Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners

Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Learning disability quarterly 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.96-109
Hauptverfasser: Cummings, Kelli D., Smolkowski, Keith, Baker, Doris Luft
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 2
container_start_page 96
container_title Learning disability quarterly
container_volume 44
creator Cummings, Kelli D.
Smolkowski, Keith
Baker, Doris Luft
description Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain an accurate picture of school performance. It is therefore surprising that few evaluations of screening systems have focused on English language measures and their use with English learners. In this article, we aim to evaluate common screening thresholds, 54 across Grades k–3, to determine the extent to which they may differ between English learners and English proficient students. Results indicate that many thresholds are consistent between groups with some exceptions in kindergarten. We discuss implications for screening assessment and decision making but suggest that similar cut scores across groups do not imply similar intervention strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0731948719864408
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1293843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1293843</ericid><jstor_id>27286818</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0731948719864408</sage_id><sourcerecordid>27286818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6a2a0f0fb3f7d92f80808652e563524226b20547b6d58eb895b311b2d1cefbf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3L0LAczU_mjQ96pi_KChOwVtJ25eZOduZZMj-e1M6JngwObzD5_s-7_EQOqXkgtIsuyQZp3mqMpormaZE7aERo1IlPJNv-2jU46Tnh-jI-wWJj-dshOaT7nOlnfVdizuDCxvA6XqDZ7UDaMHhZ-s_8AyWUAcbM9cQviPA03a-tP4dP7nO2NpCG_AsrJtYPdZts-MFaBc1_hgdGL30cLKtY_R6M32Z3CXF4-395KpIai54SKRmmhhiKm6yJmdGkfilYCAkFyxlTFaMiDSrZCMUVCoXFae0Yg2twVSG8zE6G7zgbF2unP3UblNOHyjLuUp7fj7wleu-1uBDuejWro0rlUzQOINwKWOKDKnadd47MDsTJWV_7vLvuWNLMrR4PYdf6T_57aILHzq387OMKamo4j9bn4ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513520366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Cummings, Kelli D. ; Smolkowski, Keith ; Baker, Doris Luft</creator><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Kelli D. ; Smolkowski, Keith ; Baker, Doris Luft</creatorcontrib><description>Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain an accurate picture of school performance. It is therefore surprising that few evaluations of screening systems have focused on English language measures and their use with English learners. In this article, we aim to evaluate common screening thresholds, 54 across Grades k–3, to determine the extent to which they may differ between English learners and English proficient students. Results indicate that many thresholds are consistent between groups with some exceptions in kindergarten. We discuss implications for screening assessment and decision making but suggest that similar cut scores across groups do not imply similar intervention strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-9487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-376X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0731948719864408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; At Risk Students ; Curriculum Based Assessment ; Decision Making ; Disability Identification ; Elementary School Students ; Emergent Literacy ; English as a second language learning ; English Language Learners ; Kindergarten ; Language Proficiency ; Learning Disabilities ; Literacy ; Reading Difficulties ; Reading Fluency ; Reading Tests ; Screening Tests ; Students ; Thresholds ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Learning disability quarterly, 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.96-109</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6a2a0f0fb3f7d92f80808652e563524226b20547b6d58eb895b311b2d1cefbf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6a2a0f0fb3f7d92f80808652e563524226b20547b6d58eb895b311b2d1cefbf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3703-9852 ; 0000-0003-2565-3297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0731948719864408$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0731948719864408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,689,778,782,883,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1293843$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Kelli D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolkowski, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Doris Luft</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners</title><title>Learning disability quarterly</title><description>Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain an accurate picture of school performance. It is therefore surprising that few evaluations of screening systems have focused on English language measures and their use with English learners. In this article, we aim to evaluate common screening thresholds, 54 across Grades k–3, to determine the extent to which they may differ between English learners and English proficient students. Results indicate that many thresholds are consistent between groups with some exceptions in kindergarten. We discuss implications for screening assessment and decision making but suggest that similar cut scores across groups do not imply similar intervention strategies.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Curriculum Based Assessment</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Emergent Literacy</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Kindergarten</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Reading Fluency</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0731-9487</issn><issn>2168-376X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3L0LAczU_mjQ96pi_KChOwVtJ25eZOduZZMj-e1M6JngwObzD5_s-7_EQOqXkgtIsuyQZp3mqMpormaZE7aERo1IlPJNv-2jU46Tnh-jI-wWJj-dshOaT7nOlnfVdizuDCxvA6XqDZ7UDaMHhZ-s_8AyWUAcbM9cQviPA03a-tP4dP7nO2NpCG_AsrJtYPdZts-MFaBc1_hgdGL30cLKtY_R6M32Z3CXF4-395KpIai54SKRmmhhiKm6yJmdGkfilYCAkFyxlTFaMiDSrZCMUVCoXFae0Yg2twVSG8zE6G7zgbF2unP3UblNOHyjLuUp7fj7wleu-1uBDuejWro0rlUzQOINwKWOKDKnadd47MDsTJWV_7vLvuWNLMrR4PYdf6T_57aILHzq387OMKamo4j9bn4ew</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Cummings, Kelli D.</creator><creator>Smolkowski, Keith</creator><creator>Baker, Doris Luft</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-9852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2565-3297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners</title><author>Cummings, Kelli D. ; Smolkowski, Keith ; Baker, Doris Luft</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6a2a0f0fb3f7d92f80808652e563524226b20547b6d58eb895b311b2d1cefbf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Curriculum Based Assessment</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Emergent Literacy</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Kindergarten</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Reading Fluency</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Kelli D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolkowski, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Doris Luft</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Learning disability quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cummings, Kelli D.</au><au>Smolkowski, Keith</au><au>Baker, Doris Luft</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1293843</ericid><atitle>Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners</atitle><jtitle>Learning disability quarterly</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>96-109</pages><issn>0731-9487</issn><eissn>2168-376X</eissn><abstract>Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain an accurate picture of school performance. It is therefore surprising that few evaluations of screening systems have focused on English language measures and their use with English learners. In this article, we aim to evaluate common screening thresholds, 54 across Grades k–3, to determine the extent to which they may differ between English learners and English proficient students. Results indicate that many thresholds are consistent between groups with some exceptions in kindergarten. We discuss implications for screening assessment and decision making but suggest that similar cut scores across groups do not imply similar intervention strategies.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/0731948719864408</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-9852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2565-3297</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-9487
ispartof Learning disability quarterly, 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.96-109
issn 0731-9487
2168-376X
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1293843
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Education Source
subjects Accuracy
At Risk Students
Curriculum Based Assessment
Decision Making
Disability Identification
Elementary School Students
Emergent Literacy
English as a second language learning
English Language Learners
Kindergarten
Language Proficiency
Learning Disabilities
Literacy
Reading Difficulties
Reading Fluency
Reading Tests
Screening Tests
Students
Thresholds
Young Children
title Comparison of Literacy Screener Risk Selection Between English Proficient Students and English Learners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A50%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Literacy%20Screener%20Risk%20Selection%20Between%20English%20Proficient%20Students%20and%20English%20Learners&rft.jtitle=Learning%20disability%20quarterly&rft.au=Cummings,%20Kelli%20D.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=96-109&rft.issn=0731-9487&rft.eissn=2168-376X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0731948719864408&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_eric_%3E27286818%3C/jstor_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513520366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1293843&rft_jstor_id=27286818&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0731948719864408&rfr_iscdi=true