Should I use co-assessment in higher education? Pros and cons from teachers and students' perspectives
Co-assessment is a type of participatory assessment in which the teacher and student jointly discuss, negotiate and assess the student's task or performance. Although the literature on co-assessment is scarce, some authors highlight the benefits for students of participating in co-assessment in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Assessment and evaluation in higher education 2019-10, Vol.44 (7), p.987-1002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1002 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 987 |
container_title | Assessment and evaluation in higher education |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Quesada, Victoria Gómez Ruiz, Miguel Ángel Gallego Noche, Maria Beatriz Cubero-Ibáñez, Jaione |
description | Co-assessment is a type of participatory assessment in which the teacher and student jointly discuss, negotiate and assess the student's task or performance. Although the literature on co-assessment is scarce, some authors highlight the benefits for students of participating in co-assessment in higher education, including learning, improved communication, and greater assessment literacy. This study has a double objective: on the one hand, to analyse the strengths and limitations perceived by students participating in co-assessment practices; on the other hand, to explore the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats perceived by professors participating in the experience. The study was developed in 8 class groups with the participation of 470 students and 4 teachers. The qualitative analysis of the data obtained from the questionnaires and focus groups indicates that the students acknowledged several strengths, among which learning from mistakes was prominent. Students also noted some limitations, particularly the lack of adjusted scoring. Professors offered another perspective that complemented the vision of their students, noting that co-assessment presents opportunities as well as risks that may jeopardise its implementation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531970 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1212966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1212966</ericid><sourcerecordid>2210452238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-45e03b9a5e5747955ffc16adc1d2643112e6bc2a99e3495d76104b30599f21d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_YRDwwqvOfDRpc6Uypk4EBRW8C1mauI62qUmr7N-b0umlVwfe87zn4wVghtEcoxxdIsIRETSfE4TzOWYUiwwdgAlOuUiIyN4PwWRgkgE6BichbBFCKcVsAuzLxvVVAVewDwZql6gQTAi1aTpYNnBTfmyMh6botepK11zBZ-8CVE0R2SZA610NO6N0pEY5dH0RzeECtlFqje7KLxNOwZFVVTBn-zoFb7fL18V98vh0t1rcPCaactQlKTOIroVihmVpJhizVmOuCo0LwuPBmBi-1kQJYWgqWJFxjNI1RUwISyJDp-B8nNt699mb0Mmt630TV0pCIssIoXmk2Ejp-EzwxsrWl7XyO4mRHCKVv5HKIVK5jzT6ZqPP-FL_eZYPmGAiOI_967FfNtb5Wn07XxWyU7vKeetVo8sg6f8rfgDTPYZV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210452238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should I use co-assessment in higher education? Pros and cons from teachers and students' perspectives</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Quesada, Victoria ; Gómez Ruiz, Miguel Ángel ; Gallego Noche, Maria Beatriz ; Cubero-Ibáñez, Jaione</creator><creatorcontrib>Quesada, Victoria ; Gómez Ruiz, Miguel Ángel ; Gallego Noche, Maria Beatriz ; Cubero-Ibáñez, Jaione</creatorcontrib><description>Co-assessment is a type of participatory assessment in which the teacher and student jointly discuss, negotiate and assess the student's task or performance. Although the literature on co-assessment is scarce, some authors highlight the benefits for students of participating in co-assessment in higher education, including learning, improved communication, and greater assessment literacy. This study has a double objective: on the one hand, to analyse the strengths and limitations perceived by students participating in co-assessment practices; on the other hand, to explore the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats perceived by professors participating in the experience. The study was developed in 8 class groups with the participation of 470 students and 4 teachers. The qualitative analysis of the data obtained from the questionnaires and focus groups indicates that the students acknowledged several strengths, among which learning from mistakes was prominent. Students also noted some limitations, particularly the lack of adjusted scoring. Professors offered another perspective that complemented the vision of their students, noting that co-assessment presents opportunities as well as risks that may jeopardise its implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-2938</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-297X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Assessment Literacy ; Classroom communication ; Co-assessment ; Cooperation ; dialogical assessment ; Educational evaluation ; feedback ; Focus Groups ; Foreign Countries ; Grading ; Higher education ; Learning ; Literacy ; Negotiation ; Preservice Teachers ; Qualitative research ; Questionnaires ; Student Attitudes ; Student Evaluation ; Student Participation ; Students ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Educators ; Teacher evaluations ; Teachers ; Verbal aggression</subject><ispartof>Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 2019-10, Vol.44 (7), p.987-1002</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor ' Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor ' Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-45e03b9a5e5747955ffc16adc1d2643112e6bc2a99e3495d76104b30599f21d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-45e03b9a5e5747955ffc16adc1d2643112e6bc2a99e3495d76104b30599f21d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3280-8229 ; 0000-0002-8881-2358 ; 0000-0003-2418-9525 ; 0000-0001-8978-7222</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1212966$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quesada, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Ruiz, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego Noche, Maria Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cubero-Ibáñez, Jaione</creatorcontrib><title>Should I use co-assessment in higher education? Pros and cons from teachers and students' perspectives</title><title>Assessment and evaluation in higher education</title><description>Co-assessment is a type of participatory assessment in which the teacher and student jointly discuss, negotiate and assess the student's task or performance. Although the literature on co-assessment is scarce, some authors highlight the benefits for students of participating in co-assessment in higher education, including learning, improved communication, and greater assessment literacy. This study has a double objective: on the one hand, to analyse the strengths and limitations perceived by students participating in co-assessment practices; on the other hand, to explore the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats perceived by professors participating in the experience. The study was developed in 8 class groups with the participation of 470 students and 4 teachers. The qualitative analysis of the data obtained from the questionnaires and focus groups indicates that the students acknowledged several strengths, among which learning from mistakes was prominent. Students also noted some limitations, particularly the lack of adjusted scoring. Professors offered another perspective that complemented the vision of their students, noting that co-assessment presents opportunities as well as risks that may jeopardise its implementation.</description><subject>Assessment Literacy</subject><subject>Classroom communication</subject><subject>Co-assessment</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>dialogical assessment</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>feedback</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grading</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teacher evaluations</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Verbal aggression</subject><issn>0260-2938</issn><issn>1469-297X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_YRDwwqvOfDRpc6Uypk4EBRW8C1mauI62qUmr7N-b0umlVwfe87zn4wVghtEcoxxdIsIRETSfE4TzOWYUiwwdgAlOuUiIyN4PwWRgkgE6BichbBFCKcVsAuzLxvVVAVewDwZql6gQTAi1aTpYNnBTfmyMh6botepK11zBZ-8CVE0R2SZA610NO6N0pEY5dH0RzeECtlFqje7KLxNOwZFVVTBn-zoFb7fL18V98vh0t1rcPCaactQlKTOIroVihmVpJhizVmOuCo0LwuPBmBi-1kQJYWgqWJFxjNI1RUwISyJDp-B8nNt699mb0Mmt630TV0pCIssIoXmk2Ejp-EzwxsrWl7XyO4mRHCKVv5HKIVK5jzT6ZqPP-FL_eZYPmGAiOI_967FfNtb5Wn07XxWyU7vKeetVo8sg6f8rfgDTPYZV</recordid><startdate>20191003</startdate><enddate>20191003</enddate><creator>Quesada, Victoria</creator><creator>Gómez Ruiz, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>Gallego Noche, Maria Beatriz</creator><creator>Cubero-Ibáñez, Jaione</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-8229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8881-2358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2418-9525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8978-7222</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191003</creationdate><title>Should I use co-assessment in higher education? Pros and cons from teachers and students' perspectives</title><author>Quesada, Victoria ; Gómez Ruiz, Miguel Ángel ; Gallego Noche, Maria Beatriz ; Cubero-Ibáñez, Jaione</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-45e03b9a5e5747955ffc16adc1d2643112e6bc2a99e3495d76104b30599f21d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Assessment Literacy</topic><topic>Classroom communication</topic><topic>Co-assessment</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>dialogical assessment</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>feedback</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grading</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teacher evaluations</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Verbal aggression</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quesada, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Ruiz, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego Noche, Maria Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cubero-Ibáñez, Jaione</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Assessment and evaluation in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quesada, Victoria</au><au>Gómez Ruiz, Miguel Ángel</au><au>Gallego Noche, Maria Beatriz</au><au>Cubero-Ibáñez, Jaione</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1212966</ericid><atitle>Should I use co-assessment in higher education? Pros and cons from teachers and students' perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Assessment and evaluation in higher education</jtitle><date>2019-10-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>987</spage><epage>1002</epage><pages>987-1002</pages><issn>0260-2938</issn><eissn>1469-297X</eissn><abstract>Co-assessment is a type of participatory assessment in which the teacher and student jointly discuss, negotiate and assess the student's task or performance. Although the literature on co-assessment is scarce, some authors highlight the benefits for students of participating in co-assessment in higher education, including learning, improved communication, and greater assessment literacy. This study has a double objective: on the one hand, to analyse the strengths and limitations perceived by students participating in co-assessment practices; on the other hand, to explore the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats perceived by professors participating in the experience. The study was developed in 8 class groups with the participation of 470 students and 4 teachers. The qualitative analysis of the data obtained from the questionnaires and focus groups indicates that the students acknowledged several strengths, among which learning from mistakes was prominent. Students also noted some limitations, particularly the lack of adjusted scoring. Professors offered another perspective that complemented the vision of their students, noting that co-assessment presents opportunities as well as risks that may jeopardise its implementation.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02602938.2018.1531970</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-8229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8881-2358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2418-9525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8978-7222</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0260-2938 |
ispartof | Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 2019-10, Vol.44 (7), p.987-1002 |
issn | 0260-2938 1469-297X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1212966 |
source | Education Source (EBSCOhost) |
subjects | Assessment Literacy Classroom communication Co-assessment Cooperation dialogical assessment Educational evaluation feedback Focus Groups Foreign Countries Grading Higher education Learning Literacy Negotiation Preservice Teachers Qualitative research Questionnaires Student Attitudes Student Evaluation Student Participation Students Teacher Attitudes Teacher Educators Teacher evaluations Teachers Verbal aggression |
title | Should I use co-assessment in higher education? Pros and cons from teachers and students' perspectives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A08%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20I%20use%20co-assessment%20in%20higher%20education?%20Pros%20and%20cons%20from%20teachers%20and%20students'%20perspectives&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20and%20evaluation%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Quesada,%20Victoria&rft.date=2019-10-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=987&rft.epage=1002&rft.pages=987-1002&rft.issn=0260-2938&rft.eissn=1469-297X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531970&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2210452238%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210452238&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1212966&rfr_iscdi=true |