ANALYZING PROOF TEACHING AT THE TERTIARY LEVEL USING PERELMAN’S NEW RHETORIC
In this paper, we discuss the relationship between rhetoric and mathematics, focusing on mathematical proofs. We offer a theoretical framework based on Perelman’s New Rhetoric for analyzing the teaching of proof, taking into account rhetorical aspects. We illustrate the practicality and applicabilit...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | For the learning of mathematics 2020, Vol.40 (2), p.15-19 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 19 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 15 |
| container_title | For the learning of mathematics |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | GABEL, MIKA DREYFUS, TOMMY |
| description | In this paper, we discuss the relationship between rhetoric and mathematics, focusing on mathematical proofs. We offer a theoretical framework based on Perelman’s New Rhetoric for analyzing the teaching of proof, taking into account rhetorical aspects. We illustrate the practicality and applicability of the proposed framework and methodology by analyzing an episode from a lesson in set theory taught to prospective secondary mathematics teachers. We suggest that a conscious use of rhetorical figures may enrich proof teaching and support ideas that lecturers consider important to convey to their students. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1263359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1263359</ericid><jstor_id>27091148</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27091148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e114t-641544be9754dccae56127f0740622db244784ded9f0adb3d0fd979363060ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjd1KwzAcxXOh4Jw-gpAXKPzz0aS5DCVbK1krWVTmzUibFDYUpd2Nd76Gr-eTOD_Qq8OP8-OcEzQDSosMhCRn6Hya9gBQSChmqNGNtpuHulniG9e2C-yNLqsv1B77yhzZ-Vq7Dbbmzlh8u_5WjTN2pZuPt_c1bsw9dpXxravLC3Q6hMcpXf7mHPmF8WWV2XZZl9pmiRB-yAQnOeddUjLnse9DygWhcgDJQVAaO8q5LHhMUQ0QYsciDFFJxQQDAaFjc3T1M5vGXb99GXdPYXzdmmtCBWO5-u_30-F5_BOoBHX8L9gnmHdJaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>ANALYZING PROOF TEACHING AT THE TERTIARY LEVEL USING PERELMAN’S NEW RHETORIC</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics and Statistics</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GABEL, MIKA ; DREYFUS, TOMMY</creator><creatorcontrib>GABEL, MIKA ; DREYFUS, TOMMY</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we discuss the relationship between rhetoric and mathematics, focusing on mathematical proofs. We offer a theoretical framework based on Perelman’s New Rhetoric for analyzing the teaching of proof, taking into account rhetorical aspects. We illustrate the practicality and applicability of the proposed framework and methodology by analyzing an episode from a lesson in set theory taught to prospective secondary mathematics teachers. We suggest that a conscious use of rhetorical figures may enrich proof teaching and support ideas that lecturers consider important to convey to their students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0228-0671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>FLM Publishing Association</publisher><subject>Discussion (Teaching Technique) ; Mathematical Logic ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mathematics Teachers ; Persuasive Discourse ; Preservice Teacher Education ; Rhetoric ; Secondary School Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Validity</subject><ispartof>For the learning of mathematics, 2020, Vol.40 (2), p.15-19</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27091148$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27091148$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,829,4010,57998,58002,58231,58235</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1263359$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GABEL, MIKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DREYFUS, TOMMY</creatorcontrib><title>ANALYZING PROOF TEACHING AT THE TERTIARY LEVEL USING PERELMAN’S NEW RHETORIC</title><title>For the learning of mathematics</title><description>In this paper, we discuss the relationship between rhetoric and mathematics, focusing on mathematical proofs. We offer a theoretical framework based on Perelman’s New Rhetoric for analyzing the teaching of proof, taking into account rhetorical aspects. We illustrate the practicality and applicability of the proposed framework and methodology by analyzing an episode from a lesson in set theory taught to prospective secondary mathematics teachers. We suggest that a conscious use of rhetorical figures may enrich proof teaching and support ideas that lecturers consider important to convey to their students.</description><subject>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Mathematical Logic</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Teachers</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Preservice Teacher Education</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0228-0671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFjd1KwzAcxXOh4Jw-gpAXKPzz0aS5DCVbK1krWVTmzUibFDYUpd2Nd76Gr-eTOD_Qq8OP8-OcEzQDSosMhCRn6Hya9gBQSChmqNGNtpuHulniG9e2C-yNLqsv1B77yhzZ-Vq7Dbbmzlh8u_5WjTN2pZuPt_c1bsw9dpXxravLC3Q6hMcpXf7mHPmF8WWV2XZZl9pmiRB-yAQnOeddUjLnse9DygWhcgDJQVAaO8q5LHhMUQ0QYsciDFFJxQQDAaFjc3T1M5vGXb99GXdPYXzdmmtCBWO5-u_30-F5_BOoBHX8L9gnmHdJaw</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>GABEL, MIKA</creator><creator>DREYFUS, TOMMY</creator><general>FLM Publishing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>ANALYZING PROOF TEACHING AT THE TERTIARY LEVEL USING PERELMAN’S NEW RHETORIC</title><author>GABEL, MIKA ; DREYFUS, TOMMY</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e114t-641544be9754dccae56127f0740622db244784ded9f0adb3d0fd979363060ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Mathematical Logic</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Teachers</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Preservice Teacher Education</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GABEL, MIKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DREYFUS, TOMMY</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>For the learning of mathematics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GABEL, MIKA</au><au>DREYFUS, TOMMY</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1263359</ericid><atitle>ANALYZING PROOF TEACHING AT THE TERTIARY LEVEL USING PERELMAN’S NEW RHETORIC</atitle><jtitle>For the learning of mathematics</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>15-19</pages><issn>0228-0671</issn><abstract>In this paper, we discuss the relationship between rhetoric and mathematics, focusing on mathematical proofs. We offer a theoretical framework based on Perelman’s New Rhetoric for analyzing the teaching of proof, taking into account rhetorical aspects. We illustrate the practicality and applicability of the proposed framework and methodology by analyzing an episode from a lesson in set theory taught to prospective secondary mathematics teachers. We suggest that a conscious use of rhetorical figures may enrich proof teaching and support ideas that lecturers consider important to convey to their students.</abstract><pub>FLM Publishing Association</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0228-0671 |
| ispartof | For the learning of mathematics, 2020, Vol.40 (2), p.15-19 |
| issn | 0228-0671 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1263359 |
| source | JSTOR Mathematics and Statistics; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Discussion (Teaching Technique) Mathematical Logic Mathematics Instruction Mathematics Teachers Persuasive Discourse Preservice Teacher Education Rhetoric Secondary School Teachers Teaching Methods Validity |
| title | ANALYZING PROOF TEACHING AT THE TERTIARY LEVEL USING PERELMAN’S NEW RHETORIC |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ANALYZING%20PROOF%20TEACHING%20AT%20THE%20TERTIARY%20LEVEL%20USING%20PERELMAN%E2%80%99S%20NEW%20RHETORIC&rft.jtitle=For%20the%20learning%20of%20mathematics&rft.au=GABEL,%20MIKA&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=15-19&rft.issn=0228-0671&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_eric_%3E27091148%3C/jstor_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1263359&rft_jstor_id=27091148&rfr_iscdi=true |