Accuracy order in L2 grammatical morphemes: Corpus evidence from different proficiency levels of Turkish learners of English
The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in second language learning and teaching 2021-12, Vol.11 (4), p.607-627 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 627 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 607 |
container_title | Studies in second language learning and teaching |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Akbas, Erdem Dincer, Zeynep Olcu |
description | The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977) natural order and whether proficiency levels play a role in the order of acquisition of these morphemes. With this in mind, we focus on the (in)accuracy of nine English grammatical morphemes with 2883 cases manually tagged by the UAM Corpus Tool in the written exam scripts of Turkish learners of English. The results based on target-like use scores provide evidence for deviation from what is widely believed to be a set order of acquisition of these grammatical morphemes by second language learners. In light of such findings, we challenge the view that the internally driven processes of mastering grammatical morphemes in English for interlanguage users are largely independent of their L1. Regardless of L2 grammar proficiency in our data, the observed accuracy of some morphemes ranked low in comparison with the so-called natural order. These grammatical morphemes were almost exclusively non-existent features in participants’ mother tongue (e.g., third person singular –s, articles and the irregular past tense forms), thus suggesting the influence of L1 in this respect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1327703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A690103350</galeid><ceeol_id>1005217</ceeol_id><ericid>EJ1327703</ericid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7092fcf347e140ae8532cb24b4e16147</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1005217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ce8ed9db04512af6dd576548f82b07fbae57c664adc193caf9ffe48016f950ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUlGL1DAQLqLgcd4fEISAz61JmqStb8uy6smCL-dzSJPJXta2WZP2YMEf79jKXfKQ4ZuZb76ZTFG8Z7RiohHqU87DMFecclYxVolKvSpuOG1FyTolX692XUpO5dviLuczxdOxmor2pvizs3ZJxl5JTA4SCRM5cnJKZhzNHKwZyBjT5RFGyJ_JHs0lE3gKDiYLxKc4Ehe8hwTTTC4p-mADuq5kgCcYMomePCzpV8iPiJg0QVqxw3QaEHtXvPFmyHD3_70tfn45POy_lccfX-_3u2NpBRdzaaEF17meCsm48co52SgpWt_ynja-NyAbq5QwzrKutsZ3qEi0lCnfSQquvi3uN14XzVlfUhhNuupogl6BmE7aJOx2AN3Qjnvra9EAE9RAK2tuey56AUzhtJHrw8YFKdhnrsN3VvOmoTX6P25-nMbvBfKsz3FJE7anMYA1dYO6MKraok4Gi4bJxxk_Aa-DMdg4gQ-I71RHGXJKigl8S7Ap5pzAP5dmVK9boNct0P-2QDOmhVYvWi1AHF6EMEolRyl_AZfhsAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771737016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy order in L2 grammatical morphemes: Corpus evidence from different proficiency levels of Turkish learners of English</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Akbas, Erdem ; Dincer, Zeynep Olcu</creator><creatorcontrib>Akbas, Erdem ; Dincer, Zeynep Olcu</creatorcontrib><description>The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977) natural order and whether proficiency levels play a role in the order of acquisition of these morphemes. With this in mind, we focus on the (in)accuracy of nine English grammatical morphemes with 2883 cases manually tagged by the UAM Corpus Tool in the written exam scripts of Turkish learners of English. The results based on target-like use scores provide evidence for deviation from what is widely believed to be a set order of acquisition of these grammatical morphemes by second language learners. In light of such findings, we challenge the view that the internally driven processes of mastering grammatical morphemes in English for interlanguage users are largely independent of their L1. Regardless of L2 grammar proficiency in our data, the observed accuracy of some morphemes ranked low in comparison with the so-called natural order. These grammatical morphemes were almost exclusively non-existent features in participants’ mother tongue (e.g., third person singular –s, articles and the irregular past tense forms), thus suggesting the influence of L1 in this respect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2083-5205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2084-1965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kalisz: Wojskowe Biuro Historyczne im. gen. broni Kazimierza Sosnkowskiego</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Analysis ; Computational Linguistics ; Contrastive Linguistics ; Corpus analysis ; Corpus linguistics ; English (Second Language) ; english as a foreign language ; English as a second language ; English as a second language learning ; English proficiency ; Foreign Countries ; Grammar ; grammatical morpheme ; Interlanguage ; Language acquisition ; Language and Literature Studies ; Language Proficiency ; Language Tests ; Language Usage ; learner corpus ; Linguistic Theory ; Mastery Learning ; Morphemes ; Morphological analysis ; Native Language ; natural order ; Order of acquisition ; second language acquisition ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Tense ; Transfer of Training ; Turkish ; Turkish language</subject><ispartof>Studies in second language learning and teaching, 2021-12, Vol.11 (4), p.607-627</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Adam Mickiewicz University</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ce8ed9db04512af6dd576548f82b07fbae57c664adc193caf9ffe48016f950ed3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-3680-3986 ; 0000-0003-2204-3119</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_64891.png</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2771737016?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,864,885,2102,21388,27924,27925,33744,43805</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1327703$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akbas, Erdem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Zeynep Olcu</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy order in L2 grammatical morphemes: Corpus evidence from different proficiency levels of Turkish learners of English</title><title>Studies in second language learning and teaching</title><addtitle>Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching</addtitle><description>The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977) natural order and whether proficiency levels play a role in the order of acquisition of these morphemes. With this in mind, we focus on the (in)accuracy of nine English grammatical morphemes with 2883 cases manually tagged by the UAM Corpus Tool in the written exam scripts of Turkish learners of English. The results based on target-like use scores provide evidence for deviation from what is widely believed to be a set order of acquisition of these grammatical morphemes by second language learners. In light of such findings, we challenge the view that the internally driven processes of mastering grammatical morphemes in English for interlanguage users are largely independent of their L1. Regardless of L2 grammar proficiency in our data, the observed accuracy of some morphemes ranked low in comparison with the so-called natural order. These grammatical morphemes were almost exclusively non-existent features in participants’ mother tongue (e.g., third person singular –s, articles and the irregular past tense forms), thus suggesting the influence of L1 in this respect.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Computational Linguistics</subject><subject>Contrastive Linguistics</subject><subject>Corpus analysis</subject><subject>Corpus linguistics</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>english as a foreign language</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English proficiency</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>grammatical morpheme</subject><subject>Interlanguage</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Language and Literature Studies</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>learner corpus</subject><subject>Linguistic Theory</subject><subject>Mastery Learning</subject><subject>Morphemes</subject><subject>Morphological analysis</subject><subject>Native Language</subject><subject>natural order</subject><subject>Order of acquisition</subject><subject>second language acquisition</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Tense</subject><subject>Transfer of Training</subject><subject>Turkish</subject><subject>Turkish language</subject><issn>2083-5205</issn><issn>2084-1965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUlGL1DAQLqLgcd4fEISAz61JmqStb8uy6smCL-dzSJPJXta2WZP2YMEf79jKXfKQ4ZuZb76ZTFG8Z7RiohHqU87DMFecclYxVolKvSpuOG1FyTolX692XUpO5dviLuczxdOxmor2pvizs3ZJxl5JTA4SCRM5cnJKZhzNHKwZyBjT5RFGyJ_JHs0lE3gKDiYLxKc4Ehe8hwTTTC4p-mADuq5kgCcYMomePCzpV8iPiJg0QVqxw3QaEHtXvPFmyHD3_70tfn45POy_lccfX-_3u2NpBRdzaaEF17meCsm48co52SgpWt_ynja-NyAbq5QwzrKutsZ3qEi0lCnfSQquvi3uN14XzVlfUhhNuupogl6BmE7aJOx2AN3Qjnvra9EAE9RAK2tuey56AUzhtJHrw8YFKdhnrsN3VvOmoTX6P25-nMbvBfKsz3FJE7anMYA1dYO6MKraok4Gi4bJxxk_Aa-DMdg4gQ-I71RHGXJKigl8S7Ap5pzAP5dmVK9boNct0P-2QDOmhVYvWi1AHF6EMEolRyl_AZfhsAQ</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Akbas, Erdem</creator><creator>Dincer, Zeynep Olcu</creator><general>Wojskowe Biuro Historyczne im. gen. broni Kazimierza Sosnkowskiego</general><general>Military Historical Bureau of Lieutenant-General Kazimierz Sosnkowski</general><general>Adam Mickiewicz University</general><general>Adam Mickiewicz University Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts</general><general>Adam Mickiewicz University Department of English Studies</general><general>Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3680-3986</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2204-3119</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Accuracy order in L2 grammatical morphemes: Corpus evidence from different proficiency levels of Turkish learners of English</title><author>Akbas, Erdem ; Dincer, Zeynep Olcu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ce8ed9db04512af6dd576548f82b07fbae57c664adc193caf9ffe48016f950ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Computational Linguistics</topic><topic>Contrastive Linguistics</topic><topic>Corpus analysis</topic><topic>Corpus linguistics</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>english as a foreign language</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English proficiency</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>grammatical morpheme</topic><topic>Interlanguage</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Language and Literature Studies</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>learner corpus</topic><topic>Linguistic Theory</topic><topic>Mastery Learning</topic><topic>Morphemes</topic><topic>Morphological analysis</topic><topic>Native Language</topic><topic>natural order</topic><topic>Order of acquisition</topic><topic>second language acquisition</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Tense</topic><topic>Transfer of Training</topic><topic>Turkish</topic><topic>Turkish language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akbas, Erdem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Zeynep Olcu</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Studies in second language learning and teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akbas, Erdem</au><au>Dincer, Zeynep Olcu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1327703</ericid><atitle>Accuracy order in L2 grammatical morphemes: Corpus evidence from different proficiency levels of Turkish learners of English</atitle><jtitle>Studies in second language learning and teaching</jtitle><addtitle>Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>607-627</pages><issn>2083-5205</issn><eissn>2084-1965</eissn><abstract>The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977) natural order and whether proficiency levels play a role in the order of acquisition of these morphemes. With this in mind, we focus on the (in)accuracy of nine English grammatical morphemes with 2883 cases manually tagged by the UAM Corpus Tool in the written exam scripts of Turkish learners of English. The results based on target-like use scores provide evidence for deviation from what is widely believed to be a set order of acquisition of these grammatical morphemes by second language learners. In light of such findings, we challenge the view that the internally driven processes of mastering grammatical morphemes in English for interlanguage users are largely independent of their L1. Regardless of L2 grammar proficiency in our data, the observed accuracy of some morphemes ranked low in comparison with the so-called natural order. These grammatical morphemes were almost exclusively non-existent features in participants’ mother tongue (e.g., third person singular –s, articles and the irregular past tense forms), thus suggesting the influence of L1 in this respect.</abstract><cop>Kalisz</cop><pub>Wojskowe Biuro Historyczne im. gen. broni Kazimierza Sosnkowskiego</pub><doi>10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3680-3986</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2204-3119</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2083-5205 |
ispartof | Studies in second language learning and teaching, 2021-12, Vol.11 (4), p.607-627 |
issn | 2083-5205 2084-1965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1327703 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Education Source (EBSCOhost); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Accuracy Analysis Computational Linguistics Contrastive Linguistics Corpus analysis Corpus linguistics English (Second Language) english as a foreign language English as a second language English as a second language learning English proficiency Foreign Countries Grammar grammatical morpheme Interlanguage Language acquisition Language and Literature Studies Language Proficiency Language Tests Language Usage learner corpus Linguistic Theory Mastery Learning Morphemes Morphological analysis Native Language natural order Order of acquisition second language acquisition Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Tense Transfer of Training Turkish Turkish language |
title | Accuracy order in L2 grammatical morphemes: Corpus evidence from different proficiency levels of Turkish learners of English |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20order%20in%20L2%20grammatical%20morphemes:%20Corpus%20evidence%20from%20different%20proficiency%20levels%20of%20Turkish%20learners%20of%20English&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20second%20language%20learning%20and%20teaching&rft.au=Akbas,%20Erdem&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=607-627&rft.issn=2083-5205&rft.eissn=2084-1965&rft_id=info:doi/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.6&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_eric_%3E1005217%3C/ceeol_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771737016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A690103350&rft_ceeol_id=1005217&rft_ericid=EJ1327703&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7092fcf347e140ae8532cb24b4e16147&rfr_iscdi=true |