Teacher Performance Evaluation System in a Private School: A Case Study
The purpose of this research was to reveal how the performance evaluations of teachers in a private school were made and the results of those evaluations. The research was designed as a case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The research was carried out in the 2013-2014 academ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational policy analysis and strategic research 2022-03, Vol.17 (1), p.142-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 163 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 142 |
container_title | Educational policy analysis and strategic research |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Türkoğlu, Muhammet Emin Aypay, Ahmet |
description | The purpose of this research was to reveal how the performance evaluations of teachers in a private school were made and the results of those evaluations. The research was designed as a case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The research was carried out in the 2013-2014 academic year. The participants of this research were 15 teachers, 3 administrators, 6 students and 4 parents. The data were obtained through semi-structured interviews. Findings revealed that the performance evaluation of the teachers were based on the surveys from students, school administrators and parents, general observations made by school administrators, course inspections and follow-up with digital cameras. In this context, teachers were awarded during the year and at the end of the year depending on their performance evaluation results. Participants also mentioned some positive and negative consequences of the performance evaluation in the school. The rewards given vary based on the performance of the teachers. The main rewards were as follows: salary increase, plaques and certificates with symbolic value, and contract renewal. On the other hand, teachers were punished due to their low performance. The consequences of the punishment were as follows: verbal or written warning penalties, low pay raise in salary, termination of some duties at the school and non-renewal of contract/dismissal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.29329/epasr.2022.248.8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1336045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1336045</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1336045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1558-2680ac79e6a255489681a25a15dfed6f0eea8269bed912745dfa0198bd058d743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNA_RQ0AvYlWTJlnoLJk1aAg0kPYuNvCYu_gmSE_Db101K9jKzO8scPkKeOYuFSYR5xSMEHwsmRCykjvUdmXAjTSSFNvc3n7FHMgvhh42TcKkYm5DlDsEd0NMN-rLzDbQO6eIM9Qn6qmvpdgg9NrRqKdCNr87QI926Q9fVb3ROcwjj2p-K4Yk8lFAHnP3rlHy_L3b5Klp_LT_y-TpyXCkdiVQzcJnBFIRSUptU89EBV0WJRVoyRNAiNXssDBeZHM_AuNH7gildZDKZkpdrL_rK2aOvGvCDXXzyJEmZVGPOr7nzXQgey9sPZ_YCy15g2T9YdoRldfILulRb6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teacher Performance Evaluation System in a Private School: A Case Study</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Türkoğlu, Muhammet Emin ; Aypay, Ahmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Türkoğlu, Muhammet Emin ; Aypay, Ahmet ; Anadolu Üniversitesi ; Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this research was to reveal how the performance evaluations of teachers in a private school were made and the results of those evaluations. The research was designed as a case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The research was carried out in the 2013-2014 academic year. The participants of this research were 15 teachers, 3 administrators, 6 students and 4 parents. The data were obtained through semi-structured interviews. Findings revealed that the performance evaluation of the teachers were based on the surveys from students, school administrators and parents, general observations made by school administrators, course inspections and follow-up with digital cameras. In this context, teachers were awarded during the year and at the end of the year depending on their performance evaluation results. Participants also mentioned some positive and negative consequences of the performance evaluation in the school. The rewards given vary based on the performance of the teachers. The main rewards were as follows: salary increase, plaques and certificates with symbolic value, and contract renewal. On the other hand, teachers were punished due to their low performance. The consequences of the punishment were as follows: verbal or written warning penalties, low pay raise in salary, termination of some duties at the school and non-renewal of contract/dismissal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-4270</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1949-4289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-4289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29329/epasr.2022.248.8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Association of Educators</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Administrator Attitudes ; Foreign Countries ; Incentives ; Parent Attitudes ; Private Schools ; Student Attitudes ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Discipline ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teacher Evaluation</subject><ispartof>Educational policy analysis and strategic research, 2022-03, Vol.17 (1), p.142-163</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1558-2680ac79e6a255489681a25a15dfed6f0eea8269bed912745dfa0198bd058d743</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0568-8409 ; 0000-0003-3883-3414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1336045$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Türkoğlu, Muhammet Emin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aypay, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anadolu Üniversitesi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi</creatorcontrib><title>Teacher Performance Evaluation System in a Private School: A Case Study</title><title>Educational policy analysis and strategic research</title><description>The purpose of this research was to reveal how the performance evaluations of teachers in a private school were made and the results of those evaluations. The research was designed as a case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The research was carried out in the 2013-2014 academic year. The participants of this research were 15 teachers, 3 administrators, 6 students and 4 parents. The data were obtained through semi-structured interviews. Findings revealed that the performance evaluation of the teachers were based on the surveys from students, school administrators and parents, general observations made by school administrators, course inspections and follow-up with digital cameras. In this context, teachers were awarded during the year and at the end of the year depending on their performance evaluation results. Participants also mentioned some positive and negative consequences of the performance evaluation in the school. The rewards given vary based on the performance of the teachers. The main rewards were as follows: salary increase, plaques and certificates with symbolic value, and contract renewal. On the other hand, teachers were punished due to their low performance. The consequences of the punishment were as follows: verbal or written warning penalties, low pay raise in salary, termination of some duties at the school and non-renewal of contract/dismissal.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Administrator Attitudes</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Parent Attitudes</subject><subject>Private Schools</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Discipline</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teacher Evaluation</subject><issn>1949-4270</issn><issn>1949-4289</issn><issn>1949-4289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNA_RQ0AvYlWTJlnoLJk1aAg0kPYuNvCYu_gmSE_Db101K9jKzO8scPkKeOYuFSYR5xSMEHwsmRCykjvUdmXAjTSSFNvc3n7FHMgvhh42TcKkYm5DlDsEd0NMN-rLzDbQO6eIM9Qn6qmvpdgg9NrRqKdCNr87QI926Q9fVb3ROcwjj2p-K4Yk8lFAHnP3rlHy_L3b5Klp_LT_y-TpyXCkdiVQzcJnBFIRSUptU89EBV0WJRVoyRNAiNXssDBeZHM_AuNH7gildZDKZkpdrL_rK2aOvGvCDXXzyJEmZVGPOr7nzXQgey9sPZ_YCy15g2T9YdoRldfILulRb6w</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Türkoğlu, Muhammet Emin</creator><creator>Aypay, Ahmet</creator><general>International Association of Educators</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0568-8409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3883-3414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Teacher Performance Evaluation System in a Private School: A Case Study</title><author>Türkoğlu, Muhammet Emin ; Aypay, Ahmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1558-2680ac79e6a255489681a25a15dfed6f0eea8269bed912745dfa0198bd058d743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Administrator Attitudes</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Parent Attitudes</topic><topic>Private Schools</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Discipline</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teacher Evaluation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Türkoğlu, Muhammet Emin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aypay, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anadolu Üniversitesi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Educational policy analysis and strategic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Türkoğlu, Muhammet Emin</au><au>Aypay, Ahmet</au><aucorp>Anadolu Üniversitesi</aucorp><aucorp>Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1336045</ericid><atitle>Teacher Performance Evaluation System in a Private School: A Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Educational policy analysis and strategic research</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>142-163</pages><issn>1949-4270</issn><issn>1949-4289</issn><eissn>1949-4289</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this research was to reveal how the performance evaluations of teachers in a private school were made and the results of those evaluations. The research was designed as a case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The research was carried out in the 2013-2014 academic year. The participants of this research were 15 teachers, 3 administrators, 6 students and 4 parents. The data were obtained through semi-structured interviews. Findings revealed that the performance evaluation of the teachers were based on the surveys from students, school administrators and parents, general observations made by school administrators, course inspections and follow-up with digital cameras. In this context, teachers were awarded during the year and at the end of the year depending on their performance evaluation results. Participants also mentioned some positive and negative consequences of the performance evaluation in the school. The rewards given vary based on the performance of the teachers. The main rewards were as follows: salary increase, plaques and certificates with symbolic value, and contract renewal. On the other hand, teachers were punished due to their low performance. The consequences of the punishment were as follows: verbal or written warning penalties, low pay raise in salary, termination of some duties at the school and non-renewal of contract/dismissal.</abstract><pub>International Association of Educators</pub><doi>10.29329/epasr.2022.248.8</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0568-8409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3883-3414</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1949-4270 |
ispartof | Educational policy analysis and strategic research, 2022-03, Vol.17 (1), p.142-163 |
issn | 1949-4270 1949-4289 1949-4289 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1336045 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accountability Administrator Attitudes Foreign Countries Incentives Parent Attitudes Private Schools Student Attitudes Teacher Attitudes Teacher Discipline Teacher Effectiveness Teacher Evaluation |
title | Teacher Performance Evaluation System in a Private School: A Case Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teacher%20Performance%20Evaluation%20System%20in%20a%20Private%20School:%20A%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Educational%20policy%20analysis%20and%20strategic%20research&rft.au=T%C3%BCrko%C4%9Flu,%20Muhammet%20Emin&rft.aucorp=Anadolu%20%C3%9Cniversitesi&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=142-163&rft.issn=1949-4270&rft.eissn=1949-4289&rft_id=info:doi/10.29329/epasr.2022.248.8&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1336045%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1336045&rfr_iscdi=true |