source Érudit (Freely Accessible); ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); REPÈRE - Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Accuracy
Classroom communication
College students
Communication (Thought Transfer)
Copulas
Decision Making
Educational activities
English (Second Language)
English as a second language
English as a second language learning
English Language Learners
Error Analysis (Language)
Foreign Countries
Grammar
Grammatical number
Hypotheses
Inflection (Morphology)
Language
Literature Reviews
Morphemes
Morphology
Native Language
Nouns
Oral Language
Pedagogy
Person
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Spoken language
Task Analysis
Undergraduate Students
University students
Verbal communication
Verbs
Vietnamese language
Vietnamese People
title Production of Third-Person Singular –s And be Copula in Communication Tasks by Vietnamese EFL Learners: Acquisition Order and Learner Orientation to Form
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A07%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Production%20of%20Third-Person%20Singular%20%E2%80%93s%20And%20be%20Copula%20in%20Communication%20Tasks%20by%20Vietnamese%20EFL%20Learners:%20Acquisition%20Order%20and%20Learner%20Orientation%20to%20Form&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Journal%20of%20Applied%20Linguistics&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Bao%20Trang%20Thi&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=19-46&rft.issn=1481-868X&rft.eissn=1920-1818&rft_id=info:doi/10.37213/cjal.2022.31466&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_eric_%3E1088053ar%3C/erudit_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646987075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_eruid=1088053ar&rft_ericid=EJ1336369&rfr_iscdi=true