Comparison of the effect of online teaching during COVID-19 and pre-pandemic traditional teaching in compulsory education
Online education for higher education has been well-researched. However, the same cannot be said for primary and secondary school education. Using data from two large-scale exams of representative Chinese primary and secondary schools pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic, this study analyzed the differen...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of educational research (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2021-08, Vol.114 (4), p.307-316 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 316 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 307 |
| container_title | The Journal of educational research (Washington, D.C.) |
| container_volume | 114 |
| creator | Feng, Xiaoying Ioan, Neacsu Li, Yan |
| description | Online education for higher education has been well-researched. However, the same cannot be said for primary and secondary school education. Using data from two large-scale exams of representative Chinese primary and secondary schools pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic, this study analyzed the difference in students' performance pre-pandemic, which used face-to-face teaching, and post-pandemic, which used online teaching. Primary results indicate that the performance of primary and secondary students before the pandemic was significantly better than after the pandemic. Secondary results showed that many previously high-scoring students were now scoring closer to the mean. Further, the scores of girls had changed more significantly than those of boys. Online teaching had a negative effect in rural than in urban areas; the preexisting gap between rural and urban students had widened after online teaching. Based on these results, improvements can be made on the online education system, technical support, and teachers. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00220671.2021.1930986 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1309996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1309996</ericid><sourcerecordid>2568487706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-76751f8aaa6f846ff7a8f17cf9a8b67237096354b045a5241938d3fb1bd22f243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRBIlOUTkCxxTrGdxHZuoLILiQtwtaaOTV2ldrATof49jspyYy4zo_feLA-hM0rmlEhyQQhjhAs6Z4TROW1K0ki-h2a0qUiRgXofzSbOVNNDdJTSmuQQTM7QdhE2PUSXgsfB4mFlsLHW6GHqgu-cN3gwoFfOv-N2jFNaPL89XBe0weBb3EdT9LkwG6fxEKF1gwseuj-V81jnJWOXQtxi044aJsoJOrDQJXP6nY_R6-3Ny-K-eHq-e1hcPRW65GQoRL6fWgkA3MqKWytAWiq0bUAuuWClIA0v62pJqhpqVuX3ZVvaJV22jFlWlcfofDe3j-FjNGlQ6zDGfGFSrOaykkIQnln1jqVjSCkaq_roNhC3ihI1uax-XFaTy-rb5aw72-lMdPpXc_NIM9w0E365w523IW7gM8SuVQNsuxBtBK9dUuX_K74AToiNEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568487706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the effect of online teaching during COVID-19 and pre-pandemic traditional teaching in compulsory education</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Feng, Xiaoying ; Ioan, Neacsu ; Li, Yan</creator><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xiaoying ; Ioan, Neacsu ; Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><description>Online education for higher education has been well-researched. However, the same cannot be said for primary and secondary school education. Using data from two large-scale exams of representative Chinese primary and secondary schools pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic, this study analyzed the difference in students' performance pre-pandemic, which used face-to-face teaching, and post-pandemic, which used online teaching. Primary results indicate that the performance of primary and secondary students before the pandemic was significantly better than after the pandemic. Secondary results showed that many previously high-scoring students were now scoring closer to the mean. Further, the scores of girls had changed more significantly than those of boys. Online teaching had a negative effect in rural than in urban areas; the preexisting gap between rural and urban students had widened after online teaching. Based on these results, improvements can be made on the online education system, technical support, and teachers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-0675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2021.1930986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Compulsory education ; Conventional Instruction ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Foreign Countries ; Gender Differences ; Grade 1 ; Grade 2 ; Grade 3 ; Grade 4 ; Grade 5 ; Grade 6 ; Grade 7 ; Grade 8 ; Grade 9 ; Higher education ; Intellectual Disciplines ; Online Courses ; Online instruction ; online teaching ; Pandemics ; Rural Urban Differences ; School Closing ; school performance ; Secondary school students ; Students ; Teaching ; Technology Uses in Education ; traditional teaching ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>The Journal of educational research (Washington, D.C.), 2021-08, Vol.114 (4), p.307-316</ispartof><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2021</rights><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-76751f8aaa6f846ff7a8f17cf9a8b67237096354b045a5241938d3fb1bd22f243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-76751f8aaa6f846ff7a8f17cf9a8b67237096354b045a5241938d3fb1bd22f243</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4909-3186</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1309996$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioan, Neacsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the effect of online teaching during COVID-19 and pre-pandemic traditional teaching in compulsory education</title><title>The Journal of educational research (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>Online education for higher education has been well-researched. However, the same cannot be said for primary and secondary school education. Using data from two large-scale exams of representative Chinese primary and secondary schools pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic, this study analyzed the difference in students' performance pre-pandemic, which used face-to-face teaching, and post-pandemic, which used online teaching. Primary results indicate that the performance of primary and secondary students before the pandemic was significantly better than after the pandemic. Secondary results showed that many previously high-scoring students were now scoring closer to the mean. Further, the scores of girls had changed more significantly than those of boys. Online teaching had a negative effect in rural than in urban areas; the preexisting gap between rural and urban students had widened after online teaching. Based on these results, improvements can be made on the online education system, technical support, and teachers.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Compulsory education</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Grade 2</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Grade 4</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Grade 6</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Intellectual Disciplines</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>online teaching</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Rural Urban Differences</subject><subject>School Closing</subject><subject>school performance</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>traditional teaching</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0022-0671</issn><issn>1940-0675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRBIlOUTkCxxTrGdxHZuoLILiQtwtaaOTV2ldrATof49jspyYy4zo_feLA-hM0rmlEhyQQhjhAs6Z4TROW1K0ki-h2a0qUiRgXofzSbOVNNDdJTSmuQQTM7QdhE2PUSXgsfB4mFlsLHW6GHqgu-cN3gwoFfOv-N2jFNaPL89XBe0weBb3EdT9LkwG6fxEKF1gwseuj-V81jnJWOXQtxi044aJsoJOrDQJXP6nY_R6-3Ny-K-eHq-e1hcPRW65GQoRL6fWgkA3MqKWytAWiq0bUAuuWClIA0v62pJqhpqVuX3ZVvaJV22jFlWlcfofDe3j-FjNGlQ6zDGfGFSrOaykkIQnln1jqVjSCkaq_roNhC3ihI1uax-XFaTy-rb5aw72-lMdPpXc_NIM9w0E365w523IW7gM8SuVQNsuxBtBK9dUuX_K74AToiNEA</recordid><startdate>20210819</startdate><enddate>20210819</enddate><creator>Feng, Xiaoying</creator><creator>Ioan, Neacsu</creator><creator>Li, Yan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4909-3186</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210819</creationdate><title>Comparison of the effect of online teaching during COVID-19 and pre-pandemic traditional teaching in compulsory education</title><author>Feng, Xiaoying ; Ioan, Neacsu ; Li, Yan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-76751f8aaa6f846ff7a8f17cf9a8b67237096354b045a5241938d3fb1bd22f243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Compulsory education</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Grade 2</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Grade 4</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Grade 6</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Intellectual Disciplines</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>online teaching</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Rural Urban Differences</topic><topic>School Closing</topic><topic>school performance</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>traditional teaching</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioan, Neacsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of educational research (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, Xiaoying</au><au>Ioan, Neacsu</au><au>Li, Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1309996</ericid><atitle>Comparison of the effect of online teaching during COVID-19 and pre-pandemic traditional teaching in compulsory education</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of educational research (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2021-08-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>316</epage><pages>307-316</pages><issn>0022-0671</issn><eissn>1940-0675</eissn><abstract>Online education for higher education has been well-researched. However, the same cannot be said for primary and secondary school education. Using data from two large-scale exams of representative Chinese primary and secondary schools pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic, this study analyzed the difference in students' performance pre-pandemic, which used face-to-face teaching, and post-pandemic, which used online teaching. Primary results indicate that the performance of primary and secondary students before the pandemic was significantly better than after the pandemic. Secondary results showed that many previously high-scoring students were now scoring closer to the mean. Further, the scores of girls had changed more significantly than those of boys. Online teaching had a negative effect in rural than in urban areas; the preexisting gap between rural and urban students had widened after online teaching. Based on these results, improvements can be made on the online education system, technical support, and teachers.</abstract><cop>Bloomington</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00220671.2021.1930986</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4909-3186</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-0671 |
| ispartof | The Journal of educational research (Washington, D.C.), 2021-08, Vol.114 (4), p.307-316 |
| issn | 0022-0671 1940-0675 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1309996 |
| source | Education Source |
| subjects | Academic Achievement Compulsory education Conventional Instruction Coronaviruses COVID-19 Education Educational Technology Elementary Secondary Education Foreign Countries Gender Differences Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Higher education Intellectual Disciplines Online Courses Online instruction online teaching Pandemics Rural Urban Differences School Closing school performance Secondary school students Students Teaching Technology Uses in Education traditional teaching Urban areas |
| title | Comparison of the effect of online teaching during COVID-19 and pre-pandemic traditional teaching in compulsory education |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A44%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20effect%20of%20online%20teaching%20during%20COVID-19%20and%20pre-pandemic%20traditional%20teaching%20in%20compulsory%20education&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20educational%20research%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Feng,%20Xiaoying&rft.date=2021-08-19&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=316&rft.pages=307-316&rft.issn=0022-0671&rft.eissn=1940-0675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00220671.2021.1930986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2568487706%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568487706&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1309996&rfr_iscdi=true |