Reported rationales for HPV vaccination vs. Non-vaccination among undergraduate and medical students in South Carolina
Objective: We sought to identify factors that influence Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in individuals at two higher education institutions in South Carolina (SC). Participants: We surveyed 1007 students with a mean age and standard deviation of 20.3 ± 3.3 from September 2018 to Decembe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of American college health 2021-02, Vol.69 (2), p.185-189 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 189 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 185 |
| container_title | Journal of American college health |
| container_volume | 69 |
| creator | Barrera, J. Greene, S. Petyak, E. Kenneson, S. McGill, E. Howell, H. Billing, D. Taylor, S. Ewing, A. Cull, J. |
| description | Objective: We sought to identify factors that influence Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in individuals at two higher education institutions in South Carolina (SC).
Participants: We surveyed 1007 students with a mean age and standard deviation of 20.3 ± 3.3 from September 2018 to December 2018.
Methods: Participants answered 13 questions, assessing HPV vaccination rates, demographics, and rationales for vaccination vs. non-vaccination.
Results: Of 1007 respondents, 700 received HPV vaccination, 165 were unvaccinated, 75 received partial vaccination and 138 were uncertain. Commonalities in HPV vaccination existed between females (p = 0.037), individuals who received standard childhood vaccinations (p = 0.04), and those not native-born in SC (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07448481.2019.1659279 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1291486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1291486</ericid><sourcerecordid>2290909463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-5575eed2a471930bbedadec8178a50ed20f5a6977fdff19e6e6f7af67a0117d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhIxRZ4sIlWzuJY_sGWhVKVVHEv6s1G49LqsTe2s6ifnu87LZCHCofLM37vdHoPUJOOFtyptgpk22rWsWXNeN6yTuha6mfkAXXLauamqmnZLFjqh10RF6kdMMY47XSz8lRwwVv2k4syPYrbkLMaGmEPAQPIybqQqTnX37SLfT94P_O6TYt6efgq39nMAV_TWdvMV5HsDNkpOAtndAOPYw05dmiz4kOnn4Lc_5FVxDDWOwvyTMHY8JXh_-Y_Phw9n11Xl1effy0en9Z9S3vciWEFIi2hlZy3bD1Gi1Y7BWXCgQrAnMCOi2ls85xjR12ToLrJDDOpWXNMXm737uJ4XbGlM00pB7HETyGOZm61qy8tmsK-uY_9CbMsQRSKMEaUasScaHEnupjSCmiM5s4TBDvDGdmV4y5L8bsijGHYorv9WH7vC7xPLjumyjAyR7AOPQP8tkFrzVvVVf0d3t98KWeCX6HOFqT4W4M0UXw_ZDKskdv-ANjJaeB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503528592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reported rationales for HPV vaccination vs. Non-vaccination among undergraduate and medical students in South Carolina</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Barrera, J. ; Greene, S. ; Petyak, E. ; Kenneson, S. ; McGill, E. ; Howell, H. ; Billing, D. ; Taylor, S. ; Ewing, A. ; Cull, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrera, J. ; Greene, S. ; Petyak, E. ; Kenneson, S. ; McGill, E. ; Howell, H. ; Billing, D. ; Taylor, S. ; Ewing, A. ; Cull, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: We sought to identify factors that influence Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in individuals at two higher education institutions in South Carolina (SC).
Participants: We surveyed 1007 students with a mean age and standard deviation of 20.3 ± 3.3 from September 2018 to December 2018.
Methods: Participants answered 13 questions, assessing HPV vaccination rates, demographics, and rationales for vaccination vs. non-vaccination.
Results: Of 1007 respondents, 700 received HPV vaccination, 165 were unvaccinated, 75 received partial vaccination and 138 were uncertain. Commonalities in HPV vaccination existed between females (p = 0.037), individuals who received standard childhood vaccinations (p = 0.04), and those not native-born in SC (p < 0.001). Of non-vaccinated individuals, 37% "never thought about vaccination," 32% did not perceive a need for vaccination, and 31% reported vaccine safety as reasons for not receiving the vaccine.
Conclusions: Promotion of HPV vaccination may benefit from targeting SC natives, males, and individuals who are under-vaccinated or unvaccinated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0744-8481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-3208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1659279</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31513465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Allied Health Personnel ; Barriers ; Childhood ; College Students ; Gender Differences ; Geographic Location ; Health Behavior ; Higher education ; HPV vaccine ; Human Papillomavirus ; Immunization ; Immunization Programs ; Incidence ; Males ; Medical students ; Men ; Parent Role ; Role ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases ; South Carolina ; Student Attitudes ; Student Characteristics ; vaccination rates ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Journal of American college health, 2021-02, Vol.69 (2), p.185-189</ispartof><rights>2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2019</rights><rights>2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-5575eed2a471930bbedadec8178a50ed20f5a6977fdff19e6e6f7af67a0117d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-5575eed2a471930bbedadec8178a50ed20f5a6977fdff19e6e6f7af67a0117d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1291486$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31513465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrera, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petyak, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenneson, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGill, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billing, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cull, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reported rationales for HPV vaccination vs. Non-vaccination among undergraduate and medical students in South Carolina</title><title>Journal of American college health</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Health</addtitle><description>Objective: We sought to identify factors that influence Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in individuals at two higher education institutions in South Carolina (SC).
Participants: We surveyed 1007 students with a mean age and standard deviation of 20.3 ± 3.3 from September 2018 to December 2018.
Methods: Participants answered 13 questions, assessing HPV vaccination rates, demographics, and rationales for vaccination vs. non-vaccination.
Results: Of 1007 respondents, 700 received HPV vaccination, 165 were unvaccinated, 75 received partial vaccination and 138 were uncertain. Commonalities in HPV vaccination existed between females (p = 0.037), individuals who received standard childhood vaccinations (p = 0.04), and those not native-born in SC (p < 0.001). Of non-vaccinated individuals, 37% "never thought about vaccination," 32% did not perceive a need for vaccination, and 31% reported vaccine safety as reasons for not receiving the vaccine.
Conclusions: Promotion of HPV vaccination may benefit from targeting SC natives, males, and individuals who are under-vaccinated or unvaccinated.</description><subject>Allied Health Personnel</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Geographic Location</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>HPV vaccine</subject><subject>Human Papillomavirus</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Programs</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Parent Role</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases</subject><subject>South Carolina</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>vaccination rates</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0744-8481</issn><issn>1940-3208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhIxRZ4sIlWzuJY_sGWhVKVVHEv6s1G49LqsTe2s6ifnu87LZCHCofLM37vdHoPUJOOFtyptgpk22rWsWXNeN6yTuha6mfkAXXLauamqmnZLFjqh10RF6kdMMY47XSz8lRwwVv2k4syPYrbkLMaGmEPAQPIybqQqTnX37SLfT94P_O6TYt6efgq39nMAV_TWdvMV5HsDNkpOAtndAOPYw05dmiz4kOnn4Lc_5FVxDDWOwvyTMHY8JXh_-Y_Phw9n11Xl1effy0en9Z9S3vciWEFIi2hlZy3bD1Gi1Y7BWXCgQrAnMCOi2ls85xjR12ToLrJDDOpWXNMXm737uJ4XbGlM00pB7HETyGOZm61qy8tmsK-uY_9CbMsQRSKMEaUasScaHEnupjSCmiM5s4TBDvDGdmV4y5L8bsijGHYorv9WH7vC7xPLjumyjAyR7AOPQP8tkFrzVvVVf0d3t98KWeCX6HOFqT4W4M0UXw_ZDKskdv-ANjJaeB</recordid><startdate>20210217</startdate><enddate>20210217</enddate><creator>Barrera, J.</creator><creator>Greene, S.</creator><creator>Petyak, E.</creator><creator>Kenneson, S.</creator><creator>McGill, E.</creator><creator>Howell, H.</creator><creator>Billing, D.</creator><creator>Taylor, S.</creator><creator>Ewing, A.</creator><creator>Cull, J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210217</creationdate><title>Reported rationales for HPV vaccination vs. Non-vaccination among undergraduate and medical students in South Carolina</title><author>Barrera, J. ; Greene, S. ; Petyak, E. ; Kenneson, S. ; McGill, E. ; Howell, H. ; Billing, D. ; Taylor, S. ; Ewing, A. ; Cull, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-5575eed2a471930bbedadec8178a50ed20f5a6977fdff19e6e6f7af67a0117d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Allied Health Personnel</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Geographic Location</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>HPV vaccine</topic><topic>Human Papillomavirus</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Programs</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Parent Role</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases</topic><topic>South Carolina</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>vaccination rates</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrera, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petyak, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenneson, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGill, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billing, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cull, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of American college health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrera, J.</au><au>Greene, S.</au><au>Petyak, E.</au><au>Kenneson, S.</au><au>McGill, E.</au><au>Howell, H.</au><au>Billing, D.</au><au>Taylor, S.</au><au>Ewing, A.</au><au>Cull, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1291486</ericid><atitle>Reported rationales for HPV vaccination vs. Non-vaccination among undergraduate and medical students in South Carolina</atitle><jtitle>Journal of American college health</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Health</addtitle><date>2021-02-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>185-189</pages><issn>0744-8481</issn><eissn>1940-3208</eissn><abstract>Objective: We sought to identify factors that influence Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in individuals at two higher education institutions in South Carolina (SC).
Participants: We surveyed 1007 students with a mean age and standard deviation of 20.3 ± 3.3 from September 2018 to December 2018.
Methods: Participants answered 13 questions, assessing HPV vaccination rates, demographics, and rationales for vaccination vs. non-vaccination.
Results: Of 1007 respondents, 700 received HPV vaccination, 165 were unvaccinated, 75 received partial vaccination and 138 were uncertain. Commonalities in HPV vaccination existed between females (p = 0.037), individuals who received standard childhood vaccinations (p = 0.04), and those not native-born in SC (p < 0.001). Of non-vaccinated individuals, 37% "never thought about vaccination," 32% did not perceive a need for vaccination, and 31% reported vaccine safety as reasons for not receiving the vaccine.
Conclusions: Promotion of HPV vaccination may benefit from targeting SC natives, males, and individuals who are under-vaccinated or unvaccinated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>31513465</pmid><doi>10.1080/07448481.2019.1659279</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0744-8481 |
| ispartof | Journal of American college health, 2021-02, Vol.69 (2), p.185-189 |
| issn | 0744-8481 1940-3208 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1291486 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source |
| subjects | Allied Health Personnel Barriers Childhood College Students Gender Differences Geographic Location Health Behavior Higher education HPV vaccine Human Papillomavirus Immunization Immunization Programs Incidence Males Medical students Men Parent Role Role Sexually Transmitted Diseases South Carolina Student Attitudes Student Characteristics vaccination rates Vaccines |
| title | Reported rationales for HPV vaccination vs. Non-vaccination among undergraduate and medical students in South Carolina |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A57%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reported%20rationales%20for%20HPV%20vaccination%20vs.%20Non-vaccination%20among%20undergraduate%20and%20medical%20students%20in%20South%20Carolina&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20American%20college%20health&rft.au=Barrera,%20J.&rft.date=2021-02-17&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=185-189&rft.issn=0744-8481&rft.eissn=1940-3208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07448481.2019.1659279&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2290909463%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503528592&rft_id=info:pmid/31513465&rft_ericid=EJ1291486&rfr_iscdi=true |