Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners
Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Learning disability quarterly 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.96-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 96 |
container_title | Learning disability quarterly |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Cummings, Kelli D. Smolkowski, Keith Baker, Doris Luft |
description | Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain an accurate picture of school performance. It is therefore surprising that few evaluations of screening systems have focused on English language measures and their use with English learners. In this article, we aim to evaluate common screening thresholds, 54 across Grades k–3, to determine the extent to which they may differ between English learners and English proficient students. Results indicate that many thresholds are consistent between groups with some exceptions in kindergarten. We discuss implications for screening assessment and decision making but suggest that similar cut scores across groups do not imply similar intervention strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0731948719864408 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1293843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1293843</ericid><jstor_id>27286818</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0731948719864408</sage_id><sourcerecordid>27286818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6a2a0f0fb3f7d92f80808652e563524226b20547b6d58eb895b311b2d1cefbf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3L0LAczU_mjQ96pi_KChOwVtJ25eZOduZZMj-e1M6JngwObzD5_s-7_EQOqXkgtIsuyQZp3mqMpormaZE7aERo1IlPJNv-2jU46Tnh-jI-wWJj-dshOaT7nOlnfVdizuDCxvA6XqDZ7UDaMHhZ-s_8AyWUAcbM9cQviPA03a-tP4dP7nO2NpCG_AsrJtYPdZts-MFaBc1_hgdGL30cLKtY_R6M32Z3CXF4-395KpIai54SKRmmhhiKm6yJmdGkfilYCAkFyxlTFaMiDSrZCMUVCoXFae0Yg2twVSG8zE6G7zgbF2unP3UblNOHyjLuUp7fj7wleu-1uBDuejWro0rlUzQOINwKWOKDKnadd47MDsTJWV_7vLvuWNLMrR4PYdf6T_57aILHzq387OMKamo4j9bn4ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513520366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Cummings, Kelli D. ; Smolkowski, Keith ; Baker, Doris Luft</creator><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Kelli D. ; Smolkowski, Keith ; Baker, Doris Luft</creatorcontrib><description>Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain an accurate picture of school performance. It is therefore surprising that few evaluations of screening systems have focused on English language measures and their use with English learners. In this article, we aim to evaluate common screening thresholds, 54 across Grades k–3, to determine the extent to which they may differ between English learners and English proficient students. Results indicate that many thresholds are consistent between groups with some exceptions in kindergarten. We discuss implications for screening assessment and decision making but suggest that similar cut scores across groups do not imply similar intervention strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-9487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-376X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0731948719864408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; At Risk Students ; Curriculum Based Assessment ; Decision Making ; Disability Identification ; Elementary School Students ; Emergent Literacy ; English as a second language learning ; English Language Learners ; Kindergarten ; Language Proficiency ; Learning Disabilities ; Literacy ; Reading Difficulties ; Reading Fluency ; Reading Tests ; Screening Tests ; Students ; Thresholds ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Learning disability quarterly, 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.96-109</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6a2a0f0fb3f7d92f80808652e563524226b20547b6d58eb895b311b2d1cefbf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6a2a0f0fb3f7d92f80808652e563524226b20547b6d58eb895b311b2d1cefbf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3703-9852 ; 0000-0003-2565-3297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0731948719864408$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0731948719864408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,689,778,782,883,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1293843$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Kelli D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolkowski, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Doris Luft</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners</title><title>Learning disability quarterly</title><description>Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain an accurate picture of school performance. It is therefore surprising that few evaluations of screening systems have focused on English language measures and their use with English learners. In this article, we aim to evaluate common screening thresholds, 54 across Grades k–3, to determine the extent to which they may differ between English learners and English proficient students. Results indicate that many thresholds are consistent between groups with some exceptions in kindergarten. We discuss implications for screening assessment and decision making but suggest that similar cut scores across groups do not imply similar intervention strategies.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Curriculum Based Assessment</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Emergent Literacy</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Kindergarten</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Reading Fluency</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0731-9487</issn><issn>2168-376X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3L0LAczU_mjQ96pi_KChOwVtJ25eZOduZZMj-e1M6JngwObzD5_s-7_EQOqXkgtIsuyQZp3mqMpormaZE7aERo1IlPJNv-2jU46Tnh-jI-wWJj-dshOaT7nOlnfVdizuDCxvA6XqDZ7UDaMHhZ-s_8AyWUAcbM9cQviPA03a-tP4dP7nO2NpCG_AsrJtYPdZts-MFaBc1_hgdGL30cLKtY_R6M32Z3CXF4-395KpIai54SKRmmhhiKm6yJmdGkfilYCAkFyxlTFaMiDSrZCMUVCoXFae0Yg2twVSG8zE6G7zgbF2unP3UblNOHyjLuUp7fj7wleu-1uBDuejWro0rlUzQOINwKWOKDKnadd47MDsTJWV_7vLvuWNLMrR4PYdf6T_57aILHzq387OMKamo4j9bn4ew</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Cummings, Kelli D.</creator><creator>Smolkowski, Keith</creator><creator>Baker, Doris Luft</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-9852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2565-3297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners</title><author>Cummings, Kelli D. ; Smolkowski, Keith ; Baker, Doris Luft</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6a2a0f0fb3f7d92f80808652e563524226b20547b6d58eb895b311b2d1cefbf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Curriculum Based Assessment</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Emergent Literacy</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Kindergarten</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Reading Fluency</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Kelli D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolkowski, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Doris Luft</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Learning disability quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cummings, Kelli D.</au><au>Smolkowski, Keith</au><au>Baker, Doris Luft</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1293843</ericid><atitle>Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners</atitle><jtitle>Learning disability quarterly</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>96-109</pages><issn>0731-9487</issn><eissn>2168-376X</eissn><abstract>Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain an accurate picture of school performance. It is therefore surprising that few evaluations of screening systems have focused on English language measures and their use with English learners. In this article, we aim to evaluate common screening thresholds, 54 across Grades k–3, to determine the extent to which they may differ between English learners and English proficient students. Results indicate that many thresholds are consistent between groups with some exceptions in kindergarten. We discuss implications for screening assessment and decision making but suggest that similar cut scores across groups do not imply similar intervention strategies.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/0731948719864408</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-9852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2565-3297</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0731-9487 |
ispartof | Learning disability quarterly, 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.96-109 |
issn | 0731-9487 2168-376X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1293843 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Education Source |
subjects | Accuracy At Risk Students Curriculum Based Assessment Decision Making Disability Identification Elementary School Students Emergent Literacy English as a second language learning English Language Learners Kindergarten Language Proficiency Learning Disabilities Literacy Reading Difficulties Reading Fluency Reading Tests Screening Tests Students Thresholds Young Children |
title | Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A50%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Literacy%20Screener%20Risk%20Selection%20Between%20English%20Proficient%20Students%20and%20English%20Learners&rft.jtitle=Learning%20disability%20quarterly&rft.au=Cummings,%20Kelli%20D.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=96-109&rft.issn=0731-9487&rft.eissn=2168-376X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0731948719864408&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_eric_%3E27286818%3C/jstor_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513520366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1293843&rft_jstor_id=27286818&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0731948719864408&rfr_iscdi=true |