Relationships between Cognitive Flexibility, Perceived Quality of Faculty Life, Learning Approaches, and Academic Achievement
This study aims to explore the relationships between cognitive flexibility (CF), perceived quality of faculty life (PQFL), learning approaches (LA) and academic achievement (AA). This correlational comparison study was conducted with 1573 undergraduates at Ankara University. The data collection tool...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Instruction 2020-01, Vol.13 (1), p.85-100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | International Journal of Instruction |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Toraman, Çetin Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi Kosan, Aysen Melek Aytug Orakci, Senol |
description | This study aims to explore the relationships between cognitive flexibility (CF), perceived quality of faculty life (PQFL), learning approaches (LA) and academic achievement (AA). This correlational comparison study was conducted with 1573 undergraduates at Ankara University. The data collection tools were "Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS)", "Quality of Faculty Life Scale (QFLS)" and "Approaches to Learning Questionnaire (ALQ)". Grade point average (GPA) was used as a measurement of AA. The three subscales of QFLS; satisfaction from faculty (SF), faculty members (SFM), and school climate and student relationships (SSCSR) were found positively correlated with deep approach to learning (DAL), CF and AA, and negatively correlated with surface approach to learning (SAL). DAL was also found positively correlated with CF and AA, but negatively correlated with SAL. CF and AA were positively correlated with all variables, except SAL. Although CF showed a positive correlation with AA, it assumed a negative explanatory role for AA when it was included in the model as a mediating variable. The regression estimates in the path analysis model revealed that DAL, SAL and SF were positive explanatory variables for AA, whereas SSCSR was a negative explanatory variable for AA and SAL was a negative explanatory variable for CF. |
doi_str_mv | 10.29333/iji.2020.1316a |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1239309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1239309</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1239309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d05654e584b6964b11157c585ad8d3f1a22d976716c7f249d89a4abce40935863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNuquCPiBOJEuWrGUISR8Y-qCF7owsjZMpjh1kp20W_fc6SelqDvdeZnEIueZsEhshxBQ_cBKzmE244MqekQEXLI241Oy8Z2VkpJh5vySjtsWCSaklZ1oOyM8LVLbDpm7XuG1pAd0XQE3nzarGDj-BLiv4xgIr7PZj-gTBQZ96-ryzh4g2JV1at6t6zLCEMc3AhhrrFZ1tt6Gxbg3tmNra05mzHjboelgjfMIG6u6KXJS2amH0d4fkbbl4nd9F2ePt_XyWRU5o1kWeJSqRkKSyUEbJgnOeaJekifWpFyW3ceyNVporp8tYGp8aK23hQDIjklSJIbk5_YWALt8G3NiwzxcPPBZG9JshmZ56F5q2DVD-bzjLj4LzXnB-EJwfBYtfAHdu2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationships between Cognitive Flexibility, Perceived Quality of Faculty Life, Learning Approaches, and Academic Achievement</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Toraman, Çetin ; Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi ; Kosan, Aysen Melek Aytug ; Orakci, Senol</creator><creatorcontrib>Toraman, Çetin ; Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi ; Kosan, Aysen Melek Aytug ; Orakci, Senol ; Ankara University, hasan.f.ozdemir@ankara.edu.tr ; Asst. Prof., Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, toramanacademic@gmail.com ; Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, aysenay1@yahoo.com ; Aksaray University, senolorak@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to explore the relationships between cognitive flexibility (CF), perceived quality of faculty life (PQFL), learning approaches (LA) and academic achievement (AA). This correlational comparison study was conducted with 1573 undergraduates at Ankara University. The data collection tools were "Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS)", "Quality of Faculty Life Scale (QFLS)" and "Approaches to Learning Questionnaire (ALQ)". Grade point average (GPA) was used as a measurement of AA. The three subscales of QFLS; satisfaction from faculty (SF), faculty members (SFM), and school climate and student relationships (SSCSR) were found positively correlated with deep approach to learning (DAL), CF and AA, and negatively correlated with surface approach to learning (SAL). DAL was also found positively correlated with CF and AA, but negatively correlated with SAL. CF and AA were positively correlated with all variables, except SAL. Although CF showed a positive correlation with AA, it assumed a negative explanatory role for AA when it was included in the model as a mediating variable. The regression estimates in the path analysis model revealed that DAL, SAL and SF were positive explanatory variables for AA, whereas SSCSR was a negative explanatory variable for AA and SAL was a negative explanatory variable for CF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1694-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1308-1470</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29333/iji.2020.1316a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Journal of Instruction</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive Style ; Comparative Analysis ; Correlation ; Educational Environment ; Foreign Countries ; Grade Point Average ; Measures (Individuals) ; Path Analysis ; Quality of Life ; Role ; Student Attitudes ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Instruction, 2020-01, Vol.13 (1), p.85-100</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d05654e584b6964b11157c585ad8d3f1a22d976716c7f249d89a4abce40935863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,689,778,782,883,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1239309$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toraman, Çetin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosan, Aysen Melek Aytug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orakci, Senol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ankara University, hasan.f.ozdemir@ankara.edu.tr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asst. Prof., Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, toramanacademic@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, aysenay1@yahoo.com</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksaray University, senolorak@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><title>Relationships between Cognitive Flexibility, Perceived Quality of Faculty Life, Learning Approaches, and Academic Achievement</title><title>International Journal of Instruction</title><description>This study aims to explore the relationships between cognitive flexibility (CF), perceived quality of faculty life (PQFL), learning approaches (LA) and academic achievement (AA). This correlational comparison study was conducted with 1573 undergraduates at Ankara University. The data collection tools were "Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS)", "Quality of Faculty Life Scale (QFLS)" and "Approaches to Learning Questionnaire (ALQ)". Grade point average (GPA) was used as a measurement of AA. The three subscales of QFLS; satisfaction from faculty (SF), faculty members (SFM), and school climate and student relationships (SSCSR) were found positively correlated with deep approach to learning (DAL), CF and AA, and negatively correlated with surface approach to learning (SAL). DAL was also found positively correlated with CF and AA, but negatively correlated with SAL. CF and AA were positively correlated with all variables, except SAL. Although CF showed a positive correlation with AA, it assumed a negative explanatory role for AA when it was included in the model as a mediating variable. The regression estimates in the path analysis model revealed that DAL, SAL and SF were positive explanatory variables for AA, whereas SSCSR was a negative explanatory variable for AA and SAL was a negative explanatory variable for CF.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grade Point Average</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Path Analysis</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1694-609X</issn><issn>1308-1470</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNuquCPiBOJEuWrGUISR8Y-qCF7owsjZMpjh1kp20W_fc6SelqDvdeZnEIueZsEhshxBQ_cBKzmE244MqekQEXLI241Oy8Z2VkpJh5vySjtsWCSaklZ1oOyM8LVLbDpm7XuG1pAd0XQE3nzarGDj-BLiv4xgIr7PZj-gTBQZ96-ryzh4g2JV1at6t6zLCEMc3AhhrrFZ1tt6Gxbg3tmNra05mzHjboelgjfMIG6u6KXJS2amH0d4fkbbl4nd9F2ePt_XyWRU5o1kWeJSqRkKSyUEbJgnOeaJekifWpFyW3ceyNVporp8tYGp8aK23hQDIjklSJIbk5_YWALt8G3NiwzxcPPBZG9JshmZ56F5q2DVD-bzjLj4LzXnB-EJwfBYtfAHdu2g</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Toraman, Çetin</creator><creator>Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi</creator><creator>Kosan, Aysen Melek Aytug</creator><creator>Orakci, Senol</creator><general>International Journal of Instruction</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Relationships between Cognitive Flexibility, Perceived Quality of Faculty Life, Learning Approaches, and Academic Achievement</title><author>Toraman, Çetin ; Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi ; Kosan, Aysen Melek Aytug ; Orakci, Senol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-d05654e584b6964b11157c585ad8d3f1a22d976716c7f249d89a4abce40935863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grade Point Average</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Path Analysis</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toraman, Çetin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosan, Aysen Melek Aytug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orakci, Senol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ankara University, hasan.f.ozdemir@ankara.edu.tr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asst. Prof., Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, toramanacademic@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, aysenay1@yahoo.com</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksaray University, senolorak@gmail.com</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Instruction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toraman, Çetin</au><au>Özdemir, Hasan Fehmi</au><au>Kosan, Aysen Melek Aytug</au><au>Orakci, Senol</au><aucorp>Ankara University, hasan.f.ozdemir@ankara.edu.tr</aucorp><aucorp>Asst. Prof., Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, toramanacademic@gmail.com</aucorp><aucorp>Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, aysenay1@yahoo.com</aucorp><aucorp>Aksaray University, senolorak@gmail.com</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1239309</ericid><atitle>Relationships between Cognitive Flexibility, Perceived Quality of Faculty Life, Learning Approaches, and Academic Achievement</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Instruction</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>85-100</pages><issn>1694-609X</issn><eissn>1308-1470</eissn><abstract>This study aims to explore the relationships between cognitive flexibility (CF), perceived quality of faculty life (PQFL), learning approaches (LA) and academic achievement (AA). This correlational comparison study was conducted with 1573 undergraduates at Ankara University. The data collection tools were "Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS)", "Quality of Faculty Life Scale (QFLS)" and "Approaches to Learning Questionnaire (ALQ)". Grade point average (GPA) was used as a measurement of AA. The three subscales of QFLS; satisfaction from faculty (SF), faculty members (SFM), and school climate and student relationships (SSCSR) were found positively correlated with deep approach to learning (DAL), CF and AA, and negatively correlated with surface approach to learning (SAL). DAL was also found positively correlated with CF and AA, but negatively correlated with SAL. CF and AA were positively correlated with all variables, except SAL. Although CF showed a positive correlation with AA, it assumed a negative explanatory role for AA when it was included in the model as a mediating variable. The regression estimates in the path analysis model revealed that DAL, SAL and SF were positive explanatory variables for AA, whereas SSCSR was a negative explanatory variable for AA and SAL was a negative explanatory variable for CF.</abstract><pub>International Journal of Instruction</pub><doi>10.29333/iji.2020.1316a</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1694-609X |
ispartof | International Journal of Instruction, 2020-01, Vol.13 (1), p.85-100 |
issn | 1694-609X 1308-1470 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1239309 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Education Source |
subjects | Academic Achievement Cognitive Ability Cognitive Style Comparative Analysis Correlation Educational Environment Foreign Countries Grade Point Average Measures (Individuals) Path Analysis Quality of Life Role Student Attitudes Teaching Methods Undergraduate Students |
title | Relationships between Cognitive Flexibility, Perceived Quality of Faculty Life, Learning Approaches, and Academic Achievement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A39%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationships%20between%20Cognitive%20Flexibility,%20Perceived%20Quality%20of%20Faculty%20Life,%20Learning%20Approaches,%20and%20Academic%20Achievement&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Instruction&rft.au=Toraman,%20%C3%87etin&rft.aucorp=Ankara%20University,%20hasan.f.ozdemir@ankara.edu.tr&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=85-100&rft.issn=1694-609X&rft.eissn=1308-1470&rft_id=info:doi/10.29333/iji.2020.1316a&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1239309%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1239309&rfr_iscdi=true |