The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment
The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of assessment tools in education 2021-01, Vol.8 (2), p.409-422 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 422 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 409 |
container_title | International journal of assessment tools in education |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz GÜVEN, Ufuk KARAHAN, Engin |
description | The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.
The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21449/ijate.762104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1303944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1303944</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1303944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-752409a148a704d083f02f85b55056bc20561c4255e95689cdf3b46d116221f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsNQePQr7Bbbu_yTHUKJWCi0YBU9hs5mlW9JEdqPitzc2Il5mhnkzj8cPoWtGl5xJmd36gxlgmWjOqDxDs3GZkkQqff5vvkSLGA-UUpZoKTI2Q6_lHvCLh8-Ie4d3AcgThA9vARctHKEbTPjCJRi7hxBxXvfvA952re8Am67BZTCNH3zfmRbvAALOY4QYfx6v0IUzbYTFb5-j57uiXD2QzfZ-vco3xHKeDiRRXNLMjAlNQmVDU-Eod6mqlaJK15aPlVnJlYJM6TSzjRO11A1jmnPmEjFHN5MvBG-rt-CPY-SqeGSCikzKUSeTbkMfYwD3d8NodUJXndBVEzrxDaltX74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz ; GÜVEN, Ufuk ; KARAHAN, Engin</creator><creatorcontrib>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz ; GÜVEN, Ufuk ; KARAHAN, Engin</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.
The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2148-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2148-7456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21449/ijate.762104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education</publisher><subject>Computer Mediated Communication ; Confidentiality ; Elementary Education ; Evaluation Criteria ; Foreign Countries ; Friendship ; Interaction ; Peer Evaluation ; Preservice Teachers ; Public Colleges ; Student Attitudes ; Synchronous Communication ; Undergraduate Students ; Validity ; Web 2.0 Technologies</subject><ispartof>International journal of assessment tools in education, 2021-01, Vol.8 (2), p.409-422</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-752409a148a704d083f02f85b55056bc20561c4255e95689cdf3b46d116221f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-752409a148a704d083f02f85b55056bc20561c4255e95689cdf3b46d116221f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1977-6426 ; 0000-0003-2109-976X ; 0000-0003-4530-211X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1303944$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1303944$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜVEN, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAHAN, Engin</creatorcontrib><title>The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment</title><title>International journal of assessment tools in education</title><description>The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.
The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.</description><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Evaluation Criteria</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Peer Evaluation</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Public Colleges</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Synchronous Communication</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Web 2.0 Technologies</subject><issn>2148-7456</issn><issn>2148-7456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsNQePQr7Bbbu_yTHUKJWCi0YBU9hs5mlW9JEdqPitzc2Il5mhnkzj8cPoWtGl5xJmd36gxlgmWjOqDxDs3GZkkQqff5vvkSLGA-UUpZoKTI2Q6_lHvCLh8-Ie4d3AcgThA9vARctHKEbTPjCJRi7hxBxXvfvA952re8Am67BZTCNH3zfmRbvAALOY4QYfx6v0IUzbYTFb5-j57uiXD2QzfZ-vco3xHKeDiRRXNLMjAlNQmVDU-Eod6mqlaJK15aPlVnJlYJM6TSzjRO11A1jmnPmEjFHN5MvBG-rt-CPY-SqeGSCikzKUSeTbkMfYwD3d8NodUJXndBVEzrxDaltX74</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz</creator><creator>GÜVEN, Ufuk</creator><creator>KARAHAN, Engin</creator><general>International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-6426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-976X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-211X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment</title><author>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz ; GÜVEN, Ufuk ; KARAHAN, Engin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-752409a148a704d083f02f85b55056bc20561c4255e95689cdf3b46d116221f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Evaluation Criteria</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Peer Evaluation</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Public Colleges</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Synchronous Communication</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Web 2.0 Technologies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜVEN, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAHAN, Engin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>International journal of assessment tools in education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AKÇAY, Ahmet Oğuz</au><au>GÜVEN, Ufuk</au><au>KARAHAN, Engin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1303944</ericid><atitle>The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment</atitle><jtitle>International journal of assessment tools in education</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>409-422</pages><issn>2148-7456</issn><eissn>2148-7456</eissn><abstract>The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.
The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.</abstract><pub>International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education</pub><doi>10.21449/ijate.762104</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-6426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-976X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-211X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2148-7456 |
ispartof | International journal of assessment tools in education, 2021-01, Vol.8 (2), p.409-422 |
issn | 2148-7456 2148-7456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1303944 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Computer Mediated Communication Confidentiality Elementary Education Evaluation Criteria Foreign Countries Friendship Interaction Peer Evaluation Preservice Teachers Public Colleges Student Attitudes Synchronous Communication Undergraduate Students Validity Web 2.0 Technologies |
title | The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Views%20of%20Pre-Service%20Elementary%20Teachers%20About%20Online%20and%20Traditional%20Peer%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20assessment%20tools%20in%20education&rft.au=AK%C3%87AY,%20Ahmet%20O%C4%9Fuz&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=409-422&rft.issn=2148-7456&rft.eissn=2148-7456&rft_id=info:doi/10.21449/ijate.762104&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EEJ1303944%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1303944&rfr_iscdi=true |