The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment

The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of assessment tools in education 2021-01, Vol.8 (2), p.409-422
Hauptverfasser: AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz, GÜVEN, Ufuk, KARAHAN, Engin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 422
container_issue 2
container_start_page 409
container_title International journal of assessment tools in education
container_volume 8
creator AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz
GÜVEN, Ufuk
KARAHAN, Engin
description The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment. The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.21449/ijate.762104
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1303944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1303944</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1303944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-752409a148a704d083f02f85b55056bc20561c4255e95689cdf3b46d116221f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsNQePQr7Bbbu_yTHUKJWCi0YBU9hs5mlW9JEdqPitzc2Il5mhnkzj8cPoWtGl5xJmd36gxlgmWjOqDxDs3GZkkQqff5vvkSLGA-UUpZoKTI2Q6_lHvCLh8-Ie4d3AcgThA9vARctHKEbTPjCJRi7hxBxXvfvA952re8Am67BZTCNH3zfmRbvAALOY4QYfx6v0IUzbYTFb5-j57uiXD2QzfZ-vco3xHKeDiRRXNLMjAlNQmVDU-Eod6mqlaJK15aPlVnJlYJM6TSzjRO11A1jmnPmEjFHN5MvBG-rt-CPY-SqeGSCikzKUSeTbkMfYwD3d8NodUJXndBVEzrxDaltX74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz ; GÜVEN, Ufuk ; KARAHAN, Engin</creator><creatorcontrib>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz ; GÜVEN, Ufuk ; KARAHAN, Engin</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment. The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2148-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2148-7456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21449/ijate.762104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education</publisher><subject>Computer Mediated Communication ; Confidentiality ; Elementary Education ; Evaluation Criteria ; Foreign Countries ; Friendship ; Interaction ; Peer Evaluation ; Preservice Teachers ; Public Colleges ; Student Attitudes ; Synchronous Communication ; Undergraduate Students ; Validity ; Web 2.0 Technologies</subject><ispartof>International journal of assessment tools in education, 2021-01, Vol.8 (2), p.409-422</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-752409a148a704d083f02f85b55056bc20561c4255e95689cdf3b46d116221f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-752409a148a704d083f02f85b55056bc20561c4255e95689cdf3b46d116221f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1977-6426 ; 0000-0003-2109-976X ; 0000-0003-4530-211X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1303944$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1303944$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜVEN, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAHAN, Engin</creatorcontrib><title>The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment</title><title>International journal of assessment tools in education</title><description>The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment. The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.</description><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Evaluation Criteria</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Peer Evaluation</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Public Colleges</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Synchronous Communication</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Web 2.0 Technologies</subject><issn>2148-7456</issn><issn>2148-7456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsNQePQr7Bbbu_yTHUKJWCi0YBU9hs5mlW9JEdqPitzc2Il5mhnkzj8cPoWtGl5xJmd36gxlgmWjOqDxDs3GZkkQqff5vvkSLGA-UUpZoKTI2Q6_lHvCLh8-Ie4d3AcgThA9vARctHKEbTPjCJRi7hxBxXvfvA952re8Am67BZTCNH3zfmRbvAALOY4QYfx6v0IUzbYTFb5-j57uiXD2QzfZ-vco3xHKeDiRRXNLMjAlNQmVDU-Eod6mqlaJK15aPlVnJlYJM6TSzjRO11A1jmnPmEjFHN5MvBG-rt-CPY-SqeGSCikzKUSeTbkMfYwD3d8NodUJXndBVEzrxDaltX74</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz</creator><creator>GÜVEN, Ufuk</creator><creator>KARAHAN, Engin</creator><general>International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-6426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-976X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-211X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment</title><author>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz ; GÜVEN, Ufuk ; KARAHAN, Engin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-752409a148a704d083f02f85b55056bc20561c4255e95689cdf3b46d116221f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Evaluation Criteria</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Peer Evaluation</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Public Colleges</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Synchronous Communication</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Web 2.0 Technologies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜVEN, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAHAN, Engin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>International journal of assessment tools in education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz</au><au>GÜVEN, Ufuk</au><au>KARAHAN, Engin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1303944</ericid><atitle>The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment</atitle><jtitle>International journal of assessment tools in education</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>409-422</pages><issn>2148-7456</issn><eissn>2148-7456</eissn><abstract>The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment. The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.</abstract><pub>International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education</pub><doi>10.21449/ijate.762104</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-6426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-976X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-211X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2148-7456
ispartof International journal of assessment tools in education, 2021-01, Vol.8 (2), p.409-422
issn 2148-7456
2148-7456
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1303944
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Computer Mediated Communication
Confidentiality
Elementary Education
Evaluation Criteria
Foreign Countries
Friendship
Interaction
Peer Evaluation
Preservice Teachers
Public Colleges
Student Attitudes
Synchronous Communication
Undergraduate Students
Validity
Web 2.0 Technologies
title The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Views%20of%20Pre-Service%20Elementary%20Teachers%20About%20Online%20and%20Traditional%20Peer%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20assessment%20tools%20in%20education&rft.au=AK%C3%87AY,%20Ahmet%20O%C4%9Fuz&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=409-422&rft.issn=2148-7456&rft.eissn=2148-7456&rft_id=info:doi/10.21449/ijate.762104&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EEJ1303944%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1303944&rfr_iscdi=true